Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Sex difference in pathology of the ageing gut mediates the greater response of female lifespan to dietary restriction

Jennifer C Regan, Mobina Khericha, Adam J Dobson and 3 more

eLife · 2016 · CC BY

doi:10.7554/elife.10956

Abstract

Women live on average longer than men but have greater levels of late-life morbidity. We have uncovered a substantial sex difference in the pathology of the aging gut in Drosophila. The intestinal epithelium of the aging female undergoes major deterioration, driven by intestinal stem cell (ISC) division, while lower ISC activity in males associates with delay or absence of pathology, and better barrier function, even at old ages. Males succumb to intestinal challenges to which females are resistant, associated with fewer proliferating ISCs, suggesting a trade-off between highly active repair mechanisms and late-life pathology in females. Dietary restriction reduces gut pathology in aging females, and extends female lifespan more than male. By genetic sex reversal of a specific gut region, we induced female-like aging pathologies in males, associated with decreased lifespan, but also with a greater increase in longevity in response to dietary restriction.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Women live for longer than do men in most modern societies but suffer from higher levels of morbidity later in life. Sex differences in health during aging are underpinned by differences in patterns of decline in the structure and function of specific tissues. For example, the gut ages differently in men and women, such that many gastrointestinal diseases and cancers are gender-biased. However, the mechanisms underlying sex differences in intestinal pathology are not well understood.

Females of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster show substantial gut pathology during aging, which limits female lifespan. Drosophila are mostly post-mitotic as adults, but the gut contains intestinal stem cells (ISCs), and their division drives age-related intestinal hyperplasia. Epithelial barrier function declines during aging, and its failure is predictive of death. However, it is not known to what extent males suffer from intestinal pathology during aging; indeed, studies of aging in male Drosophila are generally less common, and little is known about tissue-specific sexual dimorphisms in aging phenotypes. Interestingly, Drosophila females show a much greater longevity response to dietary restriction (DR) than do males, although the role of the gut in this sex difference has not been investigated.

We have uncovered substantial sexual dimorphism in the incidence of gut pathology during aging, with females showing widespread deterioration in epithelial structure and loss of gut barrier function, while males generally maintain both even at very late ages. However, males succumbed to oral bacterial infections to which females were resistant, with female guts containing a higher number of proliferating cells, suggesting a trade-off between gut plasticity and/or repair mechanisms, and old age pathology in females. Gut pathology in aging females was ameliorated by DR, suggesting that the greater response of female lifespan to DR may be a consequence of improved gut function. Taking advantage of cell autonomous sex determination in Drosophila, we produced males that had a region of the midgut genetically feminized and we found that this region alone showed the female pattern of aging-related pathology and increase in mitotic stem cells. Furthermore, these feminized males also showed a greater increase in lifespan in response to DR, comparable to that seen in females. Males demonstrated higher age-related, systemic inflammation compared to females, and sensitivity to oral bacterial infection, indicative of immune dysfunction, despite better maintenance of gut barrier function. Intriguingly, this points to further sex bias(es) in immunity that could contribute to male mortality.

Sex differences in age-related gut pathologies

ISC division becomes dysregulated with age, leading to a hyperplastic intestinal pathology. ISC over-proliferation and a build-up of undifferentiated enteroblasts (EBs) lead to cell crowding and eventual tumor formation. In order to better understand the effect of these events for intestinal epithelial organization, we subjected guts from outbred, wild type females and males with labeled epithelia (wDah;Resille-GFP) to high-resolution imaging over the entire adult lifespan at weekly intervals.

Several recent studies have shown the Drosophila gut to be highly regionalized in function, cell type and gene expression. We therefore analyzed four gut regions, identifying them with high fidelity (Figure 1A). These were the proventriculus (PV), midgut region 2 (R2) and midgut regions 4–5 (R4/R5), spanning most of the length and functional diversity of tissues in the adult midgut. Young females showed a well-organized PV, with a honeycomb arrangement of tightly packed cells forming the outer wall (Figure 1B–D), arranged in a columnar epithelium with perfectly aligned nuclei (Figure 1E–G). In all distal midgut regions, large, polyploid, absorptive, enterocytes (ECs) were aligned to form a single layer epithelium with evenly spaced nuclei (Figure 1H–M and Figure 1—figure supplement 1). ISCs were nested at intervals along the basal side of the gut (Figure 1K–M) and were mitotically active as visualized by phosphohistone H3 (PH3) immunostaining (Figure 2J).

In aging females, disruptions to the PV epithelium began to appear at between 2 and 3 weeks of age, with rounded, unpolarized cells clustering apically (Figure 1F’-G’). This abnormality was progressive (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), and eventually led to tumor formation. The effect of this hyperplasia on the basal side of the PV epithelium was marked; cells were pulled away from the basal edge due to tumor formation or apoptosis, leading to the appearance of rosettes characteristic of epithelial wound healing (Figure 1C’ and Figure 1—figure supplement 1). These wounds became more numerous until, at very late ages, the epithelium did not heal properly, resulting in the formation of large scars, holes and multinucleated cells (Figure 1C’-D’, N-O and Figure 1—figure supplement 1). R2 and R4 regions also showed dramatic aging phenotypes driven by an accumulation of small nuclei cells on the basal side - ISCs and EBs - which disrupted the single layer and eventually led to tumor formation and loss of epithelial organization (Figure 1I’,J’,L’,M’,O’-R’ and Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

Strikingly, aged males showed only a low incidence of pathology in both the PV and midgut (Figure 2A–H, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Indeed, many males in the oldest cohorts examined (up to 64 days post-eclosion) had well-maintained intestinal epithelia (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). For example, outer wall cells of the PV were maintained as a single layer columnar epithelium with well-aligned nuclei (Figure 2B,D,F,H). The R2 midgut region retained regular spacing of ECs with few ISCs nested between them, similar to young guts (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Aged males had far fewer PH3-positive cells in the midgut when compared to females (Figure 2J–L), suggesting that ISCs were largely quiescent. To determine whether this sex difference in ISC activity and epithelial integrity was reflected in barrier function, we fed aging wDah females and males a blue dye that normally does not traverse the gut, at 42 days and 80 days, and scored flies that leached dye into the body cavity (‘Smurfs’). A low, but consistent, proportion of Smurfs was found in old females, while males never produced Smurfs, even in the oldest (80 day-old) cohorts (Figure 2M–N, Figure 2—figure supplement 2B). This is striking given the maximum lifespan for males (final surviving 10% of the population) is 64 days (Figure 2—figure supplement 2D). A recent study, describing the Smurf technique, found that the inbred laboratory strain w1118 does produce male smurfs, but at a lower rate than females. We confirmed this, finding a small proportion of w1118 male smurfs (<2%) at 42 days (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C).

Males are more susceptible to intestinal infection and xenobiotic stress

While dysregulated ISC division may be detrimental at older ages (e.g. ), ISC responsiveness to gut damage maintains intestinal homeostasis and promotes survival in young females.

We hypothesized that males, which have fewer ISCs and with a lower basal rate of division (; this study), would be more susceptible to intestinal stress such as oral infection, compared to females. The bacterium Erwinia carotovora (Ecc) induces antimicrobial peptide (AMP) expression and ISC division in the midgut when ingested but is not usually lethal to healthy adult females. When we challenged aged females and males with oral infection by Ecc, we found that females were resistant to the infection. However, a high proportion of males succumbed after around 72 hr (Figure 2O). Upon analysis of the ISC response to Ecc infection, we found that infected female midguts had a significantly higher number of actively dividing (PH3+) cells at 18-hr post-infection compared to controls. Although male midguts also responded to infection, the overall number of mitotic cells was significantly lower than in infected females (Figure 2P). In addition, when we exposed flies to a xenobiotic agent in their food (DDT; ), female flies were significantly more resistant to this challenge (Figure 2—figure supplement 2E). These findings suggest that, despite the patent hyperplastic pathology, older females are more resilient to intestinal challenge than are males. This sex bias may, in part, be promoted by higher numbers of dividing ISCs in females, despite this being detrimental to the maintenance of epithelial integrity at older ages.

Although repair of the epithelium is an important trait for survival during intestinal stress, other factors will also contribute. We therefore assessed the systemic response to Ecc oral infection in aged males and females. Diptericin (dipt, an antimicrobial peptide [AMP] responsive to gram-negative infection sensed by the Imd pathway), was expressed at higher levels in unchallenged males compared to females, and was strongly upregulated upon infection in males (Figure 2Q). This high systemic dipt did not induce a high survival rate for males, many of which later succumbed to the infection, and may instead be indicative of an infection not effectively contained by the gut and/or a sepsis-like response. To better understand inflammatory status during aging in females and males, we measured expression of dipt during aging. Only males showed increased expression of dipt as they aged and, at both ages, males expressed dipt at a significantly higher level than did females (Figure 2S). We also analyzed expression of the ROS-producer dual oxidase (duox) at young and old ages. Duox is expressed in immune-active epithelia, especially the gut, and is necessary for survival to foodborne pathogens. Duox levels did not change significantly during aging, but males had higher expression than did females at both ages (Figure 2T). This suggests that, even in the absence of acute infection, males suffer from a higher level of systemic inflammation than do females, despite better maintenance of gut barrier function.

The sex differences in gut pathology and systemic inflammation could affect the bacterial load in the intestinal microbiota, which could in turn affect pathology and inflammation. We therefore analysed internal bacterial load in females and males at 21 days, and found that females had a higher load than did males (Figure 2U). Higher bacterial load in the gut correlated with the higher levels of dysfunction and pathology observed in females compared to males, and suggests that factors apart from total load, such as specific composition of the microbiota, or infection through other routes, may explain the increased systemic dipt in males.

Female intestinal pathologies are ameliorated by DR

ISC division is regulated by both diet and nutrient sensing IIS. DR of dietary protein can extend lifespan in a wide range of animals. When we analyzed the guts of flies fed on two different yeast dilutions, we found that pathology was lower in old females that had been exposed to the low-yeast diet (Figure 2C,G,I; Figure 2—figure supplement 1), in line with studies showing that ISC division and intestinal barrier dysfunction are reduced in females on restricted diets. Male flies, however, derived no obvious benefit to intestinal morphology from DR, largely because very little pathology was evident in males, even on a high-yeast diet (Figure 2D,H,I; Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

Males with feminized midguts develop female-like intestinal pathology

Sex determination in fruit flies is cell autonomous, with X-chromosome counting leading to a cascade of splicing events and expression of sex-specific transcription factors. We exploited this cell autonomy, by mis-expressing the female-specific spliceform of transformer (UAS-traF) in male flies, using the midgut driver NP1-Gal4, to achieve midgut-specific feminization. We then analyzed the effect on intestinal pathology during aging.

Cell size is larger in female flies than in males, in all tissues. Accordingly, males with feminized midguts had larger ECs compared to control males (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Quantitative PCR on dissected guts demonstrated that doublesex (dsxF), the direct downstream target of traF, was expressed in feminized male guts at high levels (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). As further proof-of-principle for sex reversal, we expressed UAS-traFin whole flies using the ubiquitous driver da-Gal4, producing transgendered males that were feminized in all sexually dimorphic structures (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C).

We analyzed intestinal aging in gut-feminized males (wD;NP1-Gal4/UAS-traF,Resille-GFP; NP1>traF) and found that age-related pathologies were apparent at 35 days post-eclosion, whereas male control flies (wD;+/UAS-traF,Resille-GFP; +/traF) generally had well-maintained guts at this age. Pathology in the feminized guts was comparable to that seen in females, or more severe (Figure 3A–F”). The NP1-Gal4 driver is expressed throughout the midgut from R1, but only in a small number of cells in the PV, serving as a useful internal control. Accordingly, the PV in NP1>traF males did not develop age-related pathologies (Figure 3A–B”, Figure 3—figure supplement 2A). PH3-positive cell number was dramatically increased in aged NP1>traF males compared to control males, as predicted by the observed pathologies (Figure 3G). When we analyzed barrier dysfunction in these flies, we found that at 42 days, gut-feminized males produced significantly more flies with a Smurf phenotype than control males (who produced none) and control females (Figure 3H). Feminized males presented a high level of systemic dipt expression (Figure 3I) and Duox expression (Figure 3J) at young and old ages. In addition, when we analyzed aerobic and anaerobic bacterial load at 7 and 21 days, we found that load increased with age as previously reported (e.g.; ). Importantly, while load in control females was higher than in males, this trend was switched in feminized males, who had a higher load than did females of the same genotype (Figure 3K).

To investigate whether midgut homeostasis in feminized males was responsive to diet, we raised NP1>traF flies on two different yeast dilutions. Similar to females, feminized males on the high-yeast diet appeared to show a more severe pathology at 35 days than did those on low yeast (Figure 3L–M). In line with this, when we analyzed the rate of tumor formation (category IV) in a specific region of the gut (R2), we found that DR significantly decreased the risk of tumor formation in feminized males (Figure 2L). The observed pathologies demonstrate that female and feminized ISCs respond to DR, however, when we quantified PH3+ cell number in 35 day-old guts, although female high-yeast guts had more mitoses, this difference was not significant in feminized males (Figure 3—figure supplement 2B). One possible explanation is that the observed pathology is an accumulation of ISC activity, which could expose subtle differences in mitotic rate over a lifetime. Another possibility is that ISC division and pathology are linked but pathology is driven by other factors that are responsive to diet, such as changes to the microbiota. The TOR pathway inhibitor rapamycin extends lifespan in females, and to a much lesser extent in males, and a recent study showed that it decreases ISC division and slows barrier dysfunction in females. When we treated males, females and feminized males with rapamycin, we found that ISC proliferation and gut pathology were reduced in females and feminized males (Figure 3N). This shows that, similarly to DR, females derive a greater benefit from rapamycin than do males, possibly explaining, at least in part, the sex bias in the magnitude of lifespan extension by the drug.

Feminized males are not more robust to oral infection, but their lifespan responds to DR

To assess whether the acquired ISC activity in gut-feminized males could contribute to a more robust survival to intestinal stress, we challenged them to Ecc oral infection at 7 and 42 days of age. At 5-days post-infection, 7-day-old females and males survived, but approximately 50% of gut-feminized males had died (Figure 3—figure supplement 2D). Analysis of ISCs post-infection showed that feminized males induced significantly higher proliferation than control males, but this was clearly not protective (Figure 3P). In aged (42 day-old) flies, as before, we found that only males succumbed to Ecc oral infection. Feminized males were most susceptible, dying more quickly than did control males (Figure 3O, Figure 3—figure supplement 2E), and this was not related to a change in feeding on either normal food (Figure 3—figure supplement 2F) or the infection pellet (Figure 3—figure supplement 2G). At this age, female guts had a high number of mitoses, but these did not significantly increase on infection, and nor did they in feminized males (Figure 3P). One interpretation of this result is that, in aged females and feminized males, the pool of ISCs has been exhausted by continued mitotic activity through the lifespan, or that due to age-related triggers such as inflammation or dysbiosis, ISC activity is already at a maximum. Markedly different to females, however, was the high induction of systemic dipt in control and feminized males (Figure 3Q), in line with their reduced survival. Altogether, these data show that age-related sensitivity of males to intestinal infection was not rescued by feminization of the midgut. One probable contributing factor to the high death rate of feminized males is the barrier dysfunction observed at 42 days (Figure 3H). However, their sensitivity to Ecc at young ages points to other, compromised immune responses. We hypothesize that a sex mis-match between the gut and other immune tissues such as the fat body and hemocytes, may be detrimental.

Females show a greater lifespan extension than do males when subjected to DR. Males from the outbred line wDah used in this study have a mean lifespan that is 22 days shorter than that of their female siblings’ (Figure 2—figure supplement 2D), and only females showed a lifespan extension when raised on food with a 50% reduction in yeast (Figure 2—figure supplement 2D). Comparison of the lifespans of gut-feminized males with control female and male flies raised on a standard diet showed that gut-feminized males were significantly shorter lived than control males (Figure 3R, Figure 3—figure supplement 2H), suggesting that their acquired intestinal hyperplasia was detrimental to their lifespan. Interestingly, when we measured the responses of lifespan to two different yeast dilutions, we found that midgut-feminized males had acquired a response to DR similar in magnitude to that seen in control females (Figure 3R, Figure 3—figure supplement 2H and Figure 3—source data 1). Taken together with our data on tissue sex and gut pathology, this finding suggests that lowered levels of intestinal pathology contribute to increased female longevity upon DR, and offers one explanation for the difference between males and females in the response of their lifespans to diet.

Discussion

In marked contrast to the gut pathology previously reported in aging females, and the extensive deterioration seen in multiple regions of the gut in the present study, we found that males generally have well-maintained guts into old age, even at ages close to the maximum male lifespan. Female intestinal pathology is driven by stem cell activity, which is responsive to diet. Gut hyperplasia is limiting for female lifespan: when ISC division is genetically reduced, female lifespan is extended. We showed that, by switching the sexual identity of male midgut cells, ISC activity was increased, pathologies appeared and lifespan was shortened. In addition, the lifespan of males with feminized guts became responsive to diet, with DR both reducing the risk for developing severe pathology and increasing lifespan. The marked sexual dimorphism in gut pathology during aging provides a potential explanation for why males do not increase lifespan as much as do females in response to DR. Because males do not suffer from age-related hyperplasia, they do not derive the same benefit from DR-induced stem cell quiescence. Limited hyperplasia could also at least partly explain the much greater increase in lifespan seen in females than in males upon reduced IIS; given that ISC activity in females is responsive to insulin signaling.

Intestinal barrier function decreases during aging in females, and this decline is associated with an increase in immune activation, a decrease in nutrient absorption and death. We showed that sustained ISC division has drastic consequences for the female gut epithelium, causing scars and holes to appear on the basal side. Interestingly, in transcriptomic analysis of aging guts of flies raised in both natural and axenic conditions, genes involved in wound healing were increased during aging. In line with the absence of severe pathology in males, barrier function was maintained into old age. Despite this, males succumbed to oral infection and xenobiotic stress to which females were resistant, and this sensitivity was not rescued by feminization. We found that the gut ISC response to infection, a repair process, was significantly lower in male flies and increased in feminized males. Regulation of ISC activity is therefore not the only difference between males and females affecting resistance: other epithelial immune responses such as ROS and antimicrobial peptide production or tolerance to Ecc-derived toxins could also be sexually dimorphic. The male sensitivity and sepsis-like response to Ecc oral infection, age-related systemic inflammation and high levels of ROS production shown in this study are striking and present a starting point for the analysis of sex differences in intestinal immunity, which will be relevant for resistance to opportunistic infection and shaping the microbiome.

Intestinal plasticity is important not only to resist infection, but also to respond predictively to the increased energy demands of egg production upon mating, which could explain why females and males invest so differently in ISC activity. Male reproduction does not require the same amount of nutritional input and, therefore, large-scale intestinal remodeling would probably not increase reproductive rate, which is promoted instead by increased detection and courtship of females. This sex difference is evolutionarily conserved, in that female mammals extensively grow and remodel their guts, increasing digestive and absorptive capacity in accordance with the increased nutritional demands of lactation. Possibly related to this greater gut plasticity, women have higher rates of region-specific colon cancer than do men, although the mechanisms underlying this difference are not well understood. Female-specific intestinal remodeling during reproduction could be a driving factor. Intriguingly, higher parity and earlier childbearing are protective against colon cancer, whereas later child-bearing is a significant risk factor, suggesting that the timing of reproductive events may affect ISC (mis-)regulation. Further studies linking early gut plasticity, nutrition and fecundity with severity of hyperplastic pathology during aging in Drosophila may help elucidate conserved mechanisms underlying sex differences in cancer rates.

Fly strains

All mutants were backcrossed for six generations into the wild type, outbred strain, wDahomey(wDah), maintained in population cages. The following fly stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Centre: P{UAS-tra.F}20J7, P{GawB}Myo31DFNP0001(referred to as NP1-Gal4), and daughterless-Gal4. P{PTT-un1}CG8668117-2 (Resille-GFP) was originally obtained from the Flytrap project and was a gift from A Jacinto.

Fly husbandry

Stocks were maintained and experiments conducted at 25°C on a 12 hr:12 hr light:dark cycle at 60% humidity, on food containing 10% (w/v) brewer’s yeast, 5%(w/v) sucrose, and 1.5% (w/v) agar unless otherwise noted (referred to as ‘low yeast’ food denoting an arbitrary 1:1 sugar to yeast ratio, which is changed to 1:2 (20% yeast, 5% sucrose) for ‘high yeast’ food). For measurement of gut histology and lifespans, flies were reared at standard larval density and eclosing adults were collected over a 12-hr period. Flies were mated for 48 hr before being sorted into experimental vials at a density of 10 flies per vial. Flies were transferred to fresh vials thrice weekly, and for lifespan, deaths/censors were scored during transferral.

Imaging of gut pathology

Guts were dissected from live flies in ice-cold PBS and immediately fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 15 min. Guts were mounted in mounting medium containing DAPI (Vectastain) and endogenous GFP was imaged immediately. Between 6 and 14 guts were analyzed per condition, per time point. Images were captured with a Zeiss (UK) LSM 700 confocal laser scanning microscope using a 40x oil-immersion objective.

Immunohistochemistry

The following antibodies were used for cell division analyses; primary antibodies: rabbit anti-PH3 (Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA) 9701) 1:500; mouse anti-GFP (Cell Signaling 2955) 1:1000. Secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-rabbit ((A21207) Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) 1:1000; Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse (A21202) 1:1000. Guts were dissected in ice cold PBS and immediately fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 15 min, serially dehydrated in MeOH, stored at -20°C, and subsequently stained. Guts were washed in 0.2% Triton-X / PBS, blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin / PBS, incubated in primary antibody overnight at 4°C and in secondary for 2 hr at RT. At least 10 guts per condition were mounted, scored and imaged as described above.

Gut barrier analysis (Smurf assay)

Gut barrier efficiency was analyzed by placing flies on blue food (minimum 110 flies per condition, except at 80 d, min. 80 flies) prepared using using 2.5% (w/v) FD&C blue dye no. 1 (Fastcolors) as previously described, except flies were kept on the blue food for 24 hr before the Smurf phenotype was scored.

Oral infection survival assay

At least 3 x colonies of Ecc15 were grown in separate overnight cultures in Luria-Bertani medium, pooled, pelleted and adjusted to OD600 = 200 with fresh LB. Bacteria were mixed 1:1 with 5% sucrose (final OD600 = 100); LB / sucrose was used for sham infection. Flies were starved for 5 hr in empty vials. Experimental vials were lined with 10 pieces of Whatman filter paper to which 1 ml Ecc15 / sucrose (or LB / sucrose) was added. Starved flies were added at a density of 20/vial; a minimum of 80 flies/condition. Filter paper was refreshed each day with newly grown Ecc15 / sucrose (or LB / sucrose) solutions, using a Pasteur pipette. Deaths were scored thrice daily.

DDT ingestion survival assay

Ten flies per vial, at least 110 flies per condition, were fed with the organochloride dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT; Supelco, Sigma-Aldrich, UK) for 18 hr. To standard SYA food, 0.03% (w/v) DDT, made from a stock solution of 2% (w/v) DDT in ethanol, was added. Deaths were scored thrice daily.

Feeding assay

Flies were transferred to vials at a density of 5 per vial on the evening before the assay. Vials were coded and placed in a randomized order on viewing racks at 25°C overnight. The assay occurred with minimal noise and physical disturbance. Thirty minutes was allowed between the arrival of the observer and commencement of the assay. Observations were performed blind for 90 min, 1 hr after lights-on. Vials were observed for approximately 3 s during which the number of flies feeding was noted. A feeding event was scored when a fly extended its proboscis and made contact with food. Successive rounds of observations were carried out giving an observation rate of once / 5 min. Feeding data are expressed as a proportion by experimental group (sum of scored feeding events divided by total number of feeding opportunities, where total number of feeding opportunities = number of flies in vial×number of vials in the group×number of observations). For statistical analyses, comparisons between experimental groups were made on total feeding events by all flies within a vial, to avoid pseudoreplication.

Bacterial load measurements

As described for guts, whole flies were surface sterilized for 1 min in 95% ethanol, rinsed and pooled into groups of 5, n≥8 per condition, on ice for homogenization. Three 1/5 serial dilutions were plated on Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) plates and cultured at 29°c both aerobically and anaerobically, and scored at 48 and 72 hr.

Gut cell size measurements

Nearest-neighbour internuclear distance in the R2 region was measured from raw LSM files (Zeiss) using the Measure function in Fiji (Image J); 20 distances per gut, n ≥ 6 guts per condition.

RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR analysis

RNA was isolated from n ≥ 14 guts per sample with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and cDNA was synthesized by using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to manufacturers instructions. qPCR was carried out by using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on QuantStudio6 Flex real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The following primer sequences (Eurofins, UK) were used in the analysis: dsxF-F (TCAACACGTTCGCATCACAAA); dsxF-R (TAGACTGTGATTAGCCCAATAACTGA), act5C-F (CACACCAAATCTTACAAAATGTGTGA); act5C-R (AATCCGGCCTTGCACATG); dipericin-F (GCGGCGATGGTTTTGG); dipericin-R (CGCTGGTCCACACCTTCTG); Duox-F (TAGCAAGCCGGTGTCGCAATCAAT); Duox-R: ACGGCCAGAGCACTTGCACATAG.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed in Excel (Microsoft) or Prism (Graphpad, La Jolla, CA), except for Ordinal Logistical Regression (OLR), Cox Proportional Hazards and Monte Carlo Markov Chain Generalised Linear Model with Poisson Error Family analyses, which were performed in R (using the clm function from the 'ordinal' library for OLR). Statistical tests used are indicated in the figure captions. Outliers were rarely excluded from the data, but when excluded conformed to the rule of lying more than two standard deviations away from the mean. They are clearly marked as data points on graphical displays.

References 60

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Alpatov WW. Phenotypical variation in body and cell size of Drosophila melanogaster. Biological Bulletin. 1930;58:85-103.

    Not in our library10.2307/1537121

  3. 3.

    Ayyaz A, Li H, Jasper H. Haemocytes control stem cell activity in the Drosophila intestine. Nature Cell Biology. 2015;17:736-748.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb3174

  4. 4.

    Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet. 2012;380:37-43.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Biteau B, Hochmuth CE, Jasper H. JNK activity in somatic stem cells causes loss of tissue homeostasis in the aging Drosophila gut. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3:442-455.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.024

  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Boyle M, Wong C, Rocha M, Jones DL. Decline in self-renewal factors contributes to aging of the stem cell niche in the Drosophila testis. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:470-478.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.002

  10. 10.

    Bretman A, Westmancoat JD, Gage MJ, Chapman T. Males use multiple, redundant cues to detect mating rivals. Current Biology. 2011;21:617-622.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.008

  11. 11.

    Broderick NA, Buchon N, Lemaitre B. Microbiota-induced changes in drosophila melanogaster host gene expression and gut morphology. mBio. 2014;5:14.

    Not in our library10.1128/mbio.01117-14

  12. 12.

    Buchon N, Broderick NA, Poidevin M, Pradervand S, Lemaitre B. Drosophila intestinal response to bacterial infection: activation of host defense and stem cell proliferation. Cell Host & Microbe. 2009;5:200-211.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2009.01.003

  13. 13.

    Buchon N, Osman D, David FP, Fang HY, Boquete JP, Deplancke B, Lemaitre B. Morphological and molecular characterization of adult midgut compartmentalization in drosophila. Cell Reports. 2013;3:1725-1738.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.001

  14. 14.

    Camus MF, Clancy DJ, Dowling DK. Mitochondria, maternal inheritance, and male aging. Current Biology. 2012;22:1717-1721.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.018

  15. 15.

    Chang L, Heitkemper MM. Gender differences in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1686-1701.

    Not in our library10.1053/gast.2002.36603

  16. 16.

    Chatterjee M, Ip YT. Pathogenic stimulation of intestinal stem cell response in Drosophila. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2009;220:664-671.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.21808

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Choi NH, Lucchetta E, Ohlstein B. Nonautonomous regulation of Drosophila midgut stem cell proliferation by the insulin-signaling pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:18702-18707.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1109348108

  19. 19.

    Clancy DJ, Gems D, Harshman LG, Oldham S, Stocker H, Hafen E, Leevers SJ, Partridge L. Extension of life-span by loss of CHICO, a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein. Science. 2001;292:104-106.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1057991

  20. 20.

    Clark RI, Salazar A, Yamada R, Fitz-Gibbon S, Morselli M, Alcaraz J, Rana A, Rera M, Pellegrini M, William WJ, Walker DW. Distinct shifts in microbiota composition during Drosophila aging impair intestinal function and drive mortality. Cell Reports. 2015;12:1656-1667.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004

  21. 21.

    Dutta D, Buchon N, Xiang J, Edgar BA. Regional cell specific RNA expression profiling of FACS isolated Drosophila intestinal cell populations. Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology. 2015;34:2F.2.1-2F.2.14.

    Not in our library10.1002/9780470151808.sc02f02s34

  22. 22.

    Fan X, Liang Q, Lian T, Wu Q, Gaur U, Li D, Yang D, Mao X, Jin Z, Li Y, Yang M. Rapamycin preserves gut homeostasis during Drosophila aging. Oncotarget. 2015;6:35274-35283.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.5895

  23. 23.

    Fontana L, Partridge L. Promoting health and longevity through diet: from model organisms to humans. Cell. 2015;161:106-118.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.020

  24. 24.

    French V, Feast M, Partridge L. Body size and cell size in Drosophila: the developmental response to temperature. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1998;44:1081-1089.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-1910(98)00061-4

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Guo L, Karpac J, Tran SL, Jasper H. PGRP-SC2 promotes gut immune homeostasis to limit commensal dysbiosis and extend lifespan. Cell. 2014;156:109-122.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.018

  27. 27.

    Ha EM, Oh CT, Bae YS, Lee WJ. A direct role for dual oxidase in Drosophila gut immunity. Science. 2005;310:847-850.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1117311

  28. 28.

    Hammond KA. Adaptation of the maternal intestine during lactation. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 1997;2:243-252.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1026332304435

  29. 29.

    Hur JH, Bahadorani S, Graniel J, Koehler CL, Ulgherait M, Rera M, Jones DL, Walker DW. Increased longevity mediated by yeast NDI1 expression in Drosophila intestinal stem and progenitor cells. Aging. 2013;5:662.

    Not in our library10.18632/aging.100595

  30. 30.

    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2011;61:69-90.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.20107

  31. 31.

    Jiang H, Patel PH, Kohlmaier A, Grenley MO, McEwen DG, Edgar BA. Cytokine/Jak/Stat signaling mediates regeneration and homeostasis in the Drosophila midgut. Cell. 2009;137:1343-1355.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.014

  32. 32.

    Kim SE, Paik HY, Yoon H, Lee JE, Kim N, Sung MK. Sex-and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015;21:5167.

    Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5167

  33. 33.

    Lee G, Hall JC, Park JH. Doublesex gene expression in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Neurogenetics. 2002;16:229-248.

    Not in our library10.1080/01677060216292

  34. 34.

    Lee K, Simpson S, Clissold F, Brooks R, Ballard W, Taylor P, Soran N, Raubenheimer D. Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila: new insights from nutritional geometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:2498-2503.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0710787105

  35. 35.

    Mackenzie DK, Bussière LF, Tinsley MC. Senescence of the cellular immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Experimental Gerontology. 2011;46:853-859.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.exger.2011.07.004

  36. 36.

    Magwere T, Chapman T, Partridge L. Sex differences in the effect of dietary restriction on life span and mortality rates in female and male Drosophila melanogaster. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2004;59:B3-B9.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/59.1.b3

  37. 37.

    Micchelli CA, Perrimon N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature. 2006;439:475-479.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04371

  38. 38.

    Ohlstein B, Spradling A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2006;439:470-474.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04333

  39. 39.

    O’Brien LE, Soliman SS, Li X, Bilder D. Altered modes of stem cell division drive adaptive intestinal growth. Cell. 2011;147:603-614.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.048

  40. 40.

    Partridge L, Andrews R. The effect of reproductive activity on the longevity of male Drosophila melanogaster is not caused by an acceleration of ageing. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1985;31:393-395.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-1910(85)90084-8

All 60 references

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.