Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Arkeologisk naturvitenskap eller naturvitenskapelig arkeologi?

Arne B. Johansen

Primitive Tider · 2013

doi:10.5617/pt.7258 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Archaeological science or scientific archaeology? Modern archaeology depends heavily on other scientific disciplines. This “addiction” affects both archaeology and the supporting disciplines. Here I mainly examine the effects from cooperation between natural sciences and archaeology. The effects are of two types: On one side the cooperation enables archaeologists to see prehistoric man more clearly as part of the environment. On the other side it makes archaeologists habituated to the incessant influx of knowledge from other specialists. As the enrichment of prehistoric knowledge from natural science is obvious and extremely valuable I concentrate on the internal effects on archaeology. In what direction will this cooperative archaeology move in the decades to come?

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.