No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.
Loss of the multifunctional RNA-binding protein RBM47 as a source of selectable metastatic traits in breast cancer
Sakari Vanharanta, Christina B Marney, Weiping Shu and 5 more
eLife · 2014 · CC BY
Abstract
The mechanisms through which cancer cells lock in altered transcriptional programs in support of metastasis remain largely unknown. Through integrative analysis of clinical breast cancer gene expression datasets, cell line models of breast cancer progression, and mutation data from cancer genome resequencing studies, we identified RNA binding motif protein 47 (RBM47) as a suppressor of breast cancer progression and metastasis. RBM47 inhibited breast cancer re-initiation and growth in experimental models. Transcriptome-wide HITS-CLIP analysis revealed widespread RBM47 binding to mRNAs, most prominently in introns and 3′UTRs. RBM47 altered splicing and abundance of a subset of its target mRNAs. Some of the mRNAs stabilized by RBM47, as exemplified by dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 1 , inhibit tumor progression downstream of RBM47. Our work identifies RBM47 as an RNA-binding protein that can suppress breast cancer progression and demonstrates how the inactivation of a broadly targeted RNA chaperone enables selection of a pro-metastatic state.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Cancers arise through an evolutionary process that feeds from stochastic genetic alterations and selection. The identities of the alterations that get selected for are rapidly coming to light through large-scale resequencing efforts. For example, several independent studies have characterized the mutational complement of breast cancer, one of the most common human malignancies. Besides confirming previously known cancer genes, such as TP53 and PIK3CA, most studies also report a long tail of rarely mutated genes. While many of these mutations are likely to be passenger events, some of them are potential mediators of tumor phenotypes. How to identify such low-frequency driver mutations remains a challenge.
In addition to mutations that directly promote tumorigenesis through specific alterations in cell signaling and repair pathways, many aberrations found in cancers do not affect cell signaling pathways directly, but rather, they support the stabilization of altered transcriptomic profiles that facilitate the emergence of pro-tumorigenic and metastatic traits. Mutations in epigenetic regulators fall into this category. The phenotypic output of such alterations would depend on the activity of already existing signaling processes. Indeed, examples of epigenetic alterations that result in a phenotypic trait in the presence of a specific transcriptional program have been described. Analogously, aberrations in the multi-step mRNA processing and turnover cascade could also lock in aberrant transcriptomic states.
Precise regulation of RNA metabolism is fundamental in the generation of biological complexity in both normal and disease states. The concerted action of multiple RNA binding proteins (RBPs) regulate the spatial, temporal and functional dynamics of the transcriptome via alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation and transcript stability. While malignancy-associated dysregulation of RNA metabolism via aberrant microRNA expression is relatively well established, a growing body of evidence indicates a prominent role also for RBPs in both the development and progression of cancer. For example, upregulation of the splicing regulator SRSF1 is associated with multiple tumor types, and is necessary for the oncogenic activity of MYC in lung cancer. Conversely, RBM5 has been shown to be tumor suppressive in several cancer models.
We hypothesized that combining cancer genome resequencing data with gene expression information from both clinical data sets and experimental model systems of metastasis would allow the identification of rarely mutated cancer genes with potential functional significance. This approach identified RNA binding motif protein 47 (RBM47) as a suppressor of breast cancer progression. By analyzing the transcriptome-wide RBM47 binding patterns we demonstrate that RBM47, a previously uncharacterized RNA-binding protein, modulates mRNA splicing and stability. Loss of RBM47 function thus provides a specific example of the power of global RNA modulatory events in the selection of pro-metastatic phenotypic traits.
RBM47 inactivation associated with breast cancer progression
We combined gene expression data from triple negative metastatic breast cancer models and a cohort of 368 untreated clinical breast cancer cases with mutational data from a brain metastasis that originated from a basal breast cancer (; Figure 1A). Specifically, we looked for genes that had reduced mRNA expression in functionally metastatic cancer cells, evidence for low mRNA expression associated with poor patient outcome in clinical samples, and an enriched mutation in the brain metastasis sequenced by. RBM47, a gene encoding a previously uncharacterized putative RNA-binding protein was the only one that fulfilled all these criteria. We confirmed the lower expression of RBM47 mRNA in the highly metastatic cells (Figure 1B). This translated into a comparable difference at the protein level (Figure 1C). In the clinical data sets, low RBM47 mRNA expression was significantly associated with relapse to brain and lung (Figure 1D,E) but not to bone (Figure 1F). In multivariate analysis combining RBM47 expression with estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptor status (ER, PR and HER2), the association with brain metastasis remained statistically significant (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). We further characterized the expression patterns of RBM47 in the TCGA cohort of 748 breast cancer samples studied by RNA-seq. We found that low RBM47 expression was significantly associated with claudin-low and basal breast cancers (Figure 1G), two subtypes of poor prognosis.
The RBM47I281fs mutation first reported in a brain metastasis truncates the protein from the third RNA recognition motif (RRM) onwards (Figure 1H). As this mutation was already present in a minority subpopulation of the corresponding primary tumor, we looked for additional evidence of genetic RBM47 aberrations in primary breast cancer cohorts. The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMIC) database reported 9 non-synonymous mutations in RBM47, three of which were frameshift mutations truncating one or more of the RRM domains (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Furthermore, analysis of the data from the TCGA cohort revealed that in basal breast cancer, RBM47 was targeted by a mutation or homozygous deletion in ∼8% of the cases (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Moreover, heterozygous loss of the RBM47 locus was present in 30% of the TCGA cohort. These correlative analyses of multiple different breast cancer data sets, both experimental systems and large clinical patient cohorts, suggested that reduced expression or function of RBM47 is associated with breast cancer progression already within primary tumors, and that clones with reduced RBM47 function may display enhanced lung and brain metastatic fitness.
RBM47 suppresses breast cancer progression
In order to test the role of RBM47 as a suppressor of breast cancer progression, we stably introduced both wild type RBM47 and RBM47I281fs in the lung metastatic (LM2) and brain metastatic (BrM2) derivatives of the MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer cells (MDA231 for short), respectively (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A;; ). Of note, despite robust mRNA expression, the mutant RBM47I281fs protein levels were low, indicating that the mutant protein was unstable and therefore inactive (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). As determined by in vivo bioluminescence in experimental metastasis assays, wild type RBM47 inhibited lung colonization by the MDA231-LM2 cells, when compared to RBM47I281fs (Figure 2A–B). Similarly, we observed extended brain metastasis free survival in mice inoculated with the MDA231-BrM2 cells expressing RBM47 when compared to those expressing RBM47I281fs (Figure 2C). This difference translated into reduced brain metastatic burden as determined by ex vivo imaging (Figure 2D,E, Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). We then tested the effects of inhibiting endogenous RBM47 in the metastatic colonization of the parental MDA231 cells. With comparable effects of RBM47 re-expression seen in both the lung and brain metastasis models (Figure 2A,E), we chose the lung colonization assay for loss-of-function studies as this allowed the simultaneous analysis of a greater number of tumor re-initiation events. Two RBM47-targeting shRNA constructs significantly shortened the lung metastasis free survival in mice when compared to controls (Figure 2F, Figure 2—figure supplement 1D), as determined by bioluminescence imaging (Figure 2G,H). This result was confirmed with a second more indolent cancer cell clone (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E–G).
Clonal heterogeneity in RBM47 sensitivity
The initial functional experiments suggested that the tumor suppressive effect of RBM47 on the overall population of metastatic cancer cells was modest. This could reflect either weak tumor suppressive function of RBM47 in general, heterogeneity in the sensitivity to RBM47 among different cancer cell subpopulations, or in the case of RBM47 reintroduction, loss of transgene expression. In order to distinguish between these possibilities, we used immunohistochemistry to assess RBM47 expression in the lung nodules formed either by wild type RBM47 or RBM47I281fs expressing cells. This revealed that some cancer clones were able to form robust lung metastasis even in the presence of RBM47 (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A), but that many of the metastases formed after the inoculation of wild type RBM47-expressing cells had avoided or suppressed the expression of RBM47 (Figure 3B, Figure 3A—figure supplement 1A). As expected, the RBM47I281fs-expressing tumors contained only weakly staining cancer cells intermingled with small cells with strong RBM47 expression (Figure 3C), similar to those seen in normal lung parenchyma (Figure 3D). The rate of proliferation as determined by Ki67 immunohistochemistry did not correlate with the level of RBM47 expression (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). This was in line with the idea that some clones were more sensitive to RBM47 than others, but also that a strong selective pressure led metastatic cells to lose RBM47, a finding consistent with the initial observation of RBM47 loss in metastatic cell populations (Figure 1C).
In order to allow better experimental control over RBM47 expression we utilized a conditional expression system. By focusing on the two brain metastatic cell lines that expressed the lowest levels of endogenous RBM47 (Figure 1C) we generated single cell-derived clones with doxycycline-inducible expression of either wild type RBM47 (henceforth WT10 and WT6, respectively) or the patient-derived mutant RBM47I281fs (henceforth MUT3). All clones exhibited dose-dependent RBM47 mRNA upregulation upon doxycycline induction (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A–C) that translated into increased RBM47 protein expression in the wild type-expressing clones (Figure 3—figure supplement 2D,E). Cancer cells also tolerated RBM47 in vitro (Figure 3—figure supplement 2F). After confirming the feasibility of doxycycline-mediated conditional gene activation in metastatic brain lesions (Figure 3—figure supplement 2G), we inoculated WT6, WT10 and MUT3 cells into immunocompromized mice and assessed their brain-metastatic phenotype. All clones formed robust brain metastases under doxycycline-free conditions (Figure 3E–J). The induction of RBM47 expression with doxycycline in the diet inhibited robustly brain colonization of both metastatic cell clones, WT6 and WT10 (Figure 3E–G). However, the patient-derived mutant RBM47I281fs did not show any tumor suppressive effects (Figure 3H–J). Collectively, these results demonstrated that RBM47 was able to strongly inhibit metastatic functions of some cancer clones, whereas other clones were able to form metastasis despite the presence of RBM47.
Transcriptome-wide identification of RBM47 binding sites
To determine whether RBM47 can directly bind RNA in vivo, we made use of the ability of UV-irradiation at 254 nm to induce chemical crosslinks between RNA and proteins that are in direct contact. γ-32P-labeled RNA was detected by autoradiogram at ∼76 kD, the predicted size of Flag-RBM47, in Flag-immunoprecipitates from UV-irradiated, doxycycline-treated MDA231-BrM2 WT Flag-RBM47 cells, but not doxycycline-treated empty vector control or non-irradiated WT Flag-RBM47 expressing cells (Figure 4A). To identify directly bound RBM47 targets, a modified version of the high throughput sequencing and cross-linking immunoprecipitation (HITS-CLIP) protocol was carried out in duplicate on Flag-RBM47 expressing MDA231-BrM2 cells treated with doxycycline. (Figure 4B, see 'Materials and methods'). RBM47-bound HITS-CLIP reads were mapped to the human genome, yielding ∼7.7 × 106 and ∼2.0 × 106 unique reads (tags) per replicate. 75% of the tags mapped to regions corresponding to UCSC/Refseq genes, with a high degree of reproducibility of binding observed between replicates (Spearmann correlation coefficient R2 = 0.998, total tags per gene, Figure 4C).
To identify robust and reproducible RBM47-binding sites, tags were clustered to return regions with evidence of binding in both replicates (biological complexity, BC = 2) with increasingly stringent filters (Figure 4D): tags per cluster (tags ≥2, 617,026 clusters; tags ≥10, 94,966 clusters), a previously described significant peak threshold (significant peak height ≥10, 29,562 clusters), and a ranked reproducibility chi-squared score (p≤0.01, 19,433 clusters). As has been previously described for the n-ELAV proteins, identification of the most robust binding through increased stringency of cluster definition led to an increase in proportional binding in 3′UTR regions. For RBM47 this occurred due to loss of the majority of reproducible, yet relatively small intronic binding sites (Figure 4E), which may reflect the relative abundance of pre- and mature RNA message. Motif analysis (MEME, ) failed to identify an enriched RBM47-binding sequence in ±10 nt footprints centered on the top 3000 significant peaks (data not shown), but revealed a polyU sequence enriched in RBM47-binding sites containing cross-link induced mutations (deletion CIMS,, Figure 4F). The apparent lack of an enriched RBM47-binding motif within robust CLIP-derived binding sites may reflect the broad binding patterns observed, as exemplified by the predominantly 3′UTR binding in DKK1 and IL8 (Figure 4G).
RBM47 regulates alternative splicing
Reproducible binding of RBPs in intronic regions has proven to be predictive of a role in pre-mRNA processing for multiple proteins. To explore the relationship between RBM47 intronic binding and alternative splicing, RNA-seq was carried out in triplicate to compare MDA231-BrM2 cells and RBM47-expressing WT10 cells. Reads were mapped to cassette (CA) exon junctions as described previously for Mbnl2, and an average inclusion rate (IR) calculated for each cell type to allow for the identification of reciprocal splicing changes while normalizing for changes in RNA stability (; Figure 5A). The average change in inclusion rate (ΔI) was then calculated such that positive ΔI indicates RBM47-dependent cassette exon inclusion. This analysis revealed 121 and 140 CA exons with significant RBM47-dependent inclusion and exclusion, respectively. To assess whether RBM47-binding occurred in the vicinity of these splice sites, HITS-CLIP tags in BC2 tags ≥5 clusters (to account for lower levels of intronic binding seen in Figure 4E) in the region of the alternative splice were calculated. Forty-eight RBM47-bound included and 49 RBM47-bound excluded CA exons were identified in a total of 84 genes (Figure 5B; Supplementary file 1). RBM47-dependent splicing changes were confirmed via RT-PCR as shown for SLK, MDM4, LIMCH1, MBNL1 and SEC31A (Figure 5C, Figure 5—figure supplement 1).
By mapping normalized RBM47 CLIP tags associated with RBM47-dependent splicing changes on a composite transcript we generated an RNA binding map of consensus binding sites within 1 kb of exon-intron boundaries, with respect to exon inclusion or exclusion (Figure 5D). The resulting normalized complexity map reveals enriched RBM47 binding in the vicinity of splice acceptor sites of the CA exon and 3′ CE for included alternative isoforms, while relative enrichment of RBM47 binding was seen at the 5′ CE splice donor and 3′CE splice acceptor of excluded isoforms.
RBM47 affects mRNA steady state levels
To further study the functional consequences of RBM47-mRNA binding events, we determined global steady state mRNA levels in the RBM47 expressing brain metastatic cells by RNA-seq. We took advantage of the clonal doxycycline-inducible cell line systems, which facilitated the analysis of RBM47 dose-dependence. First, genome-wide analyses showed that the mRNA level of several more genes correlated significantly with increasing concentrations of doxycycline in both cell lines expressing the wild type RBM47 (WT6 and WT10), when compared to cells expressing the mutant (Figure 6A). This result indicated that RBM47 elicits dose-dependent changes in mRNA levels. The correlation coefficients followed a pattern that suggested the existence of mRNA species that correlated both positively and negatively with wild type, but not mutant, RBM47 expression, that is few genes in MUT3 cells had correlation coefficients close to 1 or −1, whereas in WT6 and WT10 cells such genes were abundant (Figure 6B). Encouraged by these observations, we looked for mRNAs that fulfilled the following criteria: (i) p-value of correlation less than 0.01 in both WT6 and WT10 cells, (ii) mRNA expression change detectable already at the lowest levels of RBM47 expression in both cell clones and (iii) no significant correlation with RBM47I281fs expression. This revealed a set of 102 mRNAs that were upregulated and 92 that were downregulated, respectively, in cells expressing the wild type RBM47 (Figure 6C, Figure 6—figure supplement 1A,B; Supplementary file 2). Importantly, these changes were observed already with the lowest expression level of RBM47 that was comparable or lower than those detected in endogenously RBM47 expressing cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 2D,E).
To determine whether the 194 RBM47-responsive genes displayed clinically meaningful expression patterns, we conducted an unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of the TCGA cohort of breast cancer specimens. Two main clusters emerged, one of which harbored characteristics of the RBM47-low phenotype (‘Cluster 2’, Figure 6—figure supplement 1C). First, this subgroup, Cluster 2, had significantly lower RBM47 expression levels when compared to Cluster 1 (Figure 6D). Second, the genes that were induced upon RBM47 reintroduction tended to have lower expression in Cluster 2, whereas genes with reduced expression level in the RBM47-expressing cells tended to show higher expression in Cluster 2 (Figure 6E). These observations validated in clinical tumor samples the RBM47-dependent gene expression correlations identified in vitro.
To identify directly regulated targets of RBM47, we combined the mRNA expression data with the HITS-CLIP-derived RBM47 transcriptome-wide binding data. Of the 2498 strongest binding partners with >100 tags per transcript (total tags in BC2 tags ≥10 clusters; Supplementary file 3), 25 were among the 102 RBM47-upregulated genes and 17 among the 92 RBM47-downregulated genes (Figure 6F), indicating no significant binding preference for either groups. This was reflected in the similar overall RBM47 binding profiles in both the up- and down-regulated genes (Figure 6G). Two of the top-scoring RBM47 binding mRNAs, IL8 and DKK1 (17,079 and 16,208 tags in clusters per gene, respectively, Figure 4G), were among the upregulated genes. This increase in mRNA levels was associated with increased protein secretion as determined by ELISA, whereas VEGFA, the mRNA of which was bound but not upregulated by RBM47, showed no change in protein secretion (Figure 6H).
RBM47 modulates DKK1 mRNA stability
Nuclear RNA binding proteins typically function in large multiprotein complexes that regulate mRNA biogenesis. Our data from both genome-wide HITS-CLIP and RNA-seq analysis was compatible with RBM47 being a member of these RNA chaperone units. This suggested that RBM47 may not necessarily have a direct tumor suppressive signaling function. Rather, it raised the possibility that loss of RBM47, leading to subtle changes in multiple mRNAs, either through stabilization, destabilization or alternative splicing, could be selected for if the net effect of both growth-promoting and growth-inhibiting changes would be beneficial for cancer cells under the stress of dissemination to and colonizing distant organs. In line with this, both the up- and down-regulated target genes of RBM47, as well as the genes that were targets of RBM47-mediated alternative splicing, contain genes that have previously been shown to either promote or inhibit tumor phenotypes (Supplementary file 1 and Supplementary file 3). For example, DKK1, HTATIP2, HBP1, MXI1 and CASP7, all bound by RBM47 and upregulated upon RBM47 reintroduction, have known tumor suppressive functions. Similarly, RBM47-induced splicing changes were seen in genes such as SLK, MDM4 and TNC, all of which are genes with known functions in cancer.
Focusing on DKK1, one of the most robustly bound RBM47 target transcripts identified by HITS-CLIP, we investigated the possible role of RBM47 as a modulator of mRNA abundance. As predicted by our results in WT6 and WT10 cells, knockdown of RBM47 in two additional breast cancer cell lines expressing high levels of endogenous RBM47, SKBR3 and ZR-75-30, reduced DKK1 mRNA levels (Figure 7A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). This validated RBM47 as a modulator of DKK1 mRNA level in breast cancer cells.
The fact that RBM47 bound to DKK1 mRNA 3′UTR and increased DKK1 mRNA levels suggested the possibility that RBM47 had the capability of stabilizing DKK1 mRNA. We tested this by treating cancer cells with actinomycin D, a general inhibitor of transcription, and measuring DKK1 mRNA levels in the following hours. This demonstrated that wild type RBM47, but not the RBM47I281fs mutant, was able to increase the half-life of DKK1 mRNA by up to fourfold (Figure 7B).
RBM47 protects DKK1 3′UTR from destabilizing factors
As RBM47 binding to DKK1 was concentrated on the 3′UTR, a known region of regulatory activity, we considered the possibility that RBM47 could compete with microRNAs or other mRNA destabilizing factors that target the 3′UTR. To test this experimentally, we generated miR-30-based shRNA-miR constructs that targeted different regions of the DKK1 transcript, two at the 5′ end with minimal RBM47 binding and three at the 3′ end with abundant RBM47 signal (Figure 7C; ). All constructs knocked the DKK1 transcript level down by 65–80% in the WT6 cells when no doxycycline was present (Figure 7D). The induction of RBM47 expression did not have a significant effect on the efficiency on the 5′-targeting shRNA-miRs (Figure 7E). In contrast, RBM47 inhibited the capability of the 3′-targeting shRNA-miRs to keep the DKK1 mRNA level down (Figure 7E). Similar observations were made with the WT10 cells (Figure 7F,G). Argonaute HITS-CLIP in the MDA231-BrM2 cells (CBM et al., unpublished data) indicates robust binding to the DKK1 3′UTR, supporting the regulatory role of this region. We conclude that the effects of RBM47 on DKK1 mRNA levels may be due to the ability of RBM47 to protect this mRNA from destabilizing factors, possibly through direct interaction with the DKK1 mRNA.
RBM47 inhibits tumor progression by suppressing Wnt activity
DKK1 is an inhibitor of Wnt signaling, a pathway with a well-established role in regulating stem cell characteristics in both normal and malignant cells. Indeed, DKK1 as well as other Wnt antagonists have been shown to inhibit breast cancer progression. The fact that RBM47 was able to increase DKK1 secretion therefore suggested that RBM47 may also inhibit Wnt signaling and consequently reduce the tumorigenic fitness of metastatic breast cancer cells. We first tested the effects of RBM47 on cancer cell Wnt responsiveness by treating WT6 cells with recombinant Wnt3A and subsequently measuring the expression of AXIN2, a common TCF/β-catenin target gene and a general marker of Wnt activity. Doxycycline-induced expression of RBM47 in WT6 cells led to a dampened Wnt3A-dependent AXIN2 induction (Figure 8A). This inhibition of AXIN2 expression was at least partially dependent on DKK1 (Figure 8B). In agreement with these results, human breast cancers with low RBM47 expression had in general higher levels of Wnt transcriptomic activity when compared to tumors with high RBM47 expression in the TCGA cohort (Figure 8C).
We then tested the possibility that RBM47 would suppress tumorigenesis by implanting low numbers of WT6 cells at the orthotopic site. The induction of RBM47 by doxycycline was able to significantly delay the emergence of mammary tumors (Figure 8D), and the tumors that formed were smaller in size (Figure 8E). This observation was confirmed in WT10 cells (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A). In line with this, inhibition of DKK1 expression in the MDA231-BrM2 cells promoted tumor formation in the orthotopic site (Figure 8F, Figure 8—figure supplement 1B). Finally, we used the two exon 1 DKK1 shRNAmiR constructs (Figure 7C) to reduce DKK1 levels in the WT6 cells (Figure 8—figure supplement 1C) and tested how this affected the brain metastatic ability of these cells in the presence of RBM47. Only 1/9 mice (16%) injected with control cells developed brain metastasis, whereas 8/17 mice (47%) inoculated with DKK1 RNAi construct transduced cells developed metastasis (Figure 8G,H). Taken together, these observations suggested that RBM47-dependent suppression of tumor progression was partially mediated by its ability to increase the production of the Wnt antagonist DKK1, a secreted protein that can inhibit tumor phenotypes in metastatic cancer cells.
Discussion
Cancer genomes contain numerous genes with low-frequency mutations of unknown functional significance. We have studied one such gene, the previously uncharacterized RBM47, and demonstrate that it has tumor suppressive functions in breast cancer. RBM47 acts as a multifunctional RBP modulating alternative splicing and the abundance of several mRNAs, which can lead to inhibition of cancer progression (Figure 8I,J). These results highlight the significance of infrequent mutations in cancer, the importance of integrated experimental approaches to identify such functionally relevant mutations, and the role of broadly targeted mRNA chaperones as determinants of cancer progression.
RBM47 contains three classical RNA recognition motifs (RRM domains). The closest homologs of RBM47 are Apobec1 complementation factor (A1CF) and hnRNP-Q, which regulate RNA editing and splicing and transcript stability, respectively. In general, RBPs bind to and influence the function and fate of both pre-mRNAs and mRNAs. They can operate in large multiprotein complexes that dynamically regulate all the steps of mRNA biogenesis, nuclear export, stability and translation. Individual subunits of these complexes can therefore have diverse phenotypic roles depending on the exact protein complex they are in. Our observations on RBM47 are in line with these known general principles of RBP function.
Our data demonstrate widespread and reproducible RBM47 binding to target mRNAs predominantly in introns and 3′UTRs, with the most robust binding occurring in 3′UTRs. Recent RNA-compete studies have proposed a binding motif for RBM47 in vitro. Our in vivo HITS-CLIP data does not suggest a clear nucleotide binding specificity for exogenous Flag-tagged RBM47, although some preference was observed for polyU stretches around CIMS sites. It has been shown that the presence of a canonical motif is neither necessary nor sufficient to predict HITS-CLIP binding sites of FUS in both mouse and human brain, while specific sites suggested by in vitro RNA selection experiments are not enriched in HITS-CLIP derived FMRP binding sites in vivo. This would suggest that other factors such as RNA accessibility, secondary structure or protein–protein interactions may modulate RBM47 target choice. Further work is therefore needed for a comprehensive understanding of the determinants of RBM47-mRNA interactions.
We find that RBM47 binds robustly to ∼2500 gene transcripts in human breast cancer cells, with only a subset showing steady state level change or alternative splicing upon RBM47 reintroduction. Given the stringent criteria used to define RBM47-bound and regulated targets and the generally low level of intronic RNA in a cell, it is likely that this subset is an underestimation of the number of RBM47-regulated transcripts, and does not take into account the potential for regulatory events, such as re-localization, that may not alter steady state transcript levels. The complex interplay of RBPs in agonistic and antagonistic modulation of mRNA is becoming increasingly apparent. For example, the RRM-domain containing protein HuR modulates the destabilizing effects of miRNAs and AUF1 on common target transcripts. The data presented here suggest that target-specific RBM47 regulation may arise through modulation of accessibility of other factors to a common mRNA transcript.
RBM47 binds and regulates transcripts that encode for proteins of several different biological functions. The effects of reduced RBM47 activity on cancer cell fitness, determined by the sum phenotypic output of all regulated target transcripts, may therefore vary depending on the context. Such pleiotropic effects could target multiple steps of cancer progression. Indeed, even though RBM47 loss was associated with metastatic cancer clones in our model systems, evidence for selection against RBM47 was detected already in primary breast cancers. One of the most highly bound RBM47 mRNA targets, the secreted Wnt inhibitor DKK1, is stabilized by RBM47 and partially mediates RBM47 tumor suppressive function. Interestingly, rbm47 knockdown in zebra fish embryos leads to a headless phenotype mediated via up-regulation of the wnt8a pathway. In addition to DKK1, our analysis identified a number of potential mediators of RBM47 effects for future studies.
From a general perspective, the present findings illuminate two concepts. First, we show that low-frequency cancer mutations can give rise to tumorigenic phenotypes. Our work highlights the power of orthogonal approaches for the analysis of cancer genome resequencing data. Second, we show that loss of a broadly targeted and multifunctional RBP can increase the fitness of certain cancer cell clones in support of metastasis. This complements previous findings of RNA-binding proteins as mediators of oncogenic phenotypes. Deregulation of RNA-binding proteins is thus emerging as a prominent source of complex transcriptomic diversity that can serve as a platform for the selection of metastatic traits during tumor progression.
Cell lines
The metastatic breast cancer cell lines have been previously described. SKBR3, ZR-75-30 and HCC1954 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). For retrovirus and lentivirus production, GPG29 and 293T cells, respectively, were utilized. All cell lines were maintained under standard tissue culture conditions. Single cell-derived clones were isolated utilizing fluorescence-activated cell sorting from genetically engineered 231-BrM2 (WT10, MUT3) and CN34-BrM2 (WT6) cells.
cDNA expression and RNAi
For RBM47 restoration, RBM47 was cloned into the pBABE-puro retroviral expression vector. The RBM47I281fs was generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Virus was generated in the GPG29 packaging cells. For the generation of doxycycline-inducible expression constructs, both wild type and mutant FLAG-RBM47 were cloned into the pRetroX-Tight-Pur expression system (Clontech, Mountain View, CA).
For RNAi-mediated gene silencing, RBM47 pGIPZ shRNA constructs (clones V2LHS_176331 and V3LHS_393928, respectively) were obtained from Open Biosystems (Lafayette, CO). The DKK1 shRNAmiR constructs were designed based on the rules described by and cloned into the pGIPZ vector as described using the following oligonucleotide templates:DKK1miRm: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGACGGGTCTTTGTCGCGATGGTATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATACCATCGCGACAAAGACCCGGTGCCTACTGCCTCGGADKK1miRn: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGACACCTTGAACTCGGTTCTCAATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATTGAGAACCGAGTTCAAGGTGGTGCCTACTGCCTCGGADKK1miRo: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGCCAACTCAATCCTAAGGATATATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATATATCCTTAGGATTGAGTTGATGCCTACTGCCTCGGADKK1miRp: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGACAGTAAATTACTGTATTGTAATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATTACAATACAGTAATTTACTGCTGCCTACTGCCTCGGADKK1miRq: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGAAACGGAAGTGTGATATGTTTATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATAAACATATCACACTTCCGTTCTGCCTACTGCCTCGGA
DKK1miRm: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGACGGGTCTTTGTCGCGATGGTATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATACCATCGCGACAAAGACCCGGTGCCTACTGCCTCGGA
DKK1miRn: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGACACCTTGAACTCGGTTCTCAATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATTGAGAACCGAGTTCAAGGTGGTGCCTACTGCCTCGGA
DKK1miRo: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGCCAACTCAATCCTAAGGATATATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATATATCCTTAGGATTGAGTTGATGCCTACTGCCTCGGA
DKK1miRp: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGACAGTAAATTACTGTATTGTAATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATTACAATACAGTAATTTACTGCTGCCTACTGCCTCGGA
DKK1miRq: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGAAACGGAAGTGTGATATGTTTATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATAAACATATCACACTTCCGTTCTGCCTACTGCCTCGGA
The pGIPZ empty vector was used as a control.
Animal studies
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with a protocol approved by MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Lung metastasis assays were conducted in 5–7 week old female NOD/SCID mice. Brain metastasis and mammary tumor assays were carried out using 5–7 week old female athymic nude mice. In vivo bioluminescence imaging was performed using the IVIS Spectrum Xenogen machine (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA). For orthotopic mammary tumor assays, cells were mixed with Matrigel. Injections were confirmed and tumor growth was followed by bioluminescent imaging. Statistical significance of tumor and metastasis free survival was assessed by the log-rank test. Differences in raw and normalized bioluminescence signal was assessed by the Student's t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, respectively. Brain images were acquired with a Leica SP5 up-right confocal microscope and Zeiss AxioVert 200 M using 20X and 5X objectives. Image analysis was performed with Metamorph and ImageJ softwares.
mRNA and protein detection
Total RNA was extracted using PrepEase RNA spin kit (USB, Cleveland, OH). We used Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) for cDNA synthesis. Quantitative PCR was performed using predesigned Taqman gene expression assays (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and the 7900HT or ViiA 7 real-time PCR systems (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies). TBP was used as a housekeeping control gene. mRNA stability was assessed by performing quantitative PCR after actinomycin D treatment. For immunoblotting, antibodies recognizing RBM47 (HPA006347; Sigma, St. Luis, MO), α-tubulin (11H10; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) and ACTB (Sigma) were utilized. Secondary antibodies were HRP (Pierce, Rockford, IL) or fluorescence (LiCor, Lincoln, NE) conjugated. Immunostaining for RBM47 (HPA006347; Sigma) was performed according to standard protocols in the MSKCC Molecular Cytology Core Facility on paraffin embedded tissue blocks. Secreted protein was detected by ELISA (R&D, Minneapolis, MN).
HITS-CLIP
231BrM2 tet-on FLAG-RBM47 cells were treated with 1 ng/ml doxycycline for 3 days before 254 nm UV crosslinking at 400 mJ/cm2 on a bed of ice (Stratalinker2400; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Samples were processed for HITS-CLIP as previously described using an anti-Flag antibody (F3165; Sigma), and omitting 3′ linker ligation in favor of direct labeling of protein-bound RNA with 32P-γ-ATP. Non-crosslinked cells were used as a negative control, with IPed Flag-RBM47 protein detected using a second anti-Flag antibody (F7425; Sigma). Purified RBM47-bound RNA fragments were polyA tailed (E-PAP; NEB), and reverse transcribed (Superscript III; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in the presence of Br-dUTP (Sigma). Unique polydT-NV RT-primers were used per replicate, containing Solexa sequences separated by an abasic furan (that serves as an ApeI cut site), a 6 nt degenerate region and a 6 nt index sequence to allow for multiplexing during sequencing.RT Primer 1pGCACTGTTN6GATCGTCGGACTGTAGAACTCT/idSp/CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAT20VNRT Primer 2pGCGAAACTN6GATCGTCGGACTGTAGAACTCT/idSp/CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAT20VN
RT Primer 1pGCACTGTTN6GATCGTCGGACTGTAGAACTCT/idSp/CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAT20VN
RT Primer 2pGCGAAACTN6GATCGTCGGACTGTAGAACTCT/idSp/CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAT20VN
BrdU-cDNA was stringently purified by IP (sc-32323; Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX) using ProteinG dynabeads (Invitrogen), eluted from the beads via BrdU competitive elution (Sigma), and re-immunoprecipitated. cDNA was circularized on bead (CircLigase ssDNA Ligase II, Epicentre, Madison, WI), washed and digested with ApeI (NEB, Ipswich, MA) to relinearize. cDNAs were eluted from the beads by heating to 98C in Phusion HF Buffer (NEB), then PCR amplified using Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB) and SYBR Green I (Invitrogen) in an iQ5 real-time PCR machine in order to monitor amplification, with the samples being removed when the RFU signal reached ∼1000.
P5—aatgatacggcgaccaccgacaggttcagagttctacagtccgacg
P3—caagcagaagacggcata
PCR products were purified using MinElute columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) as per manufacturer's instructions and quantified using Quant-It (Invitrogen). cDNA was multiplexed and sequenced using Illumina Hi-Seq (small RNA sequencing primer—cgacaggttcagagttctacagtccgacgatc). All data analysis was done using the Galaxy platform, as previously described.
RT-PCR validation
RT-PCR validiation was carried out using total RNA from MDA231-BrM2 (Control) and WT10 cells (iScript, Bio-Rad, Accuprime Pfx Supermix 1, Life Technologies) as previously described. In all cases lanes 1–3 contain an equal mixture of control and WT10 cell cDNA amplified at n-1, n and n+1 cycles, lane 4 contains an absence of reverse transcriptase control (−RT), with all other lanes corresponding to replicate samples of the indicated cell type amplified to n cycles. IR and ΔI calculated using ImageJ.
Bioinformatic analysis
All analyses were conducted using R. Microarray data from human untreated tumor data sets (GSE2603 and GSE2034) were preprocessed as described. For the RNA-seq TCGA data set, normalized mRNA z-scores were downloaded from the TCGA cBio portal. The microarray data from metastatic cell lines were processed with GCRMA together with updated probe set definitions using R packages affy, gcrma and hs133ahsentrezgcdf (version 10). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using the function heatmap.2 with Pearson's correlation coefficient as the similarity metric. For survival analysis, a Cox proportional hazards model was utilized as implemented in the coxph function in the R-package survival. For RNA-seq analysis of the cell lines, raw paired-end sequencing data were mapped to human genome (hg19 build) with STAR2.3.0 using standard options. Reads mapped to each transcript were counted by HTSeq v0.5.4 with default settings. The read count table was normalized to library size by DESeq. Correlation with RBM47 expression was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient utilizing the R functions cor and cor.test. Wnt pathway activity in clinical tumors was assessed utilizing a curated list of Wnt target genes in breast cancer and calculating sums of z-scores for each tumor.
Accession numbers
RNA-seq and HITS-CLIP data have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession numbers GSE53779 and GSE58381.
References 79
- 1.
- 2.
Bafico A Liu G Goldin L Harris V Aaronson SA 2004 An autocrine mechanism for constitutive Wnt pathway activation in human cancer cells. Cancer Cell6:497–506
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2004.09.032
- 3.
Bailey TL Elkan C 1994 Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proceedings/International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology2:28–36
Not in our library
- 4.
Baltz AG Munschauer M Schwanhäusser B Vasile A Murakawa Y Schueler M Youngs N Penfold-Brown D Drew K Milek M Wyler E Bonneau R Selbach M Dieterich C Landthaler M 2012 The mRNA-bound proteome and its global occupancy profile on protein-coding transcripts. Molecular Cell46:674–690
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.021
- 5.
Banerji S Cibulskis K Rangel-Escareno C Brown KK Carter SL Frederick AM Lawrence MS Sivachenko AY Sougnez C Zou L Cortes ML Fernandez-Lopez JC Peng S Ardlie KG Auclair D Bautista-Piña V Duke F Francis J Jung J Maffuz-Aziz A Onofrio RC Parkin M Pho NH Quintanar-Jurado V Ramos AH Rebollar-Vega R Rodriguez-Cuevas S Romero-Cordoba SL Schumacher SE Stransky N Thompson KM Uribe-Figueroa L Baselga J Beroukhim R Polyak K Sgroi DC Richardson AL Jimenez-Sanchez G Lander ES Gabriel SB Garraway LA Golub TR Melendez-Zajgla J Toker A Getz G Hidalgo-Miranda A Meyerson M 2012 Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes. Nature486:405–409
Not in our library10.1038/nature11154
- 6.
Bhattacharyya SN Habermacher R Martine U Closs EI Filipowicz W 2006 Relief of microRNA-mediated translational repression in human cells subjected to stress. Cell125:1111–1124
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.031
- 7.
Bos PD Zhang XH Nadal C Shu W Gomis RR Nguyen DX Minn AJ van de Vijver MJ Gerald WL Foekens JA Massagué J 2009 Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature459:1005–1009
Not in our library10.1038/nature08021
- 8.
Castello A Fischer B Eichelbaum K Horos R Beckmann BM Strein C Davey NE Humphreys DT Preiss T Steinmetz LM Krijgsveld J Hentze MW 2012 Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA-binding proteins. Cell149:1393–1406
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031
- 9.
Cerami E Gao J Dogrusoz U Gross BE Sumer SO Aksoy BA Jacobsen A Byrne CJ Heuer ML Larsson E Antipin Y Reva B Goldberg AP Sander C Schultz N 2012 The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discovery2:401–404
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095
- 10.
Charizanis K Lee KY Batra R Goodwin M Zhang C Yuan Y Shiue L Cline M Scotti MM Xia G Kumar A Ashizawa T Clark HB Kimura T Takahashi MP Fujimura H Jinnai K Yoshikawa H Gomes-Pereira M Gourdon G Sakai N Nishino S Foster TC Ares M Jnr Darnell RB Swanson MS 2012 Muscleblind-like 2-mediated alternative splicing in the developing brain and dysregulation in myotonic dystrophy. Neuron75:437–450
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.029
- 11.
Chaudhury A Chander P Howe PH 2010 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) in cellular processes: Focus on hnRNP E1's multifunctional regulatory roles. RNA16:1449–1462
Not in our library10.1261/rna.2254110
- 12.
Chen HH Chang JG Lu RM Peng TY Tarn WY 2008 The RNA binding protein hnRNP Q modulates the utilization of exon 7 in the survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene. Molecular and Cellular Biology28:6929–6938
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01332-08
- 13.
Chi SW Zang JB Mele A Darnell RB 2009 Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA-mRNA interaction maps. Nature460:479–486
Not in our library10.1038/nature08170
- 14.
Clevers H Nusse R 2012 Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell149:1192–1205
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012
- 15.
Cancer Genome Atlas Network 2012 Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature490:61–70
Not in our library10.1038/nature11412
- 16.
Cowling VH D'Cruz CM Chodosh LA Cole MD 2007 c-Myc transforms human mammary epithelial cells through repression of the Wnt inhibitors DKK1 and SFRP1. Molecular and Cellular Biology27:5135–5146
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.02282-06
- 17.
Darnell RB 2010 HITS-CLIP: panoramic views of protein-RNA regulation in living cells. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews RNA1:266–286
Not in our library10.1002/wrna.31
- 18.
Darnell JC Van Driesche SJ Zhang C Hung KY Mele A Fraser CE Stone EF Chen C Fak JJ Chi SW Licatalosi DD Richter JD Darnell RB 2011 FMRP stalls ribosomal translocation on mRNAs linked to synaptic function and autism. Cell146:247–261
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.013
- 19.
Das S Anczuków O Akerman M Krainer AR 2012 Oncogenic splicing factor SRSF1 is a critical transcriptional target of MYC. Cell Reports1:110–117
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2011.12.001
- 20.
Di Leva G Garofalo M Croce CM 2013 MicroRNAs in Cancer. Annual Review of Pathology9:287–314
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104715
- 21.
Ding L Ellis MJ Li S Larson DE Chen K Wallis JW Harris CC McLellan MD Fulton RS Fulton LL Abbott RM Hoog J Dooling DJ Koboldt DC Schmidt H Kalicki J Zhang Q Chen L Lin L Wendl MC McMichael JF Magrini VJ Cook L McGrath SD Vickery TL Appelbaum E Deschryver K Davies S Guintoli T Lin L Crowder R Tao Y Snider JE Smith SM Dukes AF Sanderson GE Pohl CS Delehaunty KD Fronick CC Pape KA Reed JS Robinson JS Hodges JS Schierding W Dees ND Shen D Locke DP Wiechert ME Eldred JM Peck JB Oberkfell BJ Lolofie JT Du F Hawkins AE O'Laughlin MD Bernard KE Cunningham M Elliott G Mason MD Thompson DM Jnr Ivanovich JL Goodfellow PJ Perou CM Weinstock GM Aft R Watson M Ley TJ Wilson RK Mardis ER 2010 Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft. Nature464:999–1005
Not in our library10.1038/nature08989
- 22.
Dobin A Davis CA Schlesinger F Drenkow J Zaleski C Jha S Batut P Chaisson M Gingeras TR 2013 STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics29:15–21
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
- 23.
Dow LE Premsrirut PK Zuber J Fellmann C McJunkin K Miething C Park Y Dickins RA Hannon GJ Lowe SW 2012 A pipeline for the generation of shRNA transgenic mice. Nature Protocols7:374–393
Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2011.446
- 24.
Dreyfuss G Kim VN Kataoka N 2002 Messenger-RNA-binding proteins and the messages they carry. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology3:195–205
Not in our library10.1038/nrm760
- 25.
Fellmann C Zuber J McJunkin K Chang K Malone CD Dickins RA Xu Q Hengartner MO Elledge SJ Hannon GJ Lowe SW 2011 Functional identification of optimized RNAi triggers using a massively parallel sensor assay. Molecular Cell41:733–746
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.008
- 26.
Forbes SA Tang G Bindal N Bamford S Dawson E Cole C Kok CY Jia M Ewing R Menzies A Teague JW Stratton MR Futreal PA 2010 COSMIC (the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer): a resource to investigate acquired mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Research38:D652–D657
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkp995
- 27.
Guan R El-Rass S Spillane D Lam S Wang Y Wu J Chen Z Wang A Jia Z Keating A Hu J Wen XY 2013 rbm47, a novel RNA binding protein, regulates zebrafish head development. Developmental Dynamics242:1395–1404
Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.24039
- 28.
Hillman-Jackson J Clements D Blankenberg D Taylor J Nekrutenko A, Galaxy Team 2012 Using Galaxy to perform large-scale interactive data analyses. Current Protocols in BioinformaticsChapter 10: p. Unit10 5
Not in our library10.1002/0471250953.bi1005s38
- 29.
Hudson RS Yi M Esposito D Glynn SA Starks AM Yang Y Schetter AJ Watkins SK Hurwitz AA Dorsey TH Stephens RM Croce CM Ambs S 2013 MicroRNA-106b-25 cluster expression is associated with early disease recurrence and targets caspase-7 and focal adhesion in human prostate cancer. Oncogene32:4139–4147
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2012.424
- 30.
Ince-Dunn G Okano HJ Jensen KB Park WY Zhong R Ule J Mele A Fak JJ Yang C Zhang C Yoo J Herre M Okano H Noebels JL Darnell RB 2012 Neuronal Elav-like (Hu) proteins regulate RNA splicing and abundance to control glutamate levels and neuronal excitability. Neuron75:1067–1080
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.009
- 31.
Kang Y Siegel PM Shu W Drobnjak M Kakonen SM Cordón-Cardo C Guise TA Massagué J 2003 A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell3:537–549
Not in our library10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00132-6
- 32.
Karni R de Stanchina E Lowe SW Sinha R Mu D Krainer AR 2007 The gene encoding the splicing factor SF2/ASF is a proto-oncogene. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology14:185–193
Not in our library10.1038/nsmb1209
- 33.
Kim HH Kuwano Y Srikantan S Lee EK Martindale JL Gorospe M 2009 HuR recruits let-7/RISC to repress c-Myc expression. Genes & Development23:1743–1748
Not in our library10.1101/gad.1812509
- 34.
Lagier-Tourenne C Polymenidou M Hutt KR Vu AQ Baughn M Huelga SC Clutario KM Ling SC Liang TY Mazur C Wancewicz E Kim AS Watt A Freier S Hicks GG Donohue JP Shiue L Bennett CF Ravits J Cleveland DW Yeo GW 2012 Divergent roles of ALS-linked proteins FUS/TLS and TDP-43 intersect in processing long pre-mRNAs. Nature Neuroscience15:1488–1497
Not in our library10.1038/nn.3230
- 35.
Lahoz EG Xu L Schreiber-Agus N DePinho RA 1994 Suppression of Myc, but not E1a, transformation activity by Max-associated proteins, Mad and Mxi1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America91:5503–5507
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.91.12.5503
- 36.
Li H Bian C Liao L Li J Zhao RC 2011 miR-17-5p promotes human breast cancer cell migration and invasion through suppression of HBP1. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment126:565–575
Not in our library10.1007/s10549-010-0954-4
- 37.
Li X Kazan H Lipshitz HD Morris QD 2014 Finding the target sites of RNA-binding proteins. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews RNA5:111–130
Not in our library10.1002/wrna.1201
- 38.
Licatalosi DD Darnell RB 2010 RNA processing and its regulation: global insights into biological networks. Nature Reviews Genetics11:75–87
Not in our library10.1038/nrg2673
- 39.
Licatalosi DD Mele A Fak JJ Ule J Kayikci M Chi SW Clark TA Schweitzer AC Blume JE Wang X Darnell JC Darnell RB 2008 HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature456:464–469
Not in our library10.1038/nature07488
- 40.
Licatalosi DD Yano M Fak JJ Mele A Grabinski SE Zhang C Darnell RB 2012 Ptbp2 represses adult-specific splicing to regulate the generation of neuronal precursors in the embryonic brain. Genes & Development26:1626–1642
Not in our library10.1101/gad.191338.112
- 41.
Lu S Singh K Mangray S Tavares R Noble L Resnick MB Yakirevich E 2013 Claudin expression in high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: correlation with the molecular subtype. Modern Pathology26:485–495
Not in our library10.1038/modpathol.2012.187
- 42.
Lustig B Jerchow B Sachs M Weiler S Pietsch T Karsten U van de Wetering M Clevers H Schlag PM Birchmeier W Behrens J 2002 Negative feedback loop of Wnt signaling through upregulation of conductin/axin2 in colorectal and liver tumors. Molecular and Cellular Biology22:1184–1193
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.22.4.1184-1193.2002
- 43.
- 44.
Mehta A Kinter MT Sherman NE Driscoll DM 2000 Molecular cloning of apobec-1 complementation factor, a novel RNA-binding protein involved in the editing of apolipoprotein B mRNA. Molecular and Cellular Biology20:1846–1854
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.20.5.1846-1854.2000
- 45.
Mikheev AM Mikheeva SA Maxwell JP Rivo JV Rostomily R Swisshelm K Zarbl H 2008 Dickkopf-1 mediated tumor suppression in human breast carcinoma cells. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment112:263–273
Not in our library10.1007/s10549-007-9867-2
- 46.
Minn AJ Gupta GP Siegel PM Bos PD Shu W Giri DD Viale A Olshen AB Gerald WL Massagué J 2005 Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature436:518–524
Not in our library10.1038/nature03799
- 47.
Moore MJ Proudfoot NJ 2009 Pre-mRNA processing reaches back to transcription and ahead to translation. Cell136:688–700
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.001
- 48.
Mourtada-Maarabouni M Keen J Clark J Cooper CS Williams GT 2006 Candidate tumor suppressor LUCA-15/RBM5/H37 modulates expression of apoptosis and cell cycle genes. Experimental Cell Research312:1745–1752
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.02.009
- 49.
Oh JJ West AR Fishbein MC Slamon DJ 2002 A candidate tumor suppressor gene, H37, from the human lung cancer tumor suppressor locus 3p21.3. Cancer Research62:3207–3213
Not in our library
- 50.
Oh JJ Razfar A Delgado I Reed RA Malkina A Boctor B Slamon DJ 2006 3p21.3 tumor suppressor gene H37/Luca15/RBM5 inhibits growth of human lung cancer cells through cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Research66:3419–3427
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1667
- 51.
Oskarsson T Acharyya S Zhang XH Vanharanta S Tavazoie SF Morris PG Downey RJ Manova-Todorova K Brogi E Massagué J 2011 Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs. Nature Medicine17:867–874
Not in our library10.1038/nm.2379
- 52.
Paulson KE Rieger-Christ K McDevitt MA Kuperwasser C Kim J Unanue VE Zhang X Hu M Ruthazer R Berasi SP Huang CY Giri D Kaufman S Dugan JM Blum J Netto G Wazer DE Summerhayes IC Yee AS 2007 Alterations of the HBP1 transcriptional repressor are associated with invasive breast cancer. Cancer Research67:6136–6145
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0567
- 53.
Pencheva N Tavazoie SF 2013 Control of metastatic progression by microRNA regulatory networks. Nature Cell Biology15:546–554
Not in our library10.1038/ncb2769
- 54.
Ray D Kazan H Cook KB Weirauch MT Najafabadi HS Li X Gueroussov S Albu M Zheng H Yang A Na H Irimia M Matzat LH Dale RK Smith SA Yarosh CA Kelly SM Nabet B Mecenas D Li W Laishram RS Qiao M Lipshitz HD Piano F Corbett AH Carstens RP Frey BJ Anderson RA Lynch KW Penalva LO Lei EP Fraser AG Blencowe BJ Morris QD Hughes TR 2013 A compendium of RNA-binding motifs for decoding gene regulation. Nature499:172–177
Not in our library10.1038/nature12311
- 55.
Richard S Vogel G Huot ME Guo T Muller WJ Lukong KE 2008 Sam68 haploinsufficiency delays onset of mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis. Oncogene27:548–556
Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1210652
- 56.
Roovers K Wagner S Storbeck CJ O'Reilly P Lo V Northey JJ Chmielecki J Muller WJ Siegel PM Sabourin LA 2009 The Ste20-like kinase SLK is required for ErbB2-driven breast cancer cell motility. Oncogene28:2839–2848
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2009.146
- 57.
Schneider CA Rasband WS Eliceiri KW 2012 NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods9:671–675
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2089
- 58.
Shah SP Morin RD Khattra J Prentice L Pugh T Burleigh A Delaney A Gelmon K Guliany R Senz J Steidl C Holt RA Jones S Sun M Leung G Moore R Severson T Taylor GA Teschendorff AE Tse K Turashvili G Varhol R Warren RL Watson P Zhao Y Caldas C Huntsman D Hirst M Marra MA Aparicio S 2009 Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature461:809–813
Not in our library10.1038/nature08489
- 59.
Shah SP Roth A Goya R Oloumi A Ha G Zhao Y Turashvili G Ding J Tse K Haffari G Bashashati A Prentice LM Khattra J Burleigh A Yap D Bernard V McPherson A Shumansky K Crisan A Giuliany R Heravi-Moussavi A Rosner J Lai D Birol I Varhol R Tam A Dhalla N Zeng T Ma K Chan SK Griffith M Moradian A Cheng SW Morin GB Watson P Gelmon K Chia S Chin SF Curtis C Rueda OM Pharoah PD Damaraju S Mackey J Hoon K Harkins T Tadigotla V Sigaroudinia M Gascard P Tlsty T Costello JF Meyer IM Eaves CJ Wasserman WW Jones S Huntsman D Hirst M Caldas C Marra MA Aparicio S 2012 The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature486:395–399
Not in our library10.1038/nature10933
- 60.
Sharp PA 2009 The centrality of RNA. Cell136:577–580
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.007
- 61.
Shen H Laird PW 2013 Interplay between the cancer genome and epigenome. Cell153:38–55
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.008
- 62.
Smid M Wang Y Zhang Y Sieuwerts AM Yu J Klijn JG Foekens JA Martens JW 2008 Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse. Cancer Research68:3108–3114
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5644
- 63.
Sommer G Dittmann J Kuehnert J Reumann K Schwartz PE Will H Coulter BL Smith MT Heise T 2011 The RNA-binding protein La contributes to cell proliferation and CCND1 expression. Oncogene30:434–444
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2010.425
- 64.
Stephens PJ McBride DJ Lin ML Varela I Pleasance ED Simpson JT Stebbings LA Leroy C Edkins S Mudie LJ Greenman CD Jia M Latimer C Teague JW Lau KW Burton J Quail MA Swerdlow H Churcher C Natrajan R Sieuwerts AM Martens JW Silver DP Langerød A Russnes HE Foekens JA Reis-Filho JS van 't Veer L Richardson AL Børresen-Dale AL Campbell PJ Futreal PA Stratton MR 2009 Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature462:1005–1010
Not in our library10.1038/nature08645
- 65.
Stephens PJ Tarpey PS Davies H Van Loo P Greenman C Wedge DC Nik-Zainal S Martin S Varela I Bignell GR Yates LR Papaemmanuil E Beare D Butler A Cheverton A Gamble J Hinton J Jia M Jayakumar A Jones D Latimer C Lau KW McLaren S McBride DJ Menzies A Mudie L Raine K Rad R Chapman MS Teague J Easton D Langerød A, Oslo Breast Cancer Consortium (OSBREAC)Lee MT Shen CY Tee BT Huimin BW Broeks A Vargas AC Turashvili G Martens J Fatima A Miron P Chin SF Thomas G Boyault S Mariani O Lakhani SR van de Vijver M van 't Veer L Foekens J Desmedt C Sotiriou C Tutt A Caldas C Reis-Filho JS Aparicio SA Salomon AV Børresen-Dale AL Richardson AL Campbell PJ Futreal PA Stratton MR 2012 The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer. Nature486:400–404
Not in our library10.1038/nature11017
- 66.
Ule J Ule A Spencer J Williams A Hu JS Cline M Wang H Clark T Fraser C Ruggiu M Zeeberg BR Kane D Weinstein JN Blume J Darnell RB 2005 Nova regulates brain-specific splicing to shape the synapse. Nature Genetics37:844–852
Not in our library10.1038/ng1610
- 67.
Vanharanta S Shu W Brenet F Hakimi AA Heguy A Viale A Reuter VE Hsieh JJ Scandura JM Massagué J 2013 Epigenetic expansion of VHL-HIF signal output drives multiorgan metastasis in renal cancer. Nature Medicine19:50–56
Not in our library10.1038/nm.3029
- 68.
Vogelstein B Papadopoulos N Velculescu VE Zhou S Diaz LA Jnr Kinzler KW 2013 Cancer genome landscapes. Science339:1546–1558
Not in our library10.1126/science.1235122
- 69.
Wade M Li YC Wahl GM 2013 MDM2, MDMX and p53 in oncogenesis and cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer13:83–96
Not in our library10.1038/nrc3430
- 70.
Wang J Li D Wang B Wu Y 2013 Predictive and prognostic significance of cytoplasmic expression of ELAV-like protein HuR in invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment141:213–224
Not in our library10.1007/s10549-013-2679-7
- 71.
Wang Y Klijn JG Zhang Y Sieuwerts AM Look MP Yang F Talantov D Timmermans M Meijer-van Gelder ME Yu J Jatkoe T Berns EM Atkins D Foekens JA 2005 Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet365:671–679
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17947-1
- 72.
Weidensdorfer D Stöhr N Baude A Lederer M Köhn M Schierhorn A Buchmeier S Wahle E Hüttelmaier S 2009 Control of c-myc mRNA stability by IGF2BP1-associated cytoplasmic RNPs. RNA15:104–115
Not in our library10.1261/rna.1175909
- 73.
Weyn-Vanhentenryck SM Mele A Yan Q Sun S Farny N Zhang Z Xue C Herre M Silver PA Zhang MQ Krainer AR Darnell RB Zhang C 2014 HITS-clip and integrative modeling define the Rbfox splicing-regulatory network linked to brain development and autism. Cell Reports6:1139–1152
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.005
- 74.
Young LE Moore AE Sokol L Meisner-Kober N Dixon DA 2012 The mRNA stability factor HuR inhibits microRNA-16 targeting of COX-2. Molecular Cancer Research10:167–180
Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-11-0337
- 75.
Zhang C Darnell RB 2011 Mapping in vivo protein-RNA interactions at single-nucleotide resolution from HITS-CLIP data. Nature Biotechnology29:607–614
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1873
- 76.
Zhang XH Wang Q Gerald W Hudis CA Norton L Smid M Foekens JA Massagué J 2009 Latent bone metastasis in breast cancer tied to Src-dependent survival signals. Cancer Cell16:67–78
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.017
- 77.
Zhao J Ni H Ma Y Dong L Dai J Zhao F Yan X Lu B Xu H Guo Y 2007 TIP30/CC3 expression in breast carcinoma: relation to metastasis, clinicopathologic parameters, and P53 expression. Human Pathology38:293–298
Not in our library10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.005
- 78.
Zhou AD Diao LT Xu H Xiao ZD Li JH Zhou H Qu LH 2012 beta-Catenin/LEF1 transactivates the microRNA-371-373 cluster that modulates the Wnt/beta-catenin-signaling pathway. Oncogene31:2968–2978
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2011.461
- 79.
Zou T Rao JN Liu L Xiao L Yu TX Jiang P Gorospe M Wang JY 2010 Polyamines regulate the stability of JunD mRNA by modulating the competitive binding of its 3' untranslated region to HuR and AUF1. Molecular and Cellular Biology30:5021–5032
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00807-10
Cited by papers we hold 5
- RNA-binding protein SORBS2 suppresses clear cell renal cell carcinoma metastasis by enhancing MTUS1 mRNA stability · 2020Not checked
- RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer: Functional and Therapeutic Perspectives · 2020No notice
- EMT and stemness: flexible processes tuned by alternative splicing in development and cancer progression · 2017No notice
- The exon junction complex regulates the splicing of cell polarity gene dlg1 to control Wingless signaling in development · 2016Not checked
- The splicing regulators Esrp1 and Esrp2 direct an epithelial splicing program essential for mammalian development · 2015No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.