Discussion: Social and spatial networks
Marc Barthelemy
Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie · 2014
doi:10.4000/nda.2374 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The recent digitization of various historical sources opens the exciting possibility of discussing quantitatively a large number of phenomenon in social and human sciences. In particular, many datasets are structured as graphs, such as relations between individuals or settlement, roads or other infrastructures, and are usually georeferenced. The corresponding graphs are thus 'spatial networks', embedded in space and containing information which is not only topological. Spatial networks are very common, and it is important to recognize them as such, as their properties are very different from generic complex networks. In this chapter, I will discuss the most salient facts about spatial networks, how they are different from complex networks and how spatial constraints induce specific properties. The main purpose is to help understanding what is generic about spatial networks and how we can characterize them quantitatively.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.