Transparency and Truth: Prefatory Material in Fictional and Non-Fictional Eighteenth-Century Travel Writing
Ruth Menzies, Sandhya Patel
XVII-XVIII · 2013
doi:10.4000/1718.531 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
This paper focuses on the paratexts, more specifically the prefatory material, found in eighteenth-century travel accounts. We will argue that as the century progresses the prefaces change in terms of their complexity. This question of complexity is approached from three distinct perspectives. On a purely formal level, increasingly sophisticated textual and iconographical elements are incorporated into the introductory material. Greater interconnections between genre (fiction or non-fiction), stylistics and veracity or, to borrow Homi Bhabha’s terms, the focus on discursive transparency, also appear to gain ground. Finally, the paratextual material seems progressively to take a more multifarious approach to performatives. Using a corpus comprising fiction (Robinson Crusoe, Gulliver’s Travels) and non-fiction (Dampier, Woodes Rogers, Shelvocke, Anson, Byron, Wallis, Cook), this study suggests that this type of parallel analysis offers fresh insights into the function and development of prefaces and also suggests new interconnections between the two forms of travel writing.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.