Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Active torque generation by the actomyosin cell cortex drives left–right symmetry breaking

Sundar Ram Naganathan, Sebastian Fürthauer, Masatoshi Nishikawa and 2 more

eLife · 2014 · CC BY

doi:10.7554/elife.04165

Abstract

Many developmental processes break left–right (LR) symmetry with a consistent handedness. LR asymmetry emerges early in development, and in many species the primary determinant of this asymmetry has been linked to the cytoskeleton. However, the nature of the underlying chirally asymmetric cytoskeletal processes has remained elusive. In this study, we combine thin-film active chiral fluid theory with experimental analysis of the C. elegans embryo to show that the actomyosin cortex generates active chiral torques to facilitate chiral symmetry breaking. Active torques drive chiral counter-rotating cortical flow in the zygote, depend on myosin activity, and can be altered through mild changes in Rho signaling. Notably, they also execute the chiral skew event at the 4-cell stage to establish the C. elegans LR body axis. Taken together, our results uncover a novel, large-scale physical activity of the actomyosin cytoskeleton that provides a fundamental mechanism for chiral morphogenesis in development.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Most organisms are bilaterally asymmetric with morphologically distinct left and right hand sides. Bilateral asymmetry of organisms, organs, and tissues emerges early in development and is dependent on chiral symmetry breaking of cells and subcellular structures. In many species the primary determinant of chirality has been linked to the cytoskeleton with both the microtubule and the actomyosin cytoskeleton (AD Bershadsky, personal communication, November 2013) playing prominent roles. Generally, how chiral molecules and chiral molecular interactions generate chiral morphologies on larger scales remains to be a fundamental problem. For example, it has been observed that myosin motors can rotate actin filaments in motility assays. Yet, it remains unknown which types of large-scale mechanical activities arise from such types of chiral molecular interactions. In this study, we describe that the actomyosin cytoskeleton can generate active torques at cellular scales, and that the cell uses active torques to break chiral symmetry.

Results and discussion

We investigated chiral behaviours of the actomyosin cell cortex in the context of polarizing cortical flow in the 1-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. The cell cortex, sandwiched between the membrane and cytoplasm, is a thin actin gel containing myosin motors and actin binding proteins. Given the chirality of cortical constituents, we first asked if cortical flow breaks chiral symmetry. We quantified the cortical flow velocity field v using particle image velocimetry in C. elegans zygotes containing GFP-tagged non-muscle myosin II (NMY-2). Flow proceeds primarily along the anteroposterior (AP) axis (x-direction), however, we also observed flow vectors to have a small component in the direction orthogonal to the AP axis (y-direction). Notably, the posterior and anterior halves of the cortex counter-rotate relative to each other (Figure 1A,B, Figure 1—figure supplement 1, Video 1), with y-velocities of ∼–2.5 μm/min and ∼1 μm/min respectively (Figure 1D). We define the chiral counter-rotation velocity vc as the difference between spatially averaged y-velocities in the posterior and the anterior region (Figure 1B) and measured vc at 858 time points during flow in 25 embryos. We find that the distribution of vc is shifted towards negative values, with a mean of −2.9 ± 0.3 μm/min (mean ± error of mean at 99% confidence unless stated otherwise, Figure 1C). Thus, counter-rotating cortical flow breaks chiral symmetry at the 1-cell stage, with the posterior half undergoing a counterclockwise rotation when viewed from the posterior pole (Figure 1A). Notably, chiral counter-rotating flow precedes the previously reported chiral whole-cell rotation of the zygote during cell division.

Since AP flow depends on myosin activity, we asked if chiral flow does so as well. We tested if reducing myosin activity through RNAi of the myosin regulatory light-chain mlc-4 reduces the chiral counter-rotation velocity vc. We found that 8 hrs of mlc-4 (RNAi) not only reduces the AP flow velocity but also significantly reduces vc (Wilcoxon rank sum test at 99% confidence; mean: −1.1 ± 0.4 μm/min, Figure 1C, Video 2) when compared to non-RNAi embryos. We conclude that chiral flow depends on myosin activity.

We next sought to understand how myosin activity can drive both AP and chiral flow. We pursue the idea that molecular-scale torque generation leads to the emergence of active torques on larger scales and make use of a physical description of the cell cortex as a thin film of an active chiral fluid. In our description, force and torque generation at the molecular scale give rise to both an active contractile tension T and an active torque density τ (Figure 2A) to drive cortical flow. Under conditions of azimuthal symmetry (Figure 2—figure supplement 1, appendix), the AP flow velocity (vx) and the y-velocity (vy) obey the equations of motion,where η is the 2D viscosity of the cortical layer and γ quantifies friction with membrane and cytoplasm. From the structure of Equation 1, we see that gradients in active tension T along the AP axis drive AP flow, while gradients in active torque density τ along the AP axis drive chiral flow orthogonal to the AP axis (Figure 2B, bottom sketch). We introduce the chirality index c = τ/T, which quantifies their relative magnitude. We assume that both active tension T and active torque density τ are proportional to the local myosin concentration, leading to a single value of the chirality index c that is constant over the embryo. This remains a useful approximation even for cases where T and τ exhibit more complex dependencies on myosin concentration or where they are independently regulated (see below). In such cases the single value of c we determine corresponds to an average, capturing the overall chirality index of the embryo (see appendix). Accordingly, we calculated the theoretical AP and chiral flow profiles from the experimentally determined myosin distribution and found a best match with the experimental profiles for a hydrodynamic length of μm and an overall chirality index of c = 0.58 ± 0.09 (Figure 2B; see appendix). We conclude that a significant part of myosin activity is utilized for generating active torques. The handedness of active torques is clockwise when viewed from the outside of the embryo as indicated by the positive sign of the chirality index c. When considering the observed AP myosin gradients, active torques of this handedness give rise to counterclockwise flow in the posterior domain when viewed from the posterior tip, see Figure 2B for an illustration.

We next sought to investigate if changing myosin activity affects the overall chirality index. To this end, we performed a series of mild-to-stronger mlc-4 (RNAi) experiments with feeding times of 4, 6, and 8 hrs, respectively, and determined c for each condition. We refer to this as weak perturbation RNAi experiments as we aim to identify principle phenotypical alterations upon a mild deviation from non-RNAi conditions, similar to determining the linear response to a small perturbation. While AP flow velocity vx and the chiral flow velocity vc were generally reduced at 4 and 6 hrs of mlc-4 (RNAi) (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1–3, Video 3), c remained unchanged from non-RNAi conditions (c, 0.61 ± 0.07 at 4 hrs and 0.52 ± 0.06 at 6 hrs of RNAi, compared to 0.58 ± 0.09 for non-RNAi; Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 3). However, 8 hrs of mlc-4 (RNAi) not only resulted in a large reduction of both AP and chiral flow velocities but also led to a significant reduction of c (0.14 ± 0.04, Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 3). This indicates that the overall ratio of active torque density to active tension is not changed by weak reduction of mlc-4 activity but is altered at stronger RNAi conditions when cortical structure is affected (Figure 3—figure supplement 4A and Video 2).

We next asked whether there are conditions that modify active torque generation without affecting active tension. To this end, we tested if small changes in Rho signaling, which regulates myosin activity as well as actin dynamics, have a different impact on AP and chiral flow and thus change c. We performed a series of mild-to-stronger RNAi of the Rho GEF ect-2 and the Rho GAP rga-3. We found that weak perturbation RNAi of ect-2 led to a substantial decrease in chiral but not AP flow and thus a decrease in the overall chirality index c when compared to non-RNAi conditions (Figure 3A,D; see also Figure 3—figure supplement 4B, Video 4). Conversely, weak perturbation RNAi of rga-3 led to a substantial increase in chiral but not AP flow and thus an increase in the overall chirality index c (Figure 3A,D; see also Figure 3—figure supplement 4C, Video 5). Thus, a weak perturbation of ect-2 and rga-3 affects chiral but not AP flow, unlike a weak perturbation of mlc-4 which affects both. We conclude that a principle phenotypical alteration upon mild modifications of Rho pathway activity is a change of the chirality index, or, in other words, mild modifications of Rho pathway activity change active torque generation without affecting active tension.

We next asked whether actomyosin active torques participate in bilateral symmetry breaking, since this requires a chiral process. In C. elegans, embryonic handedness is determined at the 4-cell stage when the ABa and ABp cells skew clockwise by ∼20° (as viewed dorsally in the AP–LR plane, Figure 4A). We first tested if the clockwise skew in ABa is accompanied by chiral cortical flow. Strikingly, we observed chiral cortical flow in ABa, with the cortex in both future daughter cells counter-rotating (vc = −5.2 ± 1.1 μm/min, mean ± error of mean at 95% confidence, Video 6). The handedness of chiral flow is identical to that at the 1-cell stage, indicative of a presence of active torques with the same sign of c. If these chiral counter-rotating flows participate in the clockwise skew of both daughter cells, we would expect that changing active torque generation should affect the chiral skew at the 4-cell stage. To this end, we performed weak perturbation RNAi of the Rho pathway members, ect-2 and rga-3, to specifically modify active torques. We first tested whether chiral flows are affected at the 4-cell stage under these conditions. We found that 4.5 hrs of ect-2 (RNAi) led to a significant decrease in chiral flow velocity, vc (−3.4 ± 1.4 μm/min), while 4.5 hrs of rga-3 (RNAi) led to a significant increase in vc in the ABa cell (−6.7 ± 0.7 μm/min, Figure 4B, Video 6), similar to our observations at the 1-cell stage. We next tested whether changing chiral flow velocity at the 4-cell stage is concomitant with a change in the degree of clockwise skew. Indeed, we found that 4.5 hrs of ect-2 (RNAi) led to a significant decrease in skew (15.8° ± 4.9°) in the ABa cell measured in the AP–LR plane, while 4.5 hrs of rga-3 (RNAi) led to a significant increase in skew (37.8° ± 6.1°) when compared to non-RNAi conditions (23.6° ± 3.7°; Figure 4A and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Similar results were obtained in ABp (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Thus, changing counter-rotating chiral flow velocity in these cells by weak perturbation of the Rho pathway leads to a change in the degree of skew. This suggests that active torque generation and chiral counter-rotating flow participate in the execution of the LR symmetry breaking chiral skew event at the 4-cell stage.

Finally, we tested whether genes that affect establishment of the L/R body axis impacts chiral flow. To investigate this, we quantified chiral flow velocities and the overall chirality index c at the 1-cell stage under conditions of RNAi of the Wnt signaling genes dsh-2, gsk-3, mig-5, mom-2, and mom-5, which are known to regulate aspects of bilateral symmetry breaking. Strikingly, we found that all these conditions (except mom-5) led to reduced chiral flow and a significant reduction of the overall chirality index c at the 1-cell stage (Figure 4C, Figure 4—figure supplement 2–4, Video 7). These results are indicative of a fundamental link between genes that affect LR symmetry breaking and chiral counter-rotating flow. Since Wnt-induced signals in many systems propagate through Rho GTPases to promote morphological changes, we speculate that these effects are propagated through Rho signaling (Figure 3). Taken together, our results indicate that active torque generation and chiral counter-rotating flows participate in the establishment of the L/R body axis of C. elegans.

To conclude, the actomyosin cytoskeleton in C. elegans generates active chiral torques with clockwise handedness when viewed from the outside of the cell. They drive a specific pattern of chiral flows which can be understood quantitatively based on the physics of active gels with chiral asymmetries. Furthermore, our weak perturbation RNAi experiments indicate that Rho activity affects cortical chirality in a way that does not depend on its role in activating myosin. On the one hand, this raises an interesting question whether active chiral torques arise directly from chiral interactions between actin and myosin (Figure 2A) or whether they rather emerge through myosin molecular force generation and non-trivial tension–torque coupling in the actomyosin network. On the other hand, through these weak perturbation RNAi experiments we have identified specific conditions under which cortical chirality and active torques can be selectively modified. Bilateral symmetry breaking requires a chiral process, and we used these specific conditions to demonstrate that in C. elegans, this chiral process could be provided by active chiral torque generation of the actomyosin cortical layer for driving the spindle skew at the 4-cell stage. We note that a plausible scenario for driving spindle skew by counter-rotating flows is similar to the rotation that a crawler excavator or a digger can execute on the spot. This is done by such a machine rotating its two chains in opposite directions. In our context, the chain rotations correspond to the counter-rotating flows and the rotation of the machine corresponds to the spindle rotation giving rise to the skew.

Our results imply that active torques are generated at multiple stages during development, in the zygote during polarity establishment, without immediate consequences with respect to LR symmetry breaking, and again at the 4-cell stage, but here as an instructional and mechanistic event that helps to break left/right symmetry. Chiral morphogenetic rearrangements have been observed at other stages in C. elegans development and during the first cleavage, as well as in other systems. It is interesting to speculate that all these events might be driven by active torque generation in the actomyosin layer. As such, our work paves the way for a mechanistic understanding of chiral morphogenesis of cells, tissues, and organisms.

C. elegans strains

The following transgenic lines were used in this study: TH455 (unc-119(ed3) III; zuIs45[nmy-2::NMY-2::GFP + unc-119(+)] V; ddIs249[TH0566(pie1::Lifeact::mCherry:pie1)]) for imaging cortical flow, LP133 (nmy-2(cp8[NMY-2::GFP + unc-119(+)]) I; unc-119(ed3) III) for imaging counter-rotation of AB cells, and SWG003 (nmy-2(cp8[NMY-2::GFP + unc-119(+)]) I; unc-119(ed3) III; gesIs002[unc-119(ed3) III; (pie-1::Lifeact::tagRFP-T::pie-1 + unc-119(+))]) for quantifying chiral flow fields with an actin probe. For imaging the chiral skew event at the 4-cell stage, a mCherry::Histone; mCherry::PH-PLC1δ1 transgenic line was generated by crossing OD70 to a line expressing Moesin::GFP and mCherry::Histone obtained from the Piano lab (New York University, New York, USA). C. elegans worms were cultured on OP50-seeeded NGM agar plates as described.

RNA interference

RNAi experiments were performed by feeding. Worms were placed on feeding plates (NGM agar containing 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside and 50 μg ml−1 ampicillin) and incubated for the specified number of hours at 25°C. We defined feeding time (number of hours of RNAi) as the time between transfer of worms to the feeding plate and putative fertilization of the egg. Worms were dissected in M9 buffer and the embryos were mounted on 2% agarose pads for image acquisition. rga-3 feeding clone was obtained from Ahringer lab (Gurdon institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom), ect-2 and mlc-4 from Hyman lab (MPI-CBG, Dresden, Germany). Feeding clones dsh-2, gsk-3, mig-5, mom-2, and mom-5 were obtained from Source Bioscience (Nottingham, United Kingdom).

For performing weak perturbation RNAi experiments (from 3–12 hrs of RNAi), L4 staged worms were first incubated overnight on OP50 plates at 25°C. Young adults were then transferred to respective RNAi feeding plates. For performing 40 hr RNAi experiments, early L4 staged worms were directly transferred to respective RNAi feeding plates and incubated at 25°C.

Image acquisition

All videos were acquired at 23–24°C, with a spinning disc confocal microscope using a Zeiss C-Apochromat 63X/1.2 NA objective lens and a Yokogawa CSU-X1 scan head. The following emission filter was used for all acquisitions unless specifically stated: 525/50 nm bandpass filter from Semrock (Rochester, New York). Micromanager software (Vale lab, UCSF) was used to acquire videos using the Hamamatsu ORCA-flash camera.

Confocal videos of cortical NMY-2::GFP for non-RNAi, mlc-4, ect-2, and rga-3 (RNAi) were acquired using an Andor iXon EMCCD camera (512 by 512 pixels). A stack consisting of three z-planes (0.5 μm apart) with a 488 nm laser and an exposure of 150 ms was acquired at an interval of 5 s from the onset of cortical flow until the first cell division. The maximum intensity projection of the stack at each time point was then subjected for further analysis.

Confocal videos of cortical NMY-2::GFP for dsh-2, gsk-3, mig-5, mom-2, and mom-5 (RNAi) were acquired using an Andor Neo sCMOS camera (2560 by 2160 pixels). A stack consisting of two z-planes (0.5 μm apart) with a 488 nm laser and an exposure of 150 ms was acquired at an interval of 5 s from the onset of cortical flow until the first cell division. The maximum intensity projection of the stack at each time point was then subjected for further analysis.

Chiral skew at the 4-cell stage was imaged by using mCherry::Histone; mCherry::PH-PLC1δ1 dual transgenic line. Confocal videos were acquired using a Hamamatsu ORCA-flash 4.0 camera (2048 by 2048 pixels). A stack consisting of 25–30 z-planes (1 μm apart) with a 561 nm laser and an exposure of 300 ms (emission filter – 641/75 nm bandpass filter from Semrock) was acquired at an interval of 30 s from metaphase of the AB lineage at the 4-cell stage until telophase of the AB lineage at the 8-cell stage.

Counter-rotation of the AB cells was imaged using the LP133 strain. Embryos at the 4-cell stage were first identified and an eye-lash tool was then used to rotate the embryo to obtain a dorsal view. Confocal videos from the dorsal side of the embryo were then acquired using a Hamamatsu ORCA-flash 4.0 camera (2048 by 2048 pixels). A stack consisting of 25 z-planes (0.5 μm apart) with a 488 nm laser and an exposure of 100 ms was acquired at an interval of 5 s from the start of telophase of the AB lineage at the 4-cell stage until cytokinesis.

Flow velocity analysis

2D cortical flow velocity fields were obtained by performing Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) using the freely available PIVlab MATLAB algorithm (pivlab.blogspot.de). PIVlab was employed by performing a 3-step multi pass (with linear window deformation), where the final interrogation area was 16 pixels with a step of 8 pixels.

To obtain the flow profiles, 2D velocity fields were projected to the AP axis by dividing the embryo into 18 bins along the AP axis (Figure 1B), and by spatially averaging the x-component or the y-component of velocity along each bin in a single frame. The average velocity in each bin was then averaged over time across the entire flow period (from start of the flow till pseudocleavage). These time-averaged flow profiles were then averaged across all embryos for one experimental condition. Bin extent in the y direction was restricted to a stripe of about 13 μm (Figure 1B). An accurate quantification of chiral flow fields is only possible when the flow axis is approximately aligned with the long axis of the embryo, and we removed from our analysis a small number of embryos (3/28 embryos for the non-RNAi condition) which in the bottom plane analysis appeared to clearly polarize from the side.

Chiral counter-rotation velocity vc was quantified in each frame by subtracting the y-component of velocity in the anterior (spatially averaged across bins 3 to 6, Figure 1B) from the y-component of velocity in the posterior (spatially averaged across bins 13 to 16, Figure 1B). vc from each frame was computed across the entire flow period from all embryos of one experimental condition and a histogram was plotted.

For quantification of chiral counter-rotation velocity vc in the ABa cell, the cleavage plane as viewed from the dorsal side of the embryo was first manually identified using FIJI. PIV was then performed and the component of velocity vectors parallel to the cleavage plane was calculated. vc was then computed by subtracting velocity components in the right daughter cell (spatially averaged across a box of width 5 μm close to the cleavage plane) from the velocity components in the left daughter cell (spatially averaged across a box of size 5 μm close to the cleavage plane). vc from each frame was computed across the counter-rotation flow period and a time-averaged vc was reported. We removed from our analysis one video each from non-RNAi and ect-2 (RNAi) conditions and 2 videos from rga-3 (RNAi) condition that resulted in a marked whole body rotation along the DV-LR plane.

Chiral skew analysis

Chiral skew analysis was performed by analyzing the multi-stack videos using Imaris v7.6.5 and v7.7 software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland). The anterior and posterior pole positions were first manually identified and used to define the AP-vector. The DV-vector was then obtained utilizing the nuclear position of EMS and the AP-vector. The initial and skewed nuclei vectors of ABa and ABp cells at the beginning and end of telophase, respectively, were determined by identifying the corresponding nuclei positions. We used MATLAB to determine the angle between the initial and skewed nuclei vectors of ABa and ABp. We first determined the skew angle by projecting all vectors on to the AP–LR plane (dorsal view, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). This is the plane in which the skew has been reported previously. Next, we determined the skew angle in the DV–LR plane (anterior view, Figure 4—figure supplement 1B) by projecting all vectors on to the DV–LR plane. Finally, we also determined the full (3D) angle between the respective initial and skewed vectors.

Additional information on the chiral skew event at the 4-cell stage

As described in the main text (Figure 4A), in the ABa cell, ect-2 (RNAi) (4.5 hrs) led to a significantly reduced skew in the AP–LR plane, whereas rga-3 (RNAi) (4.5 hrs) led to a significantly increased skew. Similar to the ABa cell, the ABp skew was also significantly reduced under ect-2 (RNAi) condition (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). However, the skew was unchanged in the ABp cell for rga-3 (RNAi). We next determined the unprojected full (3D) skew angle for each condition (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C). Intriguingly, we observed that the unprojected full ABp cell skew was marginally increased under rga-3 (RNAi) condition (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C) even though the projected AP–LR plane skew remained unchanged (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Similarly, we observed that the unprojected full ABa cell skew was not significantly different for ect-2 (RNAi) compared to the non-RNAi condition (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C). This difference in skew between the AP–LR projected and the unprojected angles for the same conditions indicated that there could be an additional skew in a different plane. To this end, we determined the skew in the DV–LR plane. Interestingly, we detected an ∼20° skew in this plane even for the non-RNAi condition (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). Generally, the difference between the full (3D) skew angles and the AP–LR projected angles is due to this additional skew in the DV–LR plane. This illustrates that the chiral skew at the 4-cell stage is more complex than previously reported, with a chiral rotation in the DV–LR plane in addition to the AP–LR plane.

Foci size analysis

A characteristic myosin foci size was determined by performing spatial myosin fluorescence intensity autocorrelation in MATLAB. The autocorrelation was performed in a stripe of about 27 μm wide and 13 μm high in the anterior of the embryo and the analysis was carried out in each frame during the first 75 s of cortical flow. The spatial autocorrelation decay determined in each analysis frame was then fitted with a single exponential function and we define the decay length of this fit as the characteristic foci size. The foci size thus determined in each frame was then averaged over all analysis frames for a single embryo and an ensemble average was reported.

Cortical distribution of myosin is azimuthally symmetric

Through laser ablation experiments, we have shown that cortical flow is driven by gradients in active tension along the AP axis. We consider that active tension is proportional to myosin fluorescence intensity. Accordingly, we observed that a histogram (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A) of the difference in spatially averaged myosin fluorescence intensities between the posterior and anterior halves of the embryo (see shaded areas in Figure 2—figure supplement 1A) is shifted towards negative values, indicating an asymmetric myosin distribution along the AP axis. Similarly, it is plausible that chiral flows could originate from a gradient in myosin fluorescence intensity (i.e., myosin activity) along the azimuthal direction. To test for such a gradient, we analyzed the difference in spatially averaged myosin fluorescence intensities between the top and bottom halves of the embryo in the posterior (see shaded areas in Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). This analysis was performed in each frame and compiled across the entire flow period from all embryos of the non-RNAi condition. The resulting histogram (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B) shows that there is no detectable gradient in myosin fluorescence intensity along the azimuthal direction. Thus, we conclude that the embryo does not appear to break azimuthal symmetry with respect to myosin distribution and that chiral flow does not originate from myosin activity gradients along the azimuthal direction.

Cortical equation of motion

We derive equations of motion for the cell cortex, describing it as a thin film of active chiral fluid. We start by stating the conservation of momentum and angular momentum. Momentum conservation in the absence of external forces is expressed by,where ρv is the momentum density, with the mass density ρ and the center of mass velocity v, and is the stress tensor. A summation convention over repeated indices is implied. In general, the stress tensor can be decomposed into a symmetric traceless part, an antisymmetric part, and a trace part corresponding to the hydrostatic pressure, which we denote as σαβ,, and P, respectively.

Conservation of angular momentum in the absence of external torques reads,

In this study, we introduced the intrinsic or ‘spin’ angular momentum density IΩαβ, with Ωαβ and I being the spin rotation rate and the moment of inertia density, respectively. Moreover, we introduced the spin angular momentum flux tensor Mαβγ. Note that in general the moment of inertia tensor I is a symmetric fourth rank tensor. Here, we choose it to be diagonal for simplicity.

We describe the cell cortex as an active chiral fluid with the constitutive equations,where we introduced the strain rate uαβ = (∂αvβ + ∂βvα)/2 and the vorticity ωαβ = (∂αvβ − ∂βvα)/2. The phenomenological coefficients η, η′, and κ describe the passive response of the material. The coefficients ζ and ζ1 quantify active processes. Notably, ζ quantifies the tendency of molecular motors to generate active shear in the material, whereas ζ1 quantifies their tendency to produce active angular momentum fluxes. In general, additional couplings to the constitutive equations (Equations 4–6) exist, see. In this study, we constrain ourselves to the simplest set of equations which reproduces the phenomenology observed in the C. elegans cell cortex. The vector p denotes the broken symmetry of the cortical material in the thin direction and reflects that inhomogeneous protein distributions lead to different boundary conditions with the cytosol and the cell membrane. Thus in the following we consider px = py = 0 and pz = 1, thus p2 = 1.

To obtain equations of motion for the cortical material, we use the constitutive Equations 4–6 together with the force balance Equation 2 and the torque balance Equation 3 at low Reynolds number. The 3D torque and force balances for the cortical material read,where we used the incompressibility condition ∂γvγ = 0. After some algebra we obtain a fourth order differential equation for the velocity field,

The length scale is the length on which the intrinsic rotation rate Ωαβ decays to the vorticity ωαβ and is set by some molecular lengths in the system. An upper bound for is the thickness d of the cell cortex, which is smaller than 1 μm. Thus to describe long ranged flows in the cell cortex, we can consider the limit of and obtain,

Using the approximation, valid in thin films where Pext is the constant external pressure, as well as the incompressibility condition ∂γvγ = 0, we can rewrite this expression as,

Here, the roman indices i and j denote the in film directions x and y. Finally, we integrate Equation 11 over the film thickness d and obtain.where we introduced the averaged velocitythe active cortical tensionthe active cortical torque densityand the friction coefficient γ

Since the cell is azimuthally symmetric, the x and y components of the Equation 12 decouple such that,

Here, we have introduced the hydrodynamic length.

In summary, molecular force generation by actin and myosin is represented by active force and torque dipoles. These give rise to an active tension and an active torque density in the material and can generate flows. Spatial gradients in active tension are generated by a spatially inhomogeneous distribution of myosin motors. These give rise to a flow along the gradient of myosin density, see Equation 17. Spatial gradients in active torque density on the other hand give rise to a flow orthogonal to the gradient of myosin density (see Equation 18) in a direction that is set by the chirality of the torque dipoles in the cell cortex. The ratio of active torque densities to active tension thus generated is quantified by the chirality index,

A sketch of this mechanism is provided in Figure 2B, bottom sketch.

Non-linear dependency on myosin levels

In general, the active torque density τ and the active tension T are functions of the myosin density, which in turn is proportional to NMY-2::GFP fluorescence intensity I(x). In the absence of myosin, T and τ vanish. For increasing I, we express active tension and active torque density in a Taylor expansion,with coefficients α0, α1, β0, and β1. The chirality index c = τ/T then shows a myosin dependence of the form,where we have neglected higher order terms. Rho signalling may directly influence the levels of myosin and thereby I. Also, Rho signaling affects the structure of the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 3—figure supplement 4), and could alter the fraction of active myosin, possibly even in a position-dependent manner. Rho exhibits a spatial profile similar to that of NMY-2, which is captured by the function I(x). The non-linearities induced by Rho can thus be accounted for by non-linearities in I(x). We can therefore approximate such additional effects of Rho signaling by modifications of the position-independent parameters α0, α1, β0, and β1.

However, our experimental data do not allow us to faithfully estimate the values of α1 and β1. Thus, we consider only linear dependences in our fitting procedure using T = αI and τ = βI. The values for α and β and thus the chirality index c = α/β that our fitting routine determines correspond to averages of α0 + α1I and β0 + β1I along the embryo.

Fitting phenomenological coefficients

To compare our theory to experiment, we numerically solve Equations 17 and 18 using a finite difference scheme, using the two extreme points of the measured velocity profile as boundary conditions. Equations 17 and 18 depend on three free parameters, the hydrodynamic length ℓ, and the constants α and β which relate the measured fluorescence intensity I to the active tension and the active torque density such that T = αI and τ = βI, respectively. We adjust these parameters by performing a least squares fit of the solutions to Equations 17 and 18 to the measured velocity profile. In this way we obtain values for the hydrodynamic length ℓ and the chirality index c = τ/T numerically. We obtain error estimates for ℓ, α, and β from the Hessian of the residual of the least square fit with respect to the parameters.

References 47

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Beausang JF, Schroeder HW, Nelson PC, Goldman YE. Twirling of actin by myosins II and V observed via polarized TIRF in a modified gliding assay. Biophysical Journal. 2008;95:5820-5831.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.108.140319

  3. 3.

    Bergmann DC, Lee M, Robertson B, Tsou MF, Rose LS, Wood WB. Embryonic handedness choice in C. elegans involves the Galpha protein GPA-16. Development. 2003;130:5731-5740.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.00839

  4. 4.

    Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;1-24.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/77.1.71

  5. 5.

    Brown NA, Wolpert L. The development of handedness in left/right asymmetry. Development. 1990;109:1-9.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.109.1.1

  6. 6.

    Clark AG, Dierkes K, Paluch EK. Monitoring actin cortex thickness in live cells. Biophysical Journal. 2013;105:570-580.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.057

  7. 7.

    Danilchik MV, Brown EE, Riegert K. Intrinsic chiral properties of the Xenopus egg cortex: an early indicator of left-right asymmetry? Development. 2006;133:4517-4526.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.02642

  8. 8.

    De La Cruz EM, Roland J, McCullough BR, Blanchoin L, Martiel JL. Origin of twist-bend coupling in actin filaments. Biophysical Journal. 2010;99:1852-1860.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.009

  9. 9.

    Dickinson DJ, Ward JD, Reiner DJ, Goldstein B. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nature Methods. 2013;10:1028-1034.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2641

  10. 10.

    Fürthauer S, Strempel M, Grill SW, Jülicher F. Active chiral fluids. The European Physical Journal. E, Soft Matter. 2012;35:89.

    Not in our library10.1140/epje/i2012-12089-6

  11. 11.

    Fürthauer S, Strempel M, Grill SW, Jülicher F. Active chiral processes in thin films. Physical Review Letters. 2013;110:048103.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.110.048103

  12. 12.

    Géminard C, González-Morales N, Coutelis JB, Noselli S. The myosin ID pathway and left-right asymmetry in Drosophila. Genesis. 2014;10:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvg.22763

  13. 13.

    Gore J, Bryant Z, Nöllmann M, Le MU, Cozzarelli NR, Bustamante C. DNA overwinds when stretched. Nature. 2006;442:836-839.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04974

  14. 14.

    Hayashi T, Murakami R. Left-right asymmetry in Drosophila melanogaster gut development. Development, Growth & Differentiation. 2001;43:239-246.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1440-169x.2001.00574.x

  15. 15.

    Hejnol A. A twist in time–the evolution of spiral cleavage in the light of animal phylogeny. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2010;50:695-706.

    Not in our library10.1093/icb/icq103

  16. 16.

    Henley CL. Possible origins of macroscopic left-right asymmetry in organisms. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2012;148:740-774.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10955-012-0520-z

  17. 17.

    Hozumi S, Maeda R, Taniguchi K, Kanai M, Shirakabe S, Sasamura T, Spéder P, Noselli S, Aigaki T, Murakami R, Matsuno K. An unconventional myosin in Drosophila reverses the default handedness in visceral organs. Nature. 2006;440:798-802.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04625

  18. 18.

    Huang KC, Ehrhardt DW, Shaevitz JW. The molecular origins of chiral growth in walled cells. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2012;15:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mib.2012.11.002

  19. 19.

    Ishida T, Thitamadee S, Hashimoto T. Twisted growth and organization of cortical microtubules. Journal of Plant Research. 2007;120:61-70.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10265-006-0039-y

  20. 20.

    Kachur TM, Audhya A, Pilgrim DB. UNC-45 is required for NMY-2 contractile function in early embryonic polarity establishment and germline cellularization in C. elegans. Developmental Biology. 2008;314:287-299.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.11.028

  21. 21.

    Kron SJ, Spudich JA. Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 1986;83:6272-6276.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.83.17.6272

  22. 22.

    Kruse K, Joanny JF, Jülicher F, Prost J, Sekimoto K. Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics. The European Physical Journal. E, Soft Matter. 2005;16:5-16.

    Not in our library10.1140/epje/e2005-00002-5

  23. 23.

    Maekawa M, Ishizaki T, Boku S, Watanabe N, Fujita A, Iwamatsu A, Obinata T, Ohashi K, Mizuno K, Narumiya S. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science. 1999;285:895-898.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.285.5429.895

  24. 24.

    Mayer M, Depken M, Bois JS, Jülicher F, Grill SW. Anisotropies in cortical tension reveal the physical basis of polarizing cortical flows. Nature. 2010;467:617-621.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09376

  25. 25.

    Motegi F, Sugimoto A. Sequential functioning of the ECT-2 RhoGEF, RHO-1 and CDC-42 establishes cell polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nature Cell Biology. 2006;8:978-985.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1459

  26. 26.

    Munro E, Nance J, Priess JR. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Developmental Cell. 2004;7:413-424.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.001

  27. 27.

    Nonaka S, Tanaka Y, Okada Y, Takeda S, Harada A, Kanai Y, Kido M, Hirokawa N. Randomization of left–right asymmetry due to loss of nodal cilia generating leftward flow of extraembryonic fluid in mice lacking KIF3B motor protein. Cell. 1998;95:829-837.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81705-5

  28. 28.

    Pohl C, Bao Z. Chiral forces organize left-right patterning in C. elegans by uncoupling midline and anteroposterior axis. Developmental Cell. 2010;19:402-412.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2010.08.014

  29. 29.

    Pollard TD, Cooper JA. Actin and actin-binding proteins. A critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1986;55:987-1035.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005011

  30. 30.

    Raffel M, Willert CE, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J. Particle image velocimetry - a practical guide. 2007.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Sase I, Miyata H, Ishiwata S, Kinosita K. Axial rotation of sliding actin filaments revealed by single-fluorophore imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 1997;94:5646-5650.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.94.11.5646

  32. 32.

    Savin T, Kurpios NA, Shyer AE, Florescu P, Liang H, Mahadevan L, Tabin CJ. On the growth and form of the gut. Nature. 2011;476:57-62.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10277

  33. 33.

    Schlessinger K, Hall A, Tolwinski N. Wnt signaling pathways meet Rho GTPases. Genes & Development. 2009;23:265-277.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1760809

  34. 34.

    Schonegg S, Hyman AA, Wood WB. Timing and mechanism of the initial cue establishing handed left-right asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Genesis. 2014;52:572-580.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvg.22749

  35. 35.

    Shibazaki Y, Shimizu M, Kuroda R. Body handedness is directed by genetically determined cytoskeletal dynamics in the early embryo. Current Biology. 2004;14:1462-1467.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.018

  36. 36.

    Singh D, Pohl C. Coupling of rotational cortical flow, asymmetric midbody positioning, and spindle rotation mediates dorsoventral axis formation in C. elegans. Developmental Cell. 2014;28:253-267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.002

  37. 37.

    Spéder P, Ádám G, Noselli S. Type ID unconventional myosin controls left–right asymmetry in Drosophila. Nature. 2006;440:803-807.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04623

  38. 38.

    Stark H, Lubensky TC. Poisson bracket approach to the dynamics of nematic liquid crystals: the role of spin angular momentum. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2005;72:051714.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.72.051714

  39. 39.

    Tamada A, Kawase S, Murakami F, Kamiguchi H. Autonomous right-screw rotation of growth cone filopodia drives neurite turning. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2010;188:429-441.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200906043

  40. 40.

    Taniguchi K, Maeda R, Ando T, Okumura T, Nakazawa N, Hatori R, Nakamura M, Hozumi S, Fujiwara H, Matsuno K. Chirality in planar cell shape contributes to left-right asymmetric epithelial morphogenesis. Science. 2011;333:339-341.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1200940

All 47 references

Cited by papers we hold 5

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.