No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 25, 2026.
A molecular model for the role of SYCP3 in meiotic chromosome organisation
Johanna Liinamaria Syrjänen, Luca Pellegrini, Owen Richard Davies
eLife · 2014 · CC BY
Abstract
The synaptonemal complex (SC) is an evolutionarily-conserved protein assembly that holds together homologous chromosomes during prophase of the first meiotic division. Whilst essential for meiosis and fertility, the molecular structure of the SC has proved resistant to elucidation. The SC protein SYCP3 has a crucial but poorly understood role in establishing the architecture of the meiotic chromosome. Here we show that human SYCP3 forms a highly-elongated helical tetramer of 20 nm length. N-terminal sequences extending from each end of the rod-like structure bind double-stranded DNA, enabling SYCP3 to link distant sites along the sister chromatid. We further find that SYCP3 self-assembles into regular filamentous structures that resemble the known morphology of the SC lateral element. Together, our data form the basis for a model in which SYCP3 binding and assembly on meiotic chromosomes leads to their organisation into compact structures compatible with recombination and crossover formation.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 25, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Homologous chromosome synapsis and genetic exchange through crossing-over are central to the process of meiosis. Synapsis is achieved by the assembly of an elegant molecular structure, the synaptonemal complex (SC), which acts as a ‘zipper’ to bring in close apposition pairs of homologous chromosomes. The functional architecture provided by the SC is essential for meiotic recombination and crossover formation; disruption of SC formation in mice leads to meiotic failure, infertility and embryonic death through aneuploidy. Defective SC formation in humans has been associated with cases of infertility and recurrent miscarriage, which overall affect 15% and 5% of couples respectively, in addition to non-lethal aneuploidies such as Down's syndrome.
Since its discovery in 1956, the ultrastructure of the SC has been studied extensively by electron microscopy. These studies have shown that the SC adopts the same characteristic tripartite structure in all sexually reproducing organisms in which it is found, from yeast to humans (Figure 1A;; ). Thus, the SC is comprised of two approximately 50 nm wide lateral elements (LEs) that coat the chromosome axes, and a 100 nm wide central region that in almost all organisms contains a mid-line 20–40 nm wide central element (CE). The central and lateral elements are continuous along the entire chromosome axis (up to 24 μm in human spermatocytes) and are joined together by a series of interdigitating transverse filaments, which provide the 100 nm distance between lateral elements that defines the central region. Whilst lateral elements are often amorphous in appearance, in a number of species they present a regular 20 nm pattern of repeating dark and light bands along the longitudinal axis, hinting at structural regularity in the assembly of its underlying protein constituents. In recent years, the principal protein components of the mammalian SC have been identified and localised within the structure through immunofluorescence and immunogold staining. According to this initial map of the SC, the SYCE1, SYCE2, SYCE3 and TEX12 proteins form the central element, whilst SYCP2 and SYCP3 are the main constituents of the lateral element (Figure 1B;;; ). The transverse filaments are formed by SYCP1, with its N- and C-termini located in the central and lateral elements respectively. SC protein orthologues are present throughout vertebrates; key SC components such as SYCP1 and SYCP3 also show wider evolutionary conservation across metazoan organisms.
Assembly of the synaptonemal complex initiates in leptotene of prophase I through the induction of double-strand breaks by the SPO11 nuclease and a series of subsequent inter-homologue searches catalysed by the RAD51 and DMC1 recombinases. At this stage, homologous chromosomes are brought into a loose 400 nm-wide alignment, whilst lateral element proteins SYCP2 and SYCP3 are recruited to the chromosome axes in an inter-dependent manner. Their recruitment also depends on the prior assembly of a cohesin core that includes meiosis-specific components SMC1β, RAD21L, REC8 and STAG3. In zygotene, homologous chromosomes are ‘zipped’ together into 100 nm synapsis by interdigitation of SYCP1 transverse filaments. This process is dependent on a network of interactions that form within the central element between the SYCP1 N-terminal region, SYCE1-3 and TEX12, including the higher order assembly of the constitutive SYCE2-TEX12 complex. To achieve synapsis also requires axis protein HORMAD1, which assembles on unsynapsed chromosomes independent of SYCP2 and SYCP3 during leptotene to zygotene, and subsequently dissociates upon SYCP1 synapsis. At pachytene, the SC is fully formed, enabling the completion of meiotic recombination with the formation of typically two crossovers per tetrad. The SC is disassembled in diplotene, leading to the re-association of HORMAD1 on desynapsed chromosomes. At this stage, homologous chromosomes remain linked solely by crossovers, whose formation is essential for preventing aneuploidy. After disassembly, some SC components remain present at paired centromeres; additionally, SYCP3 is partially retained along chromosome arms until metaphase I.
Disruption of SYCP3 in mice leads to a sexually dimorphic phenotype. In males, it causes complete infertility owing to apoptotic cell death during meiotic prophase, with failure of SC formation and synapsis; in females, there is subfertility, with a high aneuploidy rate leading to embryonic death in utero. SYCP3 deficiency has two intriguing structural consequences for the chromosome axis: a doubling of chromosome axis length with respect to wild type, and premature disassembly of the cohesin cores during diplotene. These findings suggest a role for SYCP3 in chromosome compaction and stabilisation of the cohesin core. The ectopic expression of SYCP3 in somatic cells leads to the formation of fibre-like higher order assemblies that show a regular repeating pattern with a periodicity of approximately 20 nm. Their assembly is dependent on the presence of the last six amino acids of SYCP3, which have been well conserved throughout evolution. At the clinical level, several SYCP3 mutations have been identified in infertile men and women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. Furthermore, SYCP3 is ectopically expressed in a variety of primary tumours, which is associated with an increased rate of aneuploidy caused by inhibition of double-strand break DNA repair through homologous recombination by BRCA2 and RAD51. Thus, the molecular structure and function provided by SYCP3 is essential for meiotic cell division but can lead to apparently pathological consequences in mitosis.
Here, we combine the crystallographic analysis of human SYCP3 with biochemical and biophysical evidence to propose a molecular model for the role of SYCP3 in the organisation of the meiotic chromosome. We determine that SYCP3 is a tetrameric protein and that its helical core folds in an elongated rod-like structure spanning 20 nm in length. We show that SYCP3 can bind DNA through the N-terminal regions extending from its tetrameric core. As the DNA-binding sites are located at both tetramer ends, SYCP3 can act as a physical strut to hold distant regions of DNA together. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SYCP3 undergoes self-assembly into regular striated filamentous structures of 23 nm periodicity that resemble the native SC lateral element. We conclude that concurrent DNA-binding and higher order assembly by SYCP3 on meiotic chromosomes lead to compaction and organisation of the chromosome axis, in a manner conducive to SC central region assembly, recombination and crossover formation.
A helical tetrameric core defines the underlying structure of SYCP3
In order to establish the molecular basis of SYCP3 function, we set out to find a robust means for its recombinant production. Although we were able to purify full length SYCP3 (SYCP3FL) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A), the protein suffered from proteolytic degradation and irreversible aggregation at physiological concentrations of salt. We found that the high-salt dependency could be eliminated by removing six amino acids from the C-terminal end of the protein that are known to be essential for fibre formation upon heterologous expression. Unwanted proteolysis of the recombinant sample was alleviated by removing the N-terminal 65 amino acids that are predicted to be largely unstructured (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). We thus identified a core region of human SYCP3, corresponding to amino acids 66–230 (SYCP3Core), that is highly stable and can be purified in large quantities to near homogeneity.
Circular dichroism analysis showed an α-helical content of 93% (155 amino acids) and 66% (180 amino acids) for SYCP3Core and SYCP3FL respectively (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B), and both proteins demonstrated co-operative unfolding during thermal denaturation with a melting temperature of approximately 65°C (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). Thus, the majority of secondary structure, and the overall stability of the protein, emanate from the 66–230 core region. We assessed the oligomeric state of SYCP3 by size-exclusion chromatography multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS). SYCP3Core and SYCP3FL eluted in single peaks of molecular weights 78.6 and 110 kDa respectively (Figure 2A,B), closely matching their theoretical tetramer sizes of 79.5 and 111 kDa. The tetrameric status of SYCP3Core was confirmed by analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), which further indicated a highly asymmetric structure with an estimated frictional ratio (f/f0) of 2.1 (data not shown). Together, these findings demonstrate that amino acids 66–230 of human SYCP3 form a core helical structure that mediates its assembly in a constitutive tetramer.
Structure of human SYCP3
The X-ray crystal structure of SYCP3Core was solved at a resolution of 2.4 Å exploiting the single-wavelength anomalous diffraction of crystals soaked in sodium iodide; the SYCP3Core structure was refined against native data at 2.2 Å (Table 1; Figure 2—figure supplements 2, 3). The crystals contain two tetramers in the asymmetric unit; the tetramers are almost identical both between and within iodide derivative and native structures (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). The description provided below relates to the tetramer formed from chains A-D of the 2.2 Å native structure, and unless otherwise stated to the half of the tetramer formed by the N-termini of chains A, C and the C-termini of chains B, D (chain labels are provided in subscript).
The overall architecture of SYCP3 is an extended rod-like structure that spans approximately 20 nm in length (Figure 2C). The helical chains of the SYCP3 tetramer are arranged in an alternating anti-parallel fashion, such that each end of the tetramer contains two N-termini and two C-termini. The SYCP3 structure undergoes a left-handed 90° rotation along its length so that the two N-termini at each end of the tetramer lie in orthogonal planes. The tetrameric assembly is constructed from a combination of four-helix bundles and coiled-coil motifs. The two halves of the structure (hereafter referred to as arms) are formed of a four-helix bundle leading into a coiled-coil that zips together the C-terminal parallel chains, leaving the N-terminal ends to splay apart. In contrast, the centre of the molecule is asymmetrical, consisting of a coiled-coil between one pair of parallel chains that provides the left-handed 90° rotation of the molecule. A noticeable consequence of this asymmetrical assembly is that each of the four SYCP3 chains adopts a unique conformation (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).
Assembly of the SYCP3 tetrameric arms
The most prominent structural feature driving the tetrameric assembly of SYCP3 chains is the presence of two four-helix bundles, one in each arm of the tetramer. The extensive network of hydrophobic and polar interactions within the two helical bundles is likely to be responsible for the high thermal stability of the SYCP3 structure. Each bundle contains a bipartite hydrophobic core consisting of a cluster of aromatic residues proximal to the middle of the tetramer and a more distal region centred around tryptophan W111 (Figure 3A,B). The proximal aromatic-rich core of the four-helix bundle results from the close packing of Y125A/C, F129A/C and F133A/C with Y179B/D and F182B/D; it is extended by hydrophobic contacts with I175B/D, L178B/D, I183B/D and M186B/D, and hydrogen bonding between Y125A/C and Q181B/D, and between S126A/C and Y179B/D (Figure 3A). The second hydrophobic region is built around the two W111A/C residues, surrounded by L100A/C, I107A/C, F204B/D and M208B/D. Interestingly, W111 adopts two distinct conformations in chains A and C (Figure 3B, Figure 3—figure supplement 2): in both cases, the indole ring packs against L197B/D, but engages in alternative hydrogen bonding with Q201B (W111A) or D194D (W111C). The two hydrophobic cores of the four-helix bundle are separated by a solvent-rich layer of polar residues, featuring at its centre R118A/C, bonded via salt link with E190B/D.
At its distal end, the four-helix bundle morphs into a parallel coiled-coil between the C-termini of chains B and D, flanked by the N-terminal helical segments of chains A and C that splay apart (Figure 3C). The short coiled-coil is held together by canonical interactions between heptad residues M208B/D, Q212B/D and I215B/D and is further stabilised by surrounding hydrophobic interactions involving L92A/C, L100A/C, M208B/D, L211B/D, I215B/D and M216B/D, as well as salt bridges between R91A/C and E218D/B, and cation-π interactions between Y95A/C and K214B/D.
The central region of SYCP3
The centre of the SYCP3 tetramer is intrinsically asymmetrical as parallel chains B and D interact in a coiled-coil, keeping chains A and C apart by steric exclusion. The coiled-coil is held together by a heptad containing I150B/D, F154B/D, Q157B/D and L161B/D at the interface, whereas the equivalent residues of chains A and C adopt alternative conformations (Figure 3D, Figure 3—figure supplement 2). A hydrogen bonding network between highly-conserved glutamine residues Q157B/D and Q158B/D interrupts the continuity of the hydrophobic interactions at the heart of the coiled-coil, which features most prominently the aromatic stacking of phenylalanine residue F154A/C with F154B/D (Figure 3D). The boundaries of the central coiled-coil are marked by tryptophan residues W136A/C and W136B/D, which define points of conformational transition to a four-helix bundle in the two arms of the tetramer (Figure 3E,F).
As the SYCP3 structure is constructed from four identical chains, central coiled-coil formation cannot favour one pair of parallel chains over the other. Instead, the central region likely oscillates between two conformations, in which the coiled-coil encompasses either chains B and D or chains A and C. In both conformations, the left-handed 90° rotation would be retained; interchange between conformations would require a transitory super-helical unwinding of the central region. This dynamic interchange is supported by the abundance of conserved glutamine residues and would allow torsional rotation around the longitudinal axis of SYCP3. In the crystal structure, torsional rotation is precluded by the crystal lattice, freezing the central coiled-coil in a single conformation. Nevertheless, the higher crystallographic B-factors of the backbone atoms in the central region relative to rest of the structure support a dynamic rather than fixed conformation (Figure 3G).
The SYCP3 tetrameric ends interact with DNA
The known localisation of SYCP3 on the chromosome axis prompted us to test whether it interacts directly with DNA. Analysis by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and fluorescence anisotropy using SYCP3ΔCt6 (amino acids 1–230) showed double-stranded DNA-binding, with the formation of a discrete protein-DNA complex at a Kd of 0.20 μM (Figure 4B,H). DNA-binding was dependent on the N-terminal regions of SYCP3, as it was not detected for SYCP3Core (Figure 4C). The N-termini of SYCP3 contain two conserved basic patches, BP1 (52-KRRKKR-57) and BP2 (88-KRKR-91) (Figure 4A): alanine mutation of BP1 or BP2 in SYCP3ΔCt6 (ΔBP1 and ΔBP2, respectively) caused a substantial reduction in binding affinity (Figure 4D,E,H), whilst mutation of both patches (ΔBP1+2) completely eliminated DNA-binding by SYCP3ΔCt6 (Figure 4F,H). For all SYCP3ΔCt6 basic patch mutants, the tetrameric structure was confirmed by SEC-MALS (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). We further detected DNA binding by a GST fusion protein containing amino acids 49–93 (GST-SYCP3BP1+2) spanning both basic patches; its significantly lower affinity than that of SYCP3ΔCt6 (Figure 4G) indicates that the tetrameric architecture may be important to orientate correctly the DNA-binding regions of the protein. The difference in DNA-binding affinity between ΔBP1 and SYCP3Core, which includes BP2 but not BP1, suggests that additional amino acids surrounding the basic patch residues contribute to DNA binding (Figure 4C,D). The antiparallel arrangement of chains in the SYCP3 tetramer predicts that SYCP3 can interact simultaneously with two DNA molecules, one at either end of the tetramer (Figure 4I).
SYCP3 self-assembly
A role in chromosome axis compaction might be achieved through an intrinsic capacity for SYCP3 to assemble into a higher order structural scaffold. Analysis by electron microscopy revealed that full length SYCP3 readily self-assembles into filamentous structures or fibres of 50–200 nm width, and up to 5 μm in length (Figure 5A). The SYCP3 fibres display a regular pattern of alternate light and dark striations, with a repeating unit of approximately 23 nm. The striated appearance closely resembles the ultrastructures formed upon heterologous expression of SYCP3 in vivo and the SC lateral element in a number of species. The comparable size of the repeating unit relative to the length of the SYCP3Core structure suggests that the fibre contains stacked layers of SYCP3 molecules brought into parallel alignment by self-associating interactions (Figure 5B). Fibre formation is eliminated by removal of the last six amino acids of the protein (SYCP3ΔCt6), in agreement with a previous report, or by alanine mutation of a short stretch of conserved amino acids, 69-EVQNML-74 (SYCP3ΔNt6) N-terminal to the SYCP3 core (Figures 4A, 5C,D, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Therefore, self-assembly of SYCP3 is mediated by specific amino acid motifs in the N- and C-terminal tails of the tetrameric core structure.
The combined evidence represented by the dimension of the SYCP3Core structure, the regular nature of the SYCP3 fibre and the position of the sequence motifs responsible for fibre formation, suggest a molecular basis for SYCP3 self-assembly into a higher order structure. The proposed packing of SYCP3 molecules within the fibre would bring into juxtaposition the N- and C-terminal tails originating from tetramers located in adjacent layers. Thus, self-assembly may be driven by co-operative interactions of the terminal regions of the SYCP3 tetramers, extending recursively across the width of the fibre (Figure 5F). Such an arrangement of SYCP3 molecules would explain the regular striation pattern of the fibre, with layers of dense protein packing at the interface and looser, conformationally dynamic regions in the centre of the molecule accounting for the alternating dark and light bands. The presence of self-association and DNA-binding motifs within tetrameric ends suggests that both processes must be closely integrated; accordingly, we find that the presence of DNA is compatible with higher order assembly in vitro (Figure 5E).
Discussion
The distinctive tripartite ultrastructure of the synaptonemal complex embodies the molecular structure-function relationship that underlies meiosis. The SC operates both as a physical scaffold for synapsis between homologous chromosomes and as a functional component of the recombination and crossover formation machinery. It is thus imperative to gain a detailed understanding of the molecular structure of the SC in order to elucidate the mechanistic basis of meiosis. Here we combine the crystallographic analysis of human SYCP3 with evidence of its DNA-binding properties and intrinsic propensity for self-assembly to propose a molecular model for meiotic chromosome organisation by SYCP3.
The ability of the SYCP3 tetramer to bind DNA via the N-terminal regions of its rod-like structure suggests that SYCP3 might act to tether together distant locations in chromosomal DNA. Thus, SYCP3 may impose the long-distance organisation of the chromosome axis by self-assembly in a three-dimensional lattice in which chromosomal DNA is looped between the 20 nm physical struts provided by each tetramer (Figure 6). Acting as a molecular spacer, torsional rotation of SYCP3 may be critical in relieving strains in the DNA backbone that build during recombination and crossover formation. We envisage that SYCP3 assembly on the meiotic chromosome axis is initiated by interactions of individual tetramers with the DNA (Figure 6), ‘pinching’ short portions of chromosomal DNA at discrete locations. Co-operative loading of further SYCP3 molecules onto DNA would reinforce nascent loops, and then bridge between them through self-assembly interactions with SYCP3 molecules of adjacent loops. Completion of the self-assembly process would eventually link all loops in one continuous structure extending for the length of the chromosome axis. The resultant ultrastructure of the meiotic chromosome axis would contain discrete stretches of chromosomal DNA compacted in a concertina-like manner within the newly formed lateral element, interspersed with chromatin loops protruding from the SC (Figure 6).
Our prediction of a central role for SYCP3 in meiotic chromosome organisation is supported by the known impairment of SC assembly and high rates of aneuploidy in embryos upon SYCP3 deficiency in mice. The model provides a molecular basis for the known increase in chromosome axis length in oocytes of SYCP3-deficient mice. It further predicts the formation of one chromatin loop for every two repeating units in the SYCP3 fibre (46 nm), closely matching the known evolutionarily conserved loop density of ∼20 per 1 μm of chromosome axis. We envisage that SC assembly depends upon the regular and compact meiotic chromosome architecture imposed by SYCP3, explaining the formation of only short fragmented SC structures upon SYCP3 deficiency in mice. Furthermore, all SYCP3 mutations reported in human male infertility and female recurrent pregnancy loss affect the C-terminal sequence of the protein; our structural analysis shows that these mutations would block higher order assembly whilst retaining tetramer formation, confirming a key role for meiotic chromosome organisation by SYCP3 in human fertility.
EM studies of the mammalian SC have revealed that the lateral element is comprised of two parallel filaments. It is interesting to speculate that, instead of a single higher order structure, SYCP3 may compact chromosomal DNA into two parallel assemblies within the lateral element, separating sister chromatid DNA locally in the midline whilst retaining cohesion in the chromatin loops. In such a model, the structural organisation of sister chromatid DNA may inhibit inter-sister recombination whilst permitting inter-homologue recombination. A direct function of the SYCP3-dependent organisation of chromosomal DNA in recombination partner choice may also account for the tumourigenic effect of SYCP3 expression in somatic cells in which a high aneuploidy rate results from inhibition of DNA repair by inter-sister homologous recombination.
Our in vitro analysis of SYCP3 suggests a molecular model in which meiotic chromosome compaction is driven by DNA-binding and self-assembly of SYCP3. In vivo, SYCP3 function depends upon SYCP2 and the meiotic cohesin core, as SYCP3 recruitment to the chromosome axis is abrogated upon disruption of SYCP2, STAG3 or REC8/RAD21L. We propose that these factors perform functions that are essential within the cellular context to facilitate DNA-binding and self-assembly of SYCP3 on the chromosome axis. The intrinsic propensity of SYCP3 to self-assemble into higher-order structures in vitro and in vivo suggests that its loading on the chromosome axis must be tightly regulated to prevent formation of unproductive cytoplasmic structures. This may be achieved by protein mediators, possibly SYCP2, that bind to SYCP3 and prevent its self-assembly until delivery onto chromosomal DNA. Whilst SYCP3 readily binds naked DNA in vitro, the meiotic cohesin core must present chromatin-bound DNA in a manner compatible with its binding and incorporation into SYCP3 assemblies. During assembly, additional interactions of SYCP3 with axis components may further facilitate necessary changes in local chromosome structure through sliding of cohesin and condensin rings. The SYCP3 structure explains the constant loop density of compacted chromosomes, but it is presently unclear what determines the loop length and thus the chromosome axis length achieved by compaction. A role for meiotic cohesins is hinted at by the known shortening of the SYCP3-bound chromosome axis length upon disruption of SMC1β or REC8. An understanding of the interactions of SYCP3 with other axis components will be essential to define fully the molecular basis of meiotic chromosome compaction.
Completion of recombination and crossover formation is accompanied by dissolution of the SC structure and SYCP3 removal, although some SYCP3 is retained on chromosome arms until metaphase. SYCP3 removal may require post-translational modifications or interacting partners that disrupt self-assembly through competitive binding. The recent observation that in Caenorhabditis elegans crossover sites are associated with a local 0.4–0.5 µm elongation in chromosome axis length suggests the intriguing possibility that SYCP3 disassembly may be regulated locally to yield a looser chromatin structure at points of established crossovers.
The work described here has yielded the first atomic view of an SC protein, the lateral element component SYCP3, and has provided a molecular basis for SYCP3 function in the compaction and organisation of the meiotic chromosome. Future studies will aim to define the high-resolution structure of the SYCP3 fibre, explore the effect of SYCP2, cohesin and condensin on SYCP3 assembly, and investigate potential molecular mechanisms underpinning functional synergies between SYCP3 and double-strand break induction.
Protein expression and purification
Sequences corresponding to amino acids 1–236 (full length, FL), 1–230 (ΔCt6) and 66–230 (Core) of human SYCP3 (Swissprot entry Q8IZU3) were cloned into the pHAT4 vector for expression in bacteria with N-terminal tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavable His6-tags. The sequence corresponding to SYCP3 amino acids 49–93 was cloned into the pGAT3 vector for expression with an N-terminal TEV-cleavable His6-GST-tag. Recombinant proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) Rosetta2 cells (Novagen, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA) in 2xYT media, induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 16 hr at 25°C. Cells were lysed by sonication in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM KCl, EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and initial purification was achieved through Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (Qiagen, Netherlands). SYCP3FL and GST-SYCP349-93 were buffer exchanged into 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM KCl and 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 200 mM KCl, 1 mM TCEP respectively, concentrated (Millipore Amicon Ultra-4) and stored at −80°C at 1–3 mg/ml. SYCP3Core and SYCP3ΔCt6 were further purified by TEV cleavage (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), cation exchange and heparin affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare, UK), concentrated (Millipore Amicon Ultra-4) and stored at −80°C in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 200 mM KCl at 10 mg/ml and 7-12 mg/ml respectively. Protein samples were analysed by SDS-PAGE using the NuPAGE Bis-Tris system with SimplyBlue SafeStain (Invitrogen). Protein concentrations were measured by UV spectrophotometry (Varian Cary 50 spectrophotometer) with extinction coefficients and molecular weights determined by ExPASy ProtParam. Patch mutants ΔNt6 (69-EVQNML-74 to A6), BP1 (52-KRRKKR-57 to A6), BP2 (88-KRKR-91 to A4) and BP1+2 (BP1 and BP2) were purified as described above for wild type SYCP3FL and SYCP3ΔCt6.
Circular dichroism spectroscopy
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was performed using an Aviv 410 spectropolarimeter (Biophysics facility, Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge), with a 1 mm path-length quartz cuvette. CD spectra were recorded for SYCP3Core (0.15 mg/ml in 10 mM NaH2PO4 pH 7.4, 150 mM NaF) and SYCP3FL (0.078 mg/ml in 10 mM NaH2PO4 pH 7.4, 450 mM NaF) at 5°C, with 0.5 nm increments between 260 and 185 nm, 1 nm slit width and 1 s averaging time. Raw data from three measurements were averaged, corrected for buffer signal, smoothed and converted to mean residue ellipticity ([θ]). Data were deconvoluted using the CDSSTR algorithm of the Dichroweb server. CD temperature melt data were recorded for SYCP3Core (0.15 mg/ml in 10 mM NaH2PO4 pH 7.5, 150 mM NaF) and SYCP3FL (0.51 mg/ml in 20 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 500 mM KCl), at 5°C increments between 5 and 95°C, with 1°C per minute ramping rate, 0.5°C deadband, 30 s incubation time, 1 nm slit width and 1 s averaging time. Raw data were converted to mean residue ellipticity ([θ]222) and plotted as ‘% unfolded’, calculated as ([θ]222,x − [θ]222,5)/([θ]222,95 − [θ]222,5).
Size exclusion chromatography multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS)
SEC-MALS was performed using an ÄKTA Purifier with Superdex 200 10/300 GL SEC (GE Healthcare), with column output fed into a DAWN HELEOS II MALS detector with laser source at 664 nm and eight fixed angle detectors (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA), followed by an Optilab T-rEX differential refractometer using 664 nm LED light source at 25°C (Wyatt Technology). SYCP3Core and SYCP3FL (100 μl of 2–3 mg/ml) were analysed in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM KCl and 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM KCl respectively. Data were collected and analysed using ASTRA 6 (Wyatt Technology). Molecular weights (and estimated errors) were calculated across individual eluted protein peaks through extrapolation from Zimm plots using a dn/dc value of 0.1850 ml/g. SYCP3ΔNt6, SYCP3ΔCt6 and basic patch mutants were analysed using a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM KCl.
Crystallisation and structure determination
Crystallisation was achieved by vapour diffusion in hanging drops. 2 μl of crystallisation solution (100 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 13.0% (wt/vol) PEG3350) and 2 μl of 10 mg/ml SYCPCore (in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 200 mM KCl) were mixed and incubated against a 500 μl reservoir volume at 18°C for 5–7 days. The crystals were washed for 30 s in crystallisation solution supplemented with 20% (vol/vol) glycerol, or were incubated for 1 hr in crystallisation solution supplemented with 100 mM NaI and 20% (vol/vol) glycerol, prior to freezing in liquid nitrogen. For iodide derivatives, X-ray data were collected at beamline PROXIMA1 of the SOLEIL synchrotron facility (Gif-sur-Yvette, France), at 100 K, wavelength 1.77120 Å. Data were indexed and integrated in XDS and merged in Aimless; the crystal belongs to spacegroup P1 (cell dimensions a = 49.18 Å, b = 90.30 Å, c = 104.22 Å, α = 108.25°, β = 101.20°, γ = 102.75°), with two SYCP3 tetramers in the asymmetric unit. Initial SAD structure solution was achieved through the identification of 30 iodide sites using PHENIX AutoSol, and partial automated building into the density-modified experimental map using PHENIX Autobuild. The structure was extended and completed, with the identification of 13 additional iodide sites, by iterative manual building in Coot and refinement using PHENIX Refine. The structure was refined against 2.41 Å data to R and Rfree values of 0.207 and 0.229 respectively, with 100% of residues within the favoured regions of the Ramachandran plot, a clashscore of 6.66 and an overall MolProbity score of 1.37. For the native structure, X-ray data were collected at beamline I03 of the Diamond Light Source synchrotron facility (Oxfordshire, UK), at 100 K, wavelength 1.90740 Å. Data were indexed and integrated in XDS and three datasets collected on a single crystal were merged in Aimless. The crystal belongs to spacegroup P1 (cell dimensions a = 49.14 Å, b = 92.38 Å, c = 103.40 Å, α = 66.53°, β = 82.32°, γ = 76.53°), with two SYCP3 tetramers in the asymmetric unit. Initial structure solution was achieved through molecular replacement using PHENIX Phaser-MR, using a fragment of the iodide structure (chain A: 93–140, chain B: 176–216, chain C: 93–140 and chain D: 176–216, with surface residues replaced by alanines) as a search model. A partial structure was automatically built using PHENIX Autobuild and completed through iterative manual building in Coot and refinement using PHENIX refine and Buster-TNT (Global Phasing Ltd., Cambridge, UK). The structure was refined against 2.24 Å data to R and Rfree values of 0.195 and 0.226 respectively, with 100% of residues within the favoured regions of the Ramachandran plot, a clashscore of 2.25 and an overall MolProbity score of 1.23. Molecular structure images were generated using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3 Schrödinger, LLC.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
SYCP3ΔCt6 (wild type and mutants), SYCP3Core and GST-SYCP349-93 were incubated with 18.7 μM (per base pair) 187 bp linear dsDNA substrate at concentrations between 0 and 40 μM in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM KCl for 5 min at 4°C. Glycerol was added at a final concentration of 8.3% and samples were analysed by electrophoresis on a 0.5% (wt/vol) agarose gel in 0.5x TBE at 20 V for 2.5 hr at 4°C. DNA was detected by ethidium bromide.
Fluorescence anisotropy
SYCP3ΔCt6 (wild type and mutants) were incubated with 25 nM (per molecule) 60 bp linear FAM-dsDNA substrate at concentrations between 0 and 20 μM in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM KCl. Fluorescence anisotropy data were recorded using a PHERAstar FS plate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany) with fluorescence polarisation optics module (excitation at 485 nm, emission at 520 nm), at 25°C in black 96-well NBS plates (Corning, Corning, NY). Data were fitted to the following equation using curve fitting software ‘profit’ (http://quansoft.com):
This equation describes observed anisotropy r in terms of anisotropy of free DNA r0, maximum anisotropy rm, molar protein concentration C, number of binding sites n and dissociation constant Kd. The sequence of the dsDNA substrate is:
FAM- 5′ -ATGGTGTGTGTAGGTTAATGTGAGGAGGAGAGGTGAAGAAGGAGGAGAGAAGAAGGAGGC-3′
Electron microscopy
Electron microscopy (EM) was performed using an FEI Philips CM100 transmission electron microscope at the Advanced Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge. SYCP3FL (wild type and mutant) and SYCP3ΔCt6 were applied to carbon-coated EM grids at 1 mg/ml (32 μM) in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 250 mM KCl (in the presence or absence of 190 μM 350 base pair double stranded DNA) and negative staining was performed using 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate.
Protein sequence alignments
SYCP3 orthologues were identified by BLAST search (NCBI) of the UniProt Knowledgebase. Multiple sequence alignments were generated using MUSCLE and were displayed using Jalview 2.8.
Accession codes
Coordinates and structure factors for the SYCP3Core (66–230) native structure have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 4cpc.
References 64
- 1.
- 2.
Baier A Alsheimer M Benavente R 2007a Synaptonemal complex protein SYCP3: conserved polymerization properties among vertebrates. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta1774:595–602
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.03.008
- 3.
Baier A Alsheimer M Volff JN Benavente R 2007b Synaptonemal complex protein SYCP3 of the rat: evolutionarily conserved domains and the assembly of higher order structures. Sexual Development1:161–168
Not in our library10.1159/000102105
- 4.
Bannister LA Reinholdt LG Munroe RJ Schimenti JC 2004 Positional cloning and characterization of mouse mei8, a disrupted allelle of the meiotic cohesin Rec8. Genesis40:184–194
Not in our library10.1002/gene.20085
- 5.
Baudat F Imai Y de Massy B 2013 Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nature Reviews Genetics14:794–806
Not in our library10.1038/nrg3573
- 6.
- 7.
Bolcun-Filas E Costa Y Speed R Taggart M Benavente R De Rooij DG Cooke HJ 2007 SYCE2 is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, double strand break repair, and homologous recombination. Journal of Cell Biology176:741–747
Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200610027
- 8.
- 9.
Bolor H Mori T Nishiyama S Ito Y Hosoba E Inagaki H Kogo H Ohye T Tsutsumi M Kato T Tong M Nishizawa H Pryor-Koishi K Kitaoka E Sawada T Nishiyama Y Udagawa Y Kurahashi H 2009 Mutations of the SYCP3 gene in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. American Journal of Human Genetics84:14–20
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.12.002
- 10.
- 11.
Comings DE Okada TA 1971 Fine structure of the synaptonemal complex. Regular and stereo electron microscopy of deoxyribonuclease-treated whole mount preparations. Experimental Cell Research65:104–116
Not in our library10.1016/s0014-4827(71)80055-1
- 12.
Costa Y Speed R Ollinger R Alsheimer M Semple CA Gautier P Maratou K Novak I Hoog C Benavente R Cooke HJ 2005 Two novel proteins recruited by synaptonemal complex protein 1 (SYCP1) are at the centre of meiosis. Journal of Cell Science118:2755–2762
Not in our library10.1242/jcs.02402
- 13.
Cuylen S Metz J Haering CH 2011 Condensin structures chromosomal DNA through topological links. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology18:894–901
Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.2087
- 14.
Davies OR Maman JD Pellegrini L 2012 Structural analysis of the human SYCE2–TEX12 complex provides molecular insights into synaptonemal complex assembly. Open Biology2:120099
Not in our library10.1098/rsob.120099
- 15.
de Boer E Heyting C 2006 The diverse roles of transverse filaments of synaptonemal complexes in meiosis. Chromosoma115:220–234
Not in our library10.1007/s00412-006-0057-5
- 16.
de Vries FA de Boer E van den Bosch M Baarends WM Ooms M Yuan L Liu JG van Zeeland AA Heyting C Pastink A 2005 Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation. Genes & Development19:1376–1389
Not in our library10.1101/gad.329705
- 17.
Dietrich AJ van Marle J Heyting C Vink AC 1992 Ultrastructural evidence for a triple structure of the lateral element of the synaptonemal complex. Journal of Structural Biology109:196–200
Not in our library10.1016/1047-8477(92)90031-5
- 18.
Edgar RC 2004 MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research32:1792–1797
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkh340
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
Fraune J Alsheimer M Volff JN Busch K Fraune S Bosch TC Benavente R 2012a Hydra meiosis reveals unexpected conservation of structural synaptonemal complex proteins across metazoans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America109:16588–16593
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1206875109
- 22.
Fraune J Brochier-Armanet C Alsheimer M Benavente R 2013 Phylogenies of central element proteins reveal the dynamic evolutionary history of the Mammalian synaptonemal complex: ancient and recent components. Genetics195:781–793
Not in our library10.1534/genetics.113.156679
- 23.
Fraune J Schramm S Alsheimer M Benavente R 2012b The mammalian synaptonemal complex: protein components, assembly and role in meiotic recombination. Experimental Cell Research318:1340–1346
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.02.018
- 24.
Fraune J Wiesner M Benavente R 2014 The synaptonemal complex of basal metazoan hydra: more similarities to vertebrate than invertebrate meiosis model organisms. Journal of Genetics and Genomics41:107–115
Not in our library10.1016/j.jgg.2014.01.009
- 25.
Fukuda T Daniel K Wojtasz L Toth A Hoog C 2010 A novel mammalian HORMA domain-containing protein, HORMAD1, preferentially associates with unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes. Experimental Cell Research316:158–171
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.08.007
- 26.
Fukuda T Fukuda N Agostinho A Hernandez-Hernandez A Kouznetsova A Hoog C 2014 STAG3-mediated stabilization of REC8 cohesin complexes promotes chromosome synapsis during meiosis. The EMBO Journal33:1243–1255
Not in our library10.1002/embj.201387329
- 27.
Garcia-Cruz R Brieno MA Roig I Grossmann M Velilla E Pujol A Cabero L Pessarrodona A Barbero JL Garcia Caldes M 2010 Dynamics of cohesin proteins REC8, STAG3, SMC1 beta and SMC3 are consistent with a role in sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis in human oocytes. Human Reproduction25:2316–2327
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deq180
- 28.
Gasteiger E Hoogland C Gattiker A Duvaud SE Wilkins M Appel R Bairoch A 2005 Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker J, editor. The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana Press p. 571–607
Not in our library
- 29.
Hamer G Gell K Kouznetsova A Novak I Benavente R Hoog C 2006 Characterization of a novel meiosis-specific protein within the central element of the synaptonemal complex. Journal of Cell Science119:4025–4032
Not in our library10.1242/jcs.03182
- 30.
Hamer G Wang H Bolcun-Filas E Cooke HJ Benavente R Hoog C 2008 Progression of meiotic recombination requires structural maturation of the central element of the synaptonemal complex. Journal of Cell Science121:2445–2451
Not in our library10.1242/jcs.033233
- 31.
Hosoya N Okajima M Kinomura A Fujii Y Hiyama T Sun J Tashiro S Miyagawa K 2012 Synaptonemal complex protein SYCP3 impairs mitotic recombination by interfering with BRCA2. EMBO Reports13:44–51
Not in our library10.1038/embor.2011.221
- 32.
- 33.
Kleckner N 2006 Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma115:175–194
Not in our library10.1007/s00412-006-0055-7
- 34.
Kouznetsova A Benavente R Pastink A Hoog C 2011 Meiosis in mice without a synaptonemal complex. PLOS ONE6:e28255
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0028255
- 35.
Kouznetsova A Novak I Jessberger R Hoog C 2005 SYCP2 and SYCP3 are required for cohesin core integrity at diplotene but not for centromere cohesion at the first meiotic division. Journal of Cell Science118:2271–2278
Not in our library10.1242/jcs.02362
- 36.
Libuda DE Uzawa S Meyer BJ Villeneuve AM 2013 Meiotic chromosome structures constrain and respond to designation of crossover sites. Nature502:703–706
Not in our library10.1038/nature12577
- 37.
Liu JG Yuan L Brundell E Bjorkroth B Daneholt B Hoog C 1996 Localization of the N-terminus of SCP1 to the central element of the synaptonemal complex and evidence for direct interactions between the N-termini of SCP1 molecules organized head-to-head. Experimental Cell Research226:11–19
Not in our library10.1006/excr.1996.0197
- 38.
Llano E Herran Y Garcia-Tunon I Gutierrez-Caballero C de Alava E Barbero JL Schimenti J de Rooij DG Sanchez-Martin M Pendas AM 2012 Meiotic cohesin complexes are essential for the formation of the axial element in mice. The Journal of Cell Biology197:877–885
Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201201100
- 39.
Matzuk MM Lamb DJ 2002 Genetic dissection of mammalian fertility pathways. Nature Cell Biology4(Suppl):s41–S49
Not in our library10.1038/ncb-nm-fertilitys41
- 40.
Miyamoto T Hasuike S Yogev L Maduro MR Ishikawa M Westphal H Lamb DJ 2003 Azoospermia in patients heterozygous for a mutation in SYCP3. Lancet362:1714–1719
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14845-3
Cited by papers we hold 3
- Unified single-cell analysis of testis gene regulation and pathology in five mouse strains · 2019No notice
- A conserved filamentous assembly underlies the structure of the meiotic chromosome axis · 2019No notice
- An introduction to experimental phasing of macromolecules illustrated by SHELX ; new autotracing features · 2018No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.