No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.
CryoEM structures of membrane pore and prepore complex reveal cytolytic mechanism of Pneumolysin
Katharina van Pee, Alexander Neuhaus, Edoardo D'Imprima and 3 more
eLife · 2017 · CC BY
Abstract
Many pathogenic bacteria produce pore-forming toxins to attack and kill human cells. We have determined the 4.5 Å structure of the ~2.2 MDa pore complex of pneumolysin, the main virulence factor of Streptococcus pneumoniae, by cryoEM. The pneumolysin pore is a 400 Å ring of 42 membrane-inserted monomers. Domain 3 of the soluble toxin refolds into two ~85 Å β-hairpins that traverse the lipid bilayer and assemble into a 168-strand β-barrel. The pore complex is stabilized by salt bridges between β-hairpins of adjacent subunits and an internal α-barrel. The apolar outer barrel surface with large sidechains is immersed in the lipid bilayer, while the inner barrel surface is highly charged. Comparison of the cryoEM pore complex to the prepore structure obtained by electron cryo-tomography and the x-ray structure of the soluble form reveals the detailed mechanisms by which the toxin monomers insert into the lipid bilayer to perforate the target membrane.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Gram-positive bacteria, including the common wound-infecting Staphylococcus aureus, the virulent food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae that causes pneumonia, utilize cholesterol-dependent cytolysins (CDCs) to attack and kill mammalian and human cells. The bacteria produce and release CDCs as water-soluble monomers that attach to cholesterol-containing cell membranes, where they assemble into large, 200–500 Å cytolytic pores. X-ray structures of pneumolysin (PLY) from S. pneumoniae show that the soluble toxin monomers are roughly rod-shaped and consist of four domains (D1-D4). Sequence comparison suggests that all CDCs have the same domain structure and therefore insert into target membranes in essentially the same way. Although numerous biochemical studies have addressed the arrangement of monomers in the CDC prepore or pore complex and how they might penetrate the lipid bilayer, the detailed structure of the pore complex, and hence the exact mechanism of membrane insertion is unknown. The size heterogeneity of CDC prepores and pores has so far precluded structure determination at high resolution. We determined the structure of the ring-shaped ~2.2 MDa PLY pore complex by cryoEM. Together with our 2.4 Å x-ray structure of soluble PLY and a map of the prepore complex obtained by electron cryo-tomography, we can now describe the entire process of membrane attachment, prepore and pore formation in near-atomic detail. Given the high degree of sequence conservation amongst CDCs, it is likely that the same mechanism of membrane insertion holds for related bacterial toxins.
CryoEM structure of the PLY pore complex
Ring-shaped pore complexes of wildtype PLY (PLYWT) forming on unilamellar, cholesterol-containing liposomes were solubilized with detergent. The size and homogeneity of solubilized PLY pores is detergent-dependent, as indicated by negative-stain and cryoEM (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Pore diameters varied from 310 to 500 Å in DDM or 350 to 400 Å in Cymal-6. Replacing the detergent Cymal-6 by amphipol A8-35 resulted in a stable population that was sufficiently homogenous for single-particle cryoEM. 2D class averages indicated a roughly even distribution of views (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). Pore complexes were rings of 42 subunits with an aggregate molecular mass of 2.2 MDa. In total, 6461 ring images were combined to generate a 3D map with 42-fold symmetry at 4.5 Å resolution (Figure 1; Figure 1—figure supplements 2B and 3,). The final map of the pore complex has an outer diameter of 400 Å and a total height of 110 Å, of which ~80 Å protrudes from the membrane surface (Figure 1).
Where possible, individual domains of the PLY x-ray structure were moved manually into the 4.5 Å cryoEM map as rigid bodies. Rebuilding of domains that refolded upon membrane insertion and readjustment of secondary structure elements and sidechains within domains yielded an atomic model of the pore complex (Figure 1). Comparison to the soluble form (Figure 2A,B) revealed a complete reorganization of the toxin upon membrane insertion. Of the four protein domains D1-D4 in the x-ray structure, D1 and D4 fitted the map of the pore complex with minimal modifications (Figure 2—figure supplements 1–3, Video 1). In the membrane-inserted form, the loop linking D1 to D2 refolds into a helix (α3a) at the interface between the rearranged domains D1, D2 and D3 (Figures 2A,E, 3 and 4; Figure 2—figure supplement 4). In D4, the highly conserved undecapeptide loop (Figure 3) that renders PLY cholesterol-specific was shifted by up to ~9 Å into the cryoEM map (Figure 2—figure supplements 2 and 3, Video 1). The undecapeptide loops of adjacent protomers in the pore complex are located in one plane on the outer membrane surface of the target cell, where they interact closely with the lipid head groups (Figures 1B and 2A,C). In the linear rows of soluble PLY monomers that are found in the PLY crystal structures, the distance between the loops of neighbouring monomers is ~14 Å. In the pore complex this distance decreases to 4–5 Å, which enables an interaction of the loop that connects β-strands 18 and 19 (β18/19) in D4 with the β22/23 loop in D4 of the next monomer along the ring (Figure 2—figure supplements 2 and 3, Video 1). The close proximity of loop β18/19 that contains Asp403, Thr405, and His407 of one monomer to loop β18/19 and the uncedapeptide containing Trp433 of the adjacent monomer suggests a critical role of these D4 loops not only in receptor recognition, but also in oligomer formation.
Domains 2 and 3 undergo massive rearrangement and refolding (Figure 2A,B) in the membrane-inserted form. The elongated two-stranded β-sheet of D2 rotates from its vertical position in the x-ray structure by 90° around a short glycine linker to an orientation parallel to the membrane plane in the pore complex. D2 connects D1 to D4, and its rotation results in a roughly linear translation of D1 by 35 Å towards the membrane surface and by 30 Å towards the pore centre. Otherwise, D2 required only minor adjustments of secondary structure for an optimal fit to the cryoEM map (Figures 1B and 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 5).
By contrast, the structure of D3 changes entirely upon membrane insertion. In the soluble toxin, the central, five-stranded β-sheet in D3 is flanked by two bundles of short α-helices (Figure 2B). In the pore complex, both bundles refold into four 85 Å β-strands, which form two parallel β-hairpins that insert into and traverse the lipid bilayer (Figure 2A). The β-hairpins of neighbouring subunits coalesce into one extensive, 168-strand β-barrel with an inner diameter of 260 Å (Figure 1B). The new β-strands can be traced unambiguously, because they are straight, apparently rigid and continuous with four β-strands in the D3 x-ray structure that are preserved in the membrane form. The two new, long β-hairpins are inclined by 20° relative to the membrane normal, in good agreement with predictions for perfringolysin O on the basis of cysteine crosslinking experiments. The chain trace in the refolded domain is confirmed by the positions of bulky densities for large sidechains in the β-barrel (Figure 2D; Figure 2—figure supplement 4). While five of the six helices in bundles HB1 and HB2 refold into β-strands in the pore complex, one remains intact. Conversely, the loop and fifth β-strand in the central β-sheet of D3 refold into a helix (Figure 2A,B). Together, the two α-helices form a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). In the ring, the HTH motifs of the 42 subunits line up in one plane on the exoplasmic side of the molecule and form an α-barrel inside the β-barrel (Figures 1B and 4), restricting the pore diameter locally to 250 Å (Figure 1B).
The outside of the membrane-inserted part of the β-barrel is almost entirely hydrophobic (Figure 5A,E) and covered by the toroid density of disordered amphipol that replaces the membrane lipid (Figure 1B), as in the cryoEM structures of amphipol-solubilized membrane proteins. The inside pore surface is highly polar, with three aspartates and two glutamates forming a 15 by 9 Å patch of negative charge, flanked above and below by positive charges (Figure 5B,F,G). Apart from the hydrogen bonds between the 168 β-strands in the barrel and the interactions of helix α3a with D1 and β-hairpin one (Figure 2E, Figure 2—figure supplement 4), three other factors contribute to pore stability: (1) the surface and charge complementarity of the membrane-inserted monomers (Figure 5C); (2) the alternating positive and negative charges of helices α13a and α13b in the α-barrel (Figure 5D); and (3) ionic interactions between charged sidechains in adjacent β-strands of the pore barrel (Figure 5G). In particular, Asp168 and Glu170 in β-strand β7 are in a good position for forming a salt bridge with Lys271 in β-strand β10 of the next-door monomer (Figure 5G).
Three stages of PLY pore formation
To investigate the structures of the PLY prepore and pore complex in native membranes prior to detergent solubilisation, we incubated cholesterol-containing liposomes with purified PLY and generated 3D volumes by electron cryo-tomography (cryoET). The liposomes were studded with numerous ring-shaped complexes of 290 to 360 Å outer diameter (Figure 6A). Assemblies were identified as PLY pores or prepores by the absence or presence of a lipid bilayer within the ring (Figure 7A). Pore and prepore complexes were classified independently and processed by subtomogram averaging (Figure 6B). The subtomogram average map of the prepore complex at a resolution of 22 Å (Figure 6C) had an outer diameter of 320 Å and accommodated 34 subunits (Figure 6D). Of the available PLY crystal structures, the model 5cr6 fitted the map best (Figure 6—figure supplement 1), indicating that in this structure the soluble toxin is in the pre-pore state. The subtomogram average map of the pore complex at 27 Å resolution (Figure 6C) indicated a slightly larger diameter of around 350 Å, but likewise consisted of 34 subunits (Figure 6E). The cross-section profile resembled that of the high-resolution cryoEM map of the pore complex closely (Figure 1), indicating that solubilisation with detergent or amphipol does not change the structure of the membrane form significantly. The model of membrane-inserted PLY fitted the subtomogram average of the pore complex without significant adjustment, including the 20° inclination of the long β-hairpins relative to the membrane normal.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) had revealed two different forms of PLY prepores in planar bilayers, rising 110 or 80 Å above the membrane surface. The low form has the same height as the pore complex, but the lipid bilayer is still intact. We propose that in this lower prepore, D1, D2 and D4 have moved to their positions in the pore assembly, while D3 has not yet refolded and the long, membrane-spanning β-hairpins have not yet formed. We assign the tall form to an early prepore state, which then rearranges into the lower, late prepore state. The cross-section profile (Figure 6B,D) shows that the early prepore is essentially a ring-shaped side-by-side arrangement of soluble PLY monomers (Figure 6—figure supplement 1), similar to that in the crystal lattice. While the late prepore was observed for 13% of the rings on planar bilayers examined by AFM, it was not observed in tomographic volumes of PLY on liposomes, implying that it is an intermediate, transient state which inserts more readily into curved liposomes than into planar bilayers. Cross-sections of pore complexes in liposomes (Figure 6B,E) show that the lipid bilayer around the prepores and pores is curved, whereas in the AFM images it was flat. Prepore stability and membrane insertion thus seem to be related to membrane curvature, such that pores form preferentially in lipid bilayers with a convex curvature.
Determinants of lytic activity
To understand the functional role of individual sidechains in oligomerization, prepore and pore formation, we mutated Asp168 that, as the structure suggests, might be involved in forming a salt bridge between adjacent subunits to alanine (PLYD168A). We also deleted Ala146 and Arg147 (PLYΔ146/147) in the loop that would clash with the last β-strand of the central β-sheet. The resulting mutants were characterized by negative-stain EM (Figure 7A), hemolytic activity assays (Figure 7B), and x-ray crystallography (Figure 8). X-ray data were collected to 2.45 and 2.5 Å resolution from crystals of PLYD168A and PLYΔ146/147 (Table 1). The structures were solved by molecular replacement with the x-ray structure of PLYWT. As in PLYWT, the mutant monomers crystallized in rows. Superposition of both structures on PLYWT showed no significant overall differences, although a detailed comparison indicated small changes in domain D2, helix bundle HB2 and in two of the D4 loops (Figure 8). Around the mutated residue in PLYD168A differences were restricted to sidechain orientations, while the deletion of two residues in PLYΔ146/147 caused significant conformational changes in the loop connecting helix α5 to strand β7 of the central β-sheet. This deletion also caused a slight shift of helix α5 towards D3 (Figure 8).
Even though the structures of PLYD168A and PLYΔ146/147 were very similar to PLYWT, they displayed major differences in their membrane-binding and oligomerization behaviour. Like PLYWT, PLYD168A bound to cholesterol-containing liposomes and oligomerized into rings (Figure 7A). However, unlike PLYWT that lysed the liposomes within a short time, liposomes incubated with PLYD168A remained intact for hours. Frequently, the rings detached from the liposomes, indicating they were prepores that had not yet inserted into the membrane. This is also reflected by the hemolytic activity, which was reduced by 80% compared to PLYWT, highlighting the important role of Asp168 in ionic interactions between β-strands that stabilize the pore complex.
PLYΔ146/147 was not able to bind to the membranes at all and had no detectable hemolytic activity (Figure 7B). Ionic interactions between the β-strands thus contribute significantly to pore stability, and any disruption of these interactions compromises pore formation. Both mutations pinpoint protein regions that are promising targets for drug development. Drugs that interfere with these interactions would render the toxin ineffective, and the bacteria that produce it non-pathogenic.
Discussion
With the ongoing resolution revolution in cryoEM, structures of macromolecular assemblies can now be determined at high resolution without crystals. This is proving especially useful for membrane proteins and membrane protein complexes, which tend to be unstable and flexible, and often do not crystallize. In the case of CDC pore complexes, structure determination represents a particular challenge, because they consist of variable numbers of 30 to 50 monomers, and hence are intrinsically inhomogeneous. This fact has so far precluded structure determination of the membrane-attached or membrane-inserted form at high resolution. By a rigorous screen of the detergents used for solubilisation and purification of the pore complex from cholesterol-containing liposomes we were able to isolate a suitably homogenous population. Exchanging the detergent against amphipols appeared to stabilize rings of uniform size, as an important prerequisite for high-resolution single-particle cryoEM. The number of monomers in the amphipol-stabilized complexes was higher than in the prepores or the pores imaged by cryoET, even though the liposomes were prepared in the same way. This means that either the number of subunits in the ring varies from one liposome preparation to another, or that the rings rearrange into a more stable form upon detergent solubilisation, which we consider more likely. Interestingly, an earlier, low-resolution cryoEM structure of PLY pores and prepores in lipid bilayers deduced that there were 31 ± 3 subunits in the prepore and 38 or 44 in the pore complex, in good agreement with our findings. Since the PLY pores in our subtomogram averages were smaller, consisting of 34 rather than 42 subunits, it seems that the rings can grow in the membrane by incorporating further subunits. Apparently, complexes of 42 monomers are more stable than both larger and smaller rings. The inherent variability in ring size restricts the number of particles that can be averaged in any one class. Moreover, the large ring-shaped assemblies are easily distorted and rarely, if ever, perfectly circular, which limits the accuracy to which they can be aligned by image processing. Both factors constrain the attainable resolution of the cryoEM reconstruction.
Earlier cryoEM work, AFM and FRET studies have described the vertical height change of the prepore upon membrane insertion in terms of a collapse or unfolding of D2. Our atomic model of the pore complex now shows that this change is due to a rigid-body rotation of D2, in which the structure of the domain remains intact. Time-lapse AFM of PLY and listeriolysin (LLO) on planar membranes indicated that the vertical height change is not directly linked to pore formation, in line with a mechanism that involves two different prepore states that we refer to as the early and late prepore. Our model of the late prepore monomer (Figure 9) is an intermediate between the x-ray structure of the soluble form and the cryoEM structure of the membrane-inserted form. The 5-stranded central β-sheet in the crystal structure of D3 fits into the cryoET map of the early prepore complex without any modification, but the late prepore model indicates a potential steric clash between the short β-strand in the central β-sheet of D3 and the adjacent monomer. The pivotal role of the loop that contains residues 145–147 connecting helix α5 of D1 to β7 of β-hairpin one is underlined by mutant PLYΔ146/147 that was completely inactive and did not even bind to liposomes (Figure 7A). The detachment of PLYD168A rings indicates that the mutant does not insert into the membrane as easily as PLYWT to form pores. We have shown by time-lapse AFM that pore formation is irreversible. Therefore the rings that become detached from the membrane are prepores, not pores.
In earlier models of pore formation, the conserved domain D4 (Figure 3) was thought to be important for toxin targeting, receptor recognition and binding to cholesterol-containing membranes, whereas oligomer formation was mainly attributed to intermolecular interactions via D1 and D3. It has however been shown that D4 of streptolysin, pyolysin and LLO can oligomerise by itself on cholesterol crystals or erythrocyte ghosts. Our cryoEM structure confirms that D4 can indeed play a role in oligomer formation through intra- and intermolecular interactions of its loops (Figure 2—figure supplements 2 and 3). Loop β22/23 and the conserved undecapeptide loop with Trp433 at its tip appear to interact with loop β18/19 of the neighbouring monomer, thereby stabilizing the pore complex by inter- and intramolecular interactions (Figure 2—figure supplements 2 and 3).
The surface charge distribution on the toxin monomers is critical for CDC activity. Modification of surface charges affects ring formation, as we demonstrated by mutagenesis both for LLO and PLY. The alternating positive and negative charges of the HTH motif (Figure 5D) and the positive charges at the tips of the β-hairpins (Figure 5E,F) demonstrate the importance of charge complementarity for PLY ring formation. A similar HTH motif was found in the 8 Å cryoEM map of poly-C9 component of the human membrane attack complex. This HTH motif was already present in the soluble monomer of the C6 component As in PLY, the HTH in the poly-C9 pore forms an α-barrel that determines the effective pore diameter.
Together with the x-ray structure of the soluble form, our cryoEM structures of the pore and prepore explain the step-by-step process of membrane insertion and pore formation in near-atomic detail. Movies showing the transition from the soluble monomer to the pore complex via the intermediate stages of the early and late prepore illustrate the complete mechanism of pore formation (Videos 2–4). In the early prepore, PLY monomers assemble side by side into rings on the membrane surface. In the late prepore, the D3 helices are poised for re-folding immediately above membrane surface. Helix unfolding may be a stochastic yet cooperative event, such that the spontaneous transition of one monomer triggers the refolding of its neighbours in the ring, comparable to a zipper. As the 168-strand β-barrel assembles in the membrane, the charged patches on its inside surface would repel any trapped hydrophobic lipid. Most likely the lipid is pushed out of the nascent pore by successively inserted toxin monomers, rather than being ejected in the form of micelles or small vesicles, as has been proposed for suilysin. Upon pore formation, the membrane potential collapses, the cytoplasm leaks out and the cell dies.
The mechanism of membrane insertion by rearrangement of the conserved domains 1–4 is likely to be the same for all CDCs. Therefore, compounds that interfere with refolding and membrane insertion of soluble monomers would prevent infection by Streptococcus pneumonia and other CDC-producing Gram-positive bacteria that attack human cells with similar pore-forming toxins. The 4.5 Å cryoEM structure of the PLY pore complex thus paves the way towards the design of new drugs that inhibit pore formation as a promising approach towards combatting infections by dangerous and wide-spread Gram-positive pathogens.
Protein expression and purification
The gene coding for N-terminal His6-tagged PLY was inserted into the pET15b vector. E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed with the expression plasmid were grown in TB medium containing 50 µg · ml−1 ampicillin. Protein expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside upon reaching an optical density of one at 600 nm. After 4 hr at 37°C the cells were pelleted, resuspended in Buffer A (50 mM Tris pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 30 mM Imidazole, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and disrupted with a Microfluidizer (M-110L, Microfluidics Corp., Newton, MA). PLY was purified on a HisTrap FF column, equilibrated with Buffer A. The protein was eluted in Buffer A containing 300 mM imidazole. Protein fractions were pooled and diluted in 50 mM Tris pH 7.0, 5 mM β−mercaptoethanol to a final NaCl concentration of 50 mM. The His6-tag was removed by overnight cleavage with thrombin at 4°C. The protein was further purified on a HiTrap Q FF ion-exchange column equilibrated in Buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol). PLY was eluted in Buffer B containing 170 mM NaCl. Protein fractions were pooled, concentrated to 10 mg · ml−1 and stored at −80°C.
Site-directed mutagenesis and hemolysis assays
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed with the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the wildtype construct as a template. All constructs were verified by nucleotide sequencing. The hemolytic activity of PLY was determined by lysis of sheep red blood cells (SRBC). Purified protein was serially diluted in hemolysis buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate pH 6.6, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 0.1% (v/v) BSA) in final volumes of 50 µl and incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 50 µl of a suspension of SRBC (I08 ml−1). Release of hemoglobin was monitored by recording the absorbance at 405 nm. The amount of toxin necessary to lyse 50% of erythrocytes was determined and expressed as percentage of the value for PLYWT. The absorbance upon incubation with 1% Triton-X100 was used as reference value for 100% lysis of erythrocytes. Three independent measurements were performed for each PLY mutant.
Liposome preparation and amphipol stabilization
A lipid mixture containing 70 mol-% di-oleyl phosphatidyl choline (DOPC) and 30 mol-% cholesterol in chloroform was dried under a constant nitrogen stream. The lipid film was taken up in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol at a final concentration of 10 mg · ml−1 and stirred overnight at room temperature. After three freeze-thaw cycles (liquid nitrogen, 37°C), the suspension was passed through an extruder to obtain unilamellar ~200 nm liposomes. The extruded liposomes were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −20°C. The liposome suspension was incubated with PLY at a final lipid-to-protein ratio of 1:2 (wt/wt) at 37°C for 30 min. For the preparation of PLY pore complexes, the proteoliposomes were solubilized at a final concentration of 0.56% Cymal-6 at room temperature overnight. Amphipol A8-35 was added in fivefold molar excess and the suspension was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Detergent was removed by dialysis against 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol at room temperature for 72 hr.
Specimen preparation for negative-stain EM
PLY mutant pores were compared to wildtype protein formed on planar lipid layers or cholesterol-containing liposomes prepared as above. The liposome mixture was diluted to a final concentration of 0.5 mg · ml−1 and 25 µg · ml−1 PLY was added. Planar lipid bilayers and PLY were incubated in Teflon well plates. 25 µg · ml−1 PLY in reaction buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) was transferred into a well and overlaid with a droplet of a 0.5 mg · ml−1 DOPC/cholesterol solution (1:1 molar ratio) in chloroform. Planar lipid layers formed upon chloroform evaporation. Wells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, after which PLY-containing membranes were transferred to EM grids and stained with 1% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate. Negatively stained specimens were examined in an FEI Tecnai Spirit electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV. Images were recorded on a 2 K Gatan CCD camera at a magnification of 25,000x–45,000x and ∼1.0–1.5 µm underfocus.
Single-particle cryoEM and image processing
Amphipol-solubilized PLY pores were diluted to a final concentration of 1 mg · ml−1. A 3 µl aliquot was applied to freshly glow-discharged R2/2 holey carbon grids (Quantifoil Micro Tools, Jena, Germany), blotted for 3 to 4 s at 10°C and 100% humidity in a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI). Preferential orientation of toxin rings on the air-water interface was overcome by carbon backing. Dose-fractionated 6.0 s movies of 30 frames with an electron dose of 1.02 e- · (Å2 · frame)−1 were recorded after coma-free alignment with an FEI Polara electron microscope operating at 300 kV with 0.5–3.6 µm underfocus and a specimen pixel size of 1.4 Å on a K2 Summit direct electron detection camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, USA) operating in counting mode with an energy filter slit of 20 eV. Movie frames were corrected for beam-induced motion with Motioncorr and again with UNBLUR, which also applied a dose-dependent filter. The contrast transfer function of each image was determined using CTFFIND3. A total of 12308 particle images were hand-picked from 983 micrographs in RELION 1.3 or 1.4 and extracted into 360-pixel boxes. Initial 2D classification indicated that rings with 42-fold symmetry were most common, although rings with different symmetries were also present. For 3D classification in RELION, the pore structure of suilysin (EMD-2983) low-pass filtered to 50 Å was used as a reference. For the next processing step, the unsymmetrized low-resolution PLY map was used as the reference. Subsequent 3D classification yielded three classes, of which two had clear 42-fold symmetry. Rings that were distorted, damaged or of different size were sorted out at the 3D classification stage. A total of 6461 particles from 3D classes of 42-fold symmetry were auto-refined in RELION. A B-factor of −175 Å2 for map sharpening was determined using the modulation transfer function of the K2 Summit detector. The resolution of the processed data after B-factor sharpening was 4.5 Å (FSC0.143), with an estimated orientation accuracy of 0.75°. Local resolution was assessed with RELION 2.0.
CryoET of PLY prepores and pores
Preformed liposomes were incubated with PLY (1 mg · ml−1) at room temperature for 30 min to obtain prepores, or at 37°C for 30–180 min to obtain pores. For cryoET the liposomes were diluted 1:3 with buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and then 1:1 with 6 nm gold particles conjugated with protein A (Aurion) as fiducial markers. Samples of 3 µl were applied to glow-discharged Quantifoil EM grids (R2/2, Cu 300 mesh), excess liquid was blotted off with filter paper (Whatman #4) and samples were vitrified by plunge-freezing into liquid ethane. Single-axis tilt series were typically collected from −62° to +62° at 2° increments and 3–4 µm underfocus with a total electron dose of 60–80 e- · Å-2, on a Tecnai Polara electron microscope equipped with a field emisson gun operating at 300 kV (FEI, Hillsboro, OR), a post-column energy filter (GIF Quantum, Gatan) and a K2 summit direct electron detector (Gatan). Images were recorded in counting mode with a pixel size of 0.35 nm. Tilt series were CTF-corrected, binned 2 × 2 and aligned. Tomographic volumes were generated by weighted back projection in IMOD.
Sub-tomogram averaging
For particle picking and initial rounds of sub-tomogram averaging, tomograms were filtered by nonlinear anisotropic diffusion to enhance contrast. Ring-shaped complexes were picked manually in 3dmod. A total of 752 prepore complexes and 2400 pore complexes were picked for averaging. Ring volumes were pre-aligned in one plane in 2 × 2 binned unfiltered tomograms. All prepores had roughly the same size and shape and were averaged in PEET. The average volume was used as an initial reference for symmetry determination by sub-tomogram averaging with IMOD. Symmetries of 42-fold or lower were applied to each prepore volume on a trial-and-error basis. Volumes were aligned and averaged in an iterative process, which converged within about 15 iterations on an average volume with clear 34-fold symmetry. The best 70% of the prepore volumes contributed to the final average, in which 34 PLY monomers were resolved in the ring.
Pore complexes were separated into seven classes according to their shape and diameter by principal component analysis and clusterPCA in IMOD. The best class with 844 pore complexes was used for further processing as described above. In the final pore complex average, individual subunits were clearly distinguished in one third of the ring, indicating some heterogeneity of ring size and symmetry (Figure 5B). The number of PLY monomers in the pore was determined as 34 from the angular distance between distinct subunits in the average volume and the ring diameter. As for the prepores, all averaging steps were performed in PEET. The resolution at FSC0.5 was 27 Å for the pore and 22 Å for the prepore (Figure 6c). At FSC0.3, the resolution of the pore and prepore complex would be 21 Å and 20 Å, respectively.
Model building and analysis
Model building was performed in COOT based on the x-ray structure of the water-soluble PLY monomer (pdb 5a0d;. Initially, individual domains in the x-ray structure of soluble PLY were fitted manually into the cryoEM map as rigid bodies using COOT. Refolded or flexible protein regions were re-fitted manually, followed by geometry regularization in COOT. The complete backbone of PLY was traced in the pore complex map. Densities of bulky side chains were observed in well-ordered regions. The transmembrane β-hairpins, which form upon unfolding of HB1 and HB2 in domain 3 were readily fitted to the map density. The pore model with 42 subunits was generated in UCSF Chimera. Sub-tomogram average maps of the PLY prepore were fitted in UCSF Chimera with the x-ray structures of the PLY monomer (pdb 5cr6;). Sub-tomogram averages of the pore complex were fitted with the cryoEM structure of the membrane-inserted form. Figures were drawn with PyMol. FSC curves of model versus map were calculated using the EMAN package.
Crystallization, data collection, structure determination, and refinement
Intitial crystallization trials were carried out with a protein concentration of 8 mg · ml−1 (PLYD168A) or 10 mg · ml−1 (PLYΔ146/147) after addition of glycerol to a final concentration of 10% in 96-well plates by vapour diffusion. 300 nl of protein solution were mixed with 300 nl of a commercially available crystallization solution (PGA Screen from Molecular Dimensions, JB Screen Classics I from Jena Bioscience, and Classics I Suite from Qiagen) in a pipetting robot (Mosquito, TTP Labtech). Hanging drops were incubated over 100 µl of reservoir solution at 18°C. Initial crystals hits were refined by varying the protein-to-reservoir ratio with a drop volume of 3 µl, incubated over 500 µl reservoirs at 18°C in 24-well plates. PLYD168A crystals grew after one day at 18°C in a 3 µl drop of 1.5 µl protein solution (8 mg · ml-1 in 10% glycerol) and 1.5 µl of reservoir solution (0.1 M sodium cacodylate pH 6.5, 1% PGA-LM, 0.2 M potassium bromide and 0.2 M potassium thiocyanate). PLYΔ146/147 crystals grew in a few days at 18°C in a 3 µl drop of 2.0 µl protein solution (10 mg · ml-1 in 10% glycerol) and 1.0 µl of reservoir solution (0.1 M imidazole pH 6.5 and 1.2 M sodium acetate). Crystals were transferred to reservoir solution as a cryo-protectant and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Data were collected at beamline PXII (Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland) under a constant stream of cold nitrogen gas (100 K). Data processing, integration and scaling was performed with the XDS package. Structures of the PLY mutants were solved by molecular replacement with PLYWT (pdb-id 4AOD) as a search model using PHASER in the CCP4 software package. The initial electron density map was improved by cycles of density modification, automatic model building in RESOLVE and refinement by REFMAC. The model was subjected to iterative rounds of rebuilding into 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc maps using COOT and refined with the phenix.refine subroutine in the PHENIX program suite. Data collection, refinement, and model statistics are summarized in Table 1. Figures were generated with PyMOL.
Accession numbers
The cryoEM density map has been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under the accession number EMD-4118. The structure coordinates have been deposited in the protein data bank under accession number 5LY6 (PLY pore complex), 5AOE (PLYD168A) and 5AOF (PLYΔ146/147)
References 57
- 1.
Aleshin AE, Schraufstatter IU, Stec B, Bankston LA, Liddington RC, DiScipio RG. Structure of complement C6 suggests a mechanism for initiation and unidirectional, sequential assembly of membrane attack complex (MAC). Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:10210-10222.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111.327809
- 2.
Allegretti M, Klusch N, Mills DJ, Vonck J, Kühlbrandt W, Davies KM. Horizontal membrane-intrinsic α-helices in the stator a-subunit of an F-type ATP synthase. Nature. 2015;521:237-240.
Not in our library10.1038/nature14185
- 3.
Allegretti M, Mills DJ, McMullan G, Kühlbrandt W, Vonck J. Atomic model of the F420-reducing [NiFe] hydrogenase by electron cryo-microscopy using a direct electron detector. eLife. 2014;3:e01963.
Not in our library10.7554/elife.01963
- 4.
Althoff T, Mills DJ, Popot JL, Kühlbrandt W. Arrangement of electron transport chain components in bovine mitochondrial supercomplex I1III2IV1. The EMBO Journal. 2011;30:4652-4664.
Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2011.324
- 5.
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography. 1994;50:760-763.
Not in our library10.1107/s0907444994003112
- 6.
Czajkowsky DM, Hotze EM, Shao Z, Tweten RK. Vertical collapse of a cytolysin prepore moves its transmembrane beta-hairpins to the membrane. The EMBO Journal. 2004;23:3206-3215.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7600350
- 7.
Dang TX, Hotze EM, Rouiller I, Tweten RK, Wilson-Kubalek EM. Prepore to pore transition of a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin visualized by electron microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology. 2005;150:100-108.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2005.02.003
- 8.
Darji A, Chakraborty T, Niebuhr K, Tsonis N, Wehland J, Weiss S. Hyperexpression of listeriolysin in the nonpathogenic species Listeria innocua and high yield purification. Journal of Biotechnology. 1995;43:205-212.
Not in our library10.1016/0168-1656(95)00138-7
- 9.
Dubochet J, Adrian M, Chang JJ, Homo JC, Lepault J, McDowall AW, Schultz P. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 1988;21:129-228.
Not in our library10.1017/s0033583500004297
- 10.
Dudkina NV, Spicer BA, Reboul CF, Conroy PJ, Lukoyanova N, Elmlund H, Law RH, Ekkel SM, Kondos SC, Goode RJ, Ramm G, Whisstock JC, Saibil HR, Dunstone MA. Structure of the poly-C9 component of the complement membrane attack complex. Nature Communications. 2016;7:10588.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms10588
- 11.
Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography. 2004;60:2126-2132.
Not in our library10.1107/s0907444904019158
- 12.
Farrand AJ, LaChapelle S, Hotze EM, Johnson AE, Tweten RK. Only two amino acids are essential for cytolytic toxin recognition of cholesterol at the membrane surface. PNAS. 2010;107:4341-4346.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0911581107
- 13.
Frangakis AS, Hegerl R. Noise reduction in electron tomographic reconstructions using nonlinear anisotropic diffusion. Journal of Structural Biology. 2001;135:239-250.
Not in our library10.1006/jsbi.2001.4406
- 14.
Gilbert RJ. Inactivation and activity of cholesterol-dependent cytolysins: what structural studies tell us. Structure. 2005;13:1097-1106.
Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2005.04.019
- 15.
- 16.
Gu J, Wu M, Guo R, Yan K, Lei J, Gao N, Yang M. The architecture of the mammalian respirasome. Nature. 2016;537:639-643.
Not in our library10.1038/nature19359
- 17.
- 18.
Harris JR, Lewis RJ, Baik C, Pokrajac L, Billington SJ, Palmer M. Cholesterol microcrystals and cochleate cylinders: attachment of pyolysin oligomers and domain 4. Journal of Structural Biology. 2011;173:38-45.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2010.07.010
- 19.
Hotze EM, Tweten RK. Membrane assembly of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysin pore complex. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2012;1818:1028-1038.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.036
- 20.
Kabsch W. Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 1993;26:795-800.
Not in our library10.1107/s0021889893005588
- 21.
- 22.
Kirkham LA, Kerr AR, Douce GR, Paterson GK, Dilts DA, Liu DF, Mitchell TJ. Construction and immunological characterization of a novel nontoxic protective pneumolysin mutant for use in future pneumococcal vaccines. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74:586-593.
Not in our library10.1128/iai.74.1.586-593.2006
- 23.
Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. Journal of Structural Biology. 1996;116:71-76.
Not in our library10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013
- 24.
Köster S, van Pee K, Hudel M, Leustik M, Rhinow D, Kühlbrandt W, Chakraborty T, Yildiz Ö. Crystal structure of listeriolysin O reveals molecular details of oligomerization and pore formation. Nature Communications. 2014;5:3690.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms4690
- 25.
Kühlbrandt W. Biochemistry. The resolution revolution. Science. 2014;343:1443-1444.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1251652
- 26.
Lawrence SL, Feil SC, Morton CJ, Farrand AJ, Mulhern TD, Gorman MA, Wade KR, Tweten RK, Parker MW. Crystal structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin provides key insights into early steps of pore formation. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:14352.
Not in our library10.1038/srep14352
- 27.
Letts JA, Fiedorczuk K, Sazanov LA. The architecture of respiratory supercomplexes. Nature. 2016;537:644-648.
Not in our library10.1038/nature19774
- 28.
- 29.
Li X, Mooney P, Zheng S, Booth CR, Braunfeld MB, Gubbens S, Agard DA, Cheng Y. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nature Methods. 2013;10:584-590.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2472
- 30.
Liao M, Cao E, Julius D, Cheng Y. Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature. 2013;504:107-112.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12822
- 31.
Lu P, Bai XC, Ma D, Xie T, Yan C, Sun L, Yang G, Zhao Y, Zhou R, Scheres SH, Shi Y. Three-dimensional structure of human γ-secretase. Nature. 2014;512:166-170.
Not in our library10.1038/nature13567
- 32.
Marshall JE, Faraj BH, Gingras AR, Lonnen R, Sheikh MA, El-Mezgueldi M, Moody PC, Andrew PW, Wallis R. The crystal structure of pneumolysin at 2.0 å resolution reveals the molecular packing of the pre-pore complex. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:13293.
Not in our library10.1038/srep13293
- 33.
- 34.
Mindell JA, Grigorieff N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology. 2003;142:334-347.
Not in our library10.1016/s1047-8477(03)00069-8
- 35.
Mulvihill E, van Pee K, Mari SA, Müller DJ, Yildiz Ö. Directly observing the lipid-dependent self-assembly and pore-forming mechanism of the cytolytic toxin listeriolysin O. Nano Letters. 2015;15:6965-6973.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02963
- 36.
Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography. 1997;53:240-255.
Not in our library10.1107/s0907444996012255
- 37.
Nicastro D, Schwartz C, Pierson J, Gaudette R, Porter ME, McIntosh JR. The molecular architecture of axonemes revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science. 2006;313:944-948.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1128618
- 38.
Olofsson A, Hebert H, Thelestam M. The projection structure of perfringolysin O (Clostridium perfringens theta-toxin). FEBS Letters. 1993;319:125-127.
Not in our library10.1016/0014-5793(93)80050-5
- 39.
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2004;25:1605-1612.
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20084
- 40.
Ramachandran R, Heuck AP, Tweten RK, Johnson AE. Structural insights into the membrane-anchoring mechanism of a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin. Nature Structural Biology. 2002;9:823-827.
Not in our library10.1038/nsb855
- 41.
Ramachandran R, Tweten RK, Johnson AE. The domains of a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin undergo a major FRET-detected rearrangement during pore formation. PNAS. 2005;102:7139-7144.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0500556102
- 42.
Sato TK, Tweten RK, Johnson AE. Disulfide-bond scanning reveals assembly state and β-strand tilt angle of the PFO β-barrel. Nature Chemical Biology. 2013;9:383-389.
Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1228
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
Schrödinger LLC. PyMol. 2015.
Not in our library
- 46.
Shatursky O, Heuck AP, Shepard LA, Rossjohn J, Parker MW, Johnson AE, Tweten RK. The mechanism of membrane insertion for a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin: a novel paradigm for pore-forming toxins. Cell. 1999;99:293-299.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81660-8
- 47.
Shepard LA, Heuck AP, Hamman BD, Rossjohn J, Parker MW, Ryan KR, Johnson AE, Tweten RK. Identification of a membrane-spanning domain of the thiol-activated pore-forming toxin clostridium perfringens perfringolysin O: an alpha-helical to beta-sheet transition identified by fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1998;37:14563-14574.
Not in our library10.1021/bi981452f
- 48.
Soltani CE, Hotze EM, Johnson AE, Tweten RK. Specific protein-membrane contacts are required for prepore and pore assembly by a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007a;282:15709-15716.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m701173200
- 49.
Soltani CE, Hotze EM, Johnson AE, Tweten RK. Structural elements of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysins that are responsible for their cholesterol-sensitive membrane interactions. PNAS. 2007b;104:20226-20231.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0708104105
- 50.
Tang G, Peng L, Baldwin PR, Mann DS, Jiang W, Rees I, Ludtke SJ. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology. 2007;157:38-46.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.009
- 51.
Terwilliger T. SOLVE and RESOLVE: automated structure solution, density modification and model building. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation. 2004;11:49-52.
Not in our library10.1107/s0909049503023938
- 52.
Tilley SJ, Orlova EV, Gilbert RJ, Andrew PW, Saibil HR. Structural basis of pore formation by the bacterial toxin pneumolysin. Cell. 2005;121:247-256.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.033
- 53.
Tweten RK, Parker MW, Johnson AE. The cholesterol-dependent cytolysins. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2001;257:15-33.
Not in our library10.1007/978-3-642-56508-3_2
- 54.
Tweten RK. Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins, a family of versatile pore-forming toxins. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73:6199-6209.
Not in our library10.1128/iai.73.10.6199-6209.2005
- 55.
van Pee K, Mulvihill E, Müller DJ, Yildiz Ö. Unraveling the pore-Forming steps of pneumolysin from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nano Letters. 2016;16:7915-7924.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04219
- 56.
Weis S, Palmer M. Streptolysin O: the C-terminal, tryptophan-rich domain carries functional sites for both membrane binding and self-interaction but not for stable oligomerization. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2001;1510:292-299.
Not in our library10.1016/s0005-2736(00)00360-6
- 57.
Zwart PH, Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Hung LW, Ioerger TR, McCoy AJ, McKee E, Moriarty NW, Read RJ, Sacchettini JC, Sauter NK, Storoni LC, Terwilliger TC, Adams PD. Automated structure solution with the PHENIX suite. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2008;426:419-435.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_28
Cited by papers we hold 3
- Structural basis of NINJ1-mediated plasma membrane rupture in cell death · 2023No notice
- Structural insights into loss of function of a pore forming toxin and its role in pneumococcal adaptation to an intracellular lifestyle. · 2020Not checked
- Structural basis for tuning activity and membrane specificity of bacterial cytolysins · 2020Not checked
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.