Corrigendum: Examination of the Clinical Queries and Systematic Review ‘Hedges’ in EMBASE and MEDLINE
Susan M. Bradley
Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2014
doi:10.5596/c2012-003 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In Table 2, row 1, the EMBASE search string for the hedge ‘Diagnosis (2 or more terms min difference)’ was incorrectly listed as ‘sensitive*.tw. OR diagnostic accuracy.sh. OR diagnostic.tw.’ The search as run was ‘sensitiv:.tw. OR diagnostic accuracy.sh. OR diagnostic.tw.’ In Table 2, row 2, the EMBASE search string for the hedge ‘Reviews (2 or more terms, best optimization)’ was incorrectly listed as ‘meta-analysis*.mp. OR search*.tw. OR review.pt.’ The search as run was ‘meta-analys:.mp. OR search:.tw. OR review.pt.’
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.