PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility
Alison Booth, Mike Clarke, Gordon Dooley et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2013
Full textCC BY
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Filters2 filters applied
Status
- Corrected
- No notice
- Not checked
- From publisher notices and Retraction Watch. Not checked means nobody has looked yet.
Year
Readable here
Study type
Licence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Joel J Gagnier, David Moher, Heather Boon et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2012 · Review
Full textCC BY
Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
Sara Khangura, Kristin Konnyu, Rob Cushman et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2012
Full textCC BY
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact
Bo-Christer Björk, David Solomon · BMC Medicine · 2012
Full textCC BY
Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
Allison Hirst, Douglas G. Altman · PLoS ONE · 2012
Full textCC BY
A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies
Marlies Leenaars, Carlijn R Hooijmans, Nieky van Veggel et al. · Laboratory Animals · 2012 · Systematic review
Full textCC BY
The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas
Peter Bragge, Ornella Clavisi, Tari Turner et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2011
Full textCC BY
Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Qstatistics
Jack Bowden, Jayne F Tierney, Andrew J Copas et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2011
Full textCC BY
Network meta-analysis of survival data with fractional polynomials
Jeroen P Jansen · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2011
Full textCC BY
Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview
Su Golder, Yoon K. Loke, Martin Bland · PLoS Medicine · 2011 · Meta-analysis
Full textCC BY
Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review
Natalie McGauran, Beate Wieseler, Julia Kreis et al. · Trials · 2010 · Review
Full textCC BY
A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals
Merran Toerien, Sara T Brookes, Chris Metcalfe et al. · Trials · 2009
Full textCC BY
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Kerry Dwan, Douglas G. Altman, Juan A. Arnaiz et al. · PLoS ONE · 2008 · Systematic review
Full textCC BY
Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews
Patricia J Lucas, Janis Baird, Lisa Arai et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2007
Full textCC BY
Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data
Javier Zamora, Victor Abraira, Alfonso Muriel et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2006
Full textCC BY
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
Nisa Bakkalbasi, Kathleen Bauer, Janis Glover et al. · Biomedical Digital Libraries · 2006
Full textCC BY
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Penny F Whiting, Marie E Weswood, Anne WS Rutjes et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2006
Full textCC BY
No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
Penny Whiting, Roger Harbord, Jos Kleijnen · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2005 · Systematic review
Full textCC BY