COVID-19 research: quality of biostatistics
Michal Ordak
Archives of Medical Science · 2021
doi:10.5114/aoms/144644 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Introduction In recent years, unfortunately, low quality of statistical analyses in medicine has been observed. As it turns out, this also applies to COVID-19 subject matter. Material and methods The study included 2600 medical articles published between the beginning of 2020 and June 2021, in which the authors described the obtained results, i.e. related to COVID-19. Results Of the analysed articles, 39% were correct in terms of the statistical analysis performed. Conclusions There should be more emphasis on conducting statistical reviews in authors’ contributions on various aspects of COVID-19.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.