Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis in Flat Back Deformity: Optimal Degree of Correction

Ki-Tack Kim, Sang-Hun Lee, Dae-Seok Huh and 3 more

Asian Spine Journal · 2015

doi:10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.352 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Study DesignA retrospective comparative study.PurposeTo provide an ideal correction angle of lumbar lordosis (LL) in degenerative flat back deformity.Overview of LiteratureThe degree of correction in degenerative flat back in relation to pelvic incidence (PI) remains controversial.MethodsForty-nine patients with flat back deformity who underwent corrective surgery were enrolled. Posterior-anterior-posterior sequential operation was performed. Mean age and mean follow-up period was 65.6 years and 24.2 months, respectively. We divided the patients into two groups based on immediate postoperative radiographs-optimal correction (OC) group (PI-9°≤LL<PI+9°) and under-correction (UC) group (LL<PI-9°). We also classified the patients according to the PI of each patient-low PI group (PI<55°) and high PI group (PI≥55°). Radiological and clinical results were analyzed.ResultsPatients in OC group had significantly less correction loss and maintained normal sagittal alignment (sagittal vertical axis<5 cm), as compared to patients in UC group (p<0.05). LL of low PI group significantly maintained within 9° better than high PI group (p<0.05). Oswestry disability index (ODI) significantly decreased at last follow-up, as compared to preoperative state. However, there was no significant difference in last follow-up ODI between the groups.ConclusionsIn flat back deformity, correction of LL to within 9° of PI will result in better sagittal balance. Thus, we recommend sufficient LL to prevent correction loss, especially in patients with high PI.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.