Outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological research.
Marjan Bakker, Jelte M Wicherts · PLoS ONE · 2014
Abstract onlyNot checked
Psychology: papers
Filters2 filters applied
Status
- Corrected
- No notice
- Not checked
- From publisher notices and Retraction Watch. Not checked means nobody has looked yet.
Year
Readable here
Study type
Licence
Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials
Ellen Driessen, Steven D. Hollon, Claudi L. H. Bockting et al. · PLOS ONE · 2015 · Meta-analysis
Full textCC BY
Corrected Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
Denes Szucs, John P. A. Ioannidis · PLOS Biology · 2017
Abstract only
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking
Jelte M. Wicherts, Coosje L. S. Veldkamp, Hilde E. M. Augusteijn et al. · Frontiers in Psychology · 2016 · Review
Full textCC BY
When and Why to Replicate: As Easy as 1, 2, 3?
Sarahanne M. Field, Rink Hoekstra, Laura Bringmann et al. · Collabra: Psychology · 2019
Abstract onlyNot checked
Implications of “too good to be true” for replication, theoretical claims, and experimental design: An example using prominent studies of racial bias
Greg Francis · Frontiers in Psychology · 2016
Abstract onlyNot checked
Publication bias and the limited strength model of self-control: has the evidence for ego depletion been overestimated?
Evan C. Carter, Michael E. McCullough · Frontiers in Psychology · 2014
Full textCC BY