Human counting versus artificial intelligence for assessing medullation in mohair fibres
N Giovannini, D Sacchero, C Quispe Bonilla and 2 more
South African Journal of Animal Science · 2025
doi:10.4314/sajas.v55i5.02 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The fleeces of mammals with dense coats, such as the mohair fleeces of Angora goats, usually include medullated fibres. These fibres constitute a problem for the textile industry because of their structural characteristics. Three experiments were conducted in this study, with the aim of comparing human image analysis to digital image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI), in terms of their ability to determine the incidence of medullation in mohair samples. The experiments entailed determining the incidences of industry non-objectionable medullated (NOB) fibres and objectionable medullated (SME) fibres, as percentages of the non-medullated fibres. In each experiment, a set of samples was analysed by both laboratory personnel and by different AI models using a Smart Fiber Medullometer. Laboratory personnel showed better coincidence and higher correlations with the AI models when counting SME fibres (r = 0.64–0.97) than when counting NOB fibres (r = 0.57–0.87). This could be the result of the more clearly defined characteristics of SME fibres, in relation to NOB fibres. The results of this studyindicate a great advance in the automatic detection of SME and NOB fibres in mohair samples. However, further adjustments of the AI models are required for counting NOB fibres.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.