Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

The length of coastlines in Ptolemy's Geography and in ancient periploi

D. A. Shcheglov

History of Geo- and Space Sciences · 2018

doi:10.5194/hgss-9-9-2018 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The lengths of the coastlines in Ptolemy's <i>Geography</i> are compared with the corresponding values transmitted by other ancient sources, presumably based on some lost <i>periploi</i> (literally "voyages around or circumnavigations", a genre of ancient geographical literature describing coastal itineraries). The comparison reveals a remarkable agreement between them, suggesting that Ptolemy relied much more heavily on these or similar <i>periploi</i> than it used to be thought. Additionally, a possible impact of Ptolemy's erroneous estimate of the circumference of the Earth is investigated. It is argued that this error resulted in two interrelated distortions of the coastal outlines in Ptolemy's <i>Geography</i>. First, the north–south stretches of the coast that were tied to particular latitudes are shown compressed relative to the distances recorded in other sources in roughly the same proportion to which Ptolemy's circumference of the Earth is underestimated relative to the true value. Second, in several cases this compression is compensated by a proportional stretching of the adjacent east–west coastal segments. In particular, these findings suggest a simple explanation for the strange shape of the Caspian Sea in Ptolemy's <i>Geography</i>.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.