Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Validation of the Korean Version of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire

Hyun Kuk Kim, Hyun Lee, Sang-Heon Kim and 5 more

Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases · 2020

doi:10.4046/trd.2020.0025 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Background The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a simple and repeatable, self-reporting health status questionnaire for bronchiectasis. We have translated the original version of the BHQ into Korean using a standardized methodology. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the BHQ (K-BHQ) with Korean patients. Methods Stable state patients with bronchiectasis from two academic hospitals were enrolled in this study. The validity was assessed by investigating the relationship between the K-BHQ scores and the Korean version of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (K-CAT) scores. We also investigated the relationship between the K-BHQ scores and other variables of the modified Medical Research Council’s (mMRC) dyspnea scale, lung function, and exacerbations. Results A total of 126 patients with bronchiectasis were enrolled. The mean age was 64.3 (standard deviation [SD], 9.7). Women comprised 53.2% of the patients. The mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) was 60% of the predicted value (SD, 18.9%); the mean K-CAT score was 17.6 (SD, 9.1). The K-BHQ scores correlated strongly with the K-CAT scores (r=–0.656, p<0.001). There was significant correlation between the K-BHQ scores and the mMRC dyspnea scale (ρ=–0.409, p<0.001), FEV<sub>1</sub> (r=0.406, p<0.001), and number of exacerbations requiring hospitalization (ρ=–0.303, p=0.001). Conclusion The K-BHQ is valid for assessing the health-related quality of life or health status of Korean bronchiectasis patients.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.