Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Identification of exosome-like nanoparticle-derived microRNAs from 11 edible fruits and vegetables

Juan Xiao, Siyuan Feng, Xun Wang and 8 more

PeerJ · 2018

doi:10.7717/peerj.5186

Abstract

Edible plant-derived exosome-like nanoparticles (EPDELNs) are novel naturally occurring plant ultrastructures that are structurally similar to exosomes. Many EPDELNs have anti-inflammatory properties. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a critical role in mediating physiological and pathological processes in animals and plants. Although miRNAs can be selectively encapsulated in extracellular vesicles, little is known about their expression and function in EPDELNs. In this study, we isolated nanovesicles from 11 edible fruits and vegetables and subjected the corresponding EPDELN small RNA libraries to Illumina sequencing. We identified a total of 418 miRNAs—32 to 127 per species—from the 11 EPDELN samples. Target prediction and functional analyses revealed that highly expressed miRNAs were closely associated with the inflammatory response and cancer-related pathways. The 418 miRNAs could be divided into three classes according to their EPDELN distributions: 26 “frequent” miRNAs (FMs), 39 “moderately present” miRNAs (MPMs), and 353 “rare” miRNAs (RMs). FMs were represented by fewer miRNA species than RMs but had a significantly higher cumulative expression level. Taken together, our in vitro results indicate that miRNAs in EPDELNs have the potential to regulate human mRNA.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Exosomes are small (30–100 nm) membranous nanovesicles secreted by a variety of mammalian cells. These mRNA- and microRNA-rich microvesicles can be transferred into neighboring or distant cells and play an important role in intercellular communication. In recent years, plant-derived exosome-like nanoparticles (ELNs) have also been characterized and shown to have structures similar to those of mammalian exosomes. Additionally, accumulating evidence suggests that edible plant-derived ELNs (EPDELNs) can be absorbed in the mammalian gastrointestinal (GI) tract and have the potential to mediate plant–animal intercellular communication. For example, nanoparticles from four edible plants (grape, grapefruit, ginger, and carrot) have anti-inflammatory properties and help maintain intestinal homeostasis. Furthermore, ginger-derived nanoparticles can protect against the development of liver-related diseases such as alcohol-induced damage. Moreover, have demonstrated that grape exosome-like nanoparticles can be assimilated by mouse intestinal stem cells and promote intestinal stem cell proliferation through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small (18–24 nt) noncoding RNAs that play important roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation in animals and plants. These single-stranded molecules impact on fundamental biological processes, including proliferation, differentiation, immune responses, and metabolism. The abnormal expression of miRNAs is related to multiple diseases. were the first to report that plant-derived miRNAs can penetrate the mammalian GI tract and enter the serum. They also found that plant-derived MIR-168a can bind to the mRNA of low-density-lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 (LDLRAP1) to inhibit its expression in the liver and decrease LDL removal. However, controversy exists regarding cross-kingdom regulation by plant miRNAs, with some researchers suggesting that their existence in animal blood and tissues reflects sample contamination or nonfunctional ingestion. Nevertheless, subsequent studies support the view that diet-derived plant miRNAs are present in blood and tissue and can regulate endogenous gene expression in animals.

Our previous study showed that maize-derived miRNAs can exist in the bloodstream and solid tissues of pigs, and can potentially target porcine mRNAs. Intriguingly, recently reported a previously uncharacterized function of plant miRNAs in the fine-tuning of honeybee caste development. Although these results suggest that plant miRNAs can mediate cross-kingdom regulation, miRNAs encapsulated in EPDELNs remain to be identified. Therefore, in this study, EPDELNs were isolated from 11 edible plants, and their miRNAs were subjected to expression profiling by small-RNA sequencing. To reveal the potential roles of miRNAs in EPDELNs, we used in silico analysis and a dual-luciferase reporter assay to predict and validate relationships between EPDELNs miRNAs and their potential target genes. Our results showed that miRNAs enriched in EPDELNs have the potential to mediate interspecies intercellular communication.

Isolation and purification of ELNs

Eleven edible plants (blueberry, coconut, ginger, grapefruit, Hami melon, kiwifruit, orange, pea, pear, soybean, and tomato) were randomly chosen for this study. All EPDELN samples were isolated and purified by differential centrifugation as described previously. Fruits and vegetables were purchased from a local market and washed three times. Apart from coconut, juice was extracted in two different ways. Fruits and vegetables with abundant juice (blueberry, grapefruit, kiwifruit, orange, and pear) were peeled, wrapped in gauze, and squeezed by hand, while less juicy ones (ginger, Hami melon, pea, soybean, and tomato) were ground with phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) in a mixer. The collected juice was sequentially centrifuged at 1,200 × g for 20 min, 3,000 × g for 20 min, and 10,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C in a Sorvall Lynx 6000 centrifuge (Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China) to remove large particles and cellular debris. The supernatant was filtered through a 1-μm membrane filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and then centrifuged at 150,000 × g for 90 min at 4 °C in an LE-80 ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA, USA) to obtain EPDELNs. EPDELNs were resuspended in 250 μl PBS.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and nanovesicle particle size analysis

To morphologically characterize the isolated membrane fraction, specimens were diluted 1:1,000 in PBS, and absorbed onto freshly cleaved mica sheets for 20 min. To provide a surface coated with formulations to a suitable density, the mica sheets were rinsed three times with deionized water and then dried with filter paper before detection. Surface morphology was examined under an atomic force microscope (Asylum Research MFP-3D-Bio; Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) as described by. The particle size distribution of EPDELNs was evaluated using a Light Scattering System (Brookhaven BI-200SM) as previously described. Measurements were made in PBS at pH 7.0 at 25 °C after appropriate dilution of each EPDELN sample.

Small RNA sequencing and data analysis

Total RNAs from the 11 EPDELN samples were separately obtained using TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After resuspending each RNA sample in 30 μl RNase-free water (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), the RNA quality was examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Samples were stored at −80 °C. To construct each library, small RNA ranging in size from 14 to 36 nt was purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and ligated using proprietary adaptors. The modified small RNA was then reverse-transcribed into cDNA and amplified by PCR. Finally, the 11 libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform.

The resulting sequence reads were subjected to a series of stringent filters, including the removal of low-quality reads, repeat sequences, and adaptor sequences, to generate clean data. A bioinformatics pipeline (MIRPIPE) for miRNA discovery and profiling was then applied as previously described. MIRPIPE was also applied in a subsequent analysis. In brief, the filtered reads were identified against known plant mature miRNAs in miRBase21.0 (November 2016; http://www.mirbase.org/index.shtml) using the criterion of a maximum of two mismatches. The identified reads were treated as conserved miRNAs, and the number of reads per miRNA were normalized to reads per million (RPM). The miRNA profiling data have been deposited in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE116095) and are accessible through the GEO Super Series.

Prediction and functional annotation of miRNA target genes

TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71/) was used to annotate miRNA target gene. The generated list of target genes was subsequently uploaded to the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) bioinformatics resource (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) for Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. DAVID GO enrichment was regarded as significant using a criterion of P < 0.05. Sequence information on human mRNAs was collected from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The NCBI database and RNAhybrid (https://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid/) were used in combination to search for human mRNAs containing potential binding sites for plant miRNAs.

Cells, reagents, and oligonucleotides

The HeLa cell line obtained from the Chinese Academy of Sciences cell bank (SGST.CN) was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Synthetic miRNA molecules with 2′-O methylation at the 3′ end were purchased from Gene Pharma (Shanghai, China).

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

To experimentally validate miRNA–target interactions, a dual-luciferase reporter assay system was used. Wild-type (WT) or mutant (MUT) binding sites were cloned into a pmirGLO vector (100 ng per well). The vector harboring WT or MUT binding sites combined with either synthetic MIR-168c (50 nM), synthetic MIR-8155 (50 nM), or an miRNA control (50 nM) were then co-transfected into HeLa cells grown in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well using Lipofectamine 3000 (0.3 μL per well) (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were collected after 48 h, and Renilla and firefly fluorescence levels were assayed using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as means ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student’s t-test, with differences considered significant at p < 0.05.

Isolation and characterization of EPDELNs

To verify our hypothesis that miRNAs are enriched in EPDELNs and can potentially mediate interspecies intercellular communication, we randomly selected 11 commonly consumed fresh fruits and vegetables (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). EPDELNs were isolated by differential centrifugation and identified at the nanometer scale by AFM. The 11 different edible fruits and vegetables were found to contain a substantial quantity of round or oval vesicles (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). These vesicles exhibited a morphological ultrastructure similar to that of exosomes from mammalian bodily fluids. To further characterize the EPDELNs, a dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis was also performed. As shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. S1, the size distribution of EPDELNs isolated from the 11 fresh fruits and vegetables ranged from 100 to 1,000 nm, consistent with values obtained for other EPDELNs in previous studies.

Small RNA sequencing results

To investigate the expression profile of miRNAs in EPDELNs, total RNA of EPDELNs was extracted and subjected to capillary electrophoresis analysis. The EPDELNs were found to contain many small RNAs shorter than 25 nt in length, but little or no 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA, thus confirming the presence of small RNAs in EPDELNs (Fig. S2). Eleven small RNA libraries were then constructed (Table 1) and sequenced to generate a total of 202,560,279 raw reads. After applying a series of stringent filters, the remaining 141,076,120 reads (69.65% of raw reads) from all libraries were considered to be reliable miRNA candidates (Table 1). Because pre-miRNA sequences were unavailable in miRBase for certain edible plants and as genome sequence information was lacking for some plants in this study, the filtered reads were directly mapped to all known plant mature miRNAs in miRBase 21.0. Matching miRNAs were considered to be conserved miRNAs. In total, we identified 418 conserved miRNAs from the 11 EPDELN samples (Table S1), 32–127 per species (Fig. 2A). ELNs in ginger had the fewest miRNA species (n = 32) and those in soybean had the most (n = 127). Regarding the size distribution of the generated reads, a clear peak was observed at 20–22 nt (Fig. 2B), consistent with findings from previous studies on various plants in which the majority of small RNAs were 20–24 nt in length.

Prediction of possible human target genes of plant miRNAs

miRNA expression levels in each EPDELN library varied widely, from a few RPM to thousands, with the top 20 miRNAs contributing more than 92% (92.41%–99.17%) of the total miRNA expression (Figs. 2C–2E and Fig. S3). Evidence is increasing that plant-derived miRNAs can specifically bind target mammalian mRNAs and influence biological processes. To further explore the potential function of EPDELN-derived miRNAs in EPDELNs, bioinformatics analysis was used to predict relationships between miRNAs and their potential target genes. We predicted the human target genes of miRNAs of each EPDELN sample (Figs. 3A–3C and Figs. S4A–S4H) using TargetScan according to the principle of base complementary pairing between the plant miRNA seed region and target genes. The results of target gene prediction suggested that some miRNAs in EPDELNs potentially target and theoretically regulate mammalian genes (Fig. 3D, Table 2, and Table S2).

Recent evidence of the intake and bioavailability of dietary miRNAs in humans and animals suggests that plant-derived miRNAs possess immunomodulatory or cancer regulatory capacities. Our prediction results also indicate that some of these miRNAs can directly target genes encoding inflammatory factors such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-5 (IL-5), and interleukin-1 (IL-1). For example, MIR-5781 in soybean ELNs can directly target IL17A, which plays an important role in inflammatory responses (Table 2). GO and KEGG term enrichment analyses revealed that the target genes of miRNAs in EPDELNs are related to immune cells and are significantly enriched in cancer-related signaling pathways, such as those associated with small-cell lung, endometrial, and colorectal cancers (Fig. 3D).

EPDELN-derived miRNAs bind target genes in HeLa cells

To further validate the prediction results, we performed a dual-luciferase assay to verify the interaction between MIR-168c and its potential target gene (TSC22D3) (Fig. 3E and Table S3). This indicated that MIR-168c binding significantly reduced luciferase activity for the wild-type target gene, whereas binding to the mutant site had no effect on luciferase activity (Fig. 3F). MIR-8155 was similarly analyzed by dual-luciferase assay, but the result was negative (Figs. S4I, S4J and Table S3). Together, these results suggest that plant miRNAs have the potential to target mammalian mRNAs.

Distribution of miRNA species and expression profiles across 11 EPDELN samples

To better compare the expression distribution of miRNAs among EPDELNs, we divided all miRNAs into three types: frequent miRNAs (FMs), moderately present miRNAs (MPMs), and rare miRNAs (RMs), corresponding respectively to miRNAs simultaneously present in 8–11, 4–7, or 1–3 kinds of EPDELNs. FMs, MPMs, and RMs comprised 26 (Fig. 4A), 39, and 353 miRNAs, respectively (Table S1).

Because miRNAs within ancient genes are more broadly and highly expressed than those within young genes, we compared the expression levels of the three miRNA types. Notably, we found that the expression levels of FMs accounted for at least 39.46% of total miRNA expression in each EPDELN sample (Fig. 4B). This indicates that FMs have fewer miRNA species than RMs but a significantly higher cumulative expression level (Figs. 4B and 4C). Further inspection revealed that seven miRNAs were present in all 11 libraries (Fig. 4A) and were almost highly expressed miRNAs of each library (Table S1), reflecting the high expression of FMs. Among FMs, MIR-319 mainly acts on a TCP transcription factor underlying the robust and multilayered control of leaf development. Additionally, the overexpression of MIR-396 was shown to reduce stomatal cell number and stomatal density in Arabidopsis, and is thus of great importance for regulating plant tissue cell growth. To screen for miRNAs highly expressed but only detected in single EPDELN samples, we identified 19 miRNAs from among the 353 RMs whose expression levels were in the top 20 of their own species (Table 3), including MIR-1919a (tomato), MIR-858a (pear), and MIR-1078 (ginger). Among these miRNAs, MIR-1078 in ginger ELNs can act on LEP (encoding leptin), and Fairfax et al. showed that leptin in turn associated with lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-6 expression.

Discussion

Previous studies have indicated that the size and structure of exosome-like nanoparticles in edible plants are similar to those of mammalian-derived exosomes. Our findings based on AFM and DLS analyses support the viewpoint of these earlier studies. In our present study, we found that EPDELNs have two kinds of distributions, one up to 100 nm and the other up to 1,000 nm, which is consistent with previous results. Interestingly, found that these two types of ELNs have differences in composition and absorption patterns.

As expected, we detected large numbers of miRNAs in plant-derived ELNs. Consistent with other studies, we found commonalities and differences in miRNA species and expression levels in different plants. miRNAs are involved in diverse aspects of plant growth and development. Some of the 26 miRNAs that were always present in 8–11 ELNs according to our bioinformatics analysis were shown to participate in fundamental plant physiological and biochemical processes, such as various stress responses, flowering regulation, sugar accumulation, and root development. For example, the MIR-319 family acts on TCP, forming a relationship that has implications for many aspects of floral development. MIR-398 also participates in plant responses to biotic, heavy metal, high-salt, drought, and UV radiation stresses by targeting two superoxide dismutase genes (CSD1 and CSD2). An auxin response factor was predicted to be a target of MIR-167, and these DNA-binding proteins are thought to control transcription in response to the phytohormone auxin. FMs detected in the present study included the above-mentioned miRNAs. Some identified miRNAs may be associated with biological diversity, in other words, related to plant-specific phenotypes. Anthocyanins, which play a role in the change of color of ripening fruit, are found in most other plant parts and in most plant genera. Anthocyanin pigments may be red, purple, or blue, depending on the pH. The overexpression of MIR-156e from herbaceous peony improves anthocyanin accumulation in transgenic Arabidopsis. In our present study, MIR-156e expression levels differed among the 11 EPDELN samples. The regulation of plant anthocyanins by miRNAs is probably at least partially responsible for the widespread variation in plant coloration.

Recent studies have shown that plant-derived ELNs can retain their stability and be absorbed through the GI tract. Additionally, functional studies have suggested that plant-derived ELNs play a role in interspecies intercellular communication and function against inflammatory diseases and cancers. Our results indicate that miRNAs are abundant in EPDELNs, while some of them have been reported to be involved in cross-species regulation. For example, Moringa oleifera-derived MIR-166i functions in the regulation of inflammation, while honeysuckle-derived MIR-2911 inhibits influenza A viruses. Moreover, rice-derived MIR-168a specifically targets and regulates LDLRAP1 expression in mouse livers. In this study, our GO and KEGG analyses of putative target genes of highly expressed plant miRNAs revealed enriched pathways associated with immunity and cancer. recently reported that long-term oral intake of plant MIR-159 can suppress breast tumor growth by targeting TCF7 which encodes a Wnt signaling transcription factor, leading to a decrease in MYC protein levels. found that the target gene (TSC22D3) of plant MIR-168c in non-tumorous tissue of remnant liver was significantly associated with early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection. Moreover, our dual-luciferase reporter system analysis demonstrated that plant MIR-168c in ELNs binds in vitro to the potential target gene TSC22D3, suggesting that MIR-168c has the potential to be used after surgical resection of HCC. Taken together, our results and those of previous studies imply that miRNAs in ELNs are crucial factors underlying ELN regulatory functions.

Several research groups recently demonstrated that artificially synthesized nanoparticles can be used to target low doses of drugs (e.g., small interfering RNAs, proteins, and peptides) to specific cell types and tissues. From a therapeutic perspective, plant-derived edible nanoparticles are safe and more amenable to mass production than synthetic nanoparticles. They may therefore be used as efficient nanofactors for the fabrication of specific drugs deliverable as medical nanoparticles, which is a potentially novel approach to nanomedicine. However, a detailed elucidation of the molecular mechanism underlying the uptake and action of plant-derived miRNAs in EPDELNs is still urgently needed.

Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed the miRNA profiles of EPDELNs of 11 different fruits and vegetables. Although plant-derived ELNs contain many miRNAs, the types and levels of miRNAs differ markedly among species. We identified 418 miRNAs with varying EPDELN distributions. FMs were represented by fewer miRNA species than RMs but had a significantly higher cumulative expression level. Highly expressed miRNAs in EPDELNs can potentially regulate the expression of inflammatory cytokines and cancer-related genes in vitro.

References 62

  1. 1.

    Araceli C, Madelourdes PH, Maelena P, Joséa R, Carlosandrés G. Chemical studies of anthocyanins: a review. Food Chemistry. 2009;113:859-871.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.001

  2. 2.

    Bang C, Thum T. Exosomes: new players in cell–cell communication. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2012;44:2060-2064.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2012.08.007

  3. 3.

    Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281-297.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5

  4. 4.

    Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2006;6:857-866.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1997

  5. 5.

    Cavalieri D, Rizzetto L, Tocci N, Rivero D, Asquini E, Si-Ammour A, Bonechi E, Ballerini C, Viola R. Plant microRNAs as novel immunomodulatory agents. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:25761.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep25761

  6. 6.

    Chen X. Small RNAs in development—insights from plants. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2012;22:361-367.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2012.04.004

  7. 7.

    Chin AR, Fong MY, Somlo G, Wu J, Swiderski P, Wu X, Wang SE. Cross-kingdom inhibition of breast cancer growth by plant miR159. Cell Research. 2016;26:217-228.

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2016.13

  8. 8.

    Denzer K, Eijk MV, Kleijmeer MJ, Jakobson E, Groot CD, Geuze HJ. Follicular dendritic cells carry MHC Class II-expressing microvesicles at their surface. Journal of Immunology. 2000;165:1259-1265.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1259

  9. 9.

    Dickinson B, Zhang Y, Petrick JS, Heck G, Ivashuta S, Marshall WS. Lack of detectable oral bioavailability of plant microRNAs after feeding in mice. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31:965-967.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2737

  10. 10.

    Dong D, Zhang LF, Hang W, ZhiJie L, ZuXin Z, YongLian Z. Differential expression of miRNAs in response to salt stress in maize roots. Annals of Botany. 2009;103:29-38.

    Not in our library10.1093/aob/mcn205

  11. 11.

    Fairfax BP, Vannberg FO, Radhakrishnan J, Hakonarson H, Keating BJ, Hill AVS, Knight JC. An integrated expression phenotype mapping approach defines common variants in LEP, ALOX15 and CAPNS1 associated with induction of IL-6. Human Molecular Genetics. 2010;19:720-730.

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddp530

  12. 12.

    França GS, Vibranovski MD, Galante PAF. Host gene constraints and genomic context impact the expression and evolution of human microRNAs. Nature Communications. 2016;7:11438.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms11438

  13. 13.

    Hagen G, Guilfoyle T. Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors. Plant Molecular Biology. 2002;49:373-385.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1015207114117

  14. 14.

    He D, Wang Q, Wang K, Yang P. Genome-wide dissection of the MicroRNA expression profile in rice embryo during early stages of seed germination. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0145424.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0145424

  15. 15.

    Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols. 2009;4:44-57.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2008.211

  16. 16.

    Jagadeeswaran G, Sunkar R. Biotic and abiotic stress down-regulate miR398 expression in Arabidopsis. Planta. 2009;229:1009-1014.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-009-0889-3

  17. 17.

    Ju S, Mu J, Dokland T, Zhuang X, Wang Q, Jiang H, Xiang X, Deng Z-B, Wang B, Zhang L. Grape exosome-like nanoparticles induce intestinal stem cells and protect mice from DSS-induced colitis. Molecular Therapy. 2013;21:1345-1357.

    Not in our library10.1038/mt.2013.64

  18. 18.

    Kayesh E, Shangguan L, Korir NK, Sun X, Bilkish N, Zhang Y, Han J, Song C, Cheng ZM, Fang J. Fruit skin color and the role of anthocyanin. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2013;35:2879-2890.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11738-013-1332-8

  19. 19.

    Khan GA, Declerck M, Sorin C, Hartmann C, Crespi M, Lelandaisbrière C. MicroRNAs as regulators of root development and architecture. Plant Molecular Biology. 2011;77:47-58.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11103-011-9793-x

  20. 20.

    Kim BH, Kwon Y, Lee BH, Nam KH. Overexpression of miR172 suppresses the brassinosteroid signaling defects of bak1 in Arabidopsis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2014;447:479-484.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.011

  21. 21.

    Koyama T, Sato F, Ohmetakagi M. Roles of miR319 and TCP transcription factors in leaf development. Plant Physiology. 2017;175(2):874-885.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.17.00732

  22. 22.

    Kuenne C, Preussner J, Herzog M, Braun T, Looso M. MIRPIPE: quantification of microRNAs in niche model organisms. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3412-3413.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btu573

  23. 23.

    Liang H, Zhang S, Fu Z, Wang Y, Wang N, Liu Y, Zhao C, Wu J, Hu Y, Zhang J. Effective detection and quantification of dietetically absorbed plant microRNAs in human plasma. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2015;26:505-512.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.12.002

  24. 24.

    Liu D, Song Y, Chen Z, Yu D. Ectopic expression of miR396 suppresses GRF target gene expression and alters leaf growth in Arabidopsis. Physiologia Plantarum. 2009;136:223-236.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01229.x

  25. 25.

    Liu W, Xu L, Wang Y, Shen H, Zhu X, Zhang K, Chen Y, Yu R, Limera C, Liu L. Transcriptome-wide analysis of chromium-stress responsive microRNAs to explore miRNA-mediated regulatory networks in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Scientific Reports. 2015;5:14024.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep14024

  26. 26.

    Llave C. MicroRNAs: more than a role in plant development? Molecular Plant Pathology. 2004;5:361-366.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00227.x

  27. 27.

    Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834-838.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03702

  28. 28.

    Lu Y, Zhen F, Bian L, Hong X, Liang J. miR398 regulation in rice of the responses to abiotic and biotic stresses depends on CSD1 and CSD2 expression. Functional Plant Biology. 2011;38:44-53.

    Not in our library10.1071/fp10178

  29. 29.

    Luo Y, Guo Z, Li L. Evolutionary conservation of microRNA regulatory programs in plant flower development. Developmental Biology. 2013;380:133-144.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.05.009

  30. 30.

    Luo Y, Wang P, Wang X, Wang Y, Mu Z, Li Q, Fu Y, Xiao J, Li G, Ma Y, Gu Y, Jin L, Ma J, Tang Q, Jiang A, Li X, Li M. Detection of dietetically absorbed maize-derived microRNAs in pigs. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:645.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-00488-y

  31. 31.

    Mallory AC, Vaucheret H. Functions of microRNAs and related small RNAs in plants. Nature Genetics. 2006;38(Suppl):S31-S36.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng1791

  32. 32.

    Mu J, Zhuang X, Wang Q, Jiang H, Deng ZB, Wang B, Zhang L, Kakar S, Jun Y, Miller D. Interspecies communication between plant and mouse gut host cells through edible plant derived exosome-like nanoparticles. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2014;58:1561-1573.

    Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201300729

  33. 33.

    Nag A, King S, Jack T, Nasrallah JB. miR319a targeting of TCP4 is critical for petal growth and development in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:22534-22539.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0908718106

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Redis RS, Calin S, Yang Y, You MJ, Calin GA. Cell-to-cell miRNA transfer: from body homeostasis to therapy. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2012;136:169-174.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.08.003

  36. 36.

    Rodriguez RE, Mecchia MA, Debernardi JM, Schommer C, Weigel D. Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development. 2010;137:103-112.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.043067

  37. 37.

    Snow JW, Hale AE, Isaacs SK, Baggish AL, Chan SY. Ineffective delivery of diet-derived microRNAs to recipient animal organisms. RNA Biology. 2013;10:1107-1116.

    Not in our library10.4161/rna.24909

  38. 38.

    Stefano P, Letizia Z, Maurice K, Carla M, Antonella M, Marina P, Sanou SM, Antonella C, Marco C, Rosario M. MicroRNA from Moringa oleifera: identification by high throughput sequencing and their potential contribution to plant medicinal value. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0149495.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0149495

  39. 39.

    Sunkar R, Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK. Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation. Trends in Plant Science. 2007;12:301-309.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2007.05.001

  40. 40.

    Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2004;16:2001-2019.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.104.022830

All 62 references

Cited by papers we hold 10

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.