Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Arctic marine secondary organic aerosol contributes significantly to summertime particle size distributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

B. Croft, R. V. Martin, R. V. Martin and 22 more

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · 2019

doi:10.5194/acp-19-2787-2019 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

<p>Summertime Arctic aerosol size distributions are strongly controlled by natural regional emissions. Within this context, we use a chemical transport model with size-resolved aerosol microphysics (GEOS-Chem-TOMAS) to interpret measurements of aerosol size distributions from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago during the summer of 2016, as part of the “NETwork on Climate and Aerosols: Addressing key uncertainties in Remote Canadian Environments” (NETCARE) project. Our simulations suggest that condensation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from precursor vapors emitted in the Arctic and near Arctic marine (ice-free seawater) regions plays a key role in particle growth events that shape the aerosol size distributions observed at Alert (82.5<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>&thinsp;N, 62.3<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>&thinsp;W), Eureka (80.1<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>&thinsp;N, 86.4<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>&thinsp;W), and along a NETCARE ship track within the Archipelago. We refer to this SOA as Arctic marine SOA (AMSOA) to reflect the Arctic marine-based and likely biogenic sources for the precursors of the condensing organic vapors.</p> <p><span id="page2788"/>AMSOA from a simulated flux (500&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msup><mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">day</mi><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="64pt" height="15pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="8f93b7fde00f18c6b1eb9f6df658301c"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="acp-19-2787-2019-ie00001.svg" width="64pt" height="15pt" src="acp-19-2787-2019-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span>, north of 50<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>&thinsp;N) of precursor vapors (with an assumed yield of unity) reduces the summertime particle size distribution model–observation mean fractional error 2- to 4-fold, relative to a simulation without this AMSOA. Particle growth due to the condensable organic vapor flux contributes strongly (30&thinsp;%–50&thinsp;%) to the simulated summertime-mean number of particles with diameters larger than 20&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">nm</span> in the study region. This growth couples with ternary particle nucleation (sulfuric acid, ammonia, and water vapor) and biogenic sulfate condensation to account for more than 90&thinsp;% of this simulated particle number, which represents a strong biogenic influence. The simulated fit to summertime size-distribution observations is further improved at Eureka and for the ship track by scaling up the nucleation rate by a factor of 100 to account for other particle precursors such as gas-phase iodine and/or amines and/or fragmenting primary particles that could be missing from our simulations. Additionally, the fits to the observed size distributions and total aerosol number concentrations for particles larger than 4&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">nm</span> improve with the assumption that the AMSOA contains semi-volatile species: the model–observation mean fractional error is reduced 2- to 3-fold for the Alert and ship track size distributions. AMSOA accounts for about half of the simulated particle surface area and volume distributions in the summertime Canadian Arctic Archipelago, with climate-relevant simulated summertime pan-Arctic-mean top-of-the-atmosphere aerosol direct (<span class="inline-formula">−0.04</span>&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span>) and cloud-albedo indirect (<span class="inline-formula">−0.4</span>&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span>) radiative effects, which due to uncertainties are viewed as an order of magnitude estimate. Future work should focus on further understanding summertime Arctic sources of AMSOA.</p>

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.