No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and their Application in Cancer Therapy
Run Huang, Huan Chen, Jiayu Liang and 11 more
Journal of Cancer · 2021 · Review
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a dual role in the initiation, development, suppression, and treatment of cancer. Excess ROS can induce nuclear DNA, leading to cancer initiation. Not only that, but ROS also inhibit T cells and natural killer cells and promote the recruitment and M2 polarization of macrophages; consequently, cancer cells escape immune surveillance and immune defense. Furthermore, ROS promote tumor invasion and metastasis by triggering epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumor cells. Interestingly, massive accumulation of ROS inhibits tumor growth in two ways: (1) by blocking cancer cell proliferation by suppressing the proliferation signaling pathway, cell cycle, and the biosynthesis of nucleotides and ATP and (2) by inducing cancer cell death via activating endoplasmic reticulum stress-, mitochondrial-, and P53- apoptotic pathways and the ferroptosis pathway. Unfortunately, cancer cells can adapt to ROS via a self-adaption system. This review highlighted the bidirectional regulation of ROS in cancer. The study further discussed the application of massively accumulated ROS in cancer treatment. Of note, the dual role of ROS in cancer and the self-adaptive ability of cancer cells should be taken into consideration for cancer prevention.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study showed that deaths from noncommunicable diseases represented 73.4% of deaths in 2017. Cancer causes the second largest number of fatalities following cardiovascular disease. Between 2007 and 2017, the number of cancer cases increased by 33%, and the average annual age-standardized incidence rates for all cancers increased. Global cancer statistics 2018 revealed 18.1 million new cancer cases and 9.6 million cancer-related deaths in 2018. Malignant tumors have become the main killer among humans. The treatment of cancer has gained the attention of the medical community because of the rapid increase in the global cancer burden. An increasing number of studies have emerged demonstrating that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly intertwined with various cancers, such as lung cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, hepatocellular cancer, and cervical cancer, which are among the top 10 cancers ranked by the highest number of incident cases globally. The mechanism of ROS in carcinogenesis needs to be considered to determine more efficient therapeutics against cancer. This review highlighted the 'double-edged sword' role of ROS in cancer formation, development, and suppression. In addition, the self-adaption mechanism of cancer cells was discussed. The study also focused on the therapeutic approaches targeting ROS to treat cancers, thus providing an insight into how pro- and anti-tumorigenic ROS signaling pathways are involved in the treatment of cancer.
Physical properties of ROS
ROS exist in two forms. One form comprises free oxygen radicals including superoxide, hydroxyl radicals, nitric oxide, alkoxyl radicals, and peroxyl radicals. The other form comprises nonradical ROS, including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), organic hydroperoxides, and hypochlorite. ROS are mainly generated by the mitochondrial electron transport chain and tricarboxylic acid cycle. Besides, the peroxisome and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) can produce oxidants. Many enzymes also promote the production of ROS, such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX), xanthine oxidase, nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenases, cytochrome P450 enzymes, and lipoxygenases. Additionally, exogenous stress, such as that from ionizing radiation, chemotherapeutic drugs and environmental insult, is also the main cause of ROS generation. ROS can oxidize intracellular lipids, proteins and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), thus leading to the accumulation of damaged biological molecules. ROS induced DNA damage can include single- or double-strand breakage, base modifications, deoxyribose modification, and DNA cross-linking. Moreover, lipid peroxidation results in the formation of reactive aldehydes, including malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, which have high reactivity toward protein and DNA. Although this damaging aspect of ROS biology persists, oxidant species are increasingly being understood to have beneficial effects. ROS can regulate cellular proliferation, differentiation, survival, and even apoptosis processes. ROS thus play a dual role in cell development.
Promoting effects of ROS in cancer
The physiological levels of ROS are important to regulate crucial cellular processes such as cellular proliferation, differentiation, survival, and even apoptosis in normal cells. Once ROS exceed normal levels, the high levels of ROS can initiate tumorigenesis and promote tumor progression. Excess ROS cause gene mutations, and subsequently activate oncogenes and inhibit tumor suppressor genes, such as Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) and tumor suppressor P53, thus leading to cancer initiation. Not only that, but increased ROS also promote tumor development by reducing the function of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells and promoting the recruitment and M2 polarization of macrophages, thereby promoting tumor progression -. Infiltration of T cells, NK cells, and M1 macrophages in breast cancer has been reported to prevent tumor development. Furthermore, high levels of ROS induce tumor invasion and metastasis via epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Below, we further discuss the potential mechanisms of ROS in promoting cancer.
ROS promote cancer formation via initiating DNA mutation
DNA is the carrier of genetic information essential for the survival and reproduction of organisms. The evolution of normal cells into cancer cells involves genetic instability. The overexpression of exogenous and endogenous ROS often leads to DNA mutations, affecting the interpretation and transmission of genetic information. The DNA mutations lead to the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and/or the activation of oncogenes, allowing cells to proliferate outside their normal growth restraints, and promote tumorigenesis by favoring tumor cell proliferation, migration, and resistance to apoptosis. ROS can cause hotspot codon mutagenesis in P53, and the mutations of P53 have been reported in liver cancer and breast cancer,. Besides, ROS also cause mutagenesis in the oncogene rat sarcoma (Ras) gene, and the mutation of Ras is closely related to skin cancer and colorectal cancer -. In another study, excessive H2O2 produced by myeloid cells has been shown to trigger genome-wide DNA mutations in intestinal epithelial cells to stimulate invasive growth during intestinal tumorigenesis.
ROS can lead to DNA damage and cause DNA mutations (Fig. 1). ROS can oxidize nucleobases and form different types of oxidative damage products that have mutational properties. Guanine (G), with a lower oxidation potential compared with other bases, is most easily oxidized by ROS, leading to the formation of an oxidized product 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2´-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG), which is the most extensively studied oxidative damage product. 8-oxo-dG acts as a mutagenic lesion due to the loss of base-pairing specificity and mispairing with adenine (A). When ROS oxidizes guanine in DNA, 8-oxo-dG acts as a template, leading to G→T (thymine) transversion mutations. When ROS oxidize deoxyguanosine triphosphate in the nucleotide pool, 8-oxo-dG acts as a substrate, resulting in A→C (cytosine) mutations. ROS also oxidize A with two main products: 2-hydroxy-2'-deoxyadenosine (2-OH-dA) and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyadenosine (8-oxo-dA). Mutagenic replication of 2-OH-dA as a template causes A→C, A→G, A→T substitutions, and misincorporation of 2-OH-dA as a substrate causes GC→AT transition,. Besides, 8-oxo-dA can lead to A→G and A→C mutations. Other oxidative DNA lesions, such as 5-hydroxy-2'-deoxycytidine, 5,6-dihydro-5,6-dihydroxy-2'-deoxyuridine, and 5-hydroxy-2'-deoxyuridine oxidized from cytidine, as well as 5,6-dihydro-5,6-dihydroxy-2'-deoxythymidine oxidized from thymine, have also been shown to be mutagenic. In addition, ROS can cause hydrogen bond breakage, unfolding, and double- and single-strand breakage of the DNA double-helix structure, leading to the exposure of more purine and pyrimidine residues to ROS that further facilitate the oxidation of nucleobases, which promotes DNA mutations.
The DNA damage repair system is vital in dealing with DNA damage to avoid DNA mutations. DNA damage repair methods include base excision repair (BER) for base modifications, mismatch repair for mismatched bases, nucleotide excision repair (NER) for intra-strand cross-links and thymidine dimers, and nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination (HR) for double-strand DNA breaks. ROS can not only damage DNA but also repress the part DNA repair process (Fig. 1). ROS can oxidize human 8-oxoguanine DNA N-glycosylase 1 (hOGG1) and inhibit its activity, resulting in the impairment of BER. Besides, ROS block HR by inducing proteasomal degradation of breast cancer susceptibility gene 2, one of the key factors for HR. In summary, ROS not only cause direct DNA damage but also impair the DNA damage repair system, leading to DNA mutations and thus favoring tumor growth.
T cells
High levels of ROS can block the differentiation, maturation, and activation of T cells and induce T-cell death to suppress the antitumor function of T cells (Fig. 2). The upregulation of ROS enhances the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) via stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α (HIF-1α),. The overproduction of VEGF then blocks the differentiation and/or migration of thymus-committed progenitors, thus interfering with T-cell development and contributing to tumor-associated immune deficiencies. The production of ROS can also reduce the expression of the CD3ζ chain, thus blocking the differentiation and activation of T cells,. The CD3ζ chain, a component of the T-cell antigen receptor complex, is important in T-cell differentiation and activation, which mediates signal transduction of T cells. With the decrease in the expression of the CD3ζ chain, the functions of T cells, such as proliferative ability, cytotoxic activity, and cytokine production are inhibited, finally suppressing the immune response -. In line with this, the reduced expression of CD3ζ has been reported in several cancers, such as gastric adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, and head and neck cancer -. In the tumor microenvironment, granulocytic or polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which are immunosuppressive cells, have the ability to overexpress ROS to inhibit T-cell activation and function, thus promoting tumor metastasis. A reduction of ROS in myeloid-derived suppressor cells significantly increases the number of active CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes, which efficiently suppresses the proliferation of tumor cells. Besides influencing the development of T cells, elevated levels of ROS also induce T-cell death. ROS trigger extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation and subsequently lead to the activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1, which causes the release of apoptosis-inducing factor, leading to T-cell death. Consistent with these findings, the in vivo blockade of ROS reversed the selective loss of selective CD4+ T lymphocytes and delayed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-promoted hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
NK cells
Besides controlling T cells, high levels of ROS facilitate cancer cell distant metastasis by downregulating NK cell function (Fig. 2). Elevated levels of ROS downregulate CD16ζ expression in NK cells, which is an important signal transduction molecule for NK cell functions, thus inhibiting the cytotoxicity of NK cells. Besides, the overproduction of ROS can attenuate the phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2B, downregulate the expression of natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) and NKG2D ligands, and subsequently reduce the release of cytotoxic granules of NK cells, thus suppressing NK cell-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity activity and finally promoting breast cancer growth and metastasis,. Furthermore, ROS reduce interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production in NK cells, consequently downregulating NK cell-mediated clearance of malignant cells and finally resulting in melanoma metastasis. Elevated levels of ROS also can lead to the death of NK cells by inducing apoptosis. Primary human chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) cells release ROS, leading to the death of NK cells, which work as an immune escape mechanism in CMML. Additionally, liver-resident NK cells undergo apoptosis because of the increased production of mitochondrial ROS, which allows tumors to evade liver NK cell surveillance, ultimately leading to colorectal liver metastatic tumors.
Macrophages
Macrophages are of two types: cancer-inhibiting M1 type and cancer-promoting M2 type. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) show an M2 phenotype, the infiltration of which contributes to cancer malignant progression. ROS can regulate both recruitment and M2 polarization of macrophages to promote cancer development (Fig. 2). ROS have been reported to inactivate phosphatase and tensin homolog, a well-known negative regulator of phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), the activated form of which phosphorylates protein kinase B (Akt). The mechanisms reported so far suggest that NOX4-induced ROS activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and lead to the secretion of VEGF-C, cytokines chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7, interleukin-8, and colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1), resulting in macrophage recruitment. Besides, myeloid-derived H2O2 activates tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)/TNFR1 signaling in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC), increasing the recruitment of macrophages and in turn elevating the secretion of H2O2, which can trigger IEC mutation and promote tumor invasion. In addition, ROS are essential to polarize macrophages toward the M2 status. A previous study revealed that long-term arsenic exposure could trigger M2 macrophage differentiation via ROS production. Studies have found that the reduction of ROS production specifically blocks the differentiation of M2 macrophages. ROS/PI3K/Akt signaling-dependent CSF-1 production induces M2 polarization of macrophages, thus contributing to tumor cell growth. Of note, the high levels of ROS promote TAMs to generate TNF-α in the primary melanoma microenvironment, thus promoting tumor invasion and metastasis.
ROS promote cancer invasion and metastasis via EMT
EMT is a process in which epithelial cells transform into mesenchymal cells. Upon the initiation of EMT, epithelial cells lose cell-cell junctions and cell polarity. Then, the cells experience both cytoskeleton remodeling and extracellular matrix (ECM) protein degradation. These processes of EMT have endowed cancer cells with invasive and metastatic capacities. Finally, the cancer cells undergoing EMT can evade from their original epithelial layer. Recently, an increasing number of studies have described ROS as the main cause of EMT in cancer cells, finally promoting cancer cell invasion and metastasis (Fig. 3).
Oxidative stress is an essential factor causing cell-cell junction dissociation. The elevated levels of ROS can activate nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and promote the expression of transcription factor Snail, which downregulates the expression of epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) and promotes the expression of neural cadherin and vimentin,, thus resulting in the disruption of cell-cell junctions and triggering the EMT process. Moreover, ROS can promote the expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and TGF-β favors the formation of trimeric drosophila mothers against decapentaplegic protein (SMAD) complexes,. The SMAD complexes can translocate to the nucleus and activate mesenchymal genes as well as Snail, Twist, Slug, and ZEB1 genes, in turn enhancing the expression of vimentin and fibronectin and repressing E-cadherin expression. Besides, the upregulation of ROS also promotes HIF-1α-induced transcription of Snail, thus leading to the repression of E-cadherin. Furthermore, ROS also stabilize nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) via the degradation of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) to enhance the transactivation of Notch homolog 1, translocation-associated (Drosophila) (NOTHC1), promoting the NOTHC1 intracellular domain translocation to the nucleus and leading to Snail transcription, thereby promoting the EMT of cancer cells and favoring cancer cell invasion and metastasis. In addition to the aforementioned signaling, the ROS-activated PI3K/Akt signaling pathway can inhibit glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), the activation of which is involved in the proteasomal degradation of Snail,,. The inhibition of GSK-3β can promote the nuclear-translocation of β-catenin, following which nuclear β-catenin binds with TCF/LEF and enhances the transcription of vimentin and slug, finally inducing EMT. ROS can lead to the loss of cell-cell junctions via NF-κB, TGF-β, HIF-1α, NRF2, and PI3K/Akt signaling, inducing transition to the mesenchymal phenotype.
ROS also cause cytoskeleton remodeling, favoring cancer cell migration, and thus promoting the EMT process. The cytoskeleton consists of actin filaments, intermediate filaments, and microtubules, and it is important to maintain the cell shape. Actin filaments are twisted by two strands of actin polymer fiber actin (F-actin), and F-actin is polymerized by actin monomer spherical actin (G-actin). The actin filament is a dynamic structure responsible for cell migration capacity. ROS can regulate polymerization and depolymerization between G-actin and F-actin to achieve dynamic actin reorganization. ROS can oxidize 14-3-3ζ, which inactivates slingshot-1L (SSH-1L), thus alleviating the inhibition of SSH-1L. SSH-1L ultimately results in the dephosphorylation and activation of cellular cofilin; the activation of which leads to the depolymerization of F-actin, thus providing actin monomers to further polymerize,. Besides, ROS induce Arp2/3 recruitment, which can nucleate actin monomers to assemble a new actin filament meshwork,. ROS-regulated cofilin and Arp2/3 maintain actin treadmilling and drive cells to form actin-rich membrane projections called lamellipodia, which promote cytoskeletal extension,. Subsequently, ROS increase the formation of actin stress fibers, which are microfilament bundles formed by actin filaments. Additionally, ROS also inhibit protein tyrosine phosphatase to sustain the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). On the one hand, FAK can lead to focal adhesion, and actin stress fibers located on the inside of the cell membrane adhere to the focal adhesion spot. On the other hand, FAK can recruit talin, an actin-binding protein, which reacts with the extracellular domains of integrins. Integrins are cell surface adhesion molecules, and integrin α7β1 modified by ROS is a link to laminin-111 in the ECM. Thus, a connection exists between the ECM and intracellular actin cytoskeleton, which promotes cell migration.
During the EMT process, cancer cells acquire an invasive phenotype by recognizing and attaching to the ECM to degrade the basement membrane and ECM proper. Several studies have indicated that ROS can cause ECM degradation by regulating proteolytic enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and serine proteases, both of which are thought to be involved in tumor malignancy,. ROS mainly promote activator protein-1 (AP-1) and NF-κB-induced transcription of MMPs, causing protein matrix degradation,. Besides, ROS activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), AP-1, and NF-κB signaling pathways to promote the expression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and uPA receptor (uPAR),,,. ROS also enhance the binding of mRNA-stabilizing factor Hu antigen R (HuR) with AU-rich element (ARE)uPA to promote the expression of uPA and uPAR. Activated uPA, a serine protease, leads to the transformation of plasminogen into plasmin, resulting in MMP activation, ECM degradation, and eventual cancer cell invasion,.
Anti-cancer effects of ROS
In the last few years, several studies have demonstrated a dual role of ROS (“pro-tumor” and “anti-cancer”). In the early stage, high levels of ROS are crucial in promoting tumor initiation and tumor progression, as discussed earlier. However, the massive accumulation of ROS plays an antioncogenic role in cancer. Extensive accumulation of ROS can inhibit tumor cell proliferation and lead to cancer cell death, which can be explained by the activation of ER stress-, mitochondrial-, P53- apoptotic pathways and the ferroptosis pathway in cancer - (Fig. 4, Fig. 5). The anti-cancer effects of ROS can provide an additional avenue for cancer treatment. Thus, it is of great interest to discuss the potential mechanisms of the anti-cancer effects of ROS.
ROS inhibit the proliferation signaling pathway
Cancer cells are characteristic of uncontrolled cell proliferation and cell growth. ROS can inhibit cancer cell growth by inhibiting cell proliferation. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling play critical roles in tumor growth. When ROS levels exceed the self-regulating ability of cancer cells, ROS directly decrease the expression of EGF and EGFR and markedly inhibit the phosphorylation of EGFR; as a result, downstream cell proliferation signaling molecules are inhibited, such as ERK and PI3K/Akt -. Vitamin C has been reported to promote the production of ROS and inhibit the phosphorylation of ERK by decreasing EGF release and EGF receptor phosphorylation, thus suppressing the proliferation of thyroid cancer cells. Similarly, Koumine also promotes the production of ROS, which inhibits the phosphorylation of ERK, consequently suppressing the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. In line with this, the administration of H2O2 can impair the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in breast cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner, thus attenuating cancer cell proliferation. Additionally, excessive ROS inhibit EGF-induced EGFR mediated PI3K/Akt signaling and ultimately block androgen-independent prostate cancer cell proliferation. In addition, ROS block the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway, which subsequently leads to the inhibition of the proliferation of human nonsmall cell lung cancer, A549 cells; the same mechanism associated with oenothein B-mediated suppression of cancer cell growth.
ROS inhibit the cell cycle
Somatic cell proliferation mainly depends on mitosis. Somatic cell mitosis is periodic and referred to as the cell cycle. The cell cycle is composed of four phases: the gap 1 (G1) phase, synthesis (S) phase, G2 phase, and mitosis (M) phase. A specific cyclin can bind to a specific cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) to form a complex, regulating different phases of the cell cycle. CDK4 and CDK6 can bind to cyclin D to regulate the early G1 phase. CDK2 binds to cyclin E to cause S-phase initiation, and later CDK2/cyclin A complex formation promotes DNA replication in the S phase. CDK1/cyclin B complex can regulate G2 to M phase transition. The accumulation of ROS in multiple myeloma cells reduces the phosphorylation of Janus kinase (JAK)1, JAK2, and Src, thus blocking the phosphorylation of signal transducers and activators of transcription3 (STAT)/STAT5 and downregulating the expression of cyclin D1, cyclin B1, cyclin E, CDK2, and CDK4, finally leading to cell cycle arrest and attenuating tumor growth. The overexpression of ROS in human nonsmall cell lung cancer cells also promotes CDK1 phosphorylation and suppression of cyclin B1 and CDK1 expression, subsequently blocking CDK1/cyclin B1 complex formation and leading to G2/M phase arrest. The accumulation of ROS also controls cell cycle regulatory molecules, such as cell division cycle (cdc)25 and CDK inhibitors, to suppress tumor growth. LGH00031 accelerates cellular ROS production to inactivate cdc25B, which dephosphorylates tyrosine15 of CDK1 to activate the CDK1/cyclin B complex, resulting in cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cancer cell growth. Physalin A increases the levels of intracellular ROS to activate p53 and then trigger p21, an inhibitor of most CDKs, finally leading to cell cycle arrest of human nonsmall cell lung cancer cells.
ROS suppress the biosynthesis of nucleotides and ATP
Sufficient nucleotides and ATP are required to meet the needs of highly mitotic cells. The accumulation of ROS can impair the ability of cancer cells to synthesize nucleotides and ATP, thus failing to meet their demand for cell proliferation,. ROS accumulation mediates the activation of the MAPK pathway in pancreatic cancer cells, suppresses sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1, and inhibits its target gene branched-chain amino acid transaminase 2, causing a decrease in the breakdown of branched-chain amino acids and thus reducing the synthesis of glutamic acid, finally leading to a decrease in de novo nucleotide biosynthesis. Moreover, ROS accumulation inhibits glycolysis by the inactivation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase via both direct post-translational modifications and depletion of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidized form, which is consumed by PARP activated by ROS-induced DNA damage, ultimately leading to the depletion of ATP, inducing an energetic crisis, and finally killing KRAS and BRAF mutant colorectal cancer cells.
ER stress-mediated apoptosis
The accumulation of ROS in cancer cells can cause apoptosis via the ER stress-mediated pathway. ROS can cause the release of Ca2+ ions from the ER lumen, subsequently resulting in defects in ER chaperones and other proteins, thus leading to ER stress with the accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins. ER stress caused by the accumulation of ROS induces the phosphorylation of eIF2α via RNA-dependent protein kinase-like ER kinase, allowing the preferential translation of activating transcription factor-4, which in turn mediates the induction of pro-apoptotic C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), leading to cancer cell apoptosis,. Moreover, ROS-induced ER stress can mediate cancer cell apoptosis via the inositol-requiring enzyme-1α/ c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK)/CHOP pathway. Persistent ER stress initiates apoptotic cascades that play fundamental roles in the mechanism underlying the anticancer properties of ROS, -. The alantolactone-mediated accumulation of ROS breaks the imbalance of intracellular redox status in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines, increasing the levels of unfolded proteins in the ER and resulting in ER stress, subsequently leading to cancer cell apoptosis. Additionally, β-phenethyl isothiocyanate and curcumin also trigger ER stress-mediated apoptosis via ROS accumulation to treat cancers,.
Mitochondrial apoptotic pathway
In addition to ER stress-mediated apoptosis, the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway regulated by ROS accumulation has anticancer effects. The mechanisms reported so far suggest that the accumulation of ROS can drive the release of pro-apoptotic factor cytochrome c (Cyt c) from the mitochondria to the cytosol, which is a key step in the mitochondrial pathway, finally inducing cancer cell apoptosis. Cyt c is anchored to the outer surface of the mitochondrial inner membrane via combination with cardiolipin, a mitochondria-specific phospholipid. The release of Cyt c relies on disrupting the interaction of Cyt c with cardiolipin and enhancing mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), which is regulated by pro-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) and Bcl-2-antagonist killer (BAK). ROS can oxidize cardiolipin, which results in Cyt c detachment from the membrane. The oxidized cardiolipin translocates to the outer membrane and helps to recruit pro-apoptotic protein BAX to the mitochondrial membrane, thus enhancing MOMP and generating Cyt c-traversable pores. Besides, ROS can activate apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1, a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase superfamily, to activate JNK and P38 MAPK, the activation of which promotes the release of Cyt c on the mitochondrial inner membrane in a manner dependent on BAX -. Moreover, the accumulation of ROS can mediate the ER stress pathway and then activate the expression of pro-apoptotic protein Noxa,. Activated Noxa translocates into the mitochondria and subsequently inhibits anti-apoptotic proteins, thereby reversing the inhibition of BAX and BAK, forming MOMP, and finally promoting the release of Cyt c,. Then, Cyt c interacts with apoptotic protease activating factor 1 to form an apoptosome, leading to caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation and subsequent cell apoptosis. The administration of α-hederin can induce the overexpression of ROS and activate the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, finally triggering the apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. Similarly, in vitro studies have found that metal thiourea complexes can work as a new antitumor metallodrug to kill HeLa cells via a burst of the ROS-regulated mitochondria apoptotic pathway.
The P53 apoptotic pathway
Most cancers have abrogation of P53 function with a wide range of mutation frequencies. The hot mutations of P53 are DNA contact mutation (P53R273H), which impairs P53 contact with DNA, and conformational mutation (P53R175H), which affects the stability of the DNA-binding domain, resulting in the loss of function. Notably, ROS can act as an intermediate medium to reverse the abrogated P53 function. Piperlongumine reverses the R273H mutant P53 protein by overproducing ROS and leads to a restoration of the functional status of mutant P53 in human colon cancer cells, inducing the transcription of the P53 target gene, murine double minute 2, and BAX and finally resulting in cancer cell apoptosis. R-goniothalamin-induced abundant ROS reactivate the R175H mutant P53 protein in human breast cancer cells, and then P53 promotes the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins: p21cip1, BAX, and p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis, causing tumor cell apoptosis. ROS not only enhance the transcription effect of P53 but also translocate P53 to mitochondria, contributing to BAX mitochondrial recruitment and mitochondrial Cyt c release, thus leading to cancer cell apoptosis. In addition, the accumulation of ROS can trigger cancer cell DNA damage, and ROS-induced DNA damage causes the activation of DNA damage sensors and regulators such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR), thus activating P53 and subsequently leading to cancer cell apoptosis,.
ROS-induced ferroptosis
Ferroptosis is a form of iron-dependent cell death characterized by the lethal accumulation of lipid-based ROS and excessive accumulation of lipid peroxidation. Excessive iron from aberrant iron metabolism and the loss of cellular antioxidant capacity can cause the accumulation of ROS, thereby inducing catastrophic alterations in cellular redox metabolism and leading to massive lipid peroxidation in the plasma membrane and loss of cell viability, and eventually ferroptosis,. Cancer cells are more vulnerable to ferroptosis than noncancerous cells, owing to the powerful iron dependency feature. ROS-induced ferroptosis is one of the most important means of inhibiting cancer. Several ferroptosis inducing drugs have been used to treat cancer. Erastin, artesunate, and sorafenib have been reported to inactivate glutathione peroxidase 4, an important antioxidant, via inhibiting the synthesis of glutathione (GSH), thereby inducing oxidative stress in cancer cells and ultimately leading to ferroptosis,,. Ferroptosis inducers have led to high expectations regarding the potential of ferroptosis to be a new promising method of killing cancer cells.
Self-adaption system in cancer
As mentioned earlier, the massive accumulation of ROS is generally detrimental to cancer cells. ROS can inhibit cancer cell growth by suppressing the synthesis of ATP and nucleotides, leading to cell cycle arrest and blocking cancer cell proliferation. ROS also cause cancer cell death through several apoptotic pathways. However, cancer cells use the self-adaption system, including the antioxidant system, DNA damage repair pathway, and metabolism reprogramming, to inhibit the accumulation of ROS and ameliorate ROS-induced damage, so as to maintain their development and survival (Fig. 6).
Antioxidant system
The antioxidant system is essential to maintain cellular redox balance. Accumulating evidence shows that NRF2 is pivotal in antioxidant responses. Importantly, it is a key gene for cancer cells to maintain oxidative balance. The target antioxidant genes of NRF2 include reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase, quinone 1, SOD1/2, catalase, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), thioredoxin reductase 1, peroxiredoxin (PRDX)1, and PRDX3, all of which are antioxidant enzymes that reduce ROS levels. Under oxidative stress, ROS can cause the binding of 5′-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) to HCC-specific fructokinase A (KHK-A), induce KHK-A phosphorylation of serine at position 80, and subsequently phosphorylate p62 at S28. Consequently, p62 oligomerization occurs and the aggregation of p62 with KEAP1 that inhibits NRF2 is enhanced, thereby increasing nuclear translocation and activation of NRF2 to alleviate ROS, and finally promoting the development of HCC. Besides, accumulated ROS lead to lactate dehydrogenase A nuclear translocation to promote the production of α-hydroxybutyrate (α-HB) in HPV-induced cervical tumors. Then, α-HB triggers the disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like-mediated histone H3K79 hypermethylation, inducing the activation of NRF2 to control cellular redox balance. Cancer cells also use other factors, besides NRF2, to control antioxidant activity. Oxidative stress activates the expression of Krüppel-like factor 14 (KLF14) via multiple pathways, including the PI3K/Akt, p42/p44 MAPK, AMPK, and protein kinase C pathways, in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Then, KLF14 couples with p300 and CREB-binding protein (CBP) to enhance the transcriptional activation of heme oxygenase 1, which encodes the antioxidant enzyme HO-1 that helps cancer cells restore cellular redox balance under androgen-depleted conditions, resulting in cancer cell survival.
DNA damage repair pathway
Cancer cells use the DNA damage repair pathway to adapt to DNA damage caused by chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT), finally leading to therapeutic resistance. The key regulators of the DNA damage repair process are ATM and ATR. ATM and ATR can recognize DNA lesions and phosphorylate downstream molecules to transmit DNA damage signals, leading to cell cycle arrest and finally completing DNA repair. Under oxidative stress, ROS regulate the activation of ATM, which recognizes DNA damage. ATM triggers signal transduction of checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2), and the ATM-Chk2 axis causes cell cycle arrest of cancer cells, preventing the cells from undergoing mitosis and favoring DNA repair. Besides, ATM can both phosphorylate BRCA1, which is required for HR, and activate P53, which can trigger the NER pathway,, finally leading to DNA repair. Additionally, ROS can induce the phosphorylation of ATR, which in turns phosphorylate Chk1, resulting in the cell cycle arrest of cancer cells and better repair of DNA damage,. The overproduction of ROS activates the ATR-Chk1 axis, resulting in resistance to cisplatin in ovarian cancer cells, and the inhibition of ATR and Chk1 reverses chemotherapeutic resistance. The findings provided strong evidence that accumulated ROS triggered the DNA damage repair pathway to resist the ROS-caused damage in cancer cells.
Metabolism reprogramming
Metabolism reprogramming is also a critical way to resist ROS-induced inhibition of cancer cell development, besides antioxidant system and DNA damage repair pathway. Cancer cells can change their metabolic pathway to maintain the oxidative balance and their nutrient needs and cause therapeutic resistance. Accumulated ROS can trigger metabolism reprogramming to reduce the levels of ROS in cancer cells. The accumulation of ROS inhibits glycolytic enzyme pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) via the oxidation of Cys358 in human lung cancer cells. The inhibition of PKM2 leads to glucose-6-phosphate flux into the pentose phosphate pathway, which generates sufficient nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase to produce GSH, thus maintaining ROS homeostasis and favoring cancer cell survival. The change in the abundance of selected lipids can promote tumor growth and progression by eliminating ROS in colorectal cancer development. The accumulation of ROS can also trigger metabolism reprogramming to maintain the nutritional needs of cancer cells. A study has shown that severe oxidative stress triggers endothelial lipase (LIPG) upregulation, which induces the lipolysis of extracellular lipoproteins, to compensate the ROS-impeded fatty acid synthesis pathway in breast cancer cells, thus supporting tumor progression. The upregulated LIPG also results in the accumulation of intracellular lipid droplets in breast cancer cells, which protects against oxidative damage, finally supporting survival. Additionally, metabolic reprogramming leads to tumor treatment tolerance. Gemcitabine-induced ROS activate KRAS/AMPK signaling, which induces metabolic reprogramming toward aerobic glycolysis, enhancing stem-like cell properties in pancreatic cancer. Oxidative stress-induced metabolic reprogramming is one of the most important reasons for the therapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer because cancer stem cells are insensitive to external physical and chemical factors that kill tumor cells.
Scientific significance of the dual role of ROS in cancer
The incidence of cancer has increased gradually, and cancer acts as the leading cause of death among humans. Fortunately, a large number of therapeutics have been developed. Increased levels of ROS can suppress tumor cell growth and lead to apoptosis (Table 1). Recent studies show that a large number of therapeutic regimens to treat cancer depend on the elevation of ROS levels. However, ROS have a dual role in cancer, and cancer cells own a self-adaption system to resist the harmful effects of ROS. In normal cells or during early stages of cancer, the upregulation of ROS can cause gene mutations and tumor initiation that favor tumor invasion and metastasis (Table 2). If the ROS levels increase significantly, the therapeutic effect cannot be achieved; instead, ROS promote the development of cancer. Thus, different methods should be used to treat cancers in different stages. In the early carcinogenesis stage, attention should be paid to the therapeutic regimens depending on the downregulation of ROS. Nanoparticles (NPs) containing ROS-scavenging nitroxide radicals are synthesized to abrogate ROS-mediated cell proliferation and metastasis to attenuate cancers. However, in advanced cancer stages, enhancing the production of ROS to kill tumor cells and inhibiting the antioxidant system, DNA damage repair pathway, and metabolism reprogramming should be considered, as inhibition can effectively resolve therapeutic resistance. During the course of cancer treatment, considering the different roles of ROS in different stages of cancer can effectively increase the preventive and anticancer effects.
Clinical application of the dual role of ROS in cancer
Many traditional chemotherapeutic agents used in clinical settings, such as doxorubicin (DOX) and pirarubicin, can induce intracellular ROS accumulation and trigger the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, finally leading to cancer cell death. However, some chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines, have cytotoxic effects on normal cells. Many laboratories are committed to finding natural drug ingredients with lower cytotoxic effects on normal cells to treat malignant tumors. Galangin (GG), a naturally active flavonoid extracted primarily from the root of Alpinia officinarum Hance, can kill cancer cells without causing cytotoxicity in normal cells. Experiments have demonstrated that the natural drug GG, combined with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, enhances ROS production, leading to the apoptosis of human breast cancer cells. Other natural drugs, such as curcumin and parthenolide, also increase the levels of ROS to cause cancer cell apoptosis,. Besides chemotherapy, RT also becomes an important means to treat malignant tumors in clinic. RT uses ionizing radiation to promote the production of ROS to treat cancer. Ionizing radiation not only leads to the radiolysis of water to produce large amounts of ROS but also promotes the expression of NOX1 to overexpress ROS. The ROS produced react with DNA, finally leading to DNA strand breaks. Failure to perform normal functions after DNA strand breaks causes cancer cell death.
However, the emergence of treatment resistance hinders the efficacy of cancer treatment. The antioxidant system of cancer cells is important in tumor treatment resistance. High mucin 1 C-terminal subunit expression in urothelial carcinoma cells stabilizes the expression of x-cystine/glutamate transporter and increases intracellular GSH levels, thus causing cisplatin resistance by urothelial carcinoma. Also, after radiation treatment, free radical species can stabilize HIF1, the master regulator of oxygen homeostasis, finally buffering ROS generated by radiation, and hence mitigating the effect of RT. It is important to find drugs that inhibit the function of the antioxidant system to solve the problem. Fortunately, a study has shown that piperlongumine can inhibit glutathione and thioredoxin systems, thus reducing ROS clearance and enhancing the radioresponse of colorectal cancer cells. Besides, the activation of the DNA damage repair pathway can counteract DNA damage caused by chemotherapy and RT, which is one of the main causes of treatment resistance. Radiation can upregulate the expression of the ATM gene, which triggers DNA damage repair, finally mitigating the ROS-induced DNA lesions,. Obviously, inhibiting the RT-induced DNA damage repair pathway is a useful way to solve the problems. Another study has reported that the combination treatment of resveratrol and capsaicin, besides RT, can inhibit ATM activation and thus radiosensitize pancreatic tumor cells toward cell death.
New therapies have partly resolved the treatment resistance to RT and chemotherapy. However, the biggest problem at present is the inability to deliver targeted therapies. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy can induce ROS production in nontargeted tissues, and the high concentrations of ROS can damage normal cells and even cause carcinogenesis. Therefore, targeted treatments have become a hot research spot, and new therapies have emerged based on the requirement. The advent of photodynamic therapy (PDT) has enabled the precise and effective treatment of tumors. PDT is an outstandingly selective, effective, and noninvasive cancer therapeutic methodology comprising a light source, photosensitizer, and oxygen. A specific wavelength of laser light excites the photosensitizer absorbed by the tissue, and the excited-state photosensitizer transfers energy to the surrounding oxygen molecules, generating a highly active singlet oxygen (an ROS), which can kill cancer cells precisely. However, hypoxia often occurs in solid tumors with very low oxygen concentrations. Under hypoxic conditions, the generation of singlet oxygen is reduced because of the low oxygen level, and hence the therapeutic efficacy of PDT in clinical treatment is greatly suppressed. Initiator-loaded gold nanocages, as the free radical generator, can generate ROS under different oxygen tensions on exposure to near-infrared light irradiation, effectively solving the problem of PDT resistance caused by hypoxia.
The application of nanoparticles has opened new avenues to develop cancer therapies, with the advancement in nanotechnological techniques and further investigations on nanoparticles in biomedical sciences. NPs can be divided into inorganic nanomaterials such as iron oxide NPs (IO NPs) and cerium oxide NPs (CONPs), and organic nanomaterials such as polymeric micelles -. It is possible to further reduce the side effects and improve the efficacy of tumor treatment due to the selective targeting capabilities and superior efficacy of NPs. IO NPs, serving as a drug vehicle, conjugate with anticancer drug DOX, which can promote the production of ROS, forming magneto-sensitive NPs. These NPs can selectively target using magnetic fields in cancer treatment. IO NPs can also link with linoleic acid hydroperoxide (LAHP). Under the acidic-pH condition, Fe2+ ions are released from IO NPs and react with LAHP, triggering the generation of singlet oxygen (1O2), which can kill cancer cells. IO-LAHP NPs can produce tumor-specific 1O2 to treat cancer due to the overall acidic environment of solid tumors, which contribute to targeted treatment. Besides selectively killing cancer cells, NPs can combine with other therapies, such as RT and PDT, to enhance the efficacy of cancer treatment. Experiments have demonstrated that CONP pretreatment facilitates the production of RT-induced ROS in human pancreatic cancer cells, indicating that CONPs can serve as an RT sensitizer to improve pancreatic cancer treatment. Likewise, polymeric micelles are used in PDT for cancer therapy. Polymeric micelles, hemoglobin (Hb), and zinc phthalocyanine form an Hb-conjugated photosensitizer carrier, which has an oxygen self-compensating ability in PDT. Under light irradiation, the Hb-conjugated photosensitizer carrier can induce the production of more ROS, thus causing cancer cell death. NPs can target and control the release of ROS to reduce side effects. They can also combine with other therapies to improve the efficacy of cancer treatment. Hence, NPs have broad application prospects and development space.
Summary and perspectives
Anticancer treatment and early cancer prevention have become hot topics in medical research due to the increased morbidity and mortality of cancer. Targeting ROS has become an efficient way to treat cancer. Gaining a deeper understanding of the various mechanisms of ROS can provide better insights into cancer treatment. This review illustrated the dual role of ROS in promoting cancer occurrence and development and inhibiting cancer growth. In the early stages, elevated levels of ROS act as pro-tumorigenesis factors, which can induce DNA mutation and EMT, thus favoring cancer initiation, development, invasion, and metastasis. Besides, a high level of ROS inhibits T cells and NK cells and promotes the recruitment and M2 polarization of macrophages; consequently, cancer cells escape immune surveillance and immune defense. Interestingly, excessively accumulated-ROS repress cancer cell growth by inhibiting the production of essential substances needed for cell life activities, such as nucleotides and ATP, causing cell cycle arrest and blocking cancer cell proliferation. ROS also induce cancer cell death by activating ER stress-, mitochondrial-, and P53-apoptotic pathways and the ferroptosis pathway. Of note, tumor cells can establish a self-adaption system (antioxidant response, DNA damage repair pathway, and metabolism reprogramming) to deal with massively accumulated ROS and the damage they cause. Furthermore, the review discussed the methods and development of cancer treatment in recent years and also focused on therapeutics using ROS to treat cancer. The characterization of the dual role of ROS in cancer and the self-adaptive ability of cancer cells may provide a new idea for the prevention of carcinogenesis and the development of new therapeutic regimens for cancers.
An increasing number of studies have shown that various cancer cells always have high levels of ROS. ROS can promote the development of cancer by inducing gene mutation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and EMT, and activating anti-apoptotic pathways. In particular, ROS can inhibit the function of immune cells. Eventually, cancer cells escape from immune surveillance and immune defense. Interestingly, age-related thymic involution is closely connected with elevated levels of ROS. A previous study showed that a murine oxidative stress model via ozone inhalation exhibited accelerated thymic involution. Consistent with this finding, the administration of antioxidant compounds can restore the size of the thymus. The thymus is a site for T-cell differentiation and development. The thymic involution leads to the decline of T-cell output with decreased immune function. A mathematical model of cancer incidence has shown that the aging immune system leads to an increased risk of cancer. Therefore, it is speculated that ROS-mediated thymic involution is closely associated with carcinogenesis, thus providing a new basis for immune remodeling to treat cancer. However, the specific mechanism of ROS causing thymus involution to regulate cancer development is not clear.
References 194
- 1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 37.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 38.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 39.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 2
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.