Support for a clade of Placozoa and Cnidaria in genes with minimal compositional bias

The phylogenetic placement of the morphologically simple placozoans is crucial to understanding the evolution of complex animal traits. Here, we examine the influence of adding new genomes from placozoans to a large dataset designed to study the deepest splits in the animal phylogeny. Using site-heterogeneous substitution models, we show that it is possible to obtain strong support, in both amino acid and reduced-alphabet matrices, for either a sister-group relationship between Cnidaria and Placozoa, or for Cnidaria and Bilateria as seen in most published work to date, depending on the orthologues selected to construct the matrix. We demonstrate that a majority of genes show evidence of compositional heterogeneity, and that support for the Cnidaria + Bilateria clade can be assigned to this source of systematic error. In interpreting these results, we caution against a peremptory reading of placozoans as secondarily reduced forms of little relevance to broader discussions of early animal evolution.

Abstract licence: CC BY

1. 3.

   MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities · 2015

2. 5.

   OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy · 2015

3. 16.

   Accounting For Alignment Uncertainty in Phylogenomics · 2012

4. 20.

   FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments · 2010

5. 28.

   BayesHammer: Bayesian clustering for error correction in single-cell sequencing · 2013

6. 37.

   Uncertainty in the Timing of Origin of Animals and the Limits of Precision in Molecular Timescales · 2015

34 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

• Corrected

  Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla · 2019

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.