Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Are Arthroscopic PCL Avulsion Fixation and its Long Learning Curve Morally Justified When Other Surgical Approaches are Valid? An Ethical Issue in Surgical Research

Farzad Amouzadeh Omrani, Gholamhossein Kazemian, Alireza Manafi Rasi and 2 more

Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma · 2017

doi:10.5812/jost.60943 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

There are controversial disputes regarding the ethical concerns for arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fixation accompanied by various complications and difficulties. Firstly, this procedure maintains long learning curve, and it is still in a cast of dilemma if this procedure is justified, when a surgeon should undergo a considerable time and efforts in order to acquire enough experience regarding this novel procedure. Secondly, when stable fixation is not achieved, one may need to shift to open surgery; the issue arises when surgeon terminates the surgery just with somewhat fixation because he does not want to demonstrate any sign of weakness regarding his surgical skills. And finally, there are specific considerations that should be taken into account in the informed consent for an innovative surgery. Here the study discusses these terms in the faiths of fashioning a catalyst for further discussions.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.