Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and real life
Carolina Prevaldi, Giuseppe Ragusa, Fabio D’Este
Emergency Care Journal · 2006
doi:10.4081/ecj.2006.1.38 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Beloveds are, probably, the most well known and widely-read guidelines in Medicine. Although for decades these guidelines are regularly revisited every 5 years, the survival to cardiac arrest on the territory remain unsatisfactory, attesting itself on 6,4% or less. These discouraging outcomes caused some reflections on the validity of the guidelines concrete application. Some reviews, supported by the results of some good studies recently published, and the introduction of new technologies have produced remarkable changes not only in the guidelines, but also in the methodology subtended to the review process, and the consequent creation of new recommendations. The recent publication on Circulation of the 2005 guidelines is the standing point for an analysis of the great changes carried out.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
References12
12 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.