Interpretations of the ‘Living Constitution’ in the American Legal and Political Discourse. Selected Problems
Edyta Sokalska
Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu · 2019
doi:10.3935/zpfz.69.3.05 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The synoptic character of the American Constitution has created favorable conditions for varied interpretations that were hotbeds of controversy and conflicts. The explanation of the U.S. Constitution is a problem of constitutional theory, constitutional doctrine, constitutional history, as well as political theory. The proponents of constitutional interpretation labeled as the living constitution are of the opinion that the Constitution should be treated as a legal act with a dynamic meaning depending on the time of interpretation. Originalism is perceived as the main alternative to the living constitution interpretation. Contemporary American scholars emphasize that there is no dichotomy between the proponents of living constitutionalism and the supporters of originalism.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.