Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution

Abstract

A common belief is that evolution generally proceeds towards greater complexity at both the organismal and the genomic level, numerous examples of reductive evolution of parasites and symbionts notwithstanding. However, recent evolutionary reconstructions challenge this notion. Two notable examples are the reconstruction of the complex archaeal ancestor and the intron‐rich ancestor of eukaryotes. In both cases, evolution in most of the lineages was apparently dominated by extensive loss of genes and introns, respectively. These and many other cases of reductive evolution are consistent with a general model composed of two distinct evolutionary phases: the short, explosive, innovation phase that leads to an abrupt increase in genome complexity, followed by a much longer reductive phase, which encompasses either a neutral ratchet of genetic material loss or adaptive genome streamlining. Quantitatively, the evolution of genomes appears to be dominated by reduction and simplification, punctuated by episodes of complexification.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 90

1. 1.

   Gould SJ. Full House: The Spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. 1997.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Moran NA. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell. 2002;108:583-6.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00665-7

3. 3.

   McCutcheon JP, Moran NA. Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:13-26.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2670

4. 4.

   Embley TM, Martin W. Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges. Nature. 2006;440:623-30.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature04546

5. 5.

   Lane N, Martin W. The energetics of genome complexity. Nature. 2010;467:929-34.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature09486

6. 6.
   Energetics and genetics across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide · 2011

   Not checked
7. 7.

   Lynch M. The Origins of Genome Archiecture. 2007.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Koonin EV. The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution. 2011.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Gell-Mann M. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. 1995.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Johnson N. Simply Complexity: A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory. 2009.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Li M, Vitanyi PMB. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications. 2008.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    McShea D. Functional complexity in organisms: parts as proxies. Biol Philos. 2000;15:641-8.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    McShea DW, Brandon R. Biology's First Law. 2010.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Adami C. What is complexity. BioEssays. 2002;24:1085-94.

    Not in our library10.1002/bies.10192

15. 15.

    Koonin EV. A non-adaptationist perspective on evolution of genomic complexity or the continued dethroning of man. Cell Cycle. 2004;3:280-5.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Ouzounis CA. Ancestral state reconstructions for genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15:595-600.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.011

17. 17.

    Csuros M, Miklos I. Streamlining and large ancestral genomes in archaea inferred with a phylogenetic birth-and-death model. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:2087-95.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msp123

18. 18.

    Lewontin RC. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. 1974.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Koonin EV. Evolution of genome architecture. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:298-306.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2008.09.015

20. 20.
    Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns · 2012

    No notice
21. 21.
    SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies · 2006

    No notice
22. 22.

    Csuros M. Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1910-2.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq315

23. 23.

    Cohen O, Rubinstein ND, Stern A, Gophna U, et al. A likelihood framework to analyse phyletic patterns. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:3903-11.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2008.0177

24. 24.

    Cohen O, Pupko T. Inference of gain and loss events from phyletic patterns using stochastic mapping and maximum parsimony-a simulation study. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:1265-75.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evr101

25. 25.
    Reductive Genome Evolution from the Mother of Rickettsia · 2007

    No notice
26. 26.

    Merhej V, Raoult D. Rickettsial evolution in the light of comparative genomics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011;86:379-405.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00151.x

27. 27.

    Hjort K, Goldberg AV, Tsaousis AD, Hirt RP, et al. Diversity and reductive evolution of mitochondria among microbial eukaryotes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:713-27.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2009.0224

28. 28.

    Martin W, Koonin EV. Introns and the origin of nucleus-cytosol compartmentation. Nature. 2006;440:41-5.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04531

29. 29.

    Gabaldon T, Huynen MA. Lineage-specific gene loss following mitochondrial endosymbiosis and its potential for function prediction in eukaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:ii144-50.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1124

30. 30.

    Gabaldon T, Huynen MA. From endosymbiont to host-controlled organelle: the hijacking of mitochondrial protein synthesis and metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3:e219.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030219

31. 31.

    Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W. Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:123-35.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg1271

32. 32.

    Corradi N, Slamovits CH. The intriguing nature of microsporidian genomes. Brief Funct Genomics. 2011;10:115-24.

    Not in our library10.1093/bfgp/elq032

33. 33.

    Moore CE, Archibald JM. Nucleomorph genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:251-64.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134809

34. 34.

    Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, et al. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:15611-6.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0607117103

35. 35.

    Makarova KS, Koonin EV. Evolutionary genomics of lactic acid bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:1199-208.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.01351-06

36. 36.

    Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:165-90.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119

37. 37.

    Zaneveld J, Turnbaugh PJ, Lozupone C, Ley RE, et al. Host-bacterial coevolution and the search for new drug targets. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2008;12:109-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.015

38. 38.

    Yizhak K, Tuller T, Papp B, Ruppin E. Metabolic modeling of endosymbiont genome reduction on a temporal scale. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:479.

    Not in our library10.1038/msb.2011.11

39. 39.

    Al-Khodor S, Price CT, Kalia A, Abu Kwaik Y. Functional diversity of ankyrin repeats in microbial proteins. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:132-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tim.2009.11.004

40. 40.

    Dubreuil R, Segev N. Bringing host-cell takeover by pathogenic bacteria to center stage. Cell Logist. 2011;1:120-4.

    Not in our library10.4161/cl.1.4.18984

41. 41.
    Genome fluctuations in cyanobacteria reflect evolutionary, developmental and adaptive traits · 2011

    No notice
42. 42.
    Updated clusters of orthologous genes for Archaea: a complex ancestor of the Archaea and the byways of horizontal gene transfer · 2012

    No notice
43. 43.

    Deppenmeier U, Johann A, Hartsch T, Merkl R, et al. The genome of Methanosarcina mazei: evidence for lateral gene transfer between bacteria and archaea. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;4:453-61.

    Not in our library

44. 44.
    Differences in lateral gene transfer in hypersaline versus thermal environments · 2011

    Not checked
45. 45.

    Makarova KS, Yutin N, Bell SD, Koonin EV. Evolution of diverse cell division and vesicle formation systems in archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:731-41.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2406

46. 46.

    Koonin EV, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, et al. A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R7.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r7

47. 47.

    Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Mekhedov SL, Mirkin BG, et al. Ancestral paralogs and pseudoparalogs and their role in the emergence of the eukaryotic cell. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:4626-38.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gki775

48. 48.

    Fritz-Laylin LK, Prochnik SE, Ginger ML, Dacks JB, et al. The genome of Naegleria gruberi illuminates early eukaryotic versatility. Cell. 2010;140:631-42.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.032

49. 49.

    Koonin EV. Preview. the incredible expanding ancestor of eukaryotes. Cell. 2010;140:606-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.022

50. 50.

    Koonin EV. The origin and early evolution of eukaryotes in the light of phylogenomics. Genome Biol. 2010;11:209.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-209

51. 51.

    Zmasek CM, Godzik A. Strong functional patterns in the evolution of eukaryotic genomes revealed by the reconstruction of ancestral protein domain repertoires. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R4.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r4

52. 52.

    Roy SW. Intron-rich ancestors. Trends Genet. 2006;22:468-71.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2006.07.002

53. 53.
    A Detailed History of Intron-rich Eukaryotic Ancestors Inferred from a Global Survey of 100 Complete Genomes · 2011

    No notice
54. 54.

    Csuros M, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. Extremely intron-rich genes in the alveolate ancestors inferred with a flexible maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:903-11.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msn039

55. 55.

    Brinkmann H, Philippe H. The diversity of eukaryotes and the root of the eukaryotic tree. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;607:20-37.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-0-387-74021-8_2

56. 56.
    The Black Queen Hypothesis: Evolution of Dependencies through Adaptive Gene Loss · 2012

    Not checked
57. 57.

    Novichkov PS, Wolf YI, Dubchak I, Koonin EV. Trends in prokaryotic evolution revealed by comparison of closely related bacterial and archaeal genomes. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:65-73.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.01237-08

58. 58.

    Wernegreen JJ. For better or worse: genomic consequences of intracellular mutualism and parasitism. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15:572-83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.013

59. 59.

    Burke GR, Moran NA. Massive genomic decay in Serratia symbiotica, a recently evolved symbiont of aphids. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:195-208.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evr002

60. 60.

    Degnan PH, Ochman H, Moran NA. Sequence conservation and functional constraint on intergenic spacers in reduced genomes of the obligate symbiont Buchnera. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002252.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1002252

61. 61.

    Mamirova L, Popadin K, Gelfand MS. Purifying selection in mitochondria, free-living and obligate intracellular proteobacteria. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:17.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2148-7-17

62. 62.

    O'Fallon B. Population structure, levels of selection, and the evolution of intracellular symbionts. Evolution. 2008;62:361-73.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00289.x

63. 63.

    Ferrari J, Vavre F. Bacterial symbionts in insects or the story of communities affecting communities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:1389-400.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2010.0226

64. 64.

    Lynch M. Streamlining and simplification of microbial genome architecture. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:327-49.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142300

65. 65.

    Lynch M, Conery JS. The origins of genome complexity. Science. 2003;302:1401-4.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1089370

66. 66.

    Merhej V, Raoult D. Rhizome of life, catastrophes, sequence exchanges, gene creations, and giant viruses: how microbial genomics challenges Darwin. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:113.

    Not in our library10.3389/fcimb.2012.00113

67. 67.
    Accelerated evolution associated with genome reduction in a free-living prokaryote · 2005

    No notice
68. 68.

    Partensky F, Garczarek L. Prochlorococcus: advantages and limits of minimalism. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2010;2:305-31.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081034

69. 69.

    Giovannoni SJ, Tripp HJ, Givan S, Podar M, et al. Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science. 2005;309:1242-5.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1114057

70. 70.

    Viklund J, Ettema TJ, Andersson SG. Independent genome reduction and phylogenetic reclassification of the oceanic SAR11 clade. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:599-615.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msr203

71. 71.

    Sachs JL, Hollowell AC. The origins of cooperative bacterial communities. MBio. 2012;3:e00099-12.

    Not in our library10.1128/mbio.00099-12

72. 72.
    Patterns of intron gain and conservation in eukaryotic genes · 2007

    Not checked
73. 73.

    Carmel L, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Res. 2007;17:1034-44.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.6438607

74. 74.

    Novichkov PS, Omelchenko MV, Gelfand MS, Mironov AA, et al. Genome-wide molecular clock and horizontal gene transfer in bacterial evolution. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:6575-85.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.186.19.6575-6585.2004

75. 75.

    Snel B, Bork P, Huynen MA. Genomes in flux: the evolution of archaeal and proteobacterial gene content. Genome Res. 2002;12:17-25.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.176501

76. 76.

    Lynch M. The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:8597-604.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0702207104

77. 77.

    Petrov DA. DNA loss and evolution of genome size in Drosophila. Genetica. 2002;115:81-91.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1016076215168

78. 78.

    Gregory TR. Insertion-deletion biases and the evolution of genome size. Gene. 2004;324:15-34.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2003.09.030

79. 79.

    Kuo CH, Ochman H. Deletional bias across the three domains of life. Genome Biol Evol. 2009;1:145-52.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evp016

80. 80.

    Dagan T, Blekhman R, Graur D. The “domino theory” of gene death: gradual and mass gene extinction events in three lineages of obligate symbiotic bacterial pathogens. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:310-6.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msj036

81. 81.
    Bushes in the Tree of Life · 2006

    No notice
82. 82.

    Rokas A, Kruger D, Carroll SB. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science. 2005;310:1933-8.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1116759

83. 83.
    Search for a 'Tree of Life' in the thicket of the phylogenetic forest · 2009

    No notice
84. 84.

    Gould SJ, Eldredge N. Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature. 1993;366:223-7.

    Not in our library10.1038/366223a0

85. 85.

    Saw JH, Mountain BW, Feng L, Omelchenko MV, et al. Encapsulated in silica: genome, proteome and physiology of the thermophilic bacterium Anoxybacillus flavithermus WK1. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R161.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2008-9-11-r161

86. 86.

    Rogozin IB, Babenko VN, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Albert VA. Dollo parsimony and reconstruction of genome evolution. Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. 2005;190-200.

    Not in our library

87. 87.

    Farris JS. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's law. Syst Zool. 1977;26:77-88.

    Not in our library

88. 88.

    Mirkin BG, Fenner TI, Galperin MY, Koonin EV. Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes. BMC Evol Biol. 2003;3:2.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2148-3-2

89. 89.

    Kjer KM, Swigonova Z, LaPolla JS, Broughton RE. Why weight. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;43:999-1004.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ympev.2007.02.028

90. 90.

    Ames RM, Money D, Ghatge VP, Whelan S, et al. Determining the evolutionary history of gene families. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:48-55.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btr592

Cited by papers we hold 14

• Construction and Analysis of the Complete Genome Sequence of Leprosy Agent Mycobacterium lepromatosis · 2022
  Not checked
• Assessment of assumptions underlying models of prokaryotic pangenome evolution · 2021
  Not checked
• Functional Insights From the Evolutionary Diversification of Big Defensins · 2020
  Not checked
• Dynamics of Insect–Microbiome Interaction Influence Host and Microbial Symbiont · 2020
  No notice
• Chromatin Evolution-Key Innovations Underpinning Morphological Complexity · 2019
  Not checked
• Meta-transcriptomics reveals a diverse antibiotic resistance gene pool in avian microbiomes · 2019
  Not checked
• GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL OF BIFIDOBACTERIA IN THE BIOTOPE OF DISTAL HUMAN INTESTINE · 2018
  Not checked
• Large-scale gene losses underlie the genome evolution of parasitic plant Cuscuta australis · 2018
  No notice
• Gene family innovation, conservation and loss on the animal stem lineage · 2018
  No notice
• Lokiarchaea are close relatives of Euryarchaeota, not bridging the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes · 2017
  No notice
• Functional Profiling of a Plasmodium Genome Reveals an Abundance of Essential Genes · 2017
  No notice
• Genomes in turmoil: quantification of genome dynamics in prokaryote supergenomes · 2014
  No notice
• The Lineage-Specific Evolution of Aquaporin Gene Clusters Facilitated Tetrapod Terrestrial Adaptation · 2014
  No notice
• Evolution and Classification of Myosins, a Paneukaryotic Whole-Genome Approach · 2014
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.