Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.

Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Dae-Gyun Ahn, Hye-Jin Shin, Mi-Hwa Kim and 5 more

Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · 2020 · Review

doi:10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which causes serious respiratory illness such as pneumonia and lung failure, was first reported in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei, China. The etiological agent of COVID-19 has been confirmed as a novel coronavirus, now known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is most likely originated from zoonotic coronaviruses, like SARS-CoV, which emerged in 2002. Within a few months of the first report, SARS-CoV-2 had spread across China and worldwide, reaching a pandemic level. As COVID-19 has triggered enormous human casualties and serious economic loss posing global threat, an understanding of the ongoing situation and the development of strategies to contain the virus's spread are urgently needed. Currently, various diagnostic kits to test for COVID-19 are available and several repurposing therapeutics for COVID-19 have shown to be clinically effective. In addition, global institutions and companies have begun to develop vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19. Here, we review the current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development for COVID-19.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

In December 2019, cases of serious illness causing pneumonia and death were first reported in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei, China. Soon after, the number of cases soared dramatically, spreading across China and worldwide. As of March 25, more than 400,000 cases of the disease have been confirmed with over 18,000 deaths. The causative agent of the disease has been confirmed as a novel coronavirus (CoV). The World Health Organization (WHO) announced the official name of the disease as “coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)” and now publicly refers to the virus as “the COVID-19 virus” (formerly known as “2019-nCoV”, or "Wuhan Coronavirus"). Analysis of the viral genome has revealed that the new coronaviruse is phylogenetically close to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of a viral outbreak in 2002. Thus, the new coronavirus has been named “SARS-CoV-2” by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and other virologists.

Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded viruses ((+)ssRNA virus) belonging to the family Coronaviridae. Most coronaviruses have 8-10 open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1a and ORF1b are translated into polyprotein 1a (pp1a) and pp1ab, which are processed by viral proteases to produce 16 non-structural proteins containing RNA-dependent RNA polymerase enzyme (RdRp). The viral RNA is replicated through transcription of a minus-strand template by RdRp. During replication, coronaviruses generate 6-9 subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs), which lead to translation of accessory and structural proteins from downstream ORFs. Spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins, necessary for completion of a viral replication cycle, are translated from sgmRNAs.

Many coronaviruses are known to infect humans and various animals. In general, 15-30% of common colds are caused by human coronaviruses (HCoVs) including HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-HKU1. However, some coronaviruses from animal reservoirs can be transmitted to humans causing outbreaks in the human population. The SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002 originated from bats in China and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in 2012 from dromedary camels, though also likely transmitted from bats, in the Middle East. Although the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has not yet been identified, it has been reported that SARS-CoV-2 might be transmitted by bats, snakes, or pangolins. Unlike HCoVs, these zoonotic viruses infect both humans and various animals and cause severe respiratory illnesses such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pneumonia, leading to death. The symptoms of COVID-19 are more severe in older age groups with comorbidities, while allergic diseases, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are also risk factors.

Since 2000, various zoonotic coronaviruses have been circulating in the animal reservoir. Particularly, MERS became endemic in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries. At this point, we cannot exclude the possibility of other coronavirus outbreaks in the future. The following is a review of the current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines against COVID-19 and related coronaviruses.

Epidemiology

The number of COVID-19 cases reported to the WHO has been growing since the first report of COVID-19 in December 2019 from the WHO China Country Office. The infection began to spread from the Huanan seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China, while the exact infection route of the first case remains unclear. The number of confirmed cases in China grew until mid-February 2020. Then, the number of daily new cases in China started to decrease from late-February 2020 (Fig. 1). A sudden increase of the cases in China on February 17 is due to the change in COVID-19 diagnostic criteria. At the time of writing (March 19, 2020), COVID-19 cases continue to be reported globally from over 170 countries. As of March 15, 2020, 153,517 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases with 5,735 deaths (approximately 3.8% mortality) have been reported according to WHO (Fig. 2).

In the early stages of the global COVID-19 spread, the cases identified outside of China were mostly travelers who were infected in China and then traveled to areas outside of China. Countries outside of China that reported travel-associated COVID-19 cases were Singapore, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Vietnam, Australia, United States of America, Germany, etc.. Unfortunately, COVID-19 has begun to spread domestically in South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Japan from mid-February 2020(Fig.3). Particularly, in the Republic of Korea, the spread of COVID-19 had been well managed until mid-February. The number of confirmed cases in South Korea was 31 on February 18, 2020 and most of these cases were travelers from China or their close contacts. However, COVID-19 infections among a religious group in the Daegu metropolitan area and a nearby hospital triggered a sudden spread to other major domestic cities in South Korea in mid-February (Fig.4). As a result, a week later, the confirmed cases soared to 763 and 74.6% of those cases were tied to the event (as of February 24, 2020). On March 1, the total number of confirmed cases reached 3,526, among which 59.5% belonged to the religious group-related cases.

The mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 (3.8%) is lower than that of SARS-CoV (10%) or MERS-CoV (37.1%), but the number of relative infection cases is more than 10 times higher. Accumulating reports revealed that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted from people who are asymptomatic or have mild infections. These features may explain the sudden epidemic spreading of the virus.

Diagnosis

To detect this novel coronavirus, molecular-based approaches are the first line of methods to confirm suspected cases. Nucleic acid testing is the main technique for laboratory diagnosis. Other methods such as virus antigen or serological antibody testing are also valuable assays with a short turnaround time for the detection of novel coronavirus infection. As with other emerging viruses, the development of methods to detect antibodies and viral antigens are started after the identification of the viral genome.

The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was released immediately to public databases after the start of the outbreak in Wuhan, China on January 10, 2020 (Wuhan-Hu-1, GenBank Accession No. MN908947). The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that all patient samples with suspected SARS-CoV-2 should be isolated from respiratory tract specimens (including nasal and pharyngeal swabs, sputum, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) then shipped to authoritative laboratories for nucleic acid amplification diagnostic testing. During international health emergencies, the real-time RT-PCR assay has shown to be a sensitive and specific method to detect respiratory pathogens in patients with an acute respiratory infection. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens was detected by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. For the rapid development of real-time RT-PCR diagnostic tests, the genome sequence was used to design specific primers and probes to detect the SARS-CoV-2. All assays can use viral RNA extracted from SARS-CoV as positive control. The primers and probes targeting specific genes of SARS-CoV-2 were used in real-time RT-PCR assays as diagnostic tests (Fig. 5). The first open reading frames (ORF 1a and 1b), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (RdRp), envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N) have become key diagnostic targets for SARS-CoV-2 identification. Some countries hosting institutions have shared their protocols and provided specific sequences of target primers on the WHO public database.

In the Republic of Korea, since the first confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 on January 20, 2020, the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) rapidly applied WHO recommended RT-PCR assays and approved various in vitro diagnostic test kits. The diagnostic test kits have been distributed to public health departments and hospitals to prevent the COVID-19 spread in communities.

Antiviral Therapies

During the COVID-19 outbreak, some potential antiviral drugs are being urgently administered to patients with COVID-19 (Table 1). Those drugs are described in detail below.

Nucleoside Analogs

Nucleoside analogs have been used as antiviral agents. Nucleoside analogs generally interfere with cellular nucleotide synthesis pathways and cause termination of viral genome replication by the accumulating mutations and by blocking the entry of incoming natural nucleotides. In a broad spectrum of RNA viruses, nucleoside analogs act as inhibitors of viral RNA synthesis. Nucleoside analogs target the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that is responsible for the replication of viral RNA.

Favipiravir (T-705) is a guanine analog approved for treatment against influenza virus infection in Japan and also can effectively inhibit replication of Ebola, yellow fever, chikungunya, norovirus, and enterovirus. A recent study suggested that favipiravir is a potential candidate for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection showing effective antiviral activities in Vero E6 cells (EC50 = 61.88 μM). For the treatment of patients with COVID-19, favipiravir was used in combination therapy with other antiviral agents such as interferon-α (ChiCTR2000029600) or baloxavir marboxil (ChiCTR2000029544).

Among the approved nucleotide analogs, ribavirin is also a guanine analogue for treatment against hepatitis C virus (HCV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and has been used to treat patients with SARS or MERS. However, the drug showed side effects such as anemia in high dose treatment. The efficacy and safety of the drug are uncertain. For COVID-19 treatment, ribavirin was used in combination therapy with pegylated interferon (ChiCTR2000029387) to stimulate innate antiviral responses, which was given in much lower doses to minimize side effects. The combination therapies with interferon should be monitored carefully.

Remdesivir (GS-5734) is an adenine analog that has a similar chemical structure compared with tenofovir alafenamide, an approved HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Remdesivir also showed antiviral activity against MERS-CoV (IC50 = 0.074 μM) and SARS-CoV (IC50 = 0.069 μM) in human airway epithelial (HAE) cell, and, can inhibit MERS-CoV replication in mice. This drug has been developed for the treatment of Ebola virus infection and the therapeutic efficacy was confirmed in a phase III clinical trial. In the USA, the first SARS-CoV-2-infected patient was reported and administered remdesivir. For the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2, the antiviral activity of remdesivir was tested in Vero cells (EC50 = 0.77 μM). Remdesivir has emerged as the most promising candidate for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recently, two phase III clinical trials were initiated to test remdesivir in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (NCT04252664 and NCT04257656). The therapeutic efficacy and safety of favipiravir and remdesivir still need to be confirmed by clinical research in patients with SARS-CoV-2.

Chloroquine

An approved small-molecule agent, chloroquine is a cheap and safe drug for the treatment of malaria and sequesters protons into lysosomes to increase the intracellular pH. Chloroquine also has potential broad-spectrum antiviral activities by inhibiting endosomal acidification, which is required for virus-host cell fusion. Previous studies determined the antiviral activity of chloroquine against SARS, MERS, HIV, Ebola, Hendra, and Nipah viruses in vitro. Chloroquine also showed inhibitory effects against SARS by interfering with glycosylation of the cellular receptor of SARS. A recent in vitro study revealed that chloroquine is a promising candidate antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vero E6 cells (EC50 =1.13 μM). To meet urgent clinical demand, chloroquine is now being evaluated in clinical trials (ChiCTR2000029609). For the treatment of COVID-19 cases in China, patients were treated with chloroquine to test the efficacy and safety of this antiviral agent candidate against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results of trials demonstrated that chloroquine inhibits the exacerbation of COVID-19. Based on this finding, the experts from the government and organizer of clinical trials suggested that chloroquine is a promising antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2.

Protease Inhibitors

Protease inhibitors are attractive candidates for antiviral drugs. The viral genome encodes polyproteins which are cleaved by viral proteases for viral gene expression and replication. Protease inhibitors prevent viral gene replication by binding to enzymes that are responsible for proteolytic cleavage.

Both lopinavir and ritonavir are protease inhibitors, approved as HIV drugs, and have been reported to have antiviral activities against SARS and MERS. For treatment of SARS-CoV-2, clinical trials (ChiCTR2000029539) have been initiated to test the antiviral activity of HIV protease inhibitors in patients. However, the antiviral efficacy of HIV protease inhibitors in coronavirus proteases is debatable.

There is no specific antiviral agent against emerging novel coronavirus even though great efforts to develop effective antiviral drugs have been made by targeting of virus protease, polymerase, and host proteins following the MERS and SARS epidemics.

In the Republic of Korea after initial reports of an emerging novel coronavirus, experts from the government and academy initiated projects for the screening of potential antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2. These projects are supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of Republic of Korea. To identify novel treatments for patients infected with COVID-19, repurposing of FDA-approved drugs is also a realistic approach.

Current Status of COVID-19 Vaccine Development

Vaccines are the most effective strategy for preventing infectious disease since they are more cost-effective than treatment, and reduce morbidity and mortality without long-lasting effects. Preventive and therapeutic vaccines will be of fundamental value as the most obvious way to protect global health.

Over the past two decades, three human coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) emerged worldwide, causing considerable threat to global health. However, there is still no approved vaccines for human coronaviruses. Research groups around the world are accelerating the development of COVID-19 vaccines using various approaches. Precise recognition mechanisms between the virus surface proteins and the host receptors are important for understanding of cross-species transmission and host tropism and for the establishment of animal models for vaccine development. The spike (S) protein of coronaviruses is an important target for vaccine development because it mediates the infection mechanism through receptor binding of host cells. The S protein of human infectious coronaviruses recognizes various host receptors, including ACE2, APN, and DPP4 (Table 2). SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV use ACE2 as a receptor. The homology between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV is approximately 75% for the spike (S) protein-RBD. The S1 subunit of S protein contains a receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the S2 subunit is necessary for membrane fusion between host cells and viruses. The following describes the current status of vaccine development against COVID-19 through various approaches.

Recombinant Subunit Vaccine

In general, subunit vaccines are advantageous over other types of vaccines in that they are highly safe and have fewer side effects by inducing the immune system without introducing infectious viruses. Subunit-based vaccine development studies have also reported enhancement of T cell immune responses and generation of high titer neutralizing antibodies in vivo.

Clover Biopharmaceuticals is pre-clinical testing a recombinant subunit vaccine based on the trimeric S protein (S-Trimer) of the SARS-CoV-2. The S protein contains three S1 heads and a trimeric S2 stalk. Clover Biopharmaceuticals confirmed the generation of a native-like trimeric viral spike in mammalian cell culture-based expression system and the detection of antigen-specific neutralizing antibodies in the sera of fully-recovered COVID-19 patients. Recently, Clover Biopharmaceuticals and GSK announced a partnership to improve immune response by introducing GSK’s adjuvant system to S-Trimer.

The University of Queensland is developing subunit vaccines using the “molecular clamp,” a transformative technology. A molecular clamp is a polypeptide that stabilizes a surface protein and improves recognition of the correct antigen, thereby inducing stronger immune responses. This vaccine platform can be readily applicable to a wide range of enveloped viruses and their product can be rapidly manufactured. The University of Queensland has applied GSK’s adjuvant system for the development of an effective vaccine and entered partnership with CEPI.

DNA Vaccine

DNA vaccines represent an innovative approach by direct injection of plasmids encoding the antigens, accompanied with a wide range of immune responses. These advantages are applied with prophylactic vaccines and therapeutic vaccines. Recently, various DNA vaccine platforms have been developed to improve the efficacy of vaccines by using electroporation to deliver plasmids and adding adjuvant to enhance the immune responses.

Inovio Pharmaceuticals, in collaboration with Beijing Advaccine Biotechnology, has started pre-clinical trials for DNA vaccine (INO-4800) against COVID-19. INO-4800 induces activation of T cells by delivering DNA plasmids that express the SARS-CoV-2 spike. This vaccine platform has advantages that can produce therapeutic antibodies and activate immune cells by delivering the vaccines intradermally into the patient. Inovio Pharmaceuticals is preparing for phase I trials in the U.S.A. and China with support from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

mRNA Vaccine

mRNA vaccines are rapidly developing technologies to treat infectious diseases and cancers. mRNA-based vaccines contain mRNAs encoding the antigens, which are translated at the host cellular machinery by vaccination. mRNA vaccines have advantages over conventional vaccines, by the absence of genome integration, the improved immune responses, the rapid development, and the production of multimeric antigens.

Moderna, Inc. has started phase I clinical trials for mRNA-1273, an mRNA vaccine, encoding viral spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2. It was designed in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). In contrast to conventional vaccines which are produced in a cell culture system, Moderna’s mRNA vaccine is designed in silico, which enables the rapid development and evaluation of vaccine efficacy. Moderna Inc. is preparing a phase I study with financial support from CEPI.

Other Vaccine Approaches

Genexine Inc. is developing a COVID-19 vaccine using Hyleukin-7 platform technology. Hyleukin-7 platform enhances the immune responses by fusion of interlekin-7 (IL-7) to hyFc, designed to hybridize IgD and IgG4 for long-acting effects of Fc fusion proteins. IgD has a flexible hinge structure that maximizes biological activity of Fc-fusion protein. IgG4 has an unexposed junction site that minimizes adverse immunogenicity by preventing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Genexine Inc. has reported the improved vaccine efficacy showing the accumulation of pulmonary T cells and the increase of plasmacytoid dendritic cells by treatment of Fc-fused IL-7 in influenza A virus infection model.

Together with the vaccine technologies described above, some known hurdles also must be overcome for successful vaccine development. Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies facilitate virus entry into the host cell via the Fc-receptor pathway, leading to enhanced virus infection. In other words, the antibodies generated by vaccination can promote viral infectivity. ADE effects have been reported in some vaccines against Dengue and Zika viruses. Although the occurrence of ADE of SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been clearly demonstrated, potential ADE of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV was observed in an in vitro model system. Various approaches have been introduced in vaccine development to avoid adverse effects by ADE. For example, nucleocapsid (N) protein maybe an alternative target to overcome ADE. Since N protein is not a virus surface protein, antibodies induced by N protein-based vaccine will not be able to facilitate virus entry. DNA vaccine candidates targeting SARS-CoV N protein as an immunogen can generate N-specific humoral and cellular immune response. Another major hurdle for vaccine development is higher mutation rates of RNA viruses compared to DNA viruses, resulting in higher genetic diversity. Moreover, the RBD of the S protein is the most variable region in the coronavirus genome. Therefore, the ADE and the higher genetic diversity should be considered as important factors for vaccine design and antibody-based drug development against SARS-CoV-2.

Summary

Despite tremendous global efforts to contain SARS-CoV-2, the virus’s spread has reached a pandemic level. Although the development of therapeutics and vaccines for the treatment of COVID-19 is still in its early stage, there has been some significant progress in the research area from complete genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 to the beginning of clinical trials with COVID-19 vaccines. Continued international efforts are required to solve the remaining unanswered questions about the novel coronavirus, including the animal sources of infection, transmissibility, and virulence of the virus.

Rapid complete genome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and international sharing of the information have so far allowed us to produce faster and more accurate diagnostic tools. Currently, most of the developed diagnostic tools are qRT-PCR-based diagnostic tools, which require longer sample preparation and analysis time, delaying necessary actions for COVID-19 patients in the field. As COVID-19 spreads continuously all over the world, the development of rapid diagnostic methods, which can be tested in the field, is urgently required.

It has been reported that some drugs are known to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. However, the lack of clinical evidence may lead to unpredictable clinical prognosis. At the moment, quick screening of therapeutic agents for the repurposing of FDA-approved and well-characterized drugs may be a more practical approach in epidemics. Considering the seriousness of the recent outbreaks of zoonotic coronaviruses, therapeutic agents for pan-coronaviruses should be developed to cope with future outbreaks.

Together with the development of diagnostics and therapeutics, various pharmaceutical companies and institutions have announced the beginning of vaccine development as well. However, enormous funds and long-term studies are required for clinical research for the development of vaccines against infectious diseases. Despite the serious public health threat caused by viral outbreaks, the commercial markets for vaccines, particularly against emerging infectious diseases, are quite limited due to the high cost and time required for vaccine development and the uncertainty of profitability. This development environment of vaccines has created a huge gap between academic research and commercial markets. Thus, well-organized, long-term research programs should be established with internationally supported projects for the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases. For this reason, CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations) was launched at Davos in 2017 to link academics and pharmaceutical companies and to provide financial support for the development of vaccines against emerging infectious disease. Currently, a global vaccine research development pipeline for infectious diseases has been established and its clinical trials have been funded by CEPI. In addition to these global movements, the South Korean government and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) have announced urgent research projects for the development of vaccines and drugs against COVID-19.

Outbreaks caused by zoonotic coronaviruses can result not only in severe human casualties but also in global economies disrupting manufacturing supply chains and decreasing market demand. Therefore, cooperation of various institutions, academics, governments, and pharma-ceutical companies is inevitably necessary to prevent further spreading of the current COVID-19 and the future outbreaks.

References 104

  1. 1.

    Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565-574.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30251-8

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Sola I, Almazan F, Zuniga S, Enjuanes L. Continuous and discontinuous RNA synthesis in coronaviruses. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2015;2:265-288.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-055218

  4. 4.

    Fehr AR, Perlman S. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1282:1-23.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4939-2438-7_1

  5. 5.

    Fung TS, Liu DX. Human coronavirus: host-pathogen interaction. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;73:529-557.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115759

  6. 6.

    Li W, Shi Z, Yu M, Ren W, Smith C, Epstein JH, et al. Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science. 2005;310:676-679.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1118391

  7. 7.

    Corman VM, Ithete NL, Richards LR, Schoeman MC, Preiser W, Drosten C, et al. Rooting the phylogenetic tree of middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus by characterization of a conspecific virus from an African bat.J. Virol. 2014;88:11297-11303.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01498-14

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Ji W, Wang W, Zhao X, Zai J, Li X. Cross-species transmission of the newly identified coronavirus 2019-nCoV. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:433-440.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmv.25682

  10. 10.

    Did pangolins spread the China coronavirus to people?

    Not in our library10.1038/d41586-020-00364-2

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Graham RL, Donaldson EF, Baric RS. A decade after SARS: strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:836-848.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3143

  13. 13.

    Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, Guan Y, Yam LY, Lim W, et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1319-1325.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13077-2

  14. 14.

    Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia Ja, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30079-5

  15. 15.

    Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, Yuan YD, Yang YB, Yan YQ, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1111/all.14238

  16. 16.
  17. 17.

    Willman M, Kobasa D, Kindrachuk J. A comparative analysis of factors influencing two outbreaks of Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea. Viruses. 2019;11.

    Not in our library10.3390/v11121119

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    WHO Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) SITUATION REPORT - 1 21 JANUARY 2020.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    WHO Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 55 (15 Mar 2020).

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 26 (15 Feb 2020).

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (24 Feb 2020).

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (18 Feb 2020).

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (01 Mar 2020).

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    WHO Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    WHO Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) monthly summary, November 2019.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Pan X, Chen D, Xia Y, Wu X, Li T, Ou X, et al. Asymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30114-6

  29. 29.

    Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.2565

  30. 30.

    Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, et al. Transmis sion of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:970-971.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2001468

  31. 31.

    Chen Y, Chan KH, Kang Y, Chen H, Luk HK, Poon RW, et al. A sensitive and specific antigen detection assay for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2015;4:e26.

    Not in our library10.1038/emi.2015.26

  32. 32.

    Meyer B, Drosten C, Muller MA. Serological assays for emerging coronaviruses: challenges and pitfalls. Virus Res. 2014;194:175-183.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2014.03.018

  33. 33.

    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727-733.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2001017

  34. 34.

    Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395:470-473.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30185-9

  35. 35.
  36. 36.

    WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Wang Y, Wang W, Xu L, Zhou X, Shokrollahi E, Felczak K, et al. Cross talk between nucleotide synthesis pathways with cellular immunity in constraining hepatitis E virus replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2834-2848.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.02700-15

  38. 38.

    Debing Y, Emerson SU, Wang Y, Pan Q, Balzarini J, Dallmeier K, et al. Ribavirin inhibits in vitro hepatitis E virus replication through depletion of cellular GTP pools and is moderately synergistic with alpha interferon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:267-273.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.01795-13

  39. 39.

    Leyssen P, Balzarini J, De Clercq E, Neyts J. The predominant mechanism by which ribavirin exerts its antiviral activity in vitro against flaviviruses and paramy-xoviruses is mediated by inhibition of IMP dehydrogenase. J. Virol. 2005;79:1943-1947.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.79.3.1943-1947.2005

  40. 40.

    De Clercq E. New nucleoside analogues for the treatment of hemorrhagic fever virus infections. Chem. Asian J. 2019;14:3962-3968.

    Not in our library10.1002/asia.201900841

  41. 41.
  42. 42.

    So LK, Lau AC, Yam LY, Cheung TM, Poon E, Yung RW, et al. Development of a standard treatment protocol for severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1615-1617.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13265-5

  43. 43.

    Al-Tawfiq JA, Momattin H, Dib J, Memish ZA. Ribavirin and interferon therapy in patients infected with the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: an observational study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:42-46.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijid.2013.12.003

  44. 44.

    Zumla A, Chan JF, Azhar EI, Hui DS, Yuen KY. Coronaviruses - drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016;15:327-347.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2015.37

  45. 45.

    Choy M. Pharmaceutical approval update. P T. 2016;41:416-441.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    Sheahan TP, Sims AC, Graham RL, Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Case JB, et al. Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017;9.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3653

  47. 47.

    Mulangu S, Dodd LE, Davey RT, Tshiani Mbaya O, Proschan M, Mukadi D, et al. A Randomized, controlled trial of ebola virus disease therapeutics. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:2293-2303.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1910993

  48. 48.

    Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, et al. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:929-936.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2001191

  49. 49.

    Yan Y, Zou Z, Sun Y, Li X, Xu KF, Wei Y, et al. Anti-malaria drug chloroquine is highly effective in treating avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection in an animal model. Cell Res. 2013;23:300-302.

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2012.165

  50. 50.

    Savarino A, Di Trani L, Donatelli I, Cauda R, Cassone A. New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006;6:67-69.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(06)70361-9

  51. 51.

    Kono M, Tatsumi K, Imai AM, Saito K, Kuriyama T, Shirasawa H. Inhibition of human coronavirus 229E infection in human epithelial lung cells (L132) by chloroquine: involvement of p38 MAPK and ERK. Antiviral Res. 2008;77:150-152.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.10.011

  52. 52.

    Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, et al. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol. J. 2005;2:69.

    Not in our library10.1186/1743-422x-2-69

  53. 53.

    Keyaerts E, Vijgen L, Maes P, Neyts J, Van Ranst M. In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;323:264-268.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.085

  54. 54.

    Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases? Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003;3:722-727.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00806-5

  55. 55.

    Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci. Trends. 2020;14:72-73.

    Not in our library10.5582/bst.2020.01047

  56. 56.

    Wu CY, Jan JT, Ma SH, Kuo CJ, Juan HF, Cheng YS, et al. Small molecules targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome human coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:10012-10017.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0403596101

  57. 57.

    Mukherjee P, Desai P, Ross L, White EL, Avery MA. Structure-based virtual screening against SARS-3CL(pro) to identify novel non-peptidic hits. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008;16:4138-4149.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bmc.2008.01.011

  58. 58.

    Chu CM, Cheng VC, Hung IF, Wong MM, Chan KH, Chan KS, et al. Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax. 2004;59:252-256.

    Not in our library10.1136/thorax.2003.012658

  59. 59.

    Chan KS, Lai ST, Chu CM, Tsui E, Tam CY, Wong MM, et al. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with lopinavir/ritonavir: a multicentre retrospective matched cohort study. Hong Kong Med. J. 2003;9:399-406.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    MSIT Research projects initiation for drug repositioning study for COVID-19 treatment.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.
  62. 62.

    Andre FE. The future of vaccines, immunisation concepts and practice. Vaccine. 2001;19:2206-2209.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00546-6

  63. 63.
  64. 64.

    Guarner J. Three emerging coronaviruses in two decades. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020;153:420-421.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcp/aqaa029

  65. 65.

    Du L, He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Zheng BJ, Jiang S. The spike protein of SARS-CoV--a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:226-236.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2090

  66. 66.

    Coutard B, Valle C, de Lamballerie X, Canard B, Seidah NG, Decroly E. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 2020;176:104742.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742

  67. 67.

    Li F. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016;3:237-261.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042301

  68. 68.

    Sun C, Chen L, Yang J, Luo C, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Spike-RBD structure and receptor binding comparison and potential implications on neutralizing antibody and vaccine development. BioRxiv. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.02.16.951723

  69. 69.

    He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Kou Z, Li W, Farzan M, et al. Receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein induces highly potent neutralizing antibodies: implication for developing subunit vaccine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;324:773-781.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.106

  70. 70.

    Okba NM, Raj VS, Haagmans BL. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccines: current status and novel approaches. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2017;23:49-58.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coviro.2017.03.007

  71. 71.

    Bisht H, Roberts A, Vogel L, Subbarao K, Moss B. Neutralizing antibody and protective immunity to SARS coronavirus infection of mice induced by a soluble recombinant polypeptide containing an N-terminal segment of the spike glycoprotein. Virology. 2005;334:160-165.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2005.01.042

  72. 72.

    Clover Biopharmaceuticals vaccines programs.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    CEPI and GSK announce collaboration to strengthen the global effort to develop a vaccine for the 2019-nCoV virus.

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    Significant step' in COVID-19 vaccine quest.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    CEPI to fund three progrannes to develop vaccines against the novel coronavirus (nCoV-2019).

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Yang ZY, Kong WP, Huang Y, Roberts A, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, et al. A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature. 2004;428:561-564.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02463

  77. 77.

    Sardesai NY, Weiner DB. Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: prospects for success. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011;23:421-429.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coi.2011.03.008

  78. 78.

    Inovio Accelerates Timeline for COVID-19 DNA Vaccine INO-4800.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Inovio's produc pipeline.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    dMAb Technology platform.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17:261-279.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2017.243

  82. 82.

    Moderna's pipeline.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    mRNA platform: Enabling Drug Discovery & Development.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    hyFc platform.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    Seo YB, Im SJ, Namkoong H, Kim SW, Choi YW, Kang MC, et al. Crucial roles of interleukin-7 in the development of T follicular helper cells and in the induction of humoral immunity. J. Virol. 2014;88:8998-9009.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00534-14

  86. 86.

    Lee JH, Cho JH, Yeo J, Lee SH, Yang SH, Sung YC, et al. The pharmacology study of a new recombinant TNF receptor-hyFc fusion protein. Biologicals. 2013;41:77-83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biologicals.2012.09.001

  87. 87.

    Loset GA, Roux KH, Zhu P, Michaelsen TE, Sandlie I. Differential segmental flexibility and reach dictate the antigen binding mode of chimeric IgD and IgM: implications for the function of the B cell receptor. J. Immunol. 2004;172:2925-2934.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2925

  88. 88.

    Kang MC, Park HW, Choi DH, Choi YW, Park Y, Sung YC, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells contribute to the protective immunity induced by intranasal treatment with Fc-fused interleukin-7 against lethal influenza virus infection. Immune Netw. 2017;17:343-351.

    Not in our library10.4110/in.2017.17.5.343

  89. 89.

    Tirado SM, Yoon KJ. Antibody-dependent enhancement of virus infection and disease. Viral Immunol. 2003;16:69-86.

    Not in our library10.1089/088282403763635465

  90. 90.

    Khandia R, Munjal A, Dhama K, Karthik K, Tiwari R, Malik YS, et al. Modulation of Dengue/Zika Virus pathogenicity by antibody-dependent enhancement and strategies to protect against enhancement in Zika Virus infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:597.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.00597

  91. 91.

    Wan Y, Shang J, Sun S, Tai W, Chen J, Geng Q, et al. Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry. J. Virol. 2020;94(5).

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02015-19

  92. 92.

    Wang SF, Tseng SP, Yen CH, Yang JY, Tsao CH, Shen CW, et al. Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;451:208-214.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.090

  93. 93.

    Kim TW, Lee JH, Hung CF, Peng S, Roden R, Wang MC, et al. Generation and characterization of DNA vaccines targeting the nucleocapsid protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 2004;78:4638-4645.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.78.9.4638-4645.2004

  94. 94.
  95. 95.
  96. 96.

    Yeager CL, Ashmun RA, Williams RK, Cardellichio CB, Shapiro LH, Look AT, et al. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature. 1992;357:420-422.

    Not in our library10.1038/357420a0

  97. 97.

    Hofmann H, Pyrc K, van der Hoek L, Geier M, Berkhout B, Pohlmann S. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:7988-7993.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0409465102

  98. 98.

    Tresnan DB, Levis R, Holmes KV. Feline aminopeptidase N serves as a receptor for feline, canine, porcine, and human coronaviruses in serogroup I. J. Virol. 1996;70:8669-8674.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.70.12.8669-8674.1996

  99. 99.

    Delmas B, Gelfi J, L'Haridon R, Vogel LK, Sjostrom H, Noren O, et al. Aminopeptidase N is a major receptor for the entero-pathogenic coronavirus TGEV. Nature. 1992;357:417-420.

    Not in our library10.1038/357417a0

  100. 100.

    Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003;426:450-454.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02145

  101. 101.

    Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DH, Muller MA, Dijkman R, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature. 2013;495:251-254.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12005

  102. 102.

    Krempl C, Schultze B, Herrler G. Analysis of cellular receptors for human coronavirus OC43. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1995;380:371-374.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4615-1899-0_60

  103. 103.

    Huang X, Dong W, Milewska A, Golda A, Qi Y, Zhu QK, et al. Human coronavirus HKU1 spike protein uses O-acetylated sialic acid as an attachment receptor determinant and employs hemagglutinin-esterase protein as a receptor-destroying enzyme. J. Virol. 2015;89:7202-7213.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00854-15

  104. 104.

    Williams RK, Jiang GS, Holmes KV. Receptor for mouse hepatitis virus is a member of the carcinoembryonic antigen family of glycoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:5533-5536.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.88.13.5533

Cited by papers we hold 18

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.