Contesting Connectivity: India’s Discourse on CPEC and Its Impact on Sino-Indian Strategic Engagement
Muhammad Ahmad Khan, Sardar Jehanzaib Ghalib
BTTN Journal · 2025
doi:10.61732/bj.v4i1.167 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
India has been very critical of Chinese investment in South Asia, especially in Pakistan, citing concerns about its sovereignty and the growing influence of China through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Indian media, in synergy with official claims, has raised concerns regarding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) by a false argument that the project key artery passes through a disputed region of Gilgit Baltistan, only to minimize the rising Chinese influence in the region.... In this regard, the study focuses on three main questions: the impact of Indian media discourse on Sino-Indian relations, India’s rationale behind the proliferation of anti-CPEC discourse, and the implications on Sino-Indian relations as a result of India’s continuous opposition to CPEC. To find answers to these research questions, the study employs the discourse analysis framework, which analyzes the Indian media content in line with New Delhi’s policy line concerning CPEC since the project’s announcement.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.