No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.
Sterol homeostasis requires regulated degradation of squalene monooxygenase by the ubiquitin ligase Doa10/Teb4
Ombretta Foresti, Annamaria Ruggiano, Hans K Hannibal-Bach and 2 more
eLife · 2013 · CC BY
Abstract
Sterol homeostasis is essential for the function of cellular membranes and requires feedback inhibition of HMGR, a rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate pathway. As HMGR acts at the beginning of the pathway, its regulation affects the synthesis of sterols and of other essential mevalonate-derived metabolites, such as ubiquinone or dolichol. Here, we describe a novel, evolutionarily conserved feedback system operating at a sterol-specific step of the mevalonate pathway. This involves the sterol-dependent degradation of squalene monooxygenase mediated by the yeast Doa10 or mammalian Teb4, a ubiquitin ligase implicated in a branch of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated protein degradation (ERAD) pathway. Since the other branch of ERAD is required for HMGR regulation, our results reveal a fundamental role for ERAD in sterol homeostasis, with the two branches of this pathway acting together to control sterol biosynthesis at different levels and thereby allowing independent regulation of multiple products of the mevalonate pathway.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Sterols, such as cholesterol in animals or ergosterol in yeast, are essential components of cellular membranes and their concentration to a large extent determines many of the membrane properties, such as fluidity and rigidity. Therefore, cells evolved sophisticated mechanisms to precisely regulate their sterol levels. These are critical not only for adjusting membrane properties to diverse cellular environments but also for preventing the accumulation of free sterols, which is toxic both to individual cells and to whole organisms.
The regulation of cellular sterol levels occurs primarily during their biosynthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by the mevalonate pathway. This highly conserved pathway produces isoprenoids, precursors not only for sterols but also for other essential molecules such as dolichol or ubiquinone (Figure 1A; ). While a constant supply of these molecules is required, cells must avoid overaccumulation of sterols, a balance that is achieved by a number of feedback systems operating at the transcription, translation, and post-translational levels. Remarkably, decades of work demonstrated that many of these homeostatic control systems converge on the regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGR), an enzyme involved in an early and rate-limiting step of the mevalonate pathway.
A key mechanism in sterol homeostasis involves the proteasomal degradation of HMGR in a sterol-dependent manner. In fact, an increase in sterol biosynthetic intermediates, such as geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate in yeast and lanosterol or its immediate product 24,25-dihydrolanosterol in mammals, strongly accelerates the degradation of HMGR, thereby lowering the flux through the mevalonate pathway. Both in yeast and in mammals, the targeting of HMGR to the proteasome for degradation is mediated by a branch of the ER-associated protein degradation (or ERAD) pathway, which is primarily studied for its role in the elimination of misfolded ER proteins. Importantly, ERAD factors involved in the recognition of misfolded ER proteins are not required for HMGR degradation. Instead specific chaperones called Insigs, in the presence of the right sterol signal, regulate the interaction of HMGR with the central ERAD components, a ubiquitin ligase complex in the ER membrane, called Hrd1 in yeast and Gp78 in mammals. The Hrd1/Gp78-dependent ubiquitination of HMGR leads to its membrane extraction, facilitated by the Cdc48/p97 ATPase, and release in the cytoplasm for degradation by the proteasome. In mammalian cells, a second ER-bound ubiquitin ligase, Trc8, can also promote the sterol-dependent degradation of HMGR. Other branches of ERAD have never been implicated in sterol homeostasis.
Here, we report a novel role of ERAD in the regulation of sterol biosynthesis. A screen for substrates of the ERAD ubiquitin ligase Doa10 identified the squalene monooxygenase Erg1, an enzyme required for a sterol-specific step of the mevalonate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 is regulated by the levels of lanosterol and that, together with sterol esterification, it is essential for preventing the accumulation of toxic sterol intermediates. Moreover, in mammalian cells, sterol-dependent degradation of squalene monooxygenase requires the Doa10 homologue Teb4. Altogether, our findings reveal an evolutionarily conserved, central role of ERAD in sterol homeostasis.
Erg1 is a substrate of the Doa10 complex
To identify novel substrates of the ERAD ubiquitin ligase Doa10, we used SILAC (Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino acids in Culture) labeling followed by quantitative proteomics. We found that, at steady state, several proteins were overrepresented in doa10Δ mutant when compared to wild type (wt) cells (data not shown). Among these potential Doa10 substrates was the yeast squalene monooxygenase Erg1 (Figure 1A, B). Other components of the yeast sterol biosynthetic pathway (ergosterol or Erg pathway) were present at similar levels in doa10Δ and wt cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). The high levels of Erg1 in doa10Δ mutants are not due to increased ERG1 transcription as the abundance of Erg1 mRNA was indistinguishable between doa10Δ and wt cells (data not shown). Interestingly, cells lacking Ubc6 or Ubc7, the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes required for Doa10-dependent ubiquitination and members of the Doa10 complex, also showed increased steady state levels of Erg1 when compared to wt cells (Figure 1B). In contrast, deletion of Hrd1, Der1, or Usa1, involved in a different branch of ERAD as part of the Hrd1 complex, had no effect on the steady state levels of Erg1 (Figure 1B). To directly test for a role of Doa10 in the turnover of Erg1, we performed cycloheximide shut-off experiments. We found that in wt cells Erg1 is an unstable protein with a half-life of <120 min (Figure 1C). Deletion of the ubiquitin ligase Doa10 or any of the components of the Doa10 complex strongly impaired the degradation of Erg1 expressed from its own promoter (Figure 1C) or from the heterologous glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) promoter (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Similarly, Erg1 degradation was virtually blocked in cdc48-3 and npl4-1 cells, expressing temperature sensitive alleles in essential subunits of the Cdc48 ATPase complex that pulls substrates out of the ER membrane after Doa10-dependent ubiquitination (Figure 1D). On the other hand, in hrd1Δ cells the kinetics of Erg1 degradation was similar to that in wt cells (Figure 1C and Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Together, these data show that Erg1 is an ERAD substrate of the Doa10 complex.
ERAD of Erg1 depends on a single lysine residue
In the vast majority of cases, protein ubiquitination occurs on the ε-amino group of lysine residues. We therefore searched for Erg1 lysine residues required for its Doa10-dependent degradation. We focused our attention on a cluster of residues proximal to the C-terminal region (K278, K284, K311, and K360) that were reported to be ubiquitinated in several large scale studies. We generated Erg1-derivatives in which individual or pairs of the lysine residues were mutated to arginine. These lysine mutant alleles supported the growth of yeast cells, indicating that the substitutions did not significantly affect the essential enzymatic function of Erg1 (Figure 2A). To test the effect of the lysine mutations on Erg1 stability, we performed cycloheximide shut-off assays in otherwise wt cells. Degradation of Erg1(K278,284R) and Erg1(K360R) was indistinguishable from degradation of wt Erg1 (Figure 2B, C). In contrast, Erg1(K311R) was strongly stabilized either when expressed from the endogenous ERG1 promoter (Figure 2B, C) or from the strong constitutive GAPDH promoter (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Importantly, Erg1(K311R) and Erg1(K278,284,311,360R), with simultaneous mutations on four lysine residues, were only slightly stabilized by additional deletion of DOA10 (Figure 2B, C). Thus, the lysine residue at position 311 is essential for Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1.
Lanosterol levels regulate Erg1 degradation
We then tested whether Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 was affected by the levels of cellular sterols. To manipulate the levels of sterols and sterol biosynthetic intermediates, we took advantage of several well characterized small molecule inhibitors of the Erg pathway enzymes (Figure 3A). Reduction of ergosterol synthesis in wt cells by a brief treatment with zaragozic acid, an inhibitor of the squalene synthetase Erg9, led to a strong stabilization of Erg1 when compared to controls (Figure 3B). Similar treatments did not affect the degradation kinetics of the Doa10 substrates Vma12-Ndc10902–956-HA and Pca11–392-DHFR-HA (Figure 3C and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A–C). These experiments indicate that sterol depletion specifically affects the Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 but not other Doa10 substrates, such as misfolded proteins. Similar results were obtained upon treatment of wt cells with Ro48-807, an inhibitor of the squalene cyclase Erg7 and whose product (lanosterol) is the first sterol of the pathway (Figure 3A,D,E and Figure 3—figure supplement 1D–F). The next step in ergosterol biosynthesis is catalyzed by Erg11, the lanosterol demethylase, which is inhibited by fluconazole (Figure 3A). In contrast to zaragozic acid and Ro48-807, a short treatment of wt cells with fluconazole induced a marked acceleration of Erg1 degradation (Figure 3F,G). Importantly, the acceleration of Erg1 degradation upon fluconazole treatment was completely dependent on Doa10, as it was blocked in doa10Δ cells (Figure 3F). Moreover, fluconazole treatment did not have any effect on the kinetics of degradation of the Doa10 substrates Pca11–392-DHFR-HA (Figure 3G and Figure 3—figure supplement 1G) and Vma12-Ndc10902–956-HA (Figure 3—figure supplement 1H). Therefore, lanosterol accumulation induced by fluconazole treatment stimulates Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1. In agreement with these results, we found that Erg1 degradation was also accelerated in a erg11DAmP mutant bearing a hypomorphic allele of ERG11 (Figure 3H). Mutation of genes required for the very last steps of ergosterol biosynthesis (ERG2 to ERG6) did not have a major impact on the kinetics of Erg1 degradation (Figure 3—figure supplement 1I). Taken together, these data demonstrate that Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 is regulated by the levels of sterols, most likely lanosterol.
doa10Δ cells accumulate sterol precursors
We then asked whether the Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 had an effect on sterol homeostasis. To address this issue, we analyzed the lipid composition of doa10Δ cells by shotgun lipidomics. While the overall sterol levels in doa10Δ and wt cells were comparable, the relative abundance of individual sterol species was significantly different (Figure 4A). When compared to wt cells, the doa10Δ mutant showed a reduction in the levels of ergosterol (by 13%) with a concomitant fivefold increase in the ergosterol precursor lanosterol. Moreover, doa10Δ cells had small amounts of ergostadienol, a sterol intermediate virtually undetectable in wt cells (Figure 4A). Ergosterol concentration is a major determinant of membrane fluidity, which is tightly regulated according to the cellular environment. The changes in sterol composition observed in doa10Δ mutants are expected to affect the membrane properties in these cells. Accordingly, we noticed that mutations in components of the Doa10 complex have a mild growth phenotype when grown at low temperatures (10°C), as previously reported ( and data not shown). Altogether, the data presented so far indicate that sterol-dependent degradation of Erg1 by Doa10 is part of a feedback system essential for sterol homeostasis.
Parallel pathways monitoring buildup of sterol intermediates
A mechanism preventing the accumulation of sterol intermediate metabolites, which are toxic, is their esterification into sterol esters. Interestingly, doa10Δ cells also accumulated significantly higher amounts of sterol esters (approximately a 40% increase in relation to wt cells; Figure 4B). This increase prompted us to investigate a potential connection between the Doa10-dependent feedback regulation of Erg1 and sterol esterification. In yeast, esterified sterols are produced by two partially redundant acyl-CoA sterol acyl transferases (ASATs), Are1 and Are2, that are not essential for growth under laboratory conditions. We then again used shotgun lipidomics to evaluate the effect of the DOA10 mutation on sterol composition in esterification-deficient are1Δ are2Δ cells. Compared to wt cells, are1Δ are2Δ mutant has ∼20% less ergosterol (Figure 4A), as previously reported. Moreover, are1Δ are2Δ cells show significantly higher amounts of lanosterol and ergostadienol (Figure 4A), indicating that loss of esterification also leads to the accumulation of sterol intermediates. Strikingly, in are1Δ are2Δ doa10Δ mutant the levels of ergosterol dropped by more than 50%, while the levels of the intermediates lanosterol and ergostadienol increased dramatically (Figure 4A). The changes observed in the are1Δ are2Δ doa10Δ mutant, although of a much larger magnitude, perfectly mirror those observed in doa10Δ cells. Importantly, the effects appear specific to doa10Δ, as deletion of HRD1 did not significantly change the sterol profile of esterification-deficient cells (data not shown). These data suggest that sterol esterification and the ubiquitin ligase Doa10 play parallel, redundant functions in preventing accumulation of sterol intermediate metabolites. Does the massive increase in sterol intermediates at the expense of the final product, ergosterol, have any impact in the cellular physiology of are1Δ are2Δ doa10Δ cells? To address this issue, we have performed growth assays under conditions of membrane stress such as low temperature or the presence of benzyl alcohol, a membrane fluidizing agent. Although are1Δ are2Δ doa10Δ mutant grows normally at 25°C, these cells barely grew when incubated at 14°C or in the presence of benzyl alcohol (Figure 4C). The same phenotype was observed when are1Δ are2Δ mutation was combined with deletion of UBC7, encoding for the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in complex with Doa10 (data not shown). In contrast, the are1Δ are2Δ hrd1Δ mutant cells, lacking the ubiquitin ligase of the other ERAD branch, did not display any growth defect at 14°C or in the presence of benzyl alcohol (Figure 4C). These results indicate that accumulation of sterol intermediates with a concomitant decrease in ergosterol levels renders are1Δ are2Δ doa10Δ cells vulnerable to membrane stress, perhaps due to the inability to adjust membrane fluidity. To rule out the possibility that the growth phenotypes of are1Δ are2Δ doa10Δ are due to pleiotropic effects of doa10Δ, for example due to its role in the clearance of misfolded proteins, we took advantage of the degradation resistant ERG1 allele, ERG1(K311R). Remarkably, constitutive expression from the GAPDH promoter of ERG1(K311R) in are1Δ are2Δ cells led to a cold phenotype comparable to that observed in are1Δ are2Δ doa10Δ mutant (Figure 4D). In contrast, expression of ERG1 or ERG1(K360R) under the same conditions did not cause any apparent defect (Figure 4D), suggesting that Erg1 is a key Doa10 substrate for sterol homeostasis. In sum, these data show that Are1, Are2-dependent sterol esterification and Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 are parallel mechanisms preventing abnormal accumulation of potentially toxic sterol intermediates. Interestingly, these two mechanisms appear to be tightly integrated in cells. As suggested by previous studies, we found that degradation of Erg1 is accelerated in are1Δ are2Δ cells (Figure 4E, F), likely due to the higher levels of lanosterol in this mutant (Figure 4A). Importantly, this accelerated degradation still requires the lysine at position 311 (Figure 4F) and is completely dependent on Doa10 as it is blocked in doa10Δ cells (Figure 4E).
Doa10 homologue Teb4 promotes degradation of human squalene monooxygenase SM
The homologue of Erg1 in mammals, SM, is ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Interestingly, SM proteasomal-dependent degradation is stimulated by sterols, in this case by the final product of the pathway, cholesterol. These similarities prompted us to test whether the mammalian homologue of Doa10, the ubiquitin ligase Teb4, was involved in the turnover of SM. We transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells with a pool of siRNA against Teb4, which led to a 57% (±0.044%) reduction in TEB4 mRNA levels compared to control treated cells, as detected by qPCR. We noticed that although transcription of SM in Teb4-depleted and control cells was indistinguishable, the steady state levels of SM were 1.8-fold (±0.232) higher in cells treated with Teb4 siRNA (Figure 5A, ‘untreated’ lanes). This stabilization is consistent with a role of Teb4 in the degradation of SM. To directly examine SM half-life upon Teb4 depletion we performed cycloheximide shut-off experiments with or without the addition of cholesterol to stimulate SM degradation. These experiments were performed in sterol-deprived cells, as previously described. In these conditions, SM appears to have a relatively long half-life that is even longer in Teb4 siRNA-treated cells (Figure 5A, B). Cholesterol treatment of control cells induces very rapid degradation of SM (half-life <4 hr), as previously shown. In contrast, cholesterol treatment in Teb4-depleted cells has a much milder effect on the degradation of SM (Figure 5A,B) and its half-life remains longer than 4 hr (Figure 5B). Both in control and in Teb4-depleted cells, SM sterol-dependent degradation is significantly attenuated by the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Figure 5A). To independently assess the role of Teb4 in the regulated degradation of SM, HEK293 cells were transfected with constructs overexpressing Teb4-myc or Teb4(C9A)-myc, a dominant negative mutant that lacks ubiquitin ligase activity. While SM degradation occurred with normal kinetics in Teb4-overexpressing cells, expression of Teb4(C9A) strongly inhibited the cholesterol-dependent acceleration of SM degradation, as assayed by cycloheximide shut-off experiments (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Altogether, these data indicate that the Teb4 ubiquitin ligase promotes the degradation of SM in a cholesterol-dependent manner. Moreover, it emphasizes the remarkable conservation of the role of ERAD in regulating sterol homeostasis in yeast and mammals.
Discussion
Here we characterize a novel role of the ERAD pathway in the homeostatic control of sterol levels and demonstrate that loss of this feedback system leads to sterol deregulation. We show that the yeast ubiquitin ligase Doa10, along with the other components of the Doa10 complex, promotes the regulated degradation of the squalene monooxygenase Erg1. The Doa10-mediated degradation of Erg1 is stimulated by lanosterol and loss of Doa10 leads to accumulation of lanosterol and sterol esters. Moreover, we found that the requirement for Doa10 function increases in sterol esterification-deficient cells, indicating that feedback regulation of Erg1 and sterol esterification are redundant pathways preventing accumulation of sterol intermediates.
Lanosterol is the first sterol produced by the pathway and, in mammalian cells, its levels or the levels of an immediate product (24,25-dihydrolanosterol) are key in the regulation of sterol biosynthesis. Specifically, an increase in lanosterol/24,25-dihydrolanosterol levels stimulates the Gp78-dependent ubiquitination of HMGR, its proteasomal degradation, and consequently a decrease in the rate of sterol biosynthesis. We have now found that in yeast, high levels of lanosterol also lead to a decrease in flux through the sterol pathway, in this case by the Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1. Together these observations suggest that the regulation of the rate of sterol biosynthesis according to the lanosterol levels might be a unifying principle of sterol homeostasis. Besides being the first sterol of the pathway, lanosterol is also a poor substrate for the sterol esterification enzyme Are2, the most active of the yeast ASATs. Therefore, lanosterol levels might provide an accurate measurement of the flux into the sterol branch of the mevalonate pathway.
High Erg1 levels in doa10Δ cells lead to accumulation of lanosterol, that is particularly prominent in cells also lacking the ASATs Are1 and Are2. This huge increase in lanosterol levels is somewhat surprising because these cells have an intact Erg11, the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase that consumes lanosterol. This indicates that Erg11 activity is either rate limiting or regulated. Erg11 is an enzyme of the cytochrome P450 family that uses heme as a co-factor. Therefore, it is possible that lanosterol accumulation in these mutants is a consequence of changes in the availability of heme, also a product of the mevalonate pathway. Alternatively, the lanosterol accumulation might result from a still unknown regulatory system acting on Erg11 itself or another downstream enzyme. This possibility is supported by the observation that simultaneous overexpression of Erg1 and Erg11 leads to a significant increase in the production of ergosterol in yeast.
Besides the Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 in yeast, we show that the Doa10 homologue Teb4 also promotes the degradation of SM in mammalian cells. While the degradation of yeast Erg1 is accelerated by the sterol intermediate lanosterol, SM degradation is stimulated by the end product of the sterol pathway, cholesterol. Moreover, Doa10-dependent degradation of Erg1 requires a single lysine residue that is poorly conserved outside fungi, while proteasomal-dependent degradation of SM depends on an N-terminal fragment conserved only in higher animals. Despite these differences, it appears that the post-translation feedback regulation of squalene monooxygenase by the Doa10/Teb4 ubiquitin ligase is a conserved mechanism of sterol homeostasis. In fact, this regulatory system might also operate in plants, as suggested by the observation that mutations of Arabidopsis thaliana Doa10 homologue suppress a hypomorphic allele of squalene monooxygenase.
HMGR, the major target for Hrd1/Gp78 regulation, acts at a very early step of the mevalonate pathway and is required for the synthesis of all its products (Figure 1A). On the other hand, squalene monooxygenase is required for the synthesis of sterols but not of other key metabolites of the mevalonate pathway, such as dolichol or ubiquinone (Figure 1A). Therefore, the novel feedback system described here allows cells to independently regulate the biosynthesis of the different metabolites derived from mevalonate. Remarkably, regulation of HMGR and squalene monooxygenase is mediated by two branches of the ERAD pathway, both in yeast and in mammals. As previously shown, the ubiquitin ligase Hrd1/Gp78 promotes the degradation of HMGR. Our results now show that the ubiquitin ligase Doa10/Teb4 promotes the degradation of squalene monooxygenase, which place ERAD at the center of cellular sterol homeostasis, with multiple branches of ERAD acting together to regulate sterol biosynthesis at different levels (Figure 6). More broadly, our findings raise the possibility that regulated degradation of folded, active proteins might be a more prominent feature of ERAD, a pathway primarily studied for its role in the elimination of misfolded proteins. Whether regulated ERAD substrates are all related to sterol homeostasis or ERAD plays a more general role in regulating the ER proteome remains to be determined.
Gp78-mediated degradation of HMGR involves proteins called Insigs. These proteins function as adaptors: in a sterol-dependent manner they bind to the sterol-sensing domain of HMGR and recruit Gp78 ligase complex. However Insigs are not required for the degradation of squalene monooxygenase either in yeast (AR and PC unpublished results) or in mammals. Therefore, future studies should elucidate the mechanisms by which squalene monooxygenase is recognized by the ubiquitin ligase Doa10/Teb4 in a sterol-dependent manner.
Reagents
Heavy lysine [13C615N2] was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Cycloheximide (CHX; Sigma-Aldrich) stock was stored at 12.5 mg/ml in water at −20°C and was used at 250 µg/ml. Zaragozic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) stock was stored at 10 mg/ml in DMSO at 20°C and used at 10 µg/ml. Ro48-8071 (Sigma-Aldrich) stock was stored at 40 mg/ml in DMSO and used at 40 µg/ml. Fluconzole (Sigma-Aldrich) stock was stored at 5 mg/ml in DMSO and used at 10 µg/ml. Rat monoclonal anti-HA high-affinity antibody (3F10) was purchased from Roche. Mouse monoclonal anti-phosphoglycerate kinase (Pgk1) was purchased from Invitrogen. The polyclonal rabbit anti-Erg1 antibody was a generous gift from Dr Chao-Wen Wang, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Mouse monoclonal antibodies against human α-tubulin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human SM were purchased from Proteintech (Chicago, IL). All other reagents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated.
Yeast strains and plasmids
Tagging of proteins and individual gene deletions were performed by standard PCR-based homologous recombination. Strains with multiple gene deletions and/or genomically encoded fusion proteins were made by PCR-based homologous recombination or by crossing haploid cells of opposite mating types, followed by sporulation and tetrad dissection using standard protocols. The strains used are isogenic either to BY4741 (Mata ura3Δ0 his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0), BY4742 (Matα his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0 ura3Δ0), or FY251 (Mata ura3-52 his3Δ200 leu2Δ1 trp1Δ63) and are listed in Supplementary file 1A. Plasmids and primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary files 1B and C, respectively.
ERG1 gene (including endogenous promoter and terminator regions) was cloned by PCR amplification from genomic DNA isolated from the strain BY4741. Primers were designed to anneal approximately 500 bp upstream and downstream of ERG1 ORF and to introduce NotI and XhoI restriction sites for cloning in the polylinker of pRS316 plasmid originating the plasmid pPC943. Erg1-derivatives with specific lysine to arginine mutations were made by site-directed mutagenesis using pPC943 as template (Supplementary file 1B). To replace the endogenous copy of Erg1 with the lysine mutant versions, the C-terminal portion of Erg1 was amplified by PCR from pPC943 including the Erg1 3´UTR region. This fragment was digested with XbaI and NotI restriction sites (introduced by the primers) and cloned in a pRS303 plasmid originating pPC995. The resulting plasmid was linearized with EcoRI and integrated into the ERG1 locus of the recipient strain. Transformants were selected based on HIS prototrophy and confirmed by DNA sequencing. In all cases, the recombinant plasmids were able to restore sterol synthesis, with the engineered Erg1 protein as the sole source of Erg1 activity. Wild type strain BY4741 was transformed by PCR-based homologous recombination to introduce the GAL promoter and HA-tag upstream of ERG1 ORF generating strain yPC6475. PCR product was obtained from amplification of plasmid pYM-N24 using primers 1242 and 1243. Strain yPC6475 was transformed with plasmids encoding Erg1-derivatives with specific lysine to arginine mutations as specified in Supplementary files 1A, B. The plasmid encoding for the misfolded protein Pca11–392-DHFR-HA (pPC860) was generated by cloning the DNA sequence coding for FLAG-Pca11–392 under the constitutive PRC1 promoter into pRS316 and a sequence coding Escherichia coli DHFR was fused in frame, followed by a 3× HA tag-coding sequence and the PRC1 terminator.
The plasmid encoding for the modular misfolded protein Vma12-Ndc10902–956-HA (pPC926) was generated by cloning the sequence coding full-length Vma12 fused to a fragment of Ndc10 that is sufficient to promote its Doa10-dependent degradation, Ndc10902–956, and to a GGS–3× HA tag-coding sequence. The resulting fusion protein was expressed under the constitutive PRC1 promoter from the plasmid pRS316.
SILAC labeling, protein extraction, and proteomics
For SILAC experiments, the yeast strain BY4742, which is an auxotroph for lysine, was used to generate the strains doa10Δ, ubc6Δ, ubc7Δ, hrd1Δ, usa1Δ, and der1Δ by PCR-based homologous recombination. Cells were grown in 5 ml of synthetic complete media containing either 1 mM L-lysine (light) or 1 mM L-lysine [13C615N2] (heavy) until stationary phase. Cultures were then diluted to OD600 ∼0.005 in 50 ml fresh medium of the same composition. Cells were harvested at OD600 of 1.0–1.2. Then 20 OD of cells grown in light lysine media were mixed with 20 OD of cells grown in heavy lysine, harvested by centrifugation, and washed twice with cold water. Total cell extracts were prepared by glass-bead disruption in lysis buffer (6 M urea, 50 mM Tris–Cl pH 8.0, 0.5% SDS, 0.5% NP-40, 10 mM DDT). After removal of cell debris by centrifugation at 2000×g, proteins were precipitated by the addition of TCA to a final concentration of 20%. The protein pellet was washed with ice-cold acetone which was removed by drying the pellet at 50°C. Proteins were resuspended in a small amount of buffer (6 M urea, 50 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.5) and quantified by the BCA quantification method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Urea concentration was reduced to 4 M and the pH was adjusted to 8.8 with 25 mM Tris–HCl. Samples were digested with Lys-C in a 1:10 enzyme–protein ratio and desalted using an Oasis Plus HLB cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA). Digestions were fractionated using electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC). Each peptide fraction was separated by nanoLC in an EasyLC system (Proxeon) prior to mass spectrometric analysis on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos Pro (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) fitted with a nanospray source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Data analysis was performed using the Proteome Discoverer software suite (v1.3.0.339; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the Mascot search engine (v2.3; Matrix Science) was used for peptide identification. Data were searched against an in-house generated database containing all proteins in the Saccharomyces Genome Database plus the most common contaminants. The identified peptides were filtered using an FDR lower than 1%. Peptide areas were used to calculate the heavy–light ratios.
Cycloheximide shut-off experiments and drug treatments
Cycloheximide shut-off experiments were performed in exponentially growing cells, as described. cdc48-3 and npl4-1 temperature sensitive strains were grown in synthetic complete medium at permissive temperature (25°C) to exponential phase and then shifted to 37°C for 2 hr before addition of cycloheximide. Sterol synthesis inhibitors were added to culture medium 2 hr (ZA and Ro-48) or 1 hr (Fluco) before addition of cycloheximide. DMSO at the same final concentration was added to control strains under the same experimental conditions. For each time point, samples corresponding to 1 OD of yeast cells were collected and protein extracts were prepared and analyzed as previously described.
Mass spectrometric lipid analysis
Quantification of lipid species was performed essentially as previously described. In short, yeast cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml 155 mM ammonium acetate and disrupted by vigorous shaking in the presence of 300 µl glass beads in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. Cell lysates equivalent to 0.4 OD600 in 200 µl 155 mM ammonium acetate were spiked with a cocktail of internal lipid standards followed by two-step lipid extraction. Lipid extracts were analyzed using a LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a robotic TriVersa NanoMate ion source (Advion Biosciences, Ithaca, NY). Lipid species were identified and quantified using MSFileReader (Thermo Fisher Scientific), ALEX software, and Orange software 2.6. Lipid species were annotated using sum composition nomenclature as previously described.
Cell culture and RNA interference
Tissue culture cells were grown in monolayer at 37°C in an atmosphere of 8–9% CO2. HEK293 cells were cultured in DMEM high-glucose medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS). Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/well. The next day, they were transfected using Fugene HD reagent (Promega, Madison, WI) with a DNA–transfection reagent ratio of 1:3, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Myc-tagged TEB4- or TEB4(C9A)-encoding plasmids were previously described in ). On the second day after transfection, cells were sterol deprived by an overnight statin treatment as described below.
RNAi was carried out as described previously with minor modifications. HEK293 cells were set up on day 1 at 2 × 105 cells/well in DMEM high-glucose medium containing 10% FCS. Cells were incubated with 20 µM of SMARTpool ON-TARGETplus MARCH6 siRNA (L-006925-00-0005) or 20 µM ON-TARGETplus Non-targeting Pool siRNA (D-001810-10-05) mixed with HiPerFect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) that was diluted in Opti-MEM I-reduced serum medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 24 hr incubation at 37°C, fresh DMEM high-glucose medium containing 10% FCS was added. On day 3, cells were incubated for 16 hr at 37°C in DMEM high-glucose medium containing 5% fetal bovine lipoprotein-deficient serum (LPDS), the HMGR inhibitor compactin (5 µM), and a low level of mevalonate (50 µM) that allows synthesis of essential non-sterol isoprenoids but not of cholesterol. After 16 hr incubation, residual compactin was removed by washing the cells with PBS. Cells were treated as indicated in the figure legends. Test agents comprised 10 µg/ml cycloheximide, 20 µg/ml methyl-β-cyclodextrin (CD), or cholesterol/methyl-β-cyclodextrin complex (Chol/CD) (prepared as described previously in ), and 10 µM MG-132 or an equivalent amount of DMSO. Cell lysates were prepared in 100 µl sample buffer (100 mM Tris–Cl pH 6.8, 3% SDS, 15% glycerol) after a wash step with PBS. Samples (usually 40 µg of proteins) were analyzed by 4–15% gradient SDS–PAGE and immunoblotted with the following antibodies: rabbit polyclonal anti-SM (1:5000) and mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin (1:1000). The relative intensities of bands were quantified using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was harvested using the RNeasy RNA extraction kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed to yield complementary DNA (cDNA) with the SuperScript III First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Levels of SM and MARCH6/Teb4 mRNA were determined relative to the housekeeping gene hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HRPT1) by quantitative real-time PCR using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green mix (Roche).
References 45
- 1.
Adle DJ Wei W Smith N Bies JJ Lee J 2009 Cadmium-mediated rescue from ER-associated degradation induces expression of its exporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA106:10189–94.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0812114106
- 2.
Bays NW Gardner RG Seelig LP Joazeiro CA Hampton RY 2001 Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat Cell Biol3:24–9.
Not in our library10.1038/35050524
- 3.
Beltrao P Albanese V Kenner LR Swaney DL Burlingame A Villen J 2012 Systematic functional prioritization of protein posttranslational modifications. Cell150:413–25.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.036
- 4.
Brodsky JL 2012 Cleaning up: ER-associated degradation to the rescue. Cell151:1163–7.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.012
- 5.
Brown AJ Sun L Feramisco JD Brown MS Goldstein JL 2002 Cholesterol addition to ER membranes alters conformation of SCAP, the SREBP escort protein that regulates cholesterol metabolism. Mol Cell10:237–45.
Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00591-9
- 6.
Brown MS Goldstein JL 2009 Cholesterol feedback: from Schoenheimer’s bottle to Scap’s MELADL. J Lipid Res50:S15–27.
Not in our library10.1194/jlr.r800054-jlr200
- 7.
Burg JS Espenshade PJ 2011 Regulation of HMG-CoA reductase in mammals and yeast. Prog Lipid Res50:403–10.
Not in our library10.1016/j.plipres.2011.07.002
- 8.
Carvalho P Goder V Rapoport TA 2006 Distinct ubiquitin-ligase complexes define convergent pathways for the degradation of ER proteins. Cell126:361–73.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.043
- 9.
Carvalho P Stanley AM Rapoport TA 2010 Retrotranslocation of a misfolded luminal ER protein by the ubiquitin-ligase Hrd1p. Cell143:579–91.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.028
- 10.
Chang TY Chang CC Ohgami N Yamauchi Y 2006 Cholesterol sensing, trafficking, and esterification. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol22:129–57.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104656
- 11.
Curk T Demsar J Xu Q Leban G Petrovic U Bratko I 2005 Microarray data mining with visual programming. Bioinformatics21:396–8.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bth474
- 12.
de Godoy LM Olsen JV Cox J Nielsen ML Hubner NC Frohlich F 2008 Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature455:1251–4.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07341
- 13.
Doblas VG Amorim-Silva V Pose D Rosado A Esteban A Arro M 2013 The SUD1 gene encodes a putative E3 ubiquitin ligase and is a positive regulator of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell25:728–43.
Not in our library10.1105/tpc.112.108696
- 14.
Ejsing CS Sampaio JL Surendranath V Duchoslav E Ekroos K Klemm RW 2009 Global analysis of the yeast lipidome by quantitative shotgun mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA106:2136–41.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0811700106
- 15.
Espenshade PJ Hughes AL 2007 Regulation of sterol synthesis in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet41:401–27.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130315
- 16.
Flury I Garza R Shearer A Rosen J Cronin S Hampton RY 2005 INSIG: a broadly conserved transmembrane chaperone for sterol-sensing domain proteins. EMBO J24:3917–26.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7600855
- 17.
Furth N Gertman O Shiber A Alfassy OS Cohen I Rosenberg MM 2011 Exposure of bipartite hydrophobic signal triggers nuclear quality control of Ndc10 at the endoplasmic reticulum/nuclear envelope. Mol Biol Cell22:4726–39.
Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e11-05-0463
- 18.
Gill S Stevenson J Kristiana I Brown AJ 2011 Cholesterol-dependent degradation of squalene monooxygenase, a control point in cholesterol synthesis beyond HMG-CoA reductase. Cell Metab13:260–73.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2011.01.015
- 19.
Goldstein JL Brown MS 1990 Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature343:425–30.
Not in our library10.1038/343425a0
- 20.
Goldstein JL DeBose-Boyd RA Brown MS 2006 Protein sensors for membrane sterols. Cell124:35–46.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022
- 21.
Guthrie C Fink G, editors. 1991 Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology, vol 194 Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press
Not in our library
- 22.
Hampton RY Gardner RG Rine J 1996 Role of 26S proteasome and HRD genes in the degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Mol Biol Cell7:2029–44
Not in our library10.1091/mbc.7.12.2029
- 23.
Hartman IZ Liu P Zehmer JK Luby-Phelps K Jo Y Anderson RG 2010 Sterol-induced dislocation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase from endoplasmic reticulum membranes into the cytosol through a subcellular compartment resembling lipid droplets. J Biol Chem285:19288–98.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.134213
- 24.
Hassink G Kikkert M van Voorden S Lee SJ Spaapen R van Laar T 2005 TEB4 is a C4HC3 RING finger-containing ubiquitin ligase of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem J388:647–55.
Not in our library10.1042/bj20041241
- 25.
Hitchcock AL Auld K Gygi SP Silver PA 2003 A subset of membrane-associated proteins is ubiquitinated in response to mutations in the endoplasmic reticulum degradation machinery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA100:12735–40.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2135500100
- 26.
Jacquier N Schneiter R 2012 Mechanisms of sterol uptake and transport in yeast. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol129:70–8.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.11.014
- 27.
Janke C Magiera MM Rathfelder N Taxis C Reber S Maekawa H 2004 A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast21:947–62.
Not in our library10.1002/yea.1142
- 28.
Jo Y Lee PC Sguigna PV DeBose-Boyd RA 2011a Sterol-induced degradation of HMG CoA reductase depends on interplay of two Insigs and two ubiquitin ligases, gp78 and Trc8. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA108:20503–8.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1112831108
- 29.
Jo Y Sguigna PV DeBose-Boyd RA 2011b Membrane-associated ubiquitin ligase complex containing gp78 mediates sterol-accelerated degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. J Biol Chem286:15022–31.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.211326
- 30.
- 31.
Lange Y Ory DS Ye J Lanier MH Hsu FF Steck TL 2008 Effectors of rapid homeostatic responses of endoplasmic reticulum cholesterol and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase. J Biol Chem283:1445–55.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m706967200
- 32.
Loertscher J Larson LL Matson CK Parrish ML Felthauser A Sturm A 2006 Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation is required for cold adaptation and regulation of sterol biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell5:712–22.
Not in our library10.1128/ec.5.4.712-722.2006
- 33.
Longtine MS McKenzie A III Demarini DJ Shah NG Wach A Brachat A 1998 Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast14:953–61.
Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0061(199807)14:10<953::aid-yea293>3.0.co;2-u
- 34.
Maxfield FR van Meer G 2010 Cholesterol, the central lipid of mammalian cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol22:422–9.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2010.05.004
- 35.
Nguyen AD Lee SH DeBose-Boyd RA 2009 Insig-mediated, sterol-accelerated degradation of the membrane domain of hamster 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase in insect cells. J Biol Chem284:26778–88.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.032342
- 36.
Peng J Schwartz D Elias JE Thoreen CC Cheng D Marsischky G 2003 A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat Biotechnol21:921–6.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt849
- 37.
Sever N Song BL Yabe D Goldstein JL Brown MS DeBose-Boyd RA 2003 Insig-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of mammalian 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase stimulated by sterols and geranylgeraniol. J Biol Chem278:52479–90.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m310053200
- 38.
Smith MH Ploegh HL Weissman JS 2011 Road to ruin: targeting proteins for degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science334:1086–90.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1209235
- 39.
Song BL Javitt NB DeBose-Boyd RA 2005a Insig-mediated degradation of HMG CoA reductase stimulated by lanosterol, an intermediate in the synthesis of cholesterol. Cell Metab1:179–89.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2005.01.001
- 40.
Song BL Sever N DeBose-Boyd RA 2005b Gp78, a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase, associates with Insig-1 and couples sterol-regulated ubiquitination to degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Mol Cell19:829–40.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2005.08.009
Cited by papers we hold 5
- Targeting protein modifications in metabolic diseases: molecular mechanisms and targeted therapies · 2023No notice
- Order through destruction: how ER‐associated protein degradation contributes to organelle homeostasis · 2022No notice
- Regulation of Ergosterol Biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae · 2020No notice
- The role of ubiquitination and deubiquitination in cancer metabolism · 2020No notice
- Cellular functions and molecular mechanisms of non-lysine ubiquitination · 2019No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.