The Prediction of Training Proficiency in Firefighters: A Study of Predictive Validity in Spain
Alfredo Berges, Elena Fernández-del-Río, Pedro J. Ramos-Villagrasa
Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · 2018
doi:10.5093/jwop2018a2 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The present study provides results of criterion validity in the selection of firefighters in Spain. The predictors were cognitive skills, job knowledge, and physical aptitudes, and the criterion was training proficiency. The process involves 639 candidates, but only 44 complete successfully the selection process. Our results support previous evidence showing that general cognitive ability is the best predictor of training proficiency, with an operational validity of.57. With respect to the other predictors, job knowledge presented an operational validity of.55 and physical tests of.49. In addition, multiple regression analysis showed that cognitive aptitude explains 33% of the variance, but when physical aptitudes are included the explained variance increases to 50%. If we also add job knowledge, explained variance increases to 55%. Our study offers recent results of criterion validity in a barely investigated job, gathered in a country other than the one where prior research had been carried out.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.