Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples
Richard D Riley, Dan Jackson, Georgia Salanti et al. · BMJ · 2017
Full textCC BY
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Filters2 filters applied
Status
Year
Readable here
Study type
Licence
Number needed to treat (NNT) in clinical literature: an appraisal
Diogo Mendes, Carlos Alves, Francisco Batel-Marques · BMC Medicine · 2017
Full textCC BY
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
Kusala Pussegoda, Lucy Turner, Chantelle Garritty et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2017
Full textCC BY
Power analysis for random‐effects meta‐analysis
Dan Jackson, Rebecca Turner · Research Synthesis Methods · 2017
Full textCC BY
Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains
Estelle Dumas-Mallet, Katherine S. Button, Thomas Boraud et al. · Royal Society Open Science · 2017
Full textCC BY
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking
Jelte M. Wicherts, Coosje L. S. Veldkamp, Hilde E. M. Augusteijn et al. · Frontiers in Psychology · 2016 · Review
Full textCC BY
Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
Su Golder, Yoon K. Loke, Kath Wright et al. · PLOS Medicine · 2016 · Systematic review
Full textCC BY
The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory
Charlotte Benoot, Karin Hannes, Johan Bilsen · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2016
Full textCC BY
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement
Richard G. White, Avi J. Hakim, Matthew J. Salganik et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2015 · Systematic review
Full textCC BY
Corrected Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
Malcolm R. Macleod, Aaron Lawson McLean, Aikaterini Kyriakopoulou et al. · PLOS Biology · 2015
Full textCC BY
Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials
Ellen Driessen, Steven D. Hollon, Claudi L. H. Bockting et al. · PLOS ONE · 2015 · Meta-analysis
Full textCC BY
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
Gary S Collins, Johannes B Reitsma, Douglas G Altman et al. · BMC Medicine · 2015
Full textCC BY
Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording
Luke Holman, Megan L. Head, Robert Lanfear et al. · PLOS Biology · 2015
Full textCC BY
The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?
Ole Ellegaard, Johan A. Wallin · Scientometrics · 2015
Full textCC BY
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement
Eric I. Benchimol, Liam Smeeth, Astrid Guttmann et al. · PLOS Medicine · 2015
Full textCC BY
Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap
Julian H. Elliott, Tari Turner, Ornella Clavisi et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2014
Full textCC BY
A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses—an overview and application of NetMetaXL
Stephen Brown, Brian Hutton, Tammy Clifford et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2014
Full textCC BY
Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies
Francine Toye, Kate Seers, Nick Allcock et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2014
Full textCC BY
A design‐by‐treatment interaction model for network meta‐analysis with random inconsistency effects
Dan Jackson, Jessica K. Barrett, Stephen Rice et al. · Statistics in Medicine · 2014
Full textCC BY
A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
Mai T. Pham, Andrijana Rajić, Judy D. Greig et al. · Research Synthesis Methods · 2014
Full textCC BY