Arkeologisk naturvitenskap eller naturvitenskapelig arkeologi?
Arne B. Johansen
Primitive Tider · 2013
doi:10.5617/pt.7258 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Archaeological science or scientific archaeology? Modern archaeology depends heavily on other scientific disciplines. This “addiction” affects both archaeology and the supporting disciplines. Here I mainly examine the effects from cooperation between natural sciences and archaeology. The effects are of two types: On one side the cooperation enables archaeologists to see prehistoric man more clearly as part of the environment. On the other side it makes archaeologists habituated to the incessant influx of knowledge from other specialists. As the enrichment of prehistoric knowledge from natural science is obvious and extremely valuable I concentrate on the internal effects on archaeology. In what direction will this cooperative archaeology move in the decades to come?
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.