Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

PERSPECTIVE AS SYMBOLIC FORM, ONCE AGAIN. Some elements towards a revaluation of perspective and visuality in architecture

Rafael Alcayde Egea

EGA · 2012

doi:10.4995/ega.2012.1374 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Although Panofsky’s arguments have come under criticism for quite some time, they still seem to play a key role in the current disregard to perspective in architectural education. However, it is not clear that the essay expresses a negative conclusion about perspective. Furthermore, abstraction certainly implied the denial of perspective in Painting but, according to the opinion of the most celebrated masters of Modern Movement, not in Architecture.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.