Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Influence of Bone and Muscle Injuries on the Osteogenic Potential of Muscle Progenitors: Contribution of Tissue Environment to Heterotopic Ossification

Jeremy Molligan, Reed Mitchell, Lew Schon and 5 more

Stem Cells Translational Medicine · 2016

doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0082 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

By using surgical mouse models, this study investigated how the tissue environment influences the osteogenic potential of muscle progenitors (m‐progenitors) and potentially contributes to heterotopic ossification (HO). Injury was induced by clamping the gluteus maximus and medius (group M) or osteotomy of greater trochanter (group O) on the right hip, as well as combined muscle injury and osteotomy of greater trochanter (group M+O). The gluteus maximus and medius of the operated hips were harvested at days 1, 3, 5, and 10 for isolation of m‐progenitors. The cells were cultured in an osteogenic medium for 3 weeks, and osteogenesis was evaluated by matrix mineralization and the expression of osteogenesis‐related genes. The expression of type I collagen, RUNX2 (runt‐related transcription factor 2), and osteocalcin by the m‐progenitors of group M+O was significantly increased, compared with groups M and O. Osteogenic m‐progenitors in group O increased the expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 and also bone morphogenetic protein antagonist differential screening‐selected gene aberrative in neuroblastoma. On histology, there was calcium deposition mostly in the muscles of group M+O harvested at day 10. CD56, representing myogenic progenitors, was highly expressed in the m‐progenitors isolated from group M (day 10), but m‐progenitors of group M+O (day 10) exhibited the highest expression of platelet‐derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFR‐α), a marker of muscle‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (M‐MSCs). The expressions of PDGFR‐α and RUNX2 were colocalized in osteogenic m‐progenitors. The data indicate that the tissue environment simulated in the M+O model is a favorable condition for HO formation. Most likely, M‐MSCs, rather than myogenic progenitors, in the m‐progenitors participate in HO formation. Significance The prevalence of traumatic heterotopic ossification (HO) is high in war injury. The pathogenesis of HO is still unknown. This study clarified the contribution of a tissue environment created by bone or muscle injury to the formation of HO. The study also found that muscle‐derived mesenchymal stem cells, but not myogenic progenitors, are involved in the formation of HO. The findings of this study could be used to strategize the prevention and treatment of HO.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

References50

    40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    All 50 references

    Cited by papers we hold1

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.