Prejudice Reduction and Collective Action: A Conflict or Confluence of Interests?
Lucas B. Mazur
Journal of Social and Political Psychology · 2015
doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i2.324 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
There is a growing body of research findings suggesting that prejudice reduction strategies can have unintended negative consequences, particularly by helping to stabilize systems of inequality. In light of these findings, a handful of scholars have suggested that the field be guided less by the prejudice reduction tradition, so as to focus more on collective action. While agreeing with the recent critiques of prejudice reduction, I argue that in more robustly embracing a collective action approach we should be careful not to abandon the notion of perceptualism that colored original thinking on prejudice reduction, lest we artificially narrow the scope of social psychological research and unintentionally ignore communities that do not fit well within current thinking in the collective action tradition.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References126
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 126 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.