Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block patients with and without heart failure by tissue doppler imaging
Sambhaji Raut, Chandrakant Chavan, Deepak Phalgune
Journal of the Indian Academy of Echocardiography & Cardiovascular Imaging · 2019
doi:10.4103/jiae.jiae_21_18 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Introduction: Large number of patients with heart failure (HF) have left bundle branch block (LBBB). Most precise method for identification of intraventricular dyssynchrony is tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). Purpose of this research was to compare left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony in LBBB patients with and without HF and to compare various methods of LV systolic dyssynchrony assessment by TDI. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixteen patients with a diagnosis of LBBB were included in the study. All patients underwent conventional two-dimensional echocardiography for global LV function assessment. LV systolic dyssynchrony was measured by opposing wall delay, maximum delay, and Yu index. LBBB patients were grouped into four classes according to their LV function and the presence or absence of HF, normal LV function without HF (Group A), normal LV function with HF (Group B), LV dysfunction with HF (Group C), and LV dysfunction without HF (Group D). Results: LV systolic dyssynchrony was significantly higher (P <0.001) in Group C and D as compared to Group A and B. LV systolic dyssynchrony was significant higher in Group C and D as compared to Group A and B by using opposing wall delay (P <0.001), Yu index (P <0.001), and maximum delay (P <0.001) imaging criteria. Mean Yu index (P <0.001) and mean maximum delay (P <0.001) were significantly higher in Group C and D as compared to Group A and B. Conclusions: LV systolic dyssynchrony was more common in LBBB patients with LV dysfunction than those with normal LV function, irrespective of the presence or absence of HF.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.