The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form in Organisational Contexts: Factorial Validity, Invariance, and Internal Consistency
Llewellyn Ellardu van Zyl, Chantal Olckers
European Journal of Mental Health · 2019
doi:10.5708/ejmh.14.2019.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the MHC-SF within selected organisational contexts. Specifically, the aim was to determine the factorial validity, measurement invariance, and reliability of the instrument for South African organisations. A cross-sectional online survey-based research design was employed, coupled with a convenience sampling strategy (N = 624). The results showed that the original three-dimensional factor structure of the MHC-SF fitted the data the best. Items loaded statistically significantly on all three subscales (emotional, psychological, social wellbeing). Further, the scale showed full configure, convergent and metric invariance between males and females. However, invariance was not established in either age cohorts, language groups, or marital status. The instrument proved to be reliable at both a lower (Cronbach Alpha) and upper level (Composite reliability) limit within South African organisational contexts.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References66
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 66 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.