Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Sugar is an endogenous cue for juvenile-to-adult phase transition in plants

Sha Yu, Li Cao, Chuan-Miao Zhou and 7 more

eLife · 2013 · CC BY

doi:10.7554/elife.00269

Abstract

The transition from the juvenile to adult phase in plants is controlled by diverse exogenous and endogenous cues such as age, day length, light, nutrients, and temperature. Previous studies have shown that the gradual decline in microRNA156 (miR156) with age promotes the expression of adult traits. However, how age temporally regulates the abundance of miR156 is poorly understood. We show here that the expression of miR156 responds to sugar. Sugar represses miR156 expression at both the transcriptional level and post-transcriptional level through the degradation of miR156 primary transcripts. Defoliation and photosynthetic mutant assays further demonstrate that sugar from the pre-existing leaves acts as a mobile signal to repress miR156, and subsequently triggers the juvenile-to-adult phase transition in young leaf primordia. We propose that the gradual increase in sugar after seed germination serves as an endogenous cue for developmental timing in plants.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

After seed germination, plants undergo two developmental transitions: juvenile-to-adult and adult-to-reproductive. The transition from the juvenile to adult phase is marked by acquisition of reproductive competence and changes in leaf morphology. The adult to reproductive transition, also known as flowering, transforms the identity of the shoot apical meristem from vegetative into inflorescence. Physiological and genetic studies have demonstrated that both developmental transitions are regulated not only by environmental signals such as day length, light intensity, and ambient temperature, but also by endogenous signals transmitted by plant hormones and age.

microRNA156 (miR156), which targets SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) transcriptional factors, provides an endogenous age cue for developmental timing in plants. The expression of miR156 decreases over time, with a concomitant rise in SPL level. Overexpression of miR156 prolongs the juvenile phase, whereas a reduction in miR156 level results in an accelerated expression of adult traits. SPL promotes the juvenile-to-adult phase transition and flowering through activation of miR172 and MADS-box genes. Very recently, defoliation experiments and expression analyses demonstrated that the repression of miR156 in the leaf primordia is mediated by a mobile signal(s) derived from the pre-existing leaves. However, the identity of this signal is still unknown.

In addition to being essential as prime carbon and energy sources, sugars also play critical roles as signaling molecules. In Arabidopsis thaliana, diverse sugar signals are perceived and transduced through a glucose sensor, HEXOKINASE1 (HXK1). HXK1 exerts its regulatory function through distinct molecular mechanisms including transcriptional activation, translational inhibition, mRNA decay, and protein degradation. Analyses of two catalytic inactive HXK1 alleles further indicate that the signaling activity of HXK1 is uncoupled from its catalytic activity. Recently, a nuclear HXK1 complex has been identified. In this complex, HXK1 binds to two unconventional partners, the vacuolar H+-ATPase B1 (VHA-B1) and the 19S regulatory particle of a proteasome subunit (RPT5B). Since neither VHA-B1 nor RPT5B has DNA binding capacity, the precise molecular mechanism by which this nuclear-localized HXK1 complex regulates gene expression remains unanswered. In addition to the HXK1-dependent pathway, some glucose-responsive genes are regulated through an HXK1-independent pathway. For instance, the expression of the genes encoding chalcone synthase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, and asparagine synthase responds to glucose signaling in the absence of HXK1.

Here, we performed expression and mutant analyses to identify the upstream regulator of miR156. Our results demonstrate that the expression of miR156 quickly responds to sugar. Sugar reduces miR156 abundance through both transcriptional repression and transcript degradation. Thus, gradual accumulation of sugar after seed germination leads to a reduced level of miR156, which promotes the juvenile-to-adult phase transition in plants.

MIR156A and MIR156C have dominant roles within the MIR156 gene family

The transition from juvenile to adult phase in Arabidopsis is accompanied by changes in vegetative morphology. Under long day conditions, the wild type Arabidopsis plants switch from the juvenile to the adult phase from the fifth or sixth leaf. The juvenile leaves are round, smooth on their margins, and barely develop trichomes (leaf hairs) on the abaxial side (lower side). By contrast, the adult leaves are elongated, serrated, and produce abaxial trichomes.

In the Arabidopsis genome, miR156 is encoded by eight coding loci (MIR156A–MIR156H). To understand which locus or loci play important roles within this gene family, we identified all available MIR156 transfer-DNA (T-DNA) knockout plants (;;; Figure 1A and supplementary file 1A). Due to functional redundancy, none of these mutants exhibited visible developmental defects (data not shown). One of the double mutants, mir156a mir156c, displayed a similar, but weak phenotype as the transgenic plant expressing a target mimicry from the constitutively active 35S promoter (35S::MIM156), which reduced miR156 activity (Figure 1D;; ). RNA gel blot demonstrated that the amount of miR156 was moderately decreased in mir156a mir156c in comparison with the wild type (Figure 1B). Accordingly, the transcript levels of two miR156-target genes, SPL3 and SPL9, were much higher in mir156a mir156c than in the wild type (Figure 1C).

Compared to the wild type, the mir156a mir156c mutant had a shortened juvenile phase. The appearance of abaxial trichomes in mir156a mir156c was accelerated by 2.1 plastochrons (Figure 1E). In addition, the length-to-width ratios of the blades in mir156a mir156c were much closer to those of the adult leaves in the wild type (Figure 1F). Furthermore, mir156a mir156c flowered earlier than the wild type (Figure 1E). Taken together, these results indicate that MIR156A and MIR156C have dominant roles within the miR156 family in Arabidopsis.

Sugar represses MIR156 expression

To elucidate the molecular mechanism by which the level of miR156 is regulated by age, we performed time course expression assays on miR156 and the primary transcripts of MIR156A and MIR156C (pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C) by RNA gel blot and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). We collected plants grown under long day conditions for 8, 9, and 16 days. As previously reported, the abundance of miR156 gradually declined (Figure 2A,B;; ). Interestingly, the transcript levels of pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C, but not mature miR156, exhibited damped oscillations with the highest level in the morning and lowest before dark (Figure 2C,E; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). To test whether this expression pattern is generated by the circadian clock, we grew wild type plants for 5 days in long day conditions, and then transferred them to a constant light condition. After the transfer, the oscillating expression pattern of pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C was no longer observed (Figure 2D,F), demonstrating a negligible effect of the circadian clock on miR156 expression.

In addition to the circadian clock, endogenous carbohydrates are also able to trigger the oscillation of RNA transcripts. To test this possibility, we carried out sugar treatment assays. Five-day-old seedlings grown in 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) liquid media were treated with sugars, including two disaccharides (maltose and sucrose) and two hexoses (glucose and fructose). The break-down of maltose results in two glucose molecules, whereas hydrolysis of sucrose produces glucose and fructose. The abundance of pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C was greatly reduced after 1 day of treatment with 50 mM sucrose, glucose, or maltose (Figure 3A). A reduction in pri-MIR156A or pri-MIR156C was not detected when the seedlings were treated with the same concentration of mannitol or 3-O-methyl-glucose (3-OMG), suggesting that the repression of pri-MIR156 by sugars is not due to osmotic stress. Consistent with the reduction in pri-MIR156 levels, mature miR156 was decreased after 1 day of sugar treatment (Figure 3A; Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Accordingly, the transcript levels of miR156-targeted genes, SPL9 and SPL15, were markedly increased (Figure 3B).

To monitor how fast miR156 responds to sugar, wild type seedlings were treated with glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose, or mannitol for 30 min. A reduction of about 40% in pri-MIR156C was observed in the seedlings treated with glucose, sucrose, or maltose, while the level of pri-MIR156C was not altered in those treated with fructose or mannitol (Figure 3C). These results, together with the fact that glucose is the common hydrolytic product shared by sucrose and maltose, suggest that glucose plays a major role in repressing miR156.

To determine whether all the miR156 coding genes are repressed by sugar, we analyzed the expression of their primary transcripts. pri-MIR156G and pri-MIR156H were not readily amplified, probably due to their very low expression level (data not shown). The expression of other pri-MIR156 transcripts except pri-MIR156B was reduced after glucose treatment (Figure 3D).

To confirm the role of sugar in miR156 expression, we performed a sugar starvation experiment. Five-day-old wild type seedlings were transferred to 1/2 MS liquid media free of sugar and kept in the dark for 2 days. Compared to the seedlings grown in 1/2 MS liquid media supplemented with sugar under normal light conditions, the sugar-depleted seedlings exhibited a higher expression level of miR156 (Figure 3E).

To investigate whether sugar specifically represses miR156, we analyzed the expression of other miRNA primary transcripts, including pri-MIR159A, pri-MIR159B, and pri-MIR165A. The levels of all these transcripts were not reduced after sugar treatment (Figure 3F).

Sugar promotes the juvenile-to-adult phase transition

A recent study has shown that the juvenile-to-adult phase transition is mediated by a leaf-derived mobile signal that represses the expression of miR156 in young leaf primordia. Given the fact that sucrose is able to move within plants through the vascular tissues and that sucrose as well as its hydrolytic product, glucose, repress the expression of miR156, we speculated that sugar is a potential candidate for this mobile signal. To test this hypothesis, we first investigated the relationship between sugar content and the level of miR156 in vivo. Under long day conditions, Arabidopsis plants show a rapid life cycle with very short juvenile and adult phases. For this reason, we grew wild type plants under short day conditions to extend the vegetative phase. Then 15-day-old (in the juvenile phase) and 60-day-old (in the adult phase) plants were collected at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 16. Expression analyses demonstrated that miR156 was highly abundant in 15-day-old plants but less so in 60-day-old plants (Figure 4A). In contrast to this expression pattern, 60-day-old plants exhibited a higher level of glucose, fructose, and sucrose than 15-day-old plants (Figure 4B). These results are consistent with our findings that sugar represses miR156 and indicate an inverse correlation between the level of miR156 and endogenous sugar content in vivo.

We then performed defoliation assays. The blades of the first two leaves of 7-day-old wild type seedlings were manually removed. Then 50 mM sucrose or mannitol (as control) was applied to the petioles of the defoliated leaves (Figure 4C). Consistent with the previous report, the removal of the first two leaves resulted in an increased level of miR156 in the shoot apices (Figure 4F). The expression of adult-specific traits was accordingly delayed. Compared to intact plants, the production of abaxial trichomes in the defoliated plants was delayed by 1.0 plastochrons (Figure 4D), and the increase in the length-to-width ratio of the lamina was slower (Figure 4E).

Sucrose application partially suppressed the delay in the juvenile-to-adult phase transition caused by defoliation. The sucrose-treated plants produced the abaxial trichomes 0.8 plastochrons later than intact wild type plants, but 1.6 plastochrons earlier than the mannitol-treated plants (Figure 4D). In addition, the length-to-width ratios of the fifth, seventh, and ninth leaves in the sucrose-treated plants were higher than those in the mannitol-treated plants (Figure 4E). In agreement with these phenotypic differences, the expression of miR156 was reduced in the apices of the sucrose-treated plants but not in those treated with mannitol (Figure 4F).

A reduced photosynthetic rate delays the juvenile-to-adult phase transition

To confirm the role of sugar in the juvenile-to-adult phase transition, we analyzed the Arabidopsis cao/chlorina1 (ch1) mutant. A mutation in CAO/CH1 (At1g44446), which encodes chlorophyll (Chl) a oxygenase, causes a reduced level of Chl b and low efficiency of photosynthesis. Compared to the wild type, the cao/ch1 mutant developed smaller pale green leaves and had a prolonged juvenile phase (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). The rosette leaves in the cao/ch1 mutant were rounder than those in the wild type plant (Figure 5A,B). Additionally, the appearance of abaxial trichomes in the cao/ch1 mutant was delayed (Figure 5C). Expression analyses indicated that higher levels of miR156 accumulated in the cao/ch1 mutant than in the wild type plant (Figure 5D).

To examine whether the delayed phase transition in cao/ch1 depends on miR156 function, we crossed 35S::MIM156 into cao/ch1. Similarly to 35S::MIM156, 35S::MIM156 cao/ch1 produced the abaxial trichomes on the first leaf, and the leaves were elongated and serrated (Figure 5A–C; Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Compared to the wild type, the cao/ch1 mutants exhibited higher glucose sensitivity. Treatment of cao/ch1 seedlings with 50 mM glucose significantly reduced the level of miR156 (Figure 5E). Taken together, we conclude that sugar from the pre-existing leaves acts as a mobile signal to trigger the juvenile-to-adult phase transition through repression of miR156 in the young leaf primordia.

Repression of miR156 by sugar is evolutionarily conserved

miR156 is present in all major plant taxa. To test whether the regulation of miR156 by sugar is evolutionarily conserved, we examined the expression of miR156 in response to sugar in other plants, including Nicotiana benthamiana (tobacco), Physcomitrella patens (moss), and Solanum lycopersicum (tomato).

N. benthamiana and S. lycopersicum were grown in 1/2 MS liquid media without sugar. After the first two leaves appeared, the seedlings were treated with 50 mM sucrose for 2 days. The seedlings of N. benthamiana and S. lycopersicum were collected and used for expression analyses. For P. patens, the sugar treatment was conducted during the protonema stage. Compared to those treated with mannitol, the amount of miR156 was greatly reduced in all the sucrose-treated plants (Figure 6), indicating that repression of miR156 by sugar is evolutionarily conserved.

Sugar regulates miR156 expression at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level

To investigate at which level sugar represses miR156, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses (ChIP) using anti-RNA polymerase II (anti-Pol II) antibody, which recognizes the C-terminal heptapeptide repeat of RNA Pol II and has been used to correlate RNA Pol II binding with gene expression. Enrichment of the promoter fragments of MIR156A and MIR156C was compared between the seedlings treated with mannitol and those treated with glucose. As shown in Figure 7A, the promoter fragments (harboring TATA boxes) of MIR156A and MIR156C were substantially enriched in the mannitol-treated seedlings, but not in those treated with glucose, indicating that glucose induces transcriptional repression of MIR156A and MIR156C (Figure 7A).

We next examined the effect of actinomycin-D (ActD), which blocks transcription. To test transcription blocking efficiency, we analyzed the expression of HXK1, which is rapidly induced by glucose. The transcript level of HXK1 was increased about fourfold after 3 h of glucose treatment. By contrast, the expression of HXK1 was not altered in the seedlings treated with glucose and ActD (Figure 7B).

The addition of ActD did not affect repression of pri-MIR156C by glucose. The transcript level of pri-MIR156C was reduced by about 75% after 3 hr in the presence of glucose, compared to a 30% reduction in the presence of mannitol (Figure 7D). A similar expression pattern was observed in pri-MIR156A (Figure 7C), suggesting that glucose modulates miR156 expression at the post-transcriptional level through the degradation of pri-MIR156.

To investigate whether the reduction in miR156 primary transcripts after glucose treatment was caused by an increase in the processing efficiency of pri-MIR156, we performed the glucose treatment assay using the serrate (se) mutant which is defective in miRNA biogenesis. Similar to the wild type, the amount of pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C was markedly decreased in the ActD/glucose-treated se-3 mutant (Figure 7C,D), indicating that glucose regulates the abundance of pri-MIR156 independently of the miRNA processing machinery.

HXK1 encodes a glucose sensor that transduces diverse sugar signals. gin2-1, the HXK1-null mutant, exhibited a lower level of miR156 than the wild type (Figure 8A). The expression of miR156 still decreased over time in the gin2-1 mutant (Figure 8B). To test whether the repression of miR156 by sugar is mediated by HXK1, we compared the glucose response between the wild type and the gin2-1 mutant. The expression of pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C was reduced after sugar treatment in both the wild type and the gin2-1 mutant (Figure 8C,D). Similarly, an evident decrease in pri-MIR156C was observed in the gin2-1 seedlings treated with ActD/glucose (Figure 8E). These results suggest that HXK1 plays a role in miR156 expression but is not absolutely required for the repression of miR156 by sugar.

We then performed the sugar treatment assay in the presence of ActD and cycloheximide (CHX), an inhibitor of protein synthesis. The level of pri-MIR156C transcripts was greatly reduced in the ActD-treated samples, but not in those treated with both ActD and CHX (Figure 7—figure supplement 1), suggesting that sugar-induced pri-MIR156C degradation requires de novo protein synthesis.

mRNAs can be degraded through several partially independent pathways, including nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), 5′-to-3′ mRNA degradation via exonucleases, and 3′-to-5′ mRNA degradation via the exosome. The UP-frameshift (UPF) proteins, UPF1, UPF2, and UPF3, are essential for the NMD function in plants. It has been shown that upf1 and upf3 mutants impair the sugar response and over-accumulate sugar-inducible mRNAs. Therefore, we investigated the role of UPF in the sugar-mediated repression of miR156. Compared to the wild type, the expression of pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C was slightly increased in upf1-5 and upf3-1 mutants (Figure 7—figure supplement 2A). Glucose was still able to repress the accumulation of pri-MIR156C, albeit to a lesser extent (Figure 7—figure supplement 2B), indicating that sugar promotes pri-MIR156 degradation independently of canonical NMD.

Sugar as an endogenous timer for the juvenile-to-adult phase transition

Based on expression analyses, defoliation experiments, and photosynthetic mutant characterization, we show that sugar acts upstream of miR156. We propose a model explaining how sugar regulates the juvenile-to-adult phase transition through modulation of miR156 expression as follows. After seed germination, plants start accumulating sugars through photosynthesis. Sucrose, the major transportable sugar, moves from the pre-existing leaves to the young leaf primordia, where its hydrolytic hexose product, glucose, represses the expression of miR156. As a result, the level of SPL increases and the expression of adult traits is promoted.

Identification of sugar as the endogenous developmental timing cue explains the irreversible nature of the age pathway. The level of miR156 is destined to decrease because the gradual accumulation of carbohydrates is inevitable and essential for plant growth and development. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the transitions between the stages of larval development are controlled by the sequential action of two miRNAs, lin-4 and let-7. In contrast to miR156, the expression of these two miRNAs is increased with age. It will be intriguing to examine whether sugar/carbohydrates or nutrients from the diet triggers the upregulation of lin-4 and let-7 in worms.

Cellular carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) are tightly coordinated to sustain optimal plant growth. C compounds including many carbohydrates such as sucrose and glucose are synthesized in the leaf, while N nutrients such as nitrate and ammonium are assimilated by the root system. Biochemical and physiological studies have demonstrated long-distance sensing and signaling of the C/N balance in plants. When soil is short of and, photosynthesis in the leaf is inhibited. Whether miR156 and the juvenile-to-adult transition respond to N excess or deficient conditions is another interesting topic awaiting investigation.

Does sugar promote flowering through miR156?

In addition to the juvenile-to-adult transition, flowering is of great importance for reproductive success in plants. Previous studies revealed that the floral transition is regulated by diverse environmental factors, such as photoperiod, temperature, and light, in combination with the endogenous signal derived from nutritional status. The nutrient-dependent regulation of flowering is likely dependant on the rate of sucrose export from source leaves. This notion is supported by our observations that sugar from pre-existing leaves acts as a long-distance signal to repress the expression of miR156 in young leaf primordia, and that a high level of miR156 delays flowering. Intriguingly, a recent study has demonstrated that INDETERMINATE DOMAIN transcription factor AtIDD8 regulates photoperiodic flowering by modulating sugar transport and metabolism, suggesting that additional sugar-mediated flowering pathways exist.

Sugar, produced in mesophyll cells in leaves, is transported from source tissues to sink tissues through vascular bundles. In Arabidopsis, sucrose transporters are involved in loading sucrose into the phloem in source leaves and the uptake of sucrose into the cells of sink tissues such as roots, fruit, and developing leaves. Very recently, the sucrose effluxers, SWEET11 and SWEET12, which facilitate sucrose efflux into the cell wall of companion cells, have been identified. It is therefore interesting to investigate whether impairment of sucrose transport from leaf cells into the vascular system causes a defect in miR156 expression and developmental transitions.

Regulation of miR156 by sugar in a complex manner

There are several means by which sugar regulates gene expression. For example, sugar decreases the transcript level of rice AMY3 at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. It was shown that destabilization of the mRNAs of AMY3 is mediated by its 3′ untranslated region (UTR). Similarly, we found that pri-MIR156A and pri-MIR156C are subjected to transcriptional repression as well as transcript degradation in response to glucose. This two-level expression control by sugar might contribute to robust repression of miR156, which leads to irreversible transition from the juvenile to adult phase in plants. In Arabidopsis, HXK1 is a glucose sensor that transduces diverse aspects of sugar response. For example, the gin2-1 mutant reduces shoot and root growth, delays flowering, increases apical dominance, and alters sensitivity to auxin and cytokinin. However, we did not observe an obvious juvenile-to-adult phase phenotype in the gin2-1 mutant under long day conditions (data not shown). Further studies will determine if the transcriptional repression of miR156 by sugar is mediated by the previously identified nuclear-localized HXK1-VHA-B1-RPT5B complex.

The level of miR156 is greatly reduced when plants are treated with both glucose and sucrose. Since these sugars can be easily interconverted, it remains unclear whether the repression of miR156 is hexose or sucrose-dependent. Moreover, based on pharmacological treatment and mutant analyses, we show that sugar is able to trigger the degradation of pri-MIR156A/C independently of the canonical glucose sensor, HXK1. Thus, investigation of the molecular mechanism by which sugar in particular recognizes pri-MIR156 and promotes their degradation is an important goal for future research.

Plant materials

A. thaliana, P. patens, S. lycopersicum, and N. benthamiana were grown at 21°C (day)/19°C (night) under long day (16 hr light/8 hr dark) or short day (8 hr light/16 hr dark) conditions. White light was provided by a 4:2 mixture of cool white fluorescent lamps (Lifemax cool daylight 36W/865; Philips Lighting Co., Shangai, China) and warm white fluorescent lamps (Lifemax warm white 36W/830; Philips Lighting Co.). Light intensity was 80 µmol/m2/s in long day and 90 µmol/m2/s in short day conditions. mir156a (SALK_056809), mir156c (SALK_004679), cao/ch1, and gin2-1 mutants were ordered from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Columbus, OH). 35S::MIM156 was described.

Plant treatment

All treatment assays were carried out under long day conditions. Defoliation assays were performed as described. For the sugar treatment assay, Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized with 20% bleach and germinated in 50 ml 1/2 MS liquid media with shaking at 140 rpm. The seedlings were then transferred to 1/2 MS media supplemented with sugar. For the sugar starvation assay, 5-day-old wild type seedlings grown in 1/2 MS liquid media supplemented with 50 mM sucrose were transferred to 1/2 MS liquid media free of sugar and grown in the dark for 2 days. For the ActD and CHX assay, 20 µg/ml ActD (Sigma-Aldrich, Beijing, China) or 100 µM CHX (Sigma-Aldrich) was used. P. patens was cultured as described. The plants in the protonema stage were used for the sugar treatment assay. Seedlings of S. lycopersicum and N. benthamiana were treated with 50 mM sucrose for 2 days.

Expression analyses

Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Shanghai, China). Then 1 µg of total RNA was DNase I-treated and used for cDNA synthesis with an oligo (dT) primer. The qRT-PCR primers for SPL3, SPL9, SPL15, and TUB have been described. The primer sequences for other genes are shown in supplementary file 1B. A small RNA blot was performed as described. qRT-PCR on mature miR156 was performed according to a published protocol.

ChIP analyses

ChIP analysis was performed according to protocol. Crude chromatin extract was pulled down with anti-Pol II antibodies (Abcam, Hong Kong, China). ChIP DNAs were reverse crosslinked and purified using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Shanghai, China). A 1 μl sample of DNA was used for real-time PCR analyses. The relative enrichment of each fragment was calculated by the ratio of bound DNAs after ChIP to input DNAs.

Sugar measurement

Wild type plants were grown under short day conditions. Then 15-day-old juvenile or 50-day-old adult plants were collected at ZT 16. Sugar was measured using 50 mg (fresh weight) of tissue. Sample extraction, preparation, and analyses were performed as previously described. The individual sugar was identified based on the retention time and mass spectrometry standards. Quantification was performed by an external standard method.

References 48

  1. 1.

    Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003;301:653-657.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1086391

  2. 2.

    Ambros V. MicroRNAs and developmental timing. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011;21:511-517.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2011.04.003

  3. 3.

    Arciga-Reyes L, Wootton L, Kieffer M, Davies B. UPF1 is required for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) and RNAi in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006;47:480-489.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02802.x

  4. 4.

    Axtell MJ, Bowman JL. Evolution of plant microRNAs and their targets. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:343-349.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.009

  5. 5.

    Ayre BG. Membrane-transport systems for sucrose in relation to whole-plant carbon partitioning. Mol Plant. 2011;4:377-394.

    Not in our library10.1093/mp/ssr014

  6. 6.

    Bäurle I, Dean C. The timing of developmental transitions in plants. Cell. 2006;125:655-664.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.005

  7. 7.

    Bläsing OE, Gibon Y, Gunther M, Hohne M, Morcuende R, Osuna D, et al. Sugars and circadian regulation make major contributions to the global regulation of diurnal gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3257-3281.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.035261

  8. 8.

    Chan MT, Yu SM. The 3' untranslated region of a rice alpha-amylase gene functions as a sugar-dependent mRNA stability determinant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6543-6547.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.11.6543

  9. 9.

    Chen LQ, Qu XQ, Hou BH, Sosso D, Osorio S, Fernie AR, et al. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science. 2011;335:207-211.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1213351

  10. 10.

    Cho YH, Yoo SD, Sheen J. Regulatory functions of nuclear hexokinase1 complex in glucose signaling. Cell. 2006;127:579-589.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.028

  11. 11.

    Corbesier L, Lejeune P, Bernier G. The role of carbohydrates in the induction of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana: comparison between the wild type and a starchless mutant. Planta. 1998;206:131-137.

    Not in our library10.1007/s004250050383

  12. 12.

    Cove DJ, Perroud PF, Charron AJ, McDaniel SF, Khandelwal A, Quatrano RS. Culturing the moss Physcomitrella patens. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009.

    Not in our library10.1101/pdb.prot5136

  13. 13.

    Espineda CE, Linford AS, Devine D, Brusslan JA. The AtCAO gene, encoding chlorophyll a oxygenase, is required for chlorophyll b synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10507-10511.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.18.10507

  14. 14.

    Franco-Zorrilla JM, Valli A, Todesco M, Mateos I, Puga MI, Rubio-Somoza I, et al. Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1033-1037.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng2079

  15. 15.

    Grigg SP, Canales C, Hay A, Tsiantis M. SERRATE coordinates shoot meristem function and leaf axial patterning in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2005;437:1022-1026.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04052

  16. 16.

    Jung JH, Seo PJ, Kang SK, Park CM. miR172 signals are incorporated into the miR156 signaling pathway at the SPL3/4/5 genes in Arabidopsis developmental transitions. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76:35-45.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11103-011-9759-z

  17. 17.

    Kuhn C, Grof CP. Sucrose transporters of higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:288-298.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2010.02.001

  18. 18.

    Kurihara Y, Matsui A, Hanada K, Kawashima M, Ishida J, Morosawa T, et al. Genome-wide suppression of aberrant mRNA-like noncoding RNAs by NMD in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:2453-2458.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0808902106

  19. 19.

    Laubinger S, Sachsenberg T, Zeller G, Busch W, Lohmann JU, Ratsch G, et al. Dual roles of the nuclear cap-binding complex and SERRATE in pre-mRNA splicing and microRNA processing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:8795-8800.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0802493105

  20. 20.

    Lobbes D, Rallapalli G, Schmidt DD, Martin C, Clarke J. SERRATE: a new player on the plant microRNA scene. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:1052-1058.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.embor.7400806

  21. 21.

    Moore B, Zhou L, Rolland F, Hall Q, Cheng WH, Liu YX, et al. Role of the Arabidopsis glucose sensor HXK1 in nutrient, light, and hormonal signaling. Science. 2003;300:332-336.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1080585

  22. 22.

    Moss EG. Heterochronic genes and the nature of developmental time. Curr Biol. 2007;17:R425-R434.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.043

  23. 23.

    Pasquinelli AE, Ruvkun G. Control of developmental timing by micrornas and their targets. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002;18:495-513.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.012502.105832

  24. 24.

    Poethig RS. The past, present, and future of vegetative phase change. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:541-544.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.110.161620

  25. 25.

    Price J, Laxmi A, St Martin SK, Jang JC. Global transcription profiling reveals multiple sugar signal transduction mechanisms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2128-2150.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.104.022616

  26. 26.

    Raven JA, Handley LL, Andrews M. Global aspects of C/N interactions determining plant-environment interactions. J Exp Bot. 2004;55:11-25.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erh011

  27. 27.

    Reinhart BJ, Weinstein EG, Rhoades MW, Bartel B, Bartel DP. MicroRNAs in plants. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1616-1626.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1004402

  28. 28.

    Rolland F, Sheen J. Sugar sensing and signalling networks in plants. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:269-271.

    Not in our library10.1042/bst0330269

  29. 29.

    Samson F, Brunaud V, Balzergue S, Dubreucq B, Lepiniec L, Pelletier G, et al. FLAGdb/FST: a database of mapped flanking insertion sites (FSTs) of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA transformants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:94-97.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/30.1.94

  30. 30.

    Seo PJ, Ryu J, Kang SK, Park CM. Modulation of sugar metabolism by an INDETERMINATE DOMAIN transcription factor contributes to photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2011;65:418-429.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04432.x

  31. 31.

    Sivitz AB, Reinders A, Johnson ME, Krentz AD, Grof CP, Perroux JM, et al. Arabidopsis sucrose transporter AtSUC9. High-affinity transport activity, intragenic control of expression, and early flowering mutant phenotype. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:188-198.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.106.089003

  32. 32.

    Smeekens S, Ma J, Hanson J, Rolland F. Sugar signals and molecular networks controlling plant growth. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:274-279.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.002

  33. 33.

    Tan H, Yang X, Zhang F, Zheng X, Qu C, Mu J, et al. Enhanced seed oil production in canola by conditional expression of Brassica napus LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and LEC1-LIKE in developing seeds. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:1577-1588.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.111.175000

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Truernit E. Plant physiology: the importance of sucrose transporters. Curr Biol. 2001;11:R169-R171.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00085-9

  36. 36.
  37. 37.

    Wang JW, Czech B, Weigel D. miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell. 2009;138:738-749.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.014

  38. 38.

    Wang JW, Schwab R, Czech B, Mica E, Weigel D. Dual effects of miR156-targeted SPL genes and CYP78A5/KLUH on plastochron length and organ size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2008;20:1231-1243.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.108.058180

  39. 39.

    Williams LE, Lemoine R, Sauer N. Sugar transporters in higher plants–a diversity of roles and complex regulation. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:283-290.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01681-2

  40. 40.

    Woody ST, Austin-Phillips S, Amasino RM, Krysan PJ. The WiscDsLox T-DNA collection: an Arabidopsis community resource generated by using an improved high-throughput T-DNA sequencing pipeline. J Plant Res. 2007;120:157-165.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10265-006-0048-x

All 48 references

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.