Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

How experts understand the public in vaccination controversies in Chile

Verónica Rocamora Villena, René Jara Reyes, Claudio Broitman Rojas

Arbor: Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura · 2019

doi:10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4004 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The socio-scientific controversies regarding vaccination that have emerged in Chile in recent years have exposed new tensions between experts and citizens. Numerous research studies about these controversies have focused on analyzing the viewpoints of citizens who oppose vaccination, but have overlooked other relevant actors, such as the experts. Based on a qualitative approach, this article analyzes the discourse, strategies and communication practices of health experts, in order to understand their standpoint in relation to citizens who oppose vaccination. The research shows that in spite of unanimous agreement about the relevance of vaccination as a preventive policy, expert positions about these citizens differ. This is reflected in different Public Communication of Science and Technology models, with a clear prevalence of the deficit model.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.