Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

A secreted Ustilago maydis effector promotes virulence by targeting anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize

Shigeyuki Tanaka, Thomas Brefort, Nina Neidig and 7 more

eLife · 2014 · CC BY

doi:10.7554/elife.01355

Abstract

The biotrophic fungus Ustilago maydis causes smut disease in maize with characteristic tumor formation and anthocyanin induction. Here, we show that anthocyanin biosynthesis is induced by the virulence promoting secreted effector protein Tin2. Tin2 protein functions inside plant cells where it interacts with maize protein kinase ZmTTK1. Tin2 masks a ubiquitin–proteasome degradation motif in ZmTTK1, thus stabilizing the active kinase. Active ZmTTK1 controls activation of genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway. Without Tin2, enhanced lignin biosynthesis is observed in infected tissue and vascular bundles show strong lignification. This is presumably limiting access of fungal hyphae to nutrients needed for massive proliferation. Consistent with this assertion, we observe that maize brown midrib mutants affected in lignin biosynthesis are hypersensitive to U. maydis infection. We speculate that Tin2 rewires metabolites into the anthocyanin pathway to lower their availability for other defense responses.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The fungus Ustilago maydis causes smut disease in maize. U. maydis is a biotrophic fungus that needs living plant tissue for completion of its sexual cycle and spore formation. After penetrating epidermal cells and establishing an extended interaction zone in which hyphae are encased by the host plasma membrane, fungal hyphae traverse mesophyll tissue, and accumulate in and around vascular bundles presumably to obtain nutrients from veins. During infection, U. maydis secretes hundreds of effector proteins to suppress plant defense responses, and to reprogram plant signaling and metabolism. However, the function of the vast majority of these novel effectors is unknown. At later stages of host colonization, large plant tumors develop that provide the environment for massive fungal proliferation. During biotrophic growth, a high affinity fungal sucrose H+ symporter, Srt1, is upregulated and plays a crucial role for fungal nutrition.

Visible changes in host metabolism include an accumulation of anthocyanin in infected areas. Up to date, anthocyanin induction was thought to result from unspecific biotic stress caused by microbial infection, and flavonoid-pathway related compounds like luteolinidin have been shown to function as phytoalexins negatively affecting fungal growth. So far, no positive link has been established between anthocyanin induction and microbial virulence. We have recently shown that the secreted U. maydis effector Tin2 (Um05302) is specifically responsible for anthocyanin induction in infected seedling tissue. The tin2 effector gene resides in the largest effector gene cluster 19A comprising 24 effectors. Deletion of the entire cluster 19A largely abolishes tumor formation and anthocyanin induction, although the mutant is still able to grow and complete its life cycle inside the plant tissue. Here, we elucidate the molecular function of Tin2 and show that Tin2 is a secreted anthocyanin biosynthesis inducing effector protein functioning inside plant cells. We hypothesize that it may be beneficial for U. maydis to induce anthocyanin biosynthesis as a strategy to compete with tissue lignification and to gain access to veins.

tin2 mutant phenotype

Tin2 was previously shown to be responsible for anthocyanin induction during biotrophic growth and was shown to have a weak contribution to virulence. To unambiguously establish its contribution to virulence, we introduced tin2 in this study into SG200Δ19A-1, a mutant strain lacking the 14 leftmost effector genes of cluster 19A, including tin2. This mutant is severely attenuated in virulence, is unable to elicit anthocyanin formation and induces at most small tumors. Introduction of tin2 enhanced tumor formation significantly and fully restored anthocyanin biosynthesis (Figure 1A,B). In addition, we could demonstrate that tin2 was induced during biotrophic growth (Figure 1C). Microscopic analysis and fungal biomass determination revealed that a SG200Δtin2 mutant did colonize plants efficiently, but was attenuated during late proliferation (Figure 2). To get an idea, which processes might be affected by Tin2, we determined the transcriptional response of Z. mays to infection by SG200 and SG200Δtin2. At 4 days post inoculation (dpi), RNA was prepared from three biological replicates and analyzed by Affymetrix maize genome arrays as described before for other tin mutants. Hierarchical clustering analysis of differentially regulated genes showed that the expression patterns of plant genes in response to SG200Δtin2 was related to the response to SG200 (Figure 3A), consistent with the small contribution of Tin2 to tumor formation. Among the top five genes most highly induced after SG200 infection (compared to SG200Δtin2), two were related to anthocyanin biosynthesis (Figure 3—source data 1) and one of these was the second most highly induced gene when SG200-infected tissue was compared with mock inoculated tissue (Figure 3—source data 2). To substantiate these data, we performed quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for the five genes comprising the anthocyanin pathway (Figure 3B) using tissue from maize infected with SG200 and SG200Δtin2, respectively (Figure 3C). This analysis revealed that all five genes tested were significantly induced in SG200-infected tissue, illustrating that the anthocyanin pathway is transcriptionally induced when U. maydis provides the tin2 effector. Another pathway comprising three differentially regulated genes concerned the biosynthesis of the secondary metabolite 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA, Figure 3—source data 1; Figure 3D) implicated in aphid and fungal resistance. When the expression levels of eight genes comprising the entire DIMBOA biosynthesis pathway were analyzed by qPCR, we detected significant differences in expression for Bx1, Bx2, Bx5 and Bx8 (Figure 3E) in SG200- and SG200Δtin2-infected tissue while we could not detect differences in expression for Bx3, Bx4, Bx6 and Bx7 (not shown). To determine whether the transcriptional changes detected can be linked to the presence or absence of respective metabolites, amounts of total anthocyanin were quantified photometrically at the anthocyanin specific absorption of 515 nm (Figure 4A,B). This revealed an approximately 15-fold increase of anthocyanins in leaf material upon infection with the wild-type strain that was absent in the SG200Δtin2-infected leaves (Figure 4B). By UPLC-PDA-TOF-MS analysis the identity of the three highly abundant anthocyanins in infected maize leaves were determined: cyanidin 3-glucoside (449.0996 Da, C21H21O11+); cyanidin 3-(6’’-malonylglucoside) (535.1088 Da, C24H23O14+); cyanidin 3-(3’’,6’’-dimalonylglucoside) (621.1092 Da, C27H25O17+) and confirmed by MS2 fragmentation studies (Figure 4—source data 1). These cyanidin derivatives were previously described to be the major anthocyanins in maize leaves. Relative amounts of these three cyanidins identified confirmed the overall anthocyanin profile (Figure 4C). In the UPLC-PDA-TOF-MS analysis, we also identified flavonoids and DIBOA-glucoside to be reduced in tissue infected with the tin2 mutant relative to the corresponding wild type (Figure 4D,E). Exact mass as well as MS2 spectra information allowed to identify the three flavonoids as: orientin 2’’-O-rhamnoside (594.1585 Da, C27H30O15); isoorientin 2’’-O-rhamnoside (594.1585 Da, C27H30O15); quercetin-glucoside-rhamnoside (610.1534, C27H30O16) (Figure 4—source data 1). The biosynthesis of these flavonoids branches off the anthocyanin pathway and is likely a side effect of the upregulation of this pathway after infection by wild-type U. maydis (Figure 3B). In case of DIMBOA biosynthesis we identified 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one glucoside (DIBOA-glucoside, 343.0903 Da, C14H17NO9, Figure 4E) to be regulated by Tin2. These findings suggest that, besides the influence of Tin2 on anthocyanin, additional pathways may be affected directly or indirectly by tin2.

Functional domains in Tin2

The Tin2 protein does not reveal any conserved InterPro domains. Orthologous proteins are absent in other organisms examined to date but exist in the related smut fungi Sporisorium reilianum and U. scitaminea. An amino acid alignment revealed significant sequence conservation in the C-terminal third of the protein, whereas the N-terminus showed less conservation (Figure 1D). The C-terminal region contains two proline repeat sequences (PxxP), suggesting that this domain might be important for the interaction with other proteins (Figure 1D). Based on the high conservation of the C-terminus (Figure 1D) a series of C-terminally truncated Tin2 proteins were expressed in SG200Δ19A-1 to test for complementation of tumor formation and anthocyanin induction (Figure 1A,B). Tin21-206 truncated by one amino acid complemented as efficiently as full-length Tin21-207 (Figure 1A,B), whereas Tin21-202 lacking five amino acid residues at the C-terminus could neither complement for tumor formation nor anthocyanin induction (Figure 1A,B). Tin2AAAAA protein, in which the five most C-terminal amino acids were substituted by alanine, was also largely unable to complement (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). These results indicated that the C-terminal region of Tin2 is crucial for tumor formation as well as anthocyanin induction.

Tin2 functions within the plant cytosol

To demonstrate that the Tin2 protein can be secreted, we constructed a strain constitutively expressing a biologically active Tin2-HA fusion protein (Figure 5A,B) and showed that full-length Tin2-HA was detectable in the culture supernatant (Figure 5C). To visualize protein secretion during biotrophic development a Tin21-25-mCherry-Tin226-207 fusion protein was expressed in SG200Δtin2 under the cmu1 promoter, which confers strong expression during plant colonization. After infection, mCherry fluorescence could be observed around fungal hyphae (Figure 6A). When subjected to plasmolysis, which enlarges the apoplastic compartment, the fluorescence of Tin21-25-mCherry-Tin226-207 resided in the apoplast (Figure 6B), demonstrating secretion. Strain SG200Δtin2-Tin21-25-mCherry-Tin226-207 elicited anthocyanin induction, but compared to SG200 the appearance was delayed (Figure 6—figure supplement 1), suggesting that the Tin21-25-mCherry-Tin226-207 fusion protein is only partially functional. In addition, mCherry-Tin226-207 was never detected in the cytosol of infected plants. Since anthocyanin biosynthesis is occurring in the cytosol of plant cells, we expected that Tin2 would translocate to plant cells after being secreted. To demonstrate a function of Tin2 in the plant cytosol, we expressed tin2 without its secretion signal under the CaMV 35S promoter in maize leaf epidermal cells after biolistic bombardment. As this did not induce anthocyanin (Figure 6C, leftmost panel), we repeated the experiment with leaves from plants infected with SG200Δtin2. Here, anthocyanin could be induced by Tin226-207 (Figure 6C, third panel), was absent in infected leaves without tin2 expression (Figure 6C, second panel) and could also not be observed when biologically inactive Tin226-202 was expressed (Figure 6C, rightmost panel). To confirm that anthocyanin is produced in SG200Δtin2-infected tissue transiently transformed with tin2, p35S-Tin226-207 and p35S-mCherry as transformation control were introduced simultaneously in SG200Δtin2-infected tissue. Anthocyanin production, detected by its dark color in bright field microscopy, was observed in the bombarded cell that also expressed cytosolic mCherry (Figure 6D). Interestingly, cells neighboring the transformed cell also accumulated anthocyanin (Figure 6D, red arrow). When biolistic transformation of uninfected maize leaves was carried out with a plasmid expressing mCherry-Tin226-207, the fusion protein was found to spread into non-transformed neighboring cells (Figure 6E). Symplastic spreading was observed for the Cmu1 effector of U. maydis and for several translocated effectors of Magnaporthe oryzae. Collectively, these results demonstrate that Tin2 functions within the plant cytosol and suggest that Tin2 may prepare maize cells for the infection by U. maydis.

Tin2 stabilizes a maize protein kinase

To gain insight into the plant processes affected by Tin2, we identified Tin2 interacting proteins by yeast two-hybrid screening. After rescreening, only one putative cytoplasmic serine/threonine protein kinase from maize, designated ZmTTK1 (Tin2-targeting kinase 1) could be confirmed (not shown). ZmTTK1 is an uncharacterized kinase, with its kinase domain located at the C-terminus (Figure 7A). Maize may contain two putative paralogs of ZmTTK1 (GRMZM2G088409; GRMZM2G068192) with highly conserved kinase domains (63 and 65% identity), but reduced homology in the N-terminal domains (34% and 36% identity, respectively). Orthologs are found in monocot plants like Sorghum bicolor, Oryza sativa, Hordeum vulgare, and Brachypodium distachyon and these display high amino acid sequence identity with ZmTTK1 from maize (between 75% and 94%) (Figure 7A,B). Arabidopsis thaliana also encodes a putative ortholog of ZmTTK1 (AT2G40120), but in this case the amino acid identity is significantly lower (57%) (Figure 7A,B). ZmTTK1 orthologs from monocot plants display highly conserved N- and C-terminal domains, which are separated by a more variable central domain (Figure 7A,C). In the related A. thaliana protein, the N-terminal region shows only patchy homology to the monocot proteins and the central domain is missing (Figure 7A). None of these proteins have been functionally characterized to date.

In yeast two-hybrid assays, full-length ZmTTK1 was able to interact with Tin226-207 and Tin226-206, while no interaction was observed with Tin226-202 lacking biological activity (Figure 8A). Physical interaction between recombinant Strep-ZmTTK1 protein and recombinant GST-Tin226-207 protein was demonstrated by co-IP using GST-Tin226-202 as negative control (Figure 9A). Recombinant ZmTTK1 purified from E. coli was expressed as full-length protein (Figure 9B) and showed in vitro kinase activity determined with MBP (myelin basic protein) as substrate. However, no significant differences in MBP phosphorylation were apparent in the presence or absence of Tin2 (Figure 9C). To examine whether Tin2 protein affects ZmTTK1 activity in vivo, we transiently expressed ZmTTK1 protein in Nicotiana benthamiana. In this system, ZmTTK1 protein proved highly unstable and the N-terminal region could not be detected (Figure 10A). This region contains a phosphodegron-like motif DSGxS, which, when phosphorylated at serine residues, serves as a recognition motif for the ubiquitin ligase complex leading to protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Addition of proteasome inhibitor MG132 to N. benthamiana cells transiently expressing ZmTTK1-HA allowed detection of full-length protein (Figure 10B). In addition, ZmTTK1S279/282A-HA protein carrying alanine substitutions at positions serine 279 and serine 282 in the phosphodegron-like motif could be expressed as full-length protein in the transient N. benthamiana system (Figure 10B). Furthermore, poly-ubiquitinated ZmTTK1-HA protein accumulated in ZmTTK1-HA expressing plant cells treated with MG132 but not in ZmTTK1S279/282A-HA expressing N. benthamiana cells (Figure 10C). These results indicate that the phosphodegron-like motif in ZmTTK1 promotes partial degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

The region in ZmTTK1 that interacts with Tin2 was mapped by yeast two-hybrid assays and shown to coincide with the variable region containing the phosphodegron-motif (Figure 8B). Next, when ZmTTK1-HA was co-expressed in N. benthamiana together with functional Tin226-207, we detected full-length ZmTTK1, but not when non-functional truncated Tin226-202 was co-expressed with ZmTTK1 (Figure 10D,E). Furthermore, immunoprecipitated ZmTTK1-HA co-expressed with Tin226-207 showed MBP phosphorylation activity in vitro while expression of ZmTTK1-HA alone or co-expression of ZmTTK1-HA with truncated Tin226-202 did not yield an immunoprecipitate with phosphorylation activity (Figure 10E, bottom panel). This illustrates that Tin2 protein targets the phosphodegron-containing region of ZmTTK1, stabilizing full-length, active ZmTTK1.

To rule out that these effects are specific to the heterologous N. benthamiana system, ZmTTK1-YFP was transiently expressed in maize with and without co-expression of mCherry-Tin226-207. When ZmTTK1-YFP and mCherry-Tin226-207 were co-expressed, the number of cells showing a YFP signal was increased significantly compared to the situation when ZmTTK1-YFP was expressed alone, and in addition, a significant percentage of cells showed strong YFP fluorescence in the co-expression conditions (Figure 11A,B). This suggests that the ZmTTK1-YFP fusion protein is also unstable in maize epidermal cells. Co-expression of Tin2 stabilizes the fusion protein, similar to what was observed in N. benthamiana.

To elucidate whether there is a direct link between ZmTTK1 activity and anthocyanin induction, the stabilized form of the kinase, ZmTTK1S279/282A, was transiently co-expressed with cytoplasmic mCherry in leaves infected with SG200Δtin2. In transiently transformed cells weak anthocyanin induction could be observed (Figure 11C). In maize anthocyanin biosynthesis genes are positively regulated via ZmR1 and ZmC1 transcription factors. Therefore, we co-expressed Tin226-207 and ZmTTK1 in uninfected maize leaves together with mCherry-ZmR1 or mCherry-ZmC1 protein, respectively. mCherry-ZmC1 localized to the nucleus, and this localization did not change significantly in the presence of Tin226-207 and ZmTTK1 (Figure 11D). When mCherry-ZmR1 was expressed alone, the fusion protein showed weak cytoplasmic and nuclear localization (Figure 11E). However, when co-expressed with Tin226-207 and ZmTTK1, mCherry-ZmR1 protein showed almost exclusively intense nuclear localization (Figure 11D,E). These results suggest that ZmTTK1 protein kinase stabilized by Tin2 might phosphorylate the ZmR1 protein, which is then imported into the nucleus (or is retained there) and induces anthocyanin biosynthetic genes.

Tin2 differentially affects anthocyanin and lignin biosynthesis genes

Since anthocyanin precursors accumulate in the plant cytosol and anthocyanin is transported to the vacuole, two compartments U. maydis is not in direct contact with due to its biotrophic life style, we next considered that induction of the anthocyanin pathway might deplete precursors for other pathways, which could be harmful for U. maydis development. In the general phenylpropanoid pathway, phenylalanine is converted to 4-coumaroyl CoA, which then serves as a precursor for both, anthocyanins and lignin (Figure 12A). Since we had shown that all genes in the anthocyanin branch of the pathway are upregulated in tissue infected with SG200, but not in tissue infected with SG200Δtin2 (Figure 3), we determined abundance of transcripts encoding key enzymes in the general and lignin-specific branches of the phenylpropanoid pathway by qPCR in leaves infected with strains SG200 and SG200Δtin2. qPCR analysis demonstrated that the phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) gene in the general part of the pathway was significantly upregulated in both SG200- and SG200Δtin2-infected tissue compared to mock inoculation (Figure 12B). One of the two ‘cinnamoyl-CoA reductase’ (CCR) genes of maize one was not induced, while the other one (GRMZM2G131836) was clearly induced after U. maydis infection, but there was no difference in induction in SG200- and SG200Δtin2-infected leaves (Figure 12). The major 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL) gene in the lignin-specific branch (GRMZM2G075333; based on homology with sorghum; ) was not differentially regulated, while the flavonoid-related 4CL (GRMZM2G054013) was downregulated in SG200Δtin2-infected tissue compared to SG200-infected tissue (Figure 12B). Of the six cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) genes, four genes were significantly upregulated in SG200Δtin2-infected tissue (Figure 12B). The enhanced expression of several lignin biosynthesis genes after infection with the tin2 mutant coincided with an transcriptional upregulation of several plant cell wall remodeling genes (Figure 12—source data 1) and a decrease in ferulic acid (Figure 4F), which is involved in crosslinking hemicellulosic polysaccharides and provides a nucleation site for lignification, suggesting a connection between these processes. Furthermore, in a maize chalcone synthase mutant (c2), in which the biosynthetic pathway to anthocyanins is blocked, and in which there could conceivably be more precursor going into the lignin branch, virulence of U. maydis SG200 was attenuated (Figure 13).

Quantification of total lignin content from isolated cell walls in wild-type maize (cv. Early Golden Bantam) revealed a small increase in leaf tissue infected with tin2 mutant strains relative to SG200-infected material that was statistically significant in one of three analyzed mutants (Figure 14A). Collectively, these results suggest that anthocyanin induction by Tin2 protein may negatively affect the lignin pathway. To determine whether lignin content affects virulence of U. maydis, we infected single and double brown midrib (bm) mutants of maize with SG200 (Figure 14B–D). The bm1 mutation reduces CAD activity as a result of a mutation in the ZmCAD2 gene, the major CAD involved in lignification of vascular tissue in leaves and stems. The leaf midribs of the bm2 mutant contain less lignin, and the tissue-specific pattern of lignification in the leaves is altered. Lignin content in the leaves and stems of the bm3 mutant is reduced, lignin subunit composition has shifted towards a higher guaiacyl/syringyl (G/S) ratio, and novel benzodioxane structures are present as a result of the incorporation of 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol. This is the result of a mutation in the gene encoding caffeic acid O-methyl transferase (COMT). The bm4 mutation has not yet been mapped to a specific gene, but affects the cell wall composition of leaves and lowers the lignin content of leaf midribs. Except for the bm2 mutant, all other single bm mutants displayed elevated virulence symptoms after U. maydis infection, with bm3 showing the strongest effect (Figure 14C). Of the double mutants, the bm3-bm4 mutant showed dramatically enhanced disease symptoms, while disease symptoms in the bm2-bm3 double mutant was lower than in the single bm3 mutant (Figure 14C), suggesting a negative effect of the bm2 mutation on virulence in this combination. When bm2 was combined with bm1, virulence was comparable to the single bm1 mutant (Figure 14C). The alterations in virulence in the bm mutants were not only visible in symptom severity but also with respect to symptom distribution (Figure 14D). After infection with SG200, more than 80% of leaf tumors stayed locally confined, while in the bm mutants (with the exception of the single bm2 mutant) leaf tumors were much more spread and covered the entire leaf area from the injection hole to the stem (Figure 14B,D), suggesting that lignification restricts U. maydis growth and spread in the infected tissue. In line with this assertion, we observed strongly lignified cells in vascular bundle tissue in cross sections of maize leaves infected with SG200Δtin2 and could only rarely observe fungal hyphae in bundle sheath cells (Figure 14E). By contrast, lignification was significantly less pronounced in SG200-infected tissue (Figure 14F) and in tissue infected by SG200Δtin3 (Figure 14G), a mutant lacking another effector from cluster 19A that does not affect anthocyanin induction. Additionally, SG200 and SG200Δtin3 hyphae were readily detected inside bundle sheath cells (Figure 14F,G). This suggests that anthocyanin induction by the Tin2 effector attenuates lignification of vascular bundle cells, conceivably facilitating fungal access to nutrients in vascular bundle tissue.

Discussion

Comprehensive genetic, biochemical and transcriptome analyses allowed us to uncover a connection between anthocyanin and lignin biosynthesis that is targeted by a novel secreted effector of U. maydis, Tin2. Our results are summarized in the model depicted in Figure 15. The link between Tin2 and anthocyanin biosynthesis appears direct and occurs through the stabilization of the kinase ZmTTK1 via Tin2. We have shown that after U. maydis infection, when Tin2 is present, the stabilization of ZmTTK1 will increase biosynthesis of anthocyanin. Conversely, when U. maydis is lacking tin2, more of the common precursor for anthocyanin and lignin, 4-coumaric acid, is likely to be available for lignin biosynthesis (Figure 15) resulting in cell wall fortification in vascular tissue. The deposition of lignin in the plant cell wall is considered to provide an undegradable physical barrier to infection. The observed decrease in ferulic acid in SG200Δtin2-infected leaves compared to SG200-infected tissue is consistent with increased lignification where ferulic acid acts as a nucleation site for lignin polymerization. Tin2 affected all steps of the anthocyanin pathway, but did not affect transcription of all genes coding for lignin pathway components. While none of the early genes implicated in lignin biosynthesis were upregulated after infection with U. maydis wild type, we observed transcriptional effects for four of the six CAD genes acting at a late step of the lignin pathway (Figure 12A). At present, there is only a limited understanding of how the lignin biosynthetic pathway in maize is regulated. Several Myb and NAC transcriptional activators involved in secondary cell wall formation have been identified, but the mechanisms behind tissue-specific and developmentally regulated gene expression, and the role of posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression are yet to be fully elucidated. In tin2 mutant infected tissue total lignin levels appear increased, although statistically relevant effects were seen in only one of the mutants analyzed (Figure 14A). This may reflect that increased lignification does not affect the entire leaf but, as we have shown, is restricted to the vascular tissue colonized by the tin2 mutant late in infection. Therefore, when total tissue is analyzed, differences in total lignin content may not be so evident in wild-type and tin2 mutant infected tissue. However, the increased susceptibility of maize bm mutants to U. maydis and the increased leaf areas displaying disease symptoms, provide strong evidence for a role of lignification in disease resistance. Several mechanisms may form the basis for this observation. A less lignified cell wall will be easier to penetrate by the fungus. The plant may also be less effective at producing defense-related lignin that could slow down the migration of the fungus. Lastly, since the fungus spreads via the vascular tissue and may rely on nutrients obtained from this tissue for massive proliferation, the altered physico-chemical characteristics of the vascular tissue in the bm mutants, combined with altered dimensions of the xylem vessels may influence entry and the rate of migration of the fungus. The bm2 mutant appears to be an exception in that it does not show increased susceptibility to U. maydis, and even appears to attenuate the effect of infection in bm1-bm2 and bm2-bm3 double mutants relative to the bm1 and bm3 single mutants. This effect may be due to the accumulation of a fungitoxic (phenolic) compound in this mutant, as has been proposed for the sorghum brown midrib12 mutant, which was shown to be less susceptible to colonization by Fusarium spp.. Also in N. attenuata lines in which two CAD genes were silenced, compensatory processes for the structural deficiencies were observed when plants were grown in the field, and in this case such plants accumulated various phenylpropanoids. Therefore, while we consider direct effects of Tin2 on lignification to be the simplest model to explain the reduced virulence on the tin2 mutant strain (Figure 15), the situation may in reality be much more complex. For example we cannot formally rule out that in the absence of anthocyanin biosynthesis it is not actually the enhanced lignification that affects fungal spread but an altered composition of the plant cell walls. Conversely, the enhanced disease symptoms observed in the bm mutants could also be attributed to an lower incorporation of phenolics rather than to the reduction in lignin, that is in wild-type plants cell wall phenolics may negatively affect fungal growth and restrict pathogen spread.

Reduction in lignin content and changes in lignin subunit composition have been shown to improve biomass conversion in a number of species, including maize, with the bm1 and bm3 mutations leading to 50% higher yields of fermentable sugars on a per-gram-biomass-basis. Based on the experiments described here, it is clear that modifying lignin composition in maize has the risk of increased susceptibility to U. maydis, and the associated reduction in yield.

Whether Tin2 is actively diverting the flux from lignin to anthocyanin remains speculative as flux measurements would require the absolute quantification of lignin and anthocyanin in the infected tissue and this is hampered by the technical difficulties in lignin extraction and quantification due to limited amounts of infected tissue material. In addition, the direct or indirect effects of Tin2 on other pathways like DIMBOA and flavonoid biosynthesis might complicate such analyses. However, precedence for a connection between lignin and anthocyanin biosynthesis comes from A. thaliana, where the silencing of HCT (hydroxycinnamoyl transferase), the first committed enzyme from the lignin pathway, redirected the metabolic flux into flavonoids through chalcone synthase and this resulted in elevated levels of flavonols and anthocyanin. In addition, transgenic A. thaliana plants expressing the lignin biosynthesis repressing ZmMYB31 transcription factor from maize redirected carbon flux towards the biosynthesis of anthocyanins. Recently, a competition between anthocyanin and lignin pathways for their common precursor has also been detected in strawberry. In that system it was demonstrated that plant class III peroxidase (FaPRX27), a gene connected with lignin biosynthesis, is linked to a region implied in fruit color decrease. In addition, it was demonstrated that the downregulation of chalcone synthase lead to an induction of FaPRX27 and this diverted the flux from anthocyanins to lignin. Thus, there appears to be a metabolic connection between anthocyanin and lignin biosynthesis pathways in monocot as well as dicot systems and U. maydis may be altering this with the help of Tin2. Future work will be needed to address whether this connection is direct with lignin functioning as barrier or indirect with anthocyanin induction negatively affecting the accumulation of other defense compounds.

Transient expression of the ZmR1 transcription factor known to positively regulate the anthocyanin pathway in maize revealed strong nuclear localization when ZmR1 was co-expressed with ZmTTK1 and Tin2, but not when Tin2 was omitted. We suggest that the difference in ZmR1 localization may be caused by its phosphorylation, although we cannot exclude other possibilities. In A. thaliana MYB75, which is related to maize ZmC1, but is not the closest ortholog, acts as a repressor for the lignin-specific branch of the phenylpropanoid pathway presumably through an interaction with TT8, a bHLH protein related to ZmR1. If such a scenario also exists in maize, the observed Tin2-mediated nuclear localization of ZmR1 might actually promote the formation of such a repressive complex for lignin biosynthesis. How Tin2 affects the expression of DIMBOA is currently unclear. It is conceivable that this could reflect a co-regulation with anthocyanin biosynthesis genes. Alternatively, the activity of another transcription factor might be modulated by the Tin2-stabilized ZmTTK1 protein. An upregulation of Bx1 and elevated amounts of DIMBOA had previously been detected after colonization of maize by U. maydis. In this context, it had also been demonstrated that U. maydis is resistant to DIMBOA while several other fungal pathogens of maize are susceptible. This could indicate that the induction of DIMBOA might deter infection by other pathogens in U. maydis infected tissue. However, in a macro-array based expression analysis of phenylpropanoid and related genes in brown midrib mutants, two genes from the DIMBOA pathway, Bx4 and Bx5, were significantly upregulated in the bm3 mutant, that is the mutant with the strongest effect in lignin biosynthesis. The authors suggest that this may be a compensatory reaction for the lack of COMT activity in the bm3 mutant. If true, the upregulation of DIMBOA after SG200 infection could also be the consequence of the locally reduced lignin content in the infected areas.

For its function, the Tin2 protein must translocate into plant cells after being secreted. Although an mCherry-Tin2 fusion protein produced by U. maydis was partially biologically active, we could never see the fusion protein accumulate inside maize cells. Based on similar results with Cmu1, another transferred effector, we speculate that large fluorescent tags fused to the respective effector prevent uptake in this pathosystem. Cmu1 and Tin2 do not share obvious common motifs that can be recognized in their primary amino acid sequence that could serve as translocation signal, and it remains to be determined how they cross the plant plasma membrane. Anthocyanin induction after transient transformation of Tin2 could be observed only when plants were pre-infected with a tin2 mutant strain. We consider that it may be necessary to pre-infect plants to obtain high levels of phenylalanine or tyrosine for anthocyanin biosynthesis. These amino acids supply the flavonoid pathway and U. maydis infection was shown to increase their amounts in infected leaves through Cmu1 and possibly other effectors.

In maize, anthocyanin induction is connected to kernel development and is also observed when coleoptiles are exposed to UV-B. We hypothesize that there will be a native regulatory system stabilizing the ZmTTK1 protein kinase in such conditions, and Tin2 may mimic this regulator. Interestingly, ZmTTK1 orthologs in barley and B. distachyon have substitutions in critical serine residues of the phosphodegron motif DSGxS, and in the related kinase from A. thaliana this region is missing altogether (Figure 7A). Since the barley smut U. hordei and the B. distachyon smut U. bromivora both lack an ortholog of Tin2 (; AD and RK, unpublished data), this could suggest that the ongoing co-evolution between host and pathogen has already generated stable kinases in barley and B. distachyon, respectively, that no longer need respective orthologs of the Tin2 effector for activity.

Anthocyanin serves for pollinator attraction of flowers. In addition, its accumulation is frequently observed under abiotic and biotic stress conditions. Anthocyanin is transported and accumulates in the vacuole, provides UV-B stress protection and allows scavenging of reactive oxygen species. So far, the observed accumulation of anthocyanin after biotic stress was discussed in the frame of defense responses of resistant cultivars. In addition, some other examples, not connected to classical resistance responses, have been described: in a recent report it has been demonstrated that tomatoes enriched in anthocyanins are less susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. The enhanced resistance occurs through reduced spreading of the ROS burst, which limits the induction of cell death necessary for growth of this necrotroph. In potato it was shown that ectopic overexpression of an anthocyanin 5-O-glycosyl transferase conferred enhanced resistance to the bacterial pathogen Erwinia carotovora. In this system, it is not clear, however, whether the effects are direct or indirect. In perennial ryegrass infected with the fungal endophyte Epichloae festucae, prominent anthocyanin induction is observed at the base of tillers, while fungal Δsak mutants, lacking a stress activated MAP kinase, fail to induce anthocyanin, display alterations in the vascular tissue and accumulate less fungal biomass. In this system it has been speculated that the observed downregulation of key enzymes in the shikimate and anthocyanin pathway may divert precursors into the catechin/tannin pathway with negative consequences for fungal development. In the present study, we have uncovered a new positive connection between anthocyanin induction and development of a biotrophic pathogen. We suggest that examples where anthocyanin induction is observed in response to biotic stress should be revisited to see, whether metabolic rewiring of the phenylpropanoid pathway is adopted as a common strategy by biotrophic microbes colonizing plants.

Growth conditions and virulence assays

Zea mays cv. Early Golden Bantam (Olds Seeds, Madison, WI, USA) was grown in a temperature-controlled greenhouse (14 hr/10 hr light/dark cycle; 28°C/20°C) and used for infection by U. maydis. Z. mays chalcone synthase mutant M541J (A1 A2 C1 c2 R1-nj) and cognate control strain M142V (A1 A2 C1 C2 R1-nj) were obtained from the Maize Genetics Stock Center (http://maizecoop.cropsci.uiuc.edu/) and are near-isogenic lines. The brown midrib maize mutants bm1, bm2, bm3 and bm4 mutant are near-isogenic lines generated in the background of inbred line A619, following eight backcrosses. The double mutants bm1-bm2, bm1-bm4, bm2-bm3 and bm3-bm4 were created by crossing the respective single mutant lines, followed by self-pollination of the resulting F1 plants, selection of double mutants among the F2 progeny, and confirmed with test crosses to the individual single mutants. U. maydis strains were grown in YEPSL (0.4% yeast extract, 0.4% peptone, 2% sucrose) and cell suspensions in H2O adjusted to OD600 = 1.0 were injected into the stem of 7-day-old maize seedlings with a syringe as described. Disease symptoms were scored at 12 days post infection using a previously developed scoring scheme and statistical analysis was performed as described. N. benthamiana was grown under the same conditions as maize.

Plasmid constructs and mutant generation

For plasmid constructions, standard molecular cloning strategies and techniques were applied. All plasmids used and generated are listed in Supplementary file 1. To generate truncated tin2 genes, the plasmid pIP-pum05302 was digested with XbaI-AscI. Truncated tin2 genes were amplified by respective primer pairs (Supplementary file 2) and introduced into the XbaI-AscI site. tin2AAAAA was generated by amplification with respective primers (Supplementary file 2) and used to replace um05302 in pIP-pum05302. For constitutive overexpression of tin2 in U. maydis, p123Potef containing the constitutive otef promoter was digested with NcoI-NotI and full-length tin2 amplified by respective primer pairs (Supplementary file 2) was inserted. For transient expression in maize cells, p35S-mCherry was digested by EcoRI-XbaI and tin2 or ZmTTK1 genes amplified by respective primers (Supplementary file 2) were introduced. For yeast two-hybrid constructs, pGBKT7 or pGADT7 were digested with NdeI-BamHI or EcoRI-XhoI, respectively and tin2 and truncated tin2 genes or ZmTTK1 and truncated versions thereof were inserted after amplification with respective primer pairs (Supplementary file 2). For protein expression in N. benthamiana, tin2, and ZmTTK1 were amplified by respective primer pairs (Supplementary file 2) and inserted into pBIN19AN digested with ApaI-NotI. Point-mutations in ZmTTK1 were introduced using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol using primers (Supplementary file 2). All plasmid constructs containing amplified gene fragments were sequenced.

The haploid solopathogenic strain SG200 of U. maydis was used as a reference strain throughout this study. SG200Δ19A-1, SG200Δtin2, and SG200Δtin3 mutants were generated in a previous study. All U. maydis strains (Supplementary file 3) are derived from SG200 and were generated by insertion of p123 derivatives into the ip locus as described. Isolated U. maydis transformants were tested by southern analysis to assess single or multiple integration events in the ip locus.

Analysis of anthocyanins, flavonoids and DIBOA-glucoside

Maize seedlings inoculated with H2O, SG200, SG200Δtin2 and SG200Δtin2-tin2 were harvested 6 days after infection. 2–3 cm segments below the injection hole showing anthocyanin induction in leaves infected with SG200 and SG200Δtin2-tin2 were excised from 20 plants, pooled and ground in liquid nitrogen. From plants infected with the tin2 mutant strains corresponding leaf segments, which did not show anthocyanin pigmentation, were excised.

Total anthocyanins were quantified according to the method described by. 100 mg homogenized plant material was heated for 10 min in 1 ml of 2 N HCl at 55°C, cooled down and incubated overnight in the dark at room temperature. The extract was centrifuged and the clear supernatants were analyzed at 515 nm at a Cary 100 Bio Spectrophotometer (Varian, Darmstadt, Germany). Commercial cyanidin 3-arabinoside chloride (PhytoLab, Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany) was used for quantification. For further identification of anthocyanins, flavonoids, and DIBOA-glucoside, as well as for recording their profiles, powdered samples were extracted and the polar phase was measured by UPLC-PDA-TOF-MS as described. For unambiguous identification fragmentation studies were performed by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (1290 Infinity, Agilent Technologies) coupled with a 6540 UHD Accurate-Mass QTOF LC MS instrument with Agilent Jet Stream Technology as ESI source (Agilent Technologies) as described.

Lignin extraction and analysis

For cell wall isolation, 200 mg of plant material from the same batch was used for the anthocyanin quantification, was extracted with 1.6 ml 80% methanol (vol/vol) for 1 hr in a 2-ml plastic tube and centrifuged for 20 min at 16,000×g. The pellet was washed two times with 1.6 ml of 1 M NaCl and 0.5% Triton X-100, for two times with 1.8 ml water, two times with 1.7 ml of methanol, and two times with 1.7 ml of acetone. Next alkaline hydrolysis was performed by adding 1.7 ml 2 M NaOH followed by incubation for 1 hr under vigorous shaking. Then, the pellet was washed twice with 1.8 ml water and dried at 80°C overnight. For lignin determination, 2 mg of the cell wall material was used and 250 µl of 25% (vol/vol) acetylbromide in glacial acetic acid were added and incubated for 30 min at 70°C. Afterwards, the sample was cooled down immediately on ice and 250 µl 2 M NaOH were added before centrifuging for 5 min at 16,000×g. For UV analysis (280 nm), 139 ml of the supernatant were taken and 2.8 µl 50% (vol/vol) hydroxylamine and 1.25 ml glacial acetic acid were added. A calibration curve was generated with coniferyl alcohol as standard compound in the range from 5 to 20 µg.

Bioinformatic tools applied in this study

Signal peptide prediction was performed with the online program SignalP 4.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). Protein secondary structure prediction was performed with the online program Jpred3 (http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/www-jpred/). Phylogenic analysis was performed with the online program Phylogeny.fr (http://www.phylogeny.fr/). Protein conserved domain search was performed with the online program Pfam (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/search/).

Microarray analysis

For the microarray experiments, maize plants (Early Golden Bantam) were grown in a phytochamber in a 15 hr/9 hr light/dark cycle; light period started/ended with 1 hr ramping of light intensity. Temperature was 28°C and 20°C, relative humidity 40% and 60% during light and dark periods, respectively, with 1 hr ramping for both values. Plants were inoculated with H2O (mock), SG200, and SG200Δtin2 as described above. Infected or water-inoculated tissue from 20 plants per experiment was harvested at 4 dpi by excising a section of the third leaf between 1 and 3 cm below the injection holes. For RNA extraction, material was pooled, ground to powder under liquid nitrogen and RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). RNA was purified applying the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Affymetrix maize genome arrays were done in three biological replicates, using standard Affymetrix protocols (Midi_Euk2V3 protocol on GeneChip Fluidics Station 450; scanning on Affymetrix GSC3000G). Expression data were submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (Accession number: GSE48536). The microarray data obtained in this study were analyzed using the Partek Genomics Suite version 6.12. Expression values were normalized using the RMA method. Criteria for significance were a corrected p-value (per sample) with an FDR of 0.05 and a fold-change of >2. Differentially expressed genes were calculated by a 1-way ANOVA.

Quantitative real-time PCR and fungal biomass analyses

Total RNA was extracted from U. maydis cell grown in YEPSL medium and from infected leaves by excising 2–3 cm segments from below the injection holes. At least 20 leaf segments were pooled for each of the indicated time points. RNA was isolated with the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was synthesized with Superscript III First Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR reactions were performed as previously described. All reactions were performed in at least three biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test. Relative expression levels of fungal or maize genes were calculated in relation to the values obtained for the constitutively expressed peptidylprolyl isomerase gene (ppi) of U. maydis or glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) of Z. mays. Primers used for PCR are listed in Supplementary file 2. For fungal biomass assessment, samples from infected plants were prepared as above. DNA was extracted and fungal biomass was determined as previously described.

Yeast two hybrid interaction assays

To screen for interactors of Tin2, Tin2 lacking the signal peptide for secretion was expressed from pGBKT7-Tin226-207 and screened against a pAD_Gal4-library constructed from cDNAs generated from RNA of U. maydis FB1 × FB2 infected tissue. Material was collected 2 and 5 days after infection. Transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain AH109 (Clontech, Mountain View, USA) was done as described in the DUAL membrane starter kit manual (Dualsystems Biotech AG, Schlieren, Switzerland). The yeast two-hybrid screen was performed following the instructions of the matchmaker yeast two-hybrid manual (Clontech) using 1 mg of bait-DNA (pGBKT7-Tin226-207) and 0.5 mg of library-DNA. All resulting yeast clones were tested by immunoblotting for expression of the respective fusion proteins. Interacting clones were verified by empty vector controls excluding self-activating clones as well as by vector swap experiments. Full-length cDNAs of putative interaction partners were generated from SG200-infected tissue collected 6 days post infection, cloned in pGADT7 and tested for interaction with Tin226-207 expressed from pGBKT7-Tin226-207.

For yeast protein interaction assays, the genes encoding the proteins tested for interaction were cloned into pGBKT7 or pGADT7 vectors (Clontech), respectively, to express fusion proteins with the yeast GAL4 binding (BD) and activation domain (AD), respectively, in strain AH109 (Clontech). Yeast transformants were screened on selective dropout media (SD) lacking only tryptophan (Trp) and leucine (Leu) to select yeast cells, which contained the desired plasmids (Supplementary file 4). Protein interactions were assessed on SD selection medium lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine (His) containing 3 mM 3-Amino-1, 2, 4-triazole (3-AT). Yeast MEL1p activity was measured by addition of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl α-D-galactopyranoside (X-α-gal). Fusion protein expression was verified by western blot.

Protein expression and protein in vitro studies

For protein expression in Escherichia coli, pRSET-GST-PP and pPR-IBA102 (IBA Lifesciences, Göttingen, Germany) vectors were used for the preparation of GST-Tin226-207 or Strep-ZmTTK1, respectively. E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain was used as host for protein expression. E. coli transformants carrying respective expression plasmids were grown in YT medium (1.6% Bacto Tryptone, 1.0% Yeast Extract, 0.5% NaCl) containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml). Protein induction was performed by addition of 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 28°C for 5 hr. Cell pellets were lysed by BugBuster master mix (Merck, Schwalbach, Germany). Soluble supernatant was incubated with Glutathione Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare, München, Germany) or Strep-tactin sepharose (IBA Lifesciences) for GST- or Strep-tagged protein purification, respectively. Protein enrichment and purity was assessed by western blot. For in vitro co-IP, recombinant GST-Tin226-207 or GST-Tin226-202 protein (200 µg) bound to glutathione sepharose beads (GE healthcare), respectively, was incubated with 500 µl E. coli soluble extract in PBS buffer (10% glycerol, 0.1% Tween20 and 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) from induced BL21(DE3)/pPRIBA102-ZmTTK1 at 4°C for 1 hr. GST fusion proteins were eluted with reduced glutathione. Strep-ZmTTK1 in eluate was detected by western blot. Detection of Tin2-HA protein in culture supernatants of U. maydis was performed as previously described.

For western blot analysis, protein was separated by 10% or 13% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Protein was visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB). Monoclonal anti-c-myc antibody produced in mouse, anti-HA antibody produced in rabbit or monoclonal anti-ubiquitin antibody produced in mouse were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany) and used as a primary antibody. Anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked or anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA) and used as a secondary antibody. Strep-tactin-HRP (IBA Lifesciences) was used for the detection of Strep-tagged protein. For immunoprecipitation of ZmTTK1 from plant cell, total plant protein extract was incubated with human-IgG agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C for 2 hr on a rotary shaker. For in vitro kinase assay, recombinant proteins or human-IgG agarose carrying immunoprecipitates were incubated at 28°C for 30 min in a volume of 25 µl reaction buffer containing 0.5 mg/ml myelin basic protein (Sigma-Aldrich), 20 µM ATP, and 2.5 µCi [γ-32P]ATP. Phosphorylated myelin basic protein was detected using a STORM phosphoimager (GE Healthcare).

Transient protein expression in Z. mays and N. benthamiana

For protein expression in N. benthamiana, Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 strains carrying expression plasmids indicated in each experiment were grown in YT medium containing kanamycin (50 µg/ml). Cells were resuspended in 10 mM MES (pH 5.6) and the concentration was adjusted as OD600 = 0.5. A. tumefaciens strains were mixed at an equal ratio with the A. tumefaciens strain LBA2566 expressing the 35S:p19 construct encoding the p19 silencing suppressor. Bacterial mixtures were infiltrated with needleless syringe to the upper leaves of 3-weeks-old N. benthamiana plants. Protein was extracted from the leaves at 3 days after infiltration with extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% Triton-X100, 10% Glycerol, protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche, Mannheim, Germany]) under liquid nitrogen. For proteasome inhibition, 100 µM MG132 (Merck) solution was infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves at 1 day before protein extraction.

For transient protein expression in maize by biolistic gene transfer, 1.6 µm gold particles (Bio-Rad, München, Germany) were coated with the plasmids coding for the indicated genes driven under CaMV 35S promoter (Supplementary file 1). Bombardment was performed using a PDS-1000/He system (Bio-Rad) onto 2-weeks-old maize leaves or SG200Δtin2-infected leaves (at 4–5 dpi).

Microscopic observation

To visualize fungal proliferation in infected tissue, the area 1–3 cm below the injection site was excised at 3 days post infection. Fungal hyphae were stained with WGA-AF488 (Invitrogen), the plant cell wall was stained with propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich). Leaf samples were incubated in staining solution (1 µg/ml propidium iodide, 10 µg/ml WGA-AF488) and observed with a TCS-SP5 confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) under the following conditions. WGA-AF488: excitation at 488 nm and detection at 500–540 nm, propidium iodide: excitation at 561 nm and detection at 580–660 nm. For fluorescent protein detection, leaf samples were directly observed by confocal microscopy under the following conditions. mCherry: excitation at 561 nm and detection at 580–630 nm, YFP: excitation at 495 nm and detection at 510–550 nm. For observation of vascular bundles, infected leaf segments collected at 6 dpi were cut into small pieces and fixed with 4% glutaraldehyde. The segments were embedded in epoxy resin and sliced with a microtome (0.4 µm thickness). Cross-sections were stained with 1% (wt/vol) Safranin O (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2–3 min and observed by light microscopy.

Accession numbers

U. maydis genes and encoding protein sequences are available at the MIPS database (http://mips.helmholtz-muenchen.de/genre/proj/ustilago/); tin2, um05302; ppi, um03726. For Z. mays genes, sequence data can be found at MaizeSequence.org (http://www.maizesequence.org) under accession numbers; ZmGAPDH, GRMZM2G046804; ZmTTK1, GRMZM2G448633; ZmR1, GRMZM5G822829; ZmC1, GRMZM2G005066; ZmPAL, GRMZM2G074604; ZmCHS, GRMZM2G422750; ZmCHI, GRMZM2G155329; ZmF3H, GRMZM2G062396; ZmDFR, GRMZM2G026930; ZmANS, GRMZM2G345717; ZmBx1, GRMZM2G085381; ZmBx2, GRMZM2G085661; ZmBx5, GRMZM2G063756; ZmBx8, GRMZM2G085054; Zm4CL, GRMZM2G075333, GRMZM2G054013; ZmCCR, GRMZM2G131205, GRMZM2G131836; ZmCAD, GRMZM2G046070, GRMZM5G844562, GRMZM2G167613, AC234163.1_FGP002, GRMZM2G700188, GRMZM2G118610.

References 73

  1. 1.

    Ahmad S Veyrat N Gordon-Weeks R Zhang Y Martin J Smart L Glauser G Erb M Flors V Frey M Ton J 2011 Benzoxazinoid metabolites regulate innate immunity against aphids and fungi in maize. Plant Physiology157:317–327.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.111.180224

  2. 2.

    Banuett F Herskowitz I 1996 Discrete developmental stages during teliospore formation in the corn smut fungus, Ustilago maydis. Development122:2965–2976

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.122.10.2965

  3. 3.

    Barbieri M Marcel TC Niks RE 2011 Host status of false brome grass to the leaf rust fungus Puccinia brachypodii and the stripe rust fungus P. striiformis. Plant Disease95:1339–1345.

    Not in our library10.1094/pdis-11-10-0825

  4. 4.

    Basse CW 2005 Dissecting defense-related and developmental transcriptional responses of maize during Ustilago maydis infection and subsequent tumor formation. Plant Physiology138:1774–1784.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.105.061200

  5. 5.

    Beggs C Wellman E 1985 Analysis of light-controlled anthocyanin formation in coleoptiles of Zea mays L.: The role of UV-B, blue, red and far-red light. Photochemistry and Photobiology41:481–486.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1751-1097.1985.tb03515.x

  6. 6.

    Berndt P Lanver D Kahmann R 2010 The AGC Ser/Thr kinase Aga1 is essential for appressorium formation and maintenance of the actin cytoskeleton in the smut fungus Ustilago maydis. Molecular Microbiology78:1484–1499.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07422.x

  7. 7.

    Besseau S Hoffmann L Geoffroy P Lapierre C Pollet B Legrand M 2007 Flavonoid accumulation in Arabidopsis repressed in lignin synthesis affects auxin transport and plant growth. Plant Cell19:148–162.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.106.044495

  8. 8.

    Bhargava A Mansfield SD Hall HC Douglas CJ Ellis BE 2010 MYB75 functions in regulation of secondary cell wall formation in the Arabidopsis inflorescence stem. Plant Physiology154:1428–1438.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.110.162735

  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    Chabbert B Tollier MT Monties B 1994 Biological variability in lignification of maize: expression of the brown midrib bm3 mutation in three maize cultivars. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture64:349–355.

    Not in our library10.1002/jsfa.2740640317

  11. 11.

    Chen F Dixon RA 2007 Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nature Biotechnology25:759–761.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1316

  12. 12.

    Chen W VanOpdorp N Fitzl D Tewari J Friedemann P Greene T Thompson S Kumpatla S Zheng P 2012 Transposon insertion in a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene is responsible for a brown midrib1 mutation in maize. Plant Molecular Biology80:289–297.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11103-012-9948-4

  13. 13.

    Djamei A Schipper K Rabe F Ghosh A Vincon V Kahnt J Osorio S Tohge T Fernie AR Feussner I Feussner K Meinicke P Stierhof YD Schwarz H Macek B Mann M Kahmann R 2011 Metabolic priming by a secreted fungal effector. Nature478:395–398.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10454

  14. 14.

    Djamei A Kahmann R 2012 Ustilago maydis: dissecting the molecular interface between pathogen and plant. PLOS Pathogens8:e1002955.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1002955

  15. 15.

    Doehlemann G Wahl R Horst RJ Voll LM Usadel B Poree F Stitt M Pons-Kühnemann J Sonnewald U Kahmann R Kämper J 2008 Reprogramming a maize plant: transcriptional and metabolic changes induced by the fungal biotroph Ustilago maydis. Plant Journal56:181–195.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03590.x

  16. 16.
  17. 17.

    Dooner HK Robbins TP Jorgensen RA 1991 Genetic and developmental control of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Annual Review of Genetics25:173–199.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001133

  18. 18.

    Dornan D Shimizu H Burch L Smith AJ Hupp TR 2003 The proline repeat domain of p53 binds directly to the transcriptional coactivator p300 and allosterically controls DNA-dependent acetylation of p53. Molecular and Cellular Biology23:8846–8861.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.23.23.8846-8861.2003

  19. 19.

    Eaton CJ Cox MP Ambrose B Becker M Hesse U Schardl CL Scott B 2010 Disruption of signaling in a fungal-grass symbiosis leads to pathogenesis. Plant Physiology153:1780–1794.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.110.158451

  20. 20.

    Farfsing JD 2004 Regulation des Mais-induzierten mig2-Genclusters in Ustilago maydis. Ph.D. thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Fornalé S Shi X Chai C Encina A Irar S Capellades M Fuguet E Torres JL Rovira P Puigdomènech P Rigau J Grotewold E Gray J Caparrós-Ruiz D 2010 ZmMYB31 directly represses maize lignin genes and redirects the phenylpropanoid metabolic flux. Plant Journal64:633–644.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04363.x

  22. 22.

    Fossen T Slimestad R Andersen OM 2001 Anthocyanins from maize (Zea mays) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry49:2318–2321.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf001399d

  23. 23.

    Funnell-Harris DL Pedersen JF Sattler SE 2010 Alteration in lignin biosynthesis restricts growth of Fusarium spp. in brown midrib sorghum. Phytopathology100:671–681.

    Not in our library10.1094/phyto-100-7-0671

  24. 24.

    Glenn AE Gold SE Bacon CW 2002 Fdb1 and Fdb2, Fusarium verticillioides loci necessary for detoxification of preformed antimicrobials from corn. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions15:91–101.

    Not in our library10.1094/mpmi.2002.15.2.91

  25. 25.

    Goodman CD Casati P Walbot V 2004 A multidrug resistance-associated protein involved in anthocyanin transport in Zea mays. Plant Cell16:1812–1826.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.022574

  26. 26.

    Grabber JH Ralph J Hatfield RD 2002 Model studies of ferulate-coniferyl alcohol cross-product formation in primary maize walls: implications for lignification in grasses. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry50:6008–6016.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf0205312

  27. 27.

    Guillaumie S Pichon M Martinant JP Bosio M Goffner D Barrière Y 2007 Differential expression of phenylpropanoid and related genes in brown-midrib bm1, bm2, bm3, and bm4 young near-isogenic maize plants. Planta226:235–250.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-006-0468-9

  28. 28.

    Halpin C Holt K Chojecki J Oliver D Chabbert B Monties B Edwards K Barakate A Foxon GA 1998 Brown-midrib maize (bm1) - a mutation affecting the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene. Plant Journal14:545–553.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00153.x

  29. 29.

    Hammerschmidt R Nicholson RL 1977 Resistance of maize to anthracnose: Effect of light intensity on lesion development. Phytopathology67:247–250.

    Not in our library10.1094/phyto-67-247

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Hipskind J Wood K Nicholson RL 1996 Localized stimulation of anthocyanin accumulation and delineation of pathogen ingress in maize genetically resistant to Bipolaris maydis race O. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology49:247–256.

    Not in our library10.1006/pmpp.1996.0052

  32. 32.

    Hirota A Kato T Fukaki H Aida M Tasaka M 2007 The auxin-regulated AP2/EREBP gene PUCHI is required for morphogenesis in the early lateral root primordium of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell19:2156–2168.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.107.050674

  33. 33.

    Holton TA Cornish EC 1995 Genetics and biochemistry of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell7:1071–1083.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.7.7.1071

  34. 34.

    Horst RJ Doehlemann G Wahl R Hofmann J Schmiedl A Kahmann R Kämper J Sonnewald U Voll LM 2010 Ustilago maydis infection strongly alters organic nitrogen allocation in maize and stimulates productivity of systemic source leaves. Plant Physiology152:293–308.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.109.147702

  35. 35.

    Humphreys JM Chapple C 2002 Rewriting the lignin roadmap. Current Opinion in Plant Biology5:224–229.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00257-1

  36. 36.

    Kämper J Kahmann R Bölker M Ma LJ Brefort T Saville BJ Banuett F Kronstad JW Gold SE Müller O Perlin MH Wösten HA de Vries R Ruiz-Herrera J Reynaga-Peña CG Snetselaar K McCann M Pérez-Martín J Feldbrügge M Basse CW Steinberg G Ibeas JI Holloman W Guzman P Farman M Stajich JE Sentandreu R González-Prieto JM Kennell JC Molina L Schirawski J Mendoza-Mendoza A Greilinger D Münch K Rössel N Scherer M Vranes M Ladendorf O Vincon V Fuchs U Sandrock B Meng S Ho EC Cahill MJ Boyce KJ Klose J Klosterman SJ Deelstra HJ Ortiz-Castellanos L Li W Sanchez-Alonso P Schreier PH Häuser-Hahn I Vaupel M Koopmann E Friedrich G Voss H Schlüter T Margolis J Platt D Swimmer C Gnirke A Chen F Vysotskaia V Mannhaupt G Güldener U Münsterkötter M Haase D Oesterheld M Mewes HW Mauceli EW DeCaprio D Wade CM Butler J Young S Jaffe DB Calvo S Nusbaum C Galagan J Birren BW 2006 Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen. Ustilago maydis. Nature444:97–101.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05248

  37. 37.

    Kaur H Shaker K Heinzel N Ralph J Gális I Baldwin IT 2012 Environmental stresses of field growth allow cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase-deficient Nicotiana attenuata plants to compensate for their structural deficiencies. Plant Physiology159:1545–1570.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.196717

  38. 38.

    Kay BK Williamson MP Sudol M 2000 The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB Journal14:231–241

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Khang CH Berruyer R Giraldo MC Kankanala P Park SY Czymmek K Czymmek K Kang S Valent B 2010 Translocation of Magnaporthe oryzae effectors into rice cells and their subsequent cell-to-cell movement. Plant Cell22:1388–1403.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.109.069666

  40. 40.

    Koch C Tria G Fielding AJ Brodhun F Valerius O Feussner K Braus GH Svergun DI Bennati M Feussner I 2013 A structural model of PpoA derived from SAXS-analysis-implications for substrate conversion. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta1831:1449–1457.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.06.003

All 73 references

Cited by papers we hold 12

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.