Forecasting and forecast-combining of quarterly earnings-per-share via genetic programming
Arturo Rodríguez, Joaquín Trigueros
Estudios de Administración · 2008
doi:10.5354/0719-0816.2008.56413 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In this study we examine different methodologies to estimate earnings. More specifically, we evaluate the viability of Genetic Programming as both a forecasting model estimator and a forecast-combining methodology. When we compare the performance of traditional mechanical forecasting (ARIMA) models and models developed using Genetic Programming we observe that Genetic Programming can be used to create time-series models for quarterly earnings as accurate as the traditional linear models. Genetic Programming can also effectively combine forecasts. However, Genetic Programming's forecast combinations are sometimes unable to improve on Value Line. Moreover, simple averaging of forecasts results in better predictive accuracy than Genetic Programming-combining of forecasts. Hence, as implemented in this study, Genetic Programming is not superior to traditional methodologies in either forecasting or forecast combining of quarterly earnings.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
References12
12 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.