USE OF URINARY CATHETERS FOR CLEAN INTERMITTENT CATHETERIZATION: SATISFACTION OF PATIENTS WITH BONE MARROW INJURY
Gisela Maria Assis, Aline Fernanda Negri, Sabrina Alves Veiga Tung and 4 more
Cogitare Enfermagem · 2015
doi:10.5380/ce.v20i4.41585 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The objective in this study was to assess the use of the conventional catheter, hydrophilic catheter and pre-lubricated catheter with bag for clean intermittent catheterization. Exploratory-descriptive cross-sectional research involving 59 bone marrow injury patients attended at rehabilitation centers of three Brazilian states between January and April 2012. The questionnaire to assess the perceived catheter attributes and the adapted consumption experience satisfaction questionnaire were used. The conventional catheter was not statistically superior in any aspect assessed. The hydrophilic catheter was considered superior to the conventional for package opening and sliding during insertion. The pre-lubricated catheter with bag was superior to the conventional for package opening, introduction, sliding and removal. The indication of the ideal catheter depends on the individual assessment of the patients, their difficulties, potentials and preferences.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.