The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in South Africa. IV. Natural hybridiza tion
J. J. Spies, C. H. Stirton, H. du Plessis
Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation · 1987
doi:10.4102/abc.v17i1.1020 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The genus Rubus L. is represented in southern Africa by the subgenera Eubatus Focke and Idaeobatus Focke. A combination o f morphological data, data on the reproductive systems of some collections and meiotic chromosome behaviour indicates that a hybrid swarm in the eastern Transvaal was formed subsequent to the hybridization between R. cuneifolius Pursh. taxon B (subgenus Eubatus) and R. longepedicellatus (C. E. Gust.) C. H. Stirton (subgenus Idaeobatus). Other examples of intra- and intersubgeneric hybridization were found during this study of the South African material. These instances, with examples found in the literature, indicate that the subgeneric subdivisions of Rubus are artificial. Three different methods were used to analyse the meiotic chromosome configurations. The genome relationship system of Alonso & Kimber (1981) and Kimber & Alonso (1981) and the modification of the binomial system of Jackson & Casey (1980) by Spies (1984) proved to be the most sensitive for distinguishing between alio-, segmental alio- and autoploids.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.