Intraclass correlation – A discussion and demonstration of basic features
David Liljequist, Britt Elfving, Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen · PLOS ONE · 2019
Full textCC BY
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Filters2 filters applied
Status
Year
Readable here
Study type
Licence
A guide to the reporting of protocols of pilot and feasibility trials
Lehana Thabane, Gillian Lancaster · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · 2019
Full textCC BY
Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods
Kate Flemming, Andrew Booth, Ruth Garside et al. · BMJ Global Health · 2019 · Review
Full textCC BY
Global Evolution of Research in Artificial Intelligence in Health and Medicine: A Bibliometric Study
Bach Xuan Tran, Giang Thu Vu, Giang Hai Ha et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2019
Full textCC BY
BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses
Audrey Béliveau, Devon J. Boyne, Justin Slater et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2019
Full textCC BY
We need to talk about reliability: making better use of test-retest studies for study design and interpretation
Granville J. Matheson · PeerJ · 2019
Full textCC BY
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
Ben Goldacre, Henry Drysdale, Aaron Dale et al. · Trials · 2019
Full textCC BY
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
Emma F. France, Maggie Cunningham, Nicola Ring et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2019
Full textCC BY
Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
Siw Waffenschmidt, Marco Knelangen, Wiebke Sieben et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2019
Full textCC BY
A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies
Melinda C. Mills, Charles Rahal · Communications Biology · 2019 · Systematic review
Full textCC BY
MetaInsight: An interactive web‐based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta‐analyses using R‐shiny and netmeta
Rhiannon K. Owen, Naomi Bradbury, Yiqiao Xin et al. · Research Synthesis Methods · 2019
Full textCC BY
An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview
Harriet Hunt, Alex Pollock, Pauline Campbell et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2018
Full textCC BY
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
Christopher J. Colvin, Ruth Garside, Megan Wainwright et al. · Implementation Science · 2018
Full textCC BY
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Matthew J. Page, Larissa Shamseer, Andrea C. Tricco · Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Review
Full textCC BY
A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches
Wichor M. Bramer, Gerdien B. De Jonge, Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al. · Journal of the Medical Library Association · 2018
Full textCC BY
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
C. A. C. Prinsen, L. B. Mokkink, L. M. Bouter et al. · Quality of Life Research · 2018
Full textCC BY
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data
Jane Noyes, Andrew Booth, Simon Lewin et al. · Implementation Science · 2018
Full textCC BY
The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration
Bedoor K. AlShebli, Talal Rahwan, Wei Lee Woon · Nature Communications · 2018
Full textCC BY
Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes
Lifeng Lin · PLOS ONE · 2018
Full textCC BY
Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review
Tim Mathes, Pauline Klaßen, Dawid Pieper · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2017 · Systematic review
Full textCC BY