No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
Chronic 2P-STED imaging reveals high turnover of dendritic spines in the hippocampus in vivo
Thomas Pfeiffer, Stefanie Poll, Stephane Bancelin and 6 more
eLife · 2018 · CC BY
Abstract
Rewiring neural circuits by the formation and elimination of synapses is thought to be a key cellular mechanism of learning and memory in the mammalian brain. Dendritic spines are the postsynaptic structural component of excitatory synapses, and their experience-dependent plasticity has been extensively studied in mouse superficial cortex using two-photon microscopy in vivo. By contrast, very little is known about spine plasticity in the hippocampus, which is the archetypical memory center of the brain, mostly because it is difficult to visualize dendritic spines in this deeply embedded structure with sufficient spatial resolution. We developed chronic 2P-STED microscopy in mouse hippocampus, using a ‘hippocampal window’ based on resection of cortical tissue and a long working distance objective for optical access. We observed a two-fold higher spine density than previous studies and measured a spine turnover of ~40% within 4 days, which depended on spine size. We thus provide direct evidence for a high level of structural rewiring of synaptic circuits and new insights into the structure-dynamics relationship of hippocampal spines. Having established chronic super-resolution microscopy in the hippocampus in vivo, our study enables longitudinal and correlative analyses of nanoscale neuroanatomical structures with genetic, molecular and behavioral experiments.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Dendritic spines form the postsynaptic structural component of most excitatory synapses in the mammalian brain. They constitute computational units of information processing that underlie essentially all higher brain functions and play a crucial role in brain disorders such as autism spectrum disorder and Alzheimer's disease. Spine structure is closely linked to synapse function, as the size of spine heads scales with synaptic strength and the shape and number of spines can be modified by the induction of synaptic plasticity and by sensory experience.
Rewiring of neural circuits by spine plasticity is considered a key neurobiological mechanism of memory formation (reviewed in). Notably, a recent study showed that optically induced shrinkage of potentiated spines disrupts newly acquired motor skills, indicating a causal link between spine plasticity and memory. While experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines has been a consistent finding across mouse cortex in vivo, very little is known about it in the hippocampus. However, this is a major knowledge gap, because this neural structure constitutes the archetypical memory center of the brain, and hippocampal brain slices and primary cell cultures are the dominant model systems for the study of synaptic plasticity mechanisms.
Imaging dendritic spines in the hippocampus in vivo is challenging because of its remote location more than 1 mm below the surface of the mouse brain. A pioneering study accomplished this with two-photon (2P) microscopy, but only over a period of a few hours. Recently, approaches based on a ‘hippocampal window’ or micro-endoscopy enabled ‘chronic’ 2P imaging over several weeks. However, 2P microscopy inevitably lacks the spatial resolution to visualize important details of spine morphology, such as spine necks, and even struggles to resolve individual dendritic spines on CA1 pyramidal neurons, leaving a high fraction of them undetected.
While regular light microscopy typically detects a spine density of around 1 spine/µm, electron microscopy (EM) reports ~3 spines/µm on CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons in rats and in stratum radiatum of mice. By comparison, spine density is about ten times lower in many cortical areas, for example ~0.24 spines/µm for pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of mouse barrel cortex.
Given the limited spatial resolution of 2P microscopy, we turned to super-resolution stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy to improve the visualization of dendritic spines in the intact hippocampus of living mice. We used a home-built STED microscope based on 2P excitation (2P-STED) and equipped it with a long working distance objective to reach the deeply located hippocampus. We adopted a ‘hippocampal window’ technique, where a portion of the overlying somatosensory cortex is surgically removed and replaced by a metal cylinder sealed with a cover slip, providing stable optical access to the CA1 area of the hippocampus.
We demonstrate that our new approach offers substantially improved spatial resolution and image quality compared to regular 2P microscopy in mouse hippocampus in vivo. Using transgenic mice with fluorescently labeled pyramidal neurons, we measured spine density on basal dendrites of pyramidal neurons in stratum oriens of the CA1 area and compared results obtained with 2P and 2P-STED microscopy in vivo as well as with STED microscopy in fixed hippocampal sections. Furthermore, we carried out repetitive 2P-STED in vivo imaging over a 4-day period to measure spine turnover.
Our analysis showed a two times higher spine density than reported by conventional 2P microscopy, and around 40% of all spines turned over within 4 days, suggesting a high level of circuit remodeling in the hippocampus in vivo. Furthermore, detailed morphological analysis revealed that primarily small spines were affected by spine turnover.
2P-STED microscopy with a long working distance objective
We set up in vivo STED microscopy of dendritic spines in mouse hippocampus to track their morphological dynamics over the course of several days. We used a custom-built 2P-STED microscope (Figure 1A) in combination with a modified ‘cranial window’ technique to gain high-quality optical access to stratum oriens in the CA1 area of the hippocampus. We surgically removed the overlying somatosensory cortex and inserted a metal tube sealed with a cover slip as a physical place holder (Figure 1B). To bridge the distance between the surface of the skull and the alveus located right above the hippocampus, we used an objective with a long working distance yet relatively high numerical aperture (Nikon N60X-NIR: WD 2.8 mm, NA 1.0).
To verify that this objective is compatible with STED imaging, we measured the point-spread function (PSF) of the microscope using fluorescent nanospheres (diameter: 40 nm). The full-width at half maximum (FWHM) was 54 ± 2 nm in the x-y plane in 2P-STED mode, compared with 325 ± 5 nm in regular 2P mode (p<0.0001, paired t-test; n = 17 beads; Figure 1C), demonstrating that our super-resolution approach delivered a six-fold nominal gain in lateral spatial resolution. In contrast, the axial resolution remained unchanged in 2P-STED (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).
2P-STED microscopy of dendritic spines in the hippocampus in vivo
We then used the 2P-STED microscope to image dendritic spines on basal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons (stratum oriens) in anesthetized mice. We used transgenic mice (Thy1-HYFP/+ and Thy1-MGFP/+, 4–12 months old) that expressed either GFP or YFP in a subset of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Focusing on dendrites close to the coverslip (5–20 µm), spines were much more clearly delineated in 2P-STED than in 2P mode (Figure 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 2). In particular, spine necks were better resolved with 2P-STED as evidenced by paired measurements of spine neck widths (2P-STED: 147 ± 8 nm; 2P: 369 ± 6 nm; p<0.0001, paired t-test; n = 35 spine necks, 17 dendrites, 6 mice; Figure 1E).
Image distortions caused by animal breathing and heartbeat normally pose a serious challenge for imaging in vivo, in particular STED microscopy, which is especially sensitive to brain motion due to its high spatial resolution. However, we only encountered mild levels of image blur (Figure 1—video 1), making it not necessary to apply motion correction (see Discussion).
Dendritic spine density of CA1 pyramidal neurons in vivo
We determined spine density of basal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons, comparing it in images acquired both in 2P-STED and 2P mode (Figure 2A). There was a significant difference between the two modes (2P-STED: 2.13 ± 0.10 µm−1; 2P: 1.61 ± 0.07 µm−1; p<0.0001, paired t-test; n = 82 dendrites, 6 mice; Figure 2B and Figure 2—figure supplement 1), where 2P-STED detected on average 32% more spines than 2P in a direct comparison (Figure 2B). This increase was due to the improved detection or discrimination of (1) spines that either had short necks or that extended into the z-direction, which were otherwise obscured by the fluorescence signal of the dendritic shaft, and (2) closely clustered spines, which appeared merged in the 2P images (Figure 2A).
While our 2P-based mean value for spine density (1.61 µm−1) is around 45% higher than the values reported in the light microscopy literature (~1.1 µm−1), the mean value based on 2P-STED is about twice as large as this (2.13 µm−1). We also counted spines in fixed brain slices obtained from the same animals (Figure 2C and Figure 2—video 1). Using a commercial STED microscope with one-photon excitation, we measured a density of 2.68 ± 0.08 µm−1 (n = 37 dendrites, 6 mice; Figure 2D), which comes closer to the values reported by EM.
To understand where the remaining discrepancy might come from, we made a simple geometrical model to account for the limited axial resolution of our STED approach, which had left some spines invisible (Figure 2E). According to the model, which took into account the actual dimensions of dendritic morphology and the PSF of the microscope, about a quarter of the spines could not be detected in vivo because of this problem. Correcting the measured values by this fraction, we calculated a spine density of 2.91 ± 0.14 µm−1 for the in vivo data and 3.15 ± 0.09 µm−1 for the fixed tissue data (Figure 2F), which effectively closed the gap to the ‘ground truth’ EM values.
Dendritic spines undergo high morphological turnover in vivo
To determine the kinetics of spine emergence and elimination, which is a matter of controversy, we performed repeated 2P-STED imaging of individual dendritic stretches over 4 days (day 0, 2 and 4; Figure 3A). To retrieve a particular dendrite in consecutive imaging sessions, we used tissue landmarks such as blood vessels, fluorescent cell bodies and dendrites.
First, we quantified the average spine density for each time point, which remained stable over the entire observation period (day 0: 2.31 ± 0.10 µm−1; day 2: 2.28 ± 0.08 µm−1; day 4: 2.30 ± 0.10 µm−1; n = 14 dendrites, 3 mice; Figure 3A,B and Figure 3—source data 1).
Next, we examined spine turnover by counting all spines that appeared and disappeared from one imaging session to the next. Furthermore, we calculated the ‘survival fraction’, which is the percentage of spines that were present on day 0 and visible during the subsequent imaging sessions. The survival fraction was 78.1 ± 3.6% for day 2, and 60.8 ± 3.4% for day 4 (Figure 3C).
We then calculated the fraction of spines lost and gained between the imaging sessions. The fraction of lost spines was 21.2 ± 3.6% from day 0 to 2, and 24.7 ± 3.0% from day 2 to 4 (Figure 3D), while the fraction of new spines from day 0 to 2 was 20.4 ± 2.6%, and 21.9 ± 3.0% from day 2 to 4 (Figure 3E). These results indicate that the rates of spine loss and gain were balanced and did not change over the sessions, which is consistent with the constant spine density we observed.
By comparison, spine turnover was less visible in 2P mode, amounting to a survival fraction of 74.9 ± 2.2% after 4 days (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).
Spine turnover affects primarily small spines
Given the detailed morphological information in the 2P-STED images, we examined if there was a relationship between spine turnover and morphology. In cortex, spines with a large head have been shown to be more stable than filopodial and thin spines, but it is unknown whether such a link also exists for the hippocampus.
After deconvolution of the images and 3D reconstruction (see Materials and methods), we analyzed the morphology of all spines that were visible on any of the imaging sessions (i.e. on days 0, 2 and/or 4; Figure 4), dividing the spines into two groups according to their ‘observed persistence’. Spines that were visible on all three imaging sessions (Persistence >2 days) had larger heads than spines that were visible on only one or two sessions (Persistence ≤2 days), suggesting that small spines are more short-lived than large ones (>2 days: 0.03 μm3 and 0.01–0.06 μm3 versus ≤ 2 days: 0.02 μm3 and 0.01–0.04 μm3, median and interquartile range; Figure 4A,B; p<0.0001).
Refining this analysis, we plotted key morphological parameters (dendritic spine length, maximum head diameter, ratio of mean head to neck diameters) in three dimensions. The 3D plot revealed a clear difference in the distributions of the morphological parameters depending on the observed persistence of the spine (Figure 4C). A cluster analysis (‘Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering’ analysis based on Euclidian distance in the parameter space, see Materials and methods) revealed at least three distinct populations of spines (Figure 4—figure supplement 1), which resemble the different categories commonly used in the literature to classify dendritic spines (‘small’ ≅ cluster 1, ‘thin’ ≅ cluster 2 and ‘mushroom-like’ ≅ cluster 3; Figure 4D). The latter category is generally composed of long spines with high head to neck diameter ratios. Notably, whereas around 50% of more persistent spines exhibited a mushroom-like morphology, less persistent spines rarely (7%) belonged to this category (Figure 4E). Even within cluster 3, less persistent spines had on average smaller heads and lower head to neck diameter ratios (Figure 4F).
Discussion
We established chronic super-resolution imaging of dendritic spines in the intact hippocampus of living mice. It is based on a home-built upright 2P-STED microscope equipped with a long working distance water immersion objective and a ‘hippocampal window’ to reach this deeply embedded brain structure.
STED microscopy has been used before for imaging dendritic spines in vivo, but only in superficial cortical layers and for one-off and acute imaging sessions. Considering the importance of the hippocampus for learning and memory, it is of great interest to develop and improve approaches for faithful detection and monitoring of dendritic spines there.
Dendritic spines commonly serve as a morphological proxy for excitatory synapses, allowing inferences on synaptic strength and functional connectivity, for instance when their shape, size or number change over the course of an electrophysiological or behavioral experiment. However, since spines have nanoscale dimensions and are densely packed in light scattering tissue, an accurate and quantitative anatomical readout is oftentimes difficult to obtain.
Spine density has been shown to vary between 2 and 4 µm−1 on proximal apical dendrites in stratum radiatum in adult rats and mice according to serial section transmission EM, and between 2 and 3 µm−1 on basal oblique dendrites in stratum oriens in adult mice according to array tomography. By comparison, the spine densities we detected in stratum oriens lie within the range of these measurements, while the two recent in vivo 2P microscopy studies reported values less than half the amount.
As our STED approach only improved the lateral resolution, spines that protruded into the axial direction were still difficult to detect, explaining why our density values are still below those reported by EM. Indeed, correcting our data based on a simple geometric model removed the residual difference. In the near future, our method stands to benefit from ongoing technical advances, for instance in 3D beam shaping, which will improve axial resolution, and should enable nearly complete spine detection in vivo.
We could only image spines in the stratum oriens within 20 µm from the cover slip; beyond this distance, image quality degraded rapidly. This depth limitation was likely due to optical aberrations caused by mismatches in refractive index between the immersion medium, the glass cover slip and the sample (n ≈ 1.37 for brain tissue). Unlike other objectives we have used for STED microscopy in brain tissue, the new objective did not have a correction collar to reduce spherical aberrations, which otherwise probably would have permitted greater imaging depth. However, the use of adaptive optics is bound to allow for deeper imaging and thus to reach dendrites in stratum radiatum and other areas of the hippocampus.
We suspect that the near total absence of motion artifacts in the images was primarily due to two effects: firstly, the implanted metal tube probably stabilized the brain mechanically, and secondly, blood pulsations are likely much weaker in the hippocampus where the vasculature is mostly formed by capillaries and has fewer large arteries than in superficial cortex.
Faithful and complete detection of spines across space and time is absolutely critical for an accurate assessment of spine turnover. Failure to distinguish closely spaced spines will lead to an underestimate of spine turnover, because events of individual spines appearing or disappearing within a merged cluster will inevitably be missed, giving a false impression of spine stability. Conversely, temporal fluctuations, for instance when spines rotate in or out of the optical axis, will lead to an overestimate of spine turnover. Moreover, biased detection of large spines might distort the measurements of spine turnover as large spines are reportedly less structurally plastic than small spines, as we have also shown here.
The spine detection problem was highlighted by two recent studies that pioneered chronic imaging in the hippocampus in vivo and reported very different lifetimes for spines on apical and basal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons. The study by Gu et al. reported that ~96% of spines survived for at least 16 days in stratum radiatum, whereas the study by Attardo et al. predicted that the entire population of spines in stratum oriens turned over within a month.
Both studies used 2P microscopy with relatively low NA optics and presented images of comparable quality, reporting similar average spine densities (~1.1 µm−1) that were stable over time. While Gu et al. assessed spine turnover directly from the 2P images, Attardo et al. went a step further and used mathematical modeling to account for the effect of merged spines on apparent spine turnover. Importantly though, without applying the mathematical correction, their survival fraction was around 80% after 21 days, indicating that direct analysis of 2P images is highly problematic when it comes to establishing spine turnover rates.
Our super-resolution approach documented a spine survival fraction of 60% after 4 days, providing direct and unambiguous evidence that spines can turn over extremely rapidly in CA1 stratum oriens, supporting one of the main modeling-based conclusions of the Attardo et al. study. However, since we imaged just three time points over a relatively short period, it is hard to extrapolate our results in time and determine the extent to which the observed kinetics hold for the entire spine population. In fact, our observation that larger spines were more stable is a sign for the existence of multiple, kinetically distinct spine populations, unlike the Attardo et al. study, which argued for a single population.
We did not observe any overt signs of phototoxicity, such as dendritic ‘blebbing’ during short time-lapse sequences and across the imaging sessions (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 2). This absence together with the fact that spine density remained constant indicates that the observed kinetics were real and not an artifact induced by our hippocampal window approach or 2P-STED imaging. The use of the NMDA-receptor antagonist ketamine could be problematic given the important role of NMDA-receptors in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. However, as the drug was applied only for a couple of hours per imaging session and we did not induce any plasticity, it is unlikely that our results were compromised by it. The use of more innocuous drugs or performing the experiments with non-anesthetized and head-fixed animals will be preferable in the future.
As we did not image in the stratum radiatum, we do not know to what extent the divergence in spine turnover between stratum radiatum reported by Gu et al. and stratum oriens (Attardo et al. and our data) reflects methodological or genuine anatomical or physiological differences. In fact, stratum radiatum primarily receives input from CA3, whereas stratum oriens also has afferents from entorhinal cortex and amygdala. In addition, there may be intrinsic differences in the postsynaptic neuron, which account for dendrite-specific spine turnover.
Our finding that hippocampal dendrites are subject to ongoing intense anatomical remodeling supports the view of the hippocampus as a highly dynamic structure designed to encode and process new memories, but not as a long-term repository of information. The situation may be quite different in cortical areas, where typically a large fraction of spines is stable for many weeks in adult mice, unless they are subjected to behavioral training or sensory manipulations. However, whether and how spine turnover actually reflects memory-relevant functional adaptations in synaptic strength and connectivity remains to be determined.
In summary, the present work adds up to a substantial advance for the study of hippocampal synapses in living mice, extending the scope of super-resolution microscopy to a deeply embedded brain structure that is critical for memory function. By correlating spine-level structural changes with genetic, molecular and behavioral interventions and assays, our chronic super-resolution imaging approach creates manifold opportunities to study the neurobiological mechanisms and functional significance of spine plasticity in the mammalian brain.
Animals
We used adult female and male transgenic mice (Thy1-HYFP/+ and Thy1-MGFP/+, 4–12 months old) where a subset of pyramidal neurons is fluorescently labeled. The mice were group housed by gender at a day/night cycle of 12/12 hr. All procedures were in accordance with the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and approved by the Ethics Committee of Bordeaux and by the government of North Rhine Westphalia.
Hippocampal window surgery
Chronic hippocampal windows were implanted as described previously, providing optical access to the stratum oriens of the CA1 region of the hippocampus (Figure 1B). In brief, mice were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of ketamin/xylazine (0.13/0.01 mg/g bodyweight) and received subcutaneous injections of analgesics (buprenorphine, 0.05 mg/kg) and anti-inflammatory agents (dexamethasone, 0.2 mg/kg) to prevent the brain from swelling during the surgical procedure. Using a dental drill, a craniotomy of 3 mm in diameter was performed above the right hemisphere (stereotactic coordinates: anteroposterior, −2.2 mm; mediolateral, +1.8 mm relative to bregma). The dura and somatosensory cortex above the hippocampus were carefully aspirated, while leaving the external capsule of the hippocampus intact. Subsequently, a custom-made metal tube sealed with a coverslip on the bottom side (both 3 mm in diameter, height 1.5 mm and 0.13 mm) was inserted into the craniotomy and fixed to the skull with dental acrylic. Following the surgery, mice received analgesics for 3 days (buprenorphine, 0.05 mg/kg, s.c.) and were allowed to recover from the surgery for 4 weeks before experiments started.
Two-photon STED microscopy
We used a custom-made upright 2P-STED microscope (Figure 1A) based on two-photon excitation and stimulated emission depletion (STED) using pulsed lasers. Briefly, a femtosecond mode-locked Ti:Sapphire laser (Chameleon, Coherent, Santa Clara, CA) operating at 80 MHz and emitting light at 834 nm was used in combination with an optical parametric oscillator (OPO BASIC Ring fs, APE, Berlin, Germany) to produce STED light pulses at 598 nm with ~150 fs pulse duration. The pulses were stretched to ~100 ps by passing them through a glass rod and a 20 m long polarization-maintaining fiber. A STED light reflection served to synchronize a second Ti:Sapphire laser (Tsunami, Spectra Physics, Darmstadt, Germany) tuned to 910 nm and running at a repetition rate of 80 MHz, which was used for two-photon excitation of the fluorophores. Synchronization and optimal pulse delay were achieved with phase-locked loop electronics (3930, Lok-to-Clock, Spectra Physics). The STED doughnut was created by passing the STED beam through a vortex phase mask (RPC Photonics, Rochester, NY), which imposed a helical 2π-phase delay on the wave front. Wave plates (λ/2 and λ/4) were used to make the STED light circularly polarized before it entered into the objective. The 2P and STED beam were combined using a long-pass dichroic mirror. The two laser beams were moved over the sample in all three dimensions using a galvanometric x-y scanner (Janus IV, TILL Photonics) combined with a z-focusing piezo actuator (Pifoc, PI, Karlsruhe, Germany). To bridge the physical distance between the surface of the brain and the deeply embedded hippocampus, we employed a long-working distance water-immersion objective (Nikon CFI Apo 60X W NIR, 1.0 NA, 2.8 mm WD). The epi-fluorescence was de-scanned and imaged onto an avalanche photodiode (SPCM-AQR-13-FC, PerkinElmer, Villebone-sur-Yvette, France). Signal detection and peripheral hardware were controlled by the Imspector scanning software (Abberior Instruments, Göttingen, Germany) via a data acquisition card (PCIe-6259, National Instruments). Optical resolution was assessed by imaging 40 nm fluorescent nanospheres (yellow-green fluospheres, Invitrogen) immobilized on glass slides (Figure 1C). Regions of interest were consecutively imaged in 2P and 2P-STED mode (10 × 10 µm2; 10 nm pixel size; 50 µs pixel dwell time). The laser power at the sample was typically around 5–20 mW for 2P and 5–15 mW for STED.
In vivo imaging
Mice were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of ketamin/xylazine (0.13/0.01 mg/g bodyweight) and the eyes were protected with ointment (Bepanthen). The mouse was fixed to a custom-made stereotactic frame and kept at body temperature using a heating pad. For the quantification of spine density, 2P-STED and 2P images of basal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons were acquired applying identical acquisition parameters (10 × 10 × 4–8 µm3; 20–40 nm pixel size; 0.5–1 µm z-step; 20–70 µs pixel dwell time). For the chronic repetitive imaging, the position of the field of view (FOV) was registered in the first imaging session with the help of vascular landmarks and cell bodies of CA1 pyramidal neurons. This allowed for subsequent retrieval of the FOV for each mouse. An overview 2P image z-stack (100 × 100 × 20 µm3; 200 nm pixel size; 1 µm z-steps) was acquired at each time point starting from the coverslip. Subsequently, identified distal stretches of basal dendrites in CA1 stratum oriens (5–20 µm in depth) were imaged in 2P and 2P-STED mode. A single imaging session lasted for ~1 hr and mice woke up in their home cage afterwards. All mice survived the imaging sessions and recovered normally from the anesthesia. Mice were excluded from the analysis if the hippocampal window was faulty or if their fluorescence levels were too low.
Image analysis
The 2P and 2P-STED images were spatially filtered (1 pixel median filter) and their brightness and contrast were individually adjusted. Optical resolution of the 2P-STED microscope was assessed by taking images of 40 nm fluorescent nanospheres. We measured two-pixel line profiles across the nanospheres and perpendicular to the spine neck, and fitted them with a Lorentzian function, whose full-width at half maximum (FWHM) served as a measure of the spatial resolution or the neck width, respectively. Paired spine neck measurements were only done for spines where the necks could be discerned in both the 2P and 2P-STED images. Spine density was determined as described before. All dendritic spines, which extended out laterally from the dendritic shaft by more than 200 nm, were counted by manually scrolling through the z-stacks. Spine density was calculated as the number of spines divided by the dendritic length in micrometer (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). For the 4-day repetitive imaging data set, the spine density of each dendrite was determined blindly with respect to the time point of acquisition. Lost and new spines over the 4-day interval were identified by scrolling through the z-stacks in a chronological order. Spines were scored lost, if they were under the 200 nm threshold. Spines were considered new, if their position on the dendrite relative to neighboring spines shifted by ≥500 nm,. The survival fraction of spines (Fs) was calculated as the number of remaining spines at day t (Nr(t)) divided by the number of spines at day 1 (N(1)), expressed in percent:
The fraction of lost spines (Flost) was assessed for each time point by dividing the number of spines that disappeared on day t (NL(t)) by the total number of spines (N(t)):
The fraction of new spines (Fnew) was assessed for each time point by dividing the number of spines that appeared on day t (Nn(t)) by the total number of spines (N(t)):
Reconstruction of dendritic segments
To enhance contrast, raw 2P-STED image stacks were subjected to deconvolution (Huygens HuCore version 17.4, Scientific Volume Imaging b.v., Hilversum, The Netherlands) utilizing a theoretical PSF based on microscope parameters and classic maximum likelihood estimation (cmle) with a quality stop criterion of 0.01, automatic background estimation and a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 15.
After deconvolution, image stacks were 3D reconstructed in IMARIS v 8.4.1 (Bitplane AG, Zurich). Dendrites and associated spines were reconstructed semi-automatically using the Filament Tracer module. Morphological parameters of spines (mean head width, mean neck width, maximum head width, spine head volume and spine length) were measured and exported for further analysis. To quantify persistence, spines were manually traced over time by assigning individual spines of consecutive imaging sessions to each other. Morphological parameters of spines that were present in all three imaging sessions (persistence >2 days) were measured on the last imaging time point. Morphological parameters of spines that were observed for 2 days or less (persistence ≤2 days) were measured at the time point of first appearance (new spines), or at the last time point of presence (lost spines).
Cluster analysis
For the cluster analysis, the spine parameters, ratio of the mean head to neck diameters (ØHead/ØNeck), the maximum head width (Ømax Head) and spine length were taken into account. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Analysis (AHC) was performed using Python’s scikit-learn toolbox. Before cluster analysis, the parameters were centered and scaled to unit variance using the standard scaler from Python’s scikit-learn toolbox. AHC dissimilarity level was calculated based on Euclidean distance. Agglomeration was performed using Ward’s method. By fitting the hierarchical clustering to the population of all analyzed spines, we identified three clusters.
Tissue preparation and immunochemistry
All mice were injected with a lethal dose of pentobarbital (200 mg/kg, i.p., Centravet) and perfused transcardially with saline solution followed by 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M Phosphate buffer. Brains were removed, post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 6–8 hr, and then sectioned at 40 μm in the coronal plane on a vibratome (VT1200, Leica). Free floating sections were blocked and permeabilized with a blocking buffer containing 5% normal goat serum (NGS) and 0.5% TritonX-100 diluted in PBS for 1 hr at room temperature. They were then incubated with the rabbit anti-GFP (polyclonal serum 1/1000, Invitrogen) diluted in PBS containing 0.1% tween and 1% NGS for 24 hr at 4°C; and with the photostable Atto647N-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 45 min at room temperature (2 µg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich). The sections were mounted directly on coverslips (high-performance coverglass D = 0.17 ±0.005 mm refractive index = 1.526, Zeiss) using Mowiol (Mowiol 4–88 Calbiochem #475904, refractive index = 1.460) for imaging.
Fixed tissue imaging
STED images of fixed brain slices were acquired on a commercial STED microscope (Leica DMI6000 TCS SP8 X, Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany), using a 93X glycerol objective with a numerical aperture of 1.3 that was equipped with a motorized correction collar. The microscope was supplied with a white light laser 2 (WLL2) with freely tunable excitation from 470 to 670 nm. The STED module used a pulsed laser for depletion at 775 nm. Image stacks of basal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons were acquired with a pixel size of 20 nm, a z-step size of 200 nm and at a scan speed of 200 Hz using three line averages and four frame accumulations. Spine density analysis was performed as described for the in vivo image analysis (see Image Analysis).
Quantification and statistics
Quantifications and statistical analysis were performed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All data were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. For normally distributed data t-tests, either paired (data of Figures 1–3) or unpaired (Figure 4F), were performed to test for statistical significance. Not normally distributed data were tested with Mann-Whitney test (Figure 4B; Figure 4F; Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). All values are represented as mean ± sem, unless stated otherwise.
References 53
- 1.
Attardo A, Fitzgerald JE, Schnitzer MJ. Impermanence of dendritic spines in live adult CA1 hippocampus. Nature. 2015;523:592-596.
Not in our library10.1038/nature14467
- 2.
Berning S, Willig KI, Steffens H, Dibaj P, Hell SW. Nanoscopy in a living mouse brain. Science. 2012;335:551.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1215369
- 3.
Bethge P, Chéreau R, Avignone E, Marsicano G, Nägerl UV. Two-photon excitation STED microscopy in two colors in acute brain slices. Biophysical Journal. 2013;104:778-785.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.054
- 4.
Bloss EB, Cembrowski MS, Karsh B, Colonell J, Fetter RD, Spruston N. Structured Dendritic Inhibition Supports Branch-Selective Integration in CA1 Pyramidal Cells. Neuron. 2016;89:1016-1030.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.029
- 5.
Bloss EB, Cembrowski MS, Karsh B, Colonell J, Fetter RD, Spruston N. Single excitatory axons form clustered synapses onto CA1 pyramidal cell dendrites. Nature Neuroscience. 2018;21:353-363.
Not in our library10.1038/s41593-018-0084-6
- 6.
Brigman JL, Wright T, Talani G, Prasad-Mulcare S, Jinde S, Seabold GK, Mathur P, Davis MI, Bock R, Gustin RM, Colbran RJ, Alvarez VA, Nakazawa K, Delpire E, Lovinger DM, Holmes A. Loss of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors in CA1 hippocampus and cortex impairs long-term depression, reduces dendritic spine density, and disrupts learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30:4590-4600.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0640-10.2010
- 7.
Cappaert NLM, Van Strien NM, Witter MP, Paxinos G. The Rat Nervous System. 2014;1053.
Not in our library
- 8.
Dombeck DA, Harvey CD, Tian L, Looger LL, Tank DW. Functional imaging of hippocampal place cells at cellular resolution during virtual navigation. Nature Neuroscience. 2010;13:1433-1440.
Not in our library10.1038/nn.2648
- 9.
- 10.
Engert F, Bonhoeffer T. Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Nature. 1999;399:66-70.
Not in our library10.1038/19978
- 11.
Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 2000;28:41-51.
Not in our library10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00084-2
- 12.
Frankland PW, Bontempi B. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005;6:119-130.
Not in our library10.1038/nrn1607
- 13.
Fuhrmann M, Mitteregger G, Kretzschmar H, Herms J. Dendritic pathology in prion disease starts at the synaptic spine. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27:6224-6233.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5062-06.2007
- 14.
Gould TJ, Burke D, Bewersdorf J, Booth MJ. Adaptive optics enables 3D STED microscopy in aberrating specimens. Optics Express. 2012;20:20998-21009.
Not in our library10.1364/oe.20.020998
- 15.
Grutzendler J, Kasthuri N, Gan WB. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature. 2002;420:812-816.
Not in our library10.1038/nature01276
- 16.
Gu L, Kleiber S, Schmid L, Nebeling F, Chamoun M, Steffen J, Wagner J, Fuhrmann M. Long-term in vivo imaging of dendritic spines in the hippocampus reveals structural plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:13948-13953.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1464-14.2014
- 17.
Harris KM, Jensen FE, Tsao B. Three-dimensional structure of dendritic spines and synapses in rat hippocampus (CA1) at postnatal day 15 and adult ages: implications for the maturation of synaptic physiology and long-term potentiation. Journal of Neuroscience. 1992;12:2685-2705.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.12-07-02685.1992
- 18.
Harris KM, Stevens JK. Dendritic spines of CA 1 pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus: serial electron microscopy with reference to their biophysical characteristics. Journal of Neuroscience. 1989;9:2982-2997.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.09-08-02982.1989
- 19.
Hayashi-Takagi A, Yagishita S, Nakamura M, Shirai F, Wu YI, Loshbaugh AL, Kuhlman B, Hahn KM, Kasai H. Labelling and optical erasure of synaptic memory traces in the motor cortex. Nature. 2015;525:333-338.
Not in our library10.1038/nature15257
- 20.
Hell SW. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science. 2007;316:1153-1158.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1137395
- 21.
Hofer SB, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Experience leaves a lasting structural trace in cortical circuits. Nature. 2009;457:313-317.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07487
- 22.
Holtmaat A, Svoboda K. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10:647-658.
Not in our library10.1038/nrn2699
- 23.
Holtmaat A, Wilbrecht L, Knott GW, Welker E, Svoboda K. Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex. Nature. 2006;441:979-983.
Not in our library10.1038/nature04783
- 24.
Holtmaat AJ, Trachtenberg JT, Wilbrecht L, Shepherd GM, Zhang X, Knott GW, Svoboda K. Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo. Neuron. 2005;45:279-291.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.003
- 25.
Ji N. Adaptive optical fluorescence microscopy. Nature Methods. 2017;14:374-380.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.4218
- 26.
Kasai H, Fukuda M, Watanabe S, Hayashi-Takagi A, Noguchi J. Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition. Trends in Neurosciences. 2010;33:121-129.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tins.2010.01.001
- 27.
Keck T, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Vaz Afonso M, Eysel UT, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Massive restructuring of neuronal circuits during functional reorganization of adult visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2008;11:1162-1167.
Not in our library10.1038/nn.2181
- 28.
Keck T, Scheuss V, Jacobsen RI, Wierenga CJ, Eysel UT, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Loss of sensory input causes rapid structural changes of inhibitory neurons in adult mouse visual cortex. Neuron. 2011;71:869-882.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.034
- 29.
Klar TA, Jakobs S, Dyba M, Egner A, Hell SW. Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. PNAS. 2000;97:8206-8210.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.97.15.8206
- 30.
Knott GW, Holtmaat A, Wilbrecht L, Welker E, Svoboda K. Spine growth precedes synapse formation in the adult neocortex in vivo. Nature Neuroscience. 2006;9:1117-1124.
Not in our library10.1038/nn1747
- 31.
Lue N, Bewersdorf J, Lessard MD, Badizadegan K, Dasari RR, Feld MS, Popescu G. Tissue refractometry using Hilbert phase microscopy. Optics Letters. 2007;32:3522-3524.
Not in our library10.1364/ol.32.003522
- 32.
Majewska AK, Newton JR, Sur M. Remodeling of synaptic structure in sensory cortical areas in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:3021-3029.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.4454-05.2006
- 33.
Marinković S, Milisavljević M, Puskas L. Microvascular anatomy of the hippocampal formation. Surgical Neurology. 1992;37:339-349.
Not in our library10.1016/0090-3019(92)90001-4
- 34.
Matsuzaki M, Ellis-Davies GC, Nemoto T, Miyashita Y, Iino M, Kasai H. Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nature Neuroscience. 2001;4:1086-1092.
Not in our library10.1038/nn736
- 35.
Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature. 2004;429:761-766.
Not in our library10.1038/nature02617
- 36.
Mizrahi A, Crowley JC, Shtoyerman E, Katz LC. High-resolution in vivo imaging of hippocampal dendrites and spines. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24:3147-3151.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5218-03.2004
- 37.
Nägerl UV, Eberhorn N, Cambridge SB, Bonhoeffer T. Bidirectional activity-dependent morphological plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Neuron. 2004;44:759-767.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.016
- 38.
Nimchinsky EA, Sabatini BL, Svoboda K. Structure and function of dendritic spines. Annual Review of Physiology. 2002;64:313-353.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.081501.160008
- 39.
Noguchi J, Nagaoka A, Watanabe S, Ellis-Davies GC, Kitamura K, Kano M, Matsuzaki M, Kasai H. In vivo two-photon uncaging of glutamate revealing the structure-function relationships of dendritic spines in the neocortex of adult mice. The Journal of Physiology. 2011;589:2447-2457.
Not in our library10.1113/jphysiol.2011.207100
- 40.
Patton BR, Burke D, Owald D, Gould TJ, Bewersdorf J, Booth MJ. Three-dimensional STED microscopy of aberrating tissue using dual adaptive optics. Optics Express. 2016;24:8862-8876.
Not in our library10.1364/oe.24.008862
Cited by papers we hold 7
- Synaptic memory and CaMKII · 2023No notice
- Neuronal Activity at Synapse Resolution: Reporters and Effectors for Synaptic Neuroscience · 2020Not checked
- Structural basis of astrocytic Ca2+ signals at tripartite synapses · 2020Corrected
- The brain in motion: How ensemble fluidity drives memory-updating and flexibility · 2020No notice
- Dendritic Spine Plasticity: Function and Mechanisms · 2020No notice
- Glial Contribution to Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Loss in Neurodegeneration · 2019No notice
- Pre-plaque Aß-Mediated Impairment of Synaptic Depotentiation in a Transgenic Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Amyloidosis · 2019Not checked
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.