Impact of CO 2 and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the ORCHIDEE/IPSL models

Vegetation reconstructions from pollen data for the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), 21 ky ago, reveal lanscapes radically different from the modern ones, with, in particular, a massive regression of forested areas in both hemispheres. Two main factors have to be taken into account to explain these changes in comparison to today's potential vegetation: a generally cooler and drier climate and a lower level of atmospheric CO₂. In order to assess the relative impact of climate and atmospheric CO₂ changes on the global vegetation, we simulate the potential modern vegetation and the glacial vegetation with the dynamical global vegetation model ORCHIDEE, driven by outputs from the IPSL_CM4_v1 atmosphere-ocean general circulation model, under modern or glacial CO₂ levels for photosynthesis. ORCHIDEE correctly reproduces the broad features of the glacial vegetation. Our modelling results support the view that the physiological effect of glacial CO₂ is a key factor to explain vegetation changes during glacial times. In our simulations, the low atmospheric CO₂ is the only driver of the tropical forests regression, and explains half of the response of temperate and boreal forests to glacial conditions. Our study shows that the sensitivity to CO₂ changes depends on the background climate over a region, and also depends on the vegetation type, needleleaf trees being much more sensitive than broadleaf trees in our model. This difference of sensitivity leads to a dominance of broadleaf types in the remaining simulated forests, which is not supported by pollen data, but nonetheless suggests a potential impact of CO₂ on the glacial vegetation assemblages. It also modifies the competitivity between the trees and makes the amplitude of the response to CO₂ dependent on the initial vegetation state.

Abstract licence: CC BY

40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

• Extra-Mediterranean refugia: The rule and not the exception? · 2012

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.