Classical Logic and Neutrosophic Logic. Answers to K. Georgiev
Florentin Smarandache
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems · 2016
doi:10.5281/zenodo.570844 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In this paper, we make distinctions between Classical Logic (where the propositions are 100% true, or 100 false) and the Neutrosophic Logic (where one deals with partially true, partially indeterminate and partially false propositions) in order to respond to K. Georgiev’s criticism. We recall that if an axiom is true in a classical logic system, it is not necessarily that the axiom be valid in a modern (fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic etc.) logic system.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.