Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Contrasting source contributions of Arctic black carbon to atmospheric concentrations, deposition flux, and atmospheric and snow radiative effects

H. Matsui, T. Mori, T. Mori and 8 more

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · 2022

doi:10.5194/acp-22-8989-2022 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

<p>Black carbon (BC) particles in the Arctic contribute to rapid warming of the Arctic by heating the atmosphere and snow and ice surfaces. Understanding the source contributions to Arctic BC is therefore important, but they are not well understood, especially those for atmospheric and snow radiative effects. Here we estimate simultaneously the source contributions of Arctic BC to near-surface and vertically integrated atmospheric BC mass concentrations (<span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_SRF</sub></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_COL</sub></span>), BC deposition flux (<span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_DEP</sub></span>), and BC radiative effects at the top of the atmosphere and snow surface (RE<span class="inline-formula"><sub>BC_TOA</sub></span> and RE<span class="inline-formula"><sub>BC_SNOW</sub></span>) and show that the source contributions to these five variables are highly different. In our estimates, Siberia makes the largest contribution to <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_SRF</sub></span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_DEP</sub></span>, and RE<span class="inline-formula"><sub>BC_SNOW</sub></span> in the Arctic (defined as <span class="inline-formula"><i>&gt;</i>70</span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> N), accounting for 70 %, 53 %, and 41 %, respectively. In contrast, Asia's contributions to <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_COL</sub></span> and RE<span class="inline-formula"><sub>BC_TOA</sub></span> are largest, accounting for 37 % and 43 %, respectively. In addition, the contributions of biomass burning sources are larger (29 %–35 %) to <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_DEP</sub></span>, RE<span class="inline-formula"><sub>BC_TOA</sub></span>, and RE<span class="inline-formula"><sub>BC_SNOW</sub></span>, which are highest from late spring to summer, and smaller (5.9 %–17 %) to <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_SRF</sub></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_COL</sub></span>, whose concentrations are highest from winter to spring. These differences in source contributions to these five variables are due to seasonal variations in BC emission, transport, and removal processes and solar radiation, as well as to differences in radiative effect efficiency (radiative effect per unit BC mass) among sources. Radiative effect efficiency varies by a factor of up to 4 among sources (1471–5326 W g<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) depending on lifetimes, mixing states, and heights of BC and seasonal variations of emissions and solar radiation. As a result, source contributions to radiative effects and mass concentrations (i.e., RE<span class="inline-formula"><sub>BC_TOA</sub></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>M</i><sub>BC_COL</sub></span>, respectively) are substantially different. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of considering differences in the source contributions of Arctic BC among mass concentrations, deposition, and atmospheric and snow radiative effects for accurate understanding of Arctic BC and its climate impacts.</p>

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.