Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution

Abstract

A common belief is that evolution generally proceeds towards greater complexity at both the organismal and the genomic level, numerous examples of reductive evolution of parasites and symbionts notwithstanding. However, recent evolutionary reconstructions challenge this notion. Two notable examples are the reconstruction of the complex archaeal ancestor and the intron‐rich ancestor of eukaryotes. In both cases, evolution in most of the lineages was apparently dominated by extensive loss of genes and introns, respectively. These and many other cases of reductive evolution are consistent with a general model composed of two distinct evolutionary phases: the short, explosive, innovation phase that leads to an abrupt increase in genome complexity, followed by a much longer reductive phase, which encompasses either a neutral ratchet of genetic material loss or adaptive genome streamlining. Quantitatively, the evolution of genomes appears to be dominated by reduction and simplification, punctuated by episodes of complexification.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 90

1. 1.

   Gould SJ. Full House: The Spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. 1997.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Moran NA. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell. 2002;108:583-6.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00665-7

3. 3.

   McCutcheon JP, Moran NA. Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:13-26.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2670

4. 4.

   Embley TM, Martin W. Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges. Nature. 2006;440:623-30.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature04546

5. 5.

   Lane N, Martin W. The energetics of genome complexity. Nature. 2010;467:929-34.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature09486

6. 6.
   Energetics and genetics across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide · 2011

   Not checked
7. 7.

   Lynch M. The Origins of Genome Archiecture. 2007.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Koonin EV. The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution. 2011.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Gell-Mann M. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. 1995.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Johnson N. Simply Complexity: A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory. 2009.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Li M, Vitanyi PMB. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications. 2008.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    McShea D. Functional complexity in organisms: parts as proxies. Biol Philos. 2000;15:641-8.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    McShea DW, Brandon R. Biology's First Law. 2010.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Adami C. What is complexity. BioEssays. 2002;24:1085-94.

    Not in our library10.1002/bies.10192

15. 15.

    Koonin EV. A non-adaptationist perspective on evolution of genomic complexity or the continued dethroning of man. Cell Cycle. 2004;3:280-5.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Ouzounis CA. Ancestral state reconstructions for genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15:595-600.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.011

17. 17.

    Csuros M, Miklos I. Streamlining and large ancestral genomes in archaea inferred with a phylogenetic birth-and-death model. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:2087-95.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msp123

18. 18.

    Lewontin RC. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. 1974.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Koonin EV. Evolution of genome architecture. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:298-306.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2008.09.015

20. 20.
    Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns · 2012

    No notice
21. 21.
    SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies · 2006

    No notice
22. 22.

    Csuros M. Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1910-2.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq315

23. 23.

    Cohen O, Rubinstein ND, Stern A, Gophna U, et al. A likelihood framework to analyse phyletic patterns. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:3903-11.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2008.0177

24. 24.

    Cohen O, Pupko T. Inference of gain and loss events from phyletic patterns using stochastic mapping and maximum parsimony-a simulation study. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:1265-75.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evr101

25. 25.
    Reductive Genome Evolution from the Mother of Rickettsia · 2007

    No notice
26. 26.

    Merhej V, Raoult D. Rickettsial evolution in the light of comparative genomics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011;86:379-405.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00151.x

27. 27.

    Hjort K, Goldberg AV, Tsaousis AD, Hirt RP, et al. Diversity and reductive evolution of mitochondria among microbial eukaryotes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:713-27.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2009.0224

28. 28.

    Martin W, Koonin EV. Introns and the origin of nucleus-cytosol compartmentation. Nature. 2006;440:41-5.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04531

29. 29.

    Gabaldon T, Huynen MA. Lineage-specific gene loss following mitochondrial endosymbiosis and its potential for function prediction in eukaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:ii144-50.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1124

30. 30.

    Gabaldon T, Huynen MA. From endosymbiont to host-controlled organelle: the hijacking of mitochondrial protein synthesis and metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3:e219.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030219

31. 31.

    Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W. Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:123-35.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg1271

32. 32.

    Corradi N, Slamovits CH. The intriguing nature of microsporidian genomes. Brief Funct Genomics. 2011;10:115-24.

    Not in our library10.1093/bfgp/elq032

33. 33.

    Moore CE, Archibald JM. Nucleomorph genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:251-64.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134809

34. 34.

    Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, et al. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:15611-6.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0607117103

35. 35.

    Makarova KS, Koonin EV. Evolutionary genomics of lactic acid bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:1199-208.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.01351-06

36. 36.

    Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:165-90.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119

37. 37.

    Zaneveld J, Turnbaugh PJ, Lozupone C, Ley RE, et al. Host-bacterial coevolution and the search for new drug targets. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2008;12:109-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.015

38. 38.

    Yizhak K, Tuller T, Papp B, Ruppin E. Metabolic modeling of endosymbiont genome reduction on a temporal scale. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:479.

    Not in our library10.1038/msb.2011.11

39. 39.

    Al-Khodor S, Price CT, Kalia A, Abu Kwaik Y. Functional diversity of ankyrin repeats in microbial proteins. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:132-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tim.2009.11.004

40. 40.

    Dubreuil R, Segev N. Bringing host-cell takeover by pathogenic bacteria to center stage. Cell Logist. 2011;1:120-4.

    Not in our library10.4161/cl.1.4.18984

Cited by papers we hold 14

• Construction and Analysis of the Complete Genome Sequence of Leprosy Agent Mycobacterium lepromatosis · 2022
  Not checked
• Assessment of assumptions underlying models of prokaryotic pangenome evolution · 2021
  Not checked
• Functional Insights From the Evolutionary Diversification of Big Defensins · 2020
  Not checked
• Dynamics of Insect–Microbiome Interaction Influence Host and Microbial Symbiont · 2020
  No notice
• Chromatin Evolution-Key Innovations Underpinning Morphological Complexity · 2019
  Not checked
• Meta-transcriptomics reveals a diverse antibiotic resistance gene pool in avian microbiomes · 2019
  Not checked
• GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL OF BIFIDOBACTERIA IN THE BIOTOPE OF DISTAL HUMAN INTESTINE · 2018
  Not checked
• Large-scale gene losses underlie the genome evolution of parasitic plant Cuscuta australis · 2018
  No notice
• Gene family innovation, conservation and loss on the animal stem lineage · 2018
  No notice
• Lokiarchaea are close relatives of Euryarchaeota, not bridging the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes · 2017
  No notice
• Functional Profiling of a Plasmodium Genome Reveals an Abundance of Essential Genes · 2017
  No notice
• Genomes in turmoil: quantification of genome dynamics in prokaryote supergenomes · 2014
  No notice
• The Lineage-Specific Evolution of Aquaporin Gene Clusters Facilitated Tetrapod Terrestrial Adaptation · 2014
  No notice
• Evolution and Classification of Myosins, a Paneukaryotic Whole-Genome Approach · 2014
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.