Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Las vicisitudes de la carta amatoria en los tratados de retórica (ss. iv-xvi)

M. Josefa Navarro Gala

Criticón · 2009

doi:10.4000/criticon.12689 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the scarce and irregular presence of love letters in preceptive epistolography up to the beginning of the 16th century, and to analyse the different conceptions and approaches that classical rhetors, medieval dictatores, and humanist secretaries had on the epistolary love discourse. A diacronic study shows that their opinions on love letters written in their manuals do not always derive form rhetorical, technical, or stylistic considerations, as happens in other epistolary genres. On the contrary, quite often they adopt ludic and/or moral criteria that are alien to other rhetorical and textual practices.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.