Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Testicular oocyte development and other toxic effects in the common hourglass tree frog exposed to three commercial insecticide formulations

P. Jeganathan, R. S. Rajakaruna

Ceylon Journal of Science · 2021

doi:10.4038/cjs.v50i3.7906 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The endocrine-disrupting effects of insecticides on wildlife have received increasing attention in the literature in recent years. Here we tested the lethal and sub-lethal effects of three commercial insecticide formulations of profenofos, carbosulfan, and diazinon on the common hourglass tree frog, <em>Polypedates cruciger, </em>under laboratory conditions. Acute and chronic exposures to the three chemicals on the survival, growth and development of malformations were studied. The acute toxicity (at Gosner stages 23, 25 - 26, and 31) in terms of LC<sub>50</sub> was highest in profenofos followed by diazinon and lowest in carbosulfan. Chronic exposure (at Gosner stage 25) to environmentally relevant concentrations of three insecticides showed a reduction in the survival of the tadpoles. It also affected the growth where the exposed individuals were smaller and took longer to metamorphose than unexposed tadpoles. Histological preparations of the testes of male frogs exposed to all three insecticides developed oocytes, reporting a profound effect in carbosulfan exposure. The concentrations of more than 2 ppb caused oocyte development in 100% of the exposed frogs. However, none of the chemicals induced any external malformations. These laboratory findings highlight the importance of examining the frogs in chemically contaminated environments for testicular oogenesis, leading to demasculinization of male frogs.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References30

  1. 6.
  2. 12.

28 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.