Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Radiation-induced signaling pathways that promote cancer cell survival (Review)

ASHLEY L. HEIN, MICHEL M. OUELLETTE, YING YAN

International Journal of Oncology · 2014 · Review

doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2614

Abstract

Radiation therapy is a staple cancer treatment approach that has significantly improved local disease control and the overall survival of cancer patients. However, its efficacy is still limited by the development of radiation resistance and the presence of residual disease after therapy that leads to cancer recurrence. Radiation impedes cancer cell growth by inducing cytotoxicity, mainly caused by DNA damage. However, radiation can also simultaneously induce multiple pro-survival signaling pathways, such as those mediated by AKT, ERK and ATM/ATR, which can lead to suppression of apoptosis, induction of cell cycle arrest and/or initiation of DNA repair. These signaling pathways act conjointly to reduce the magnitude of radiation-induced cytotoxicity and promote the development of radioresistance in cancer cells. Thus, targeting these pro-survival pathways has great potential for the radiosensitization of cancer cells. In the present review, we summarize the current literature on how these radiation‑activated signaling pathways promote cancer cell survival.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

1. Introduction

As a staple approach for cancer treatment, radiation therapy plays a critical role in local disease control. When combined with chemotherapy (i.e., chemoradiation), radiation provides additional benefits, which give better disease control and significantly improve cancer patient survival. However, radioresistance and the presence of residual disease after radiation therapy remain major problems that result in the loss of the therapy effectiveness. Currently, there is no clinical approach available either for predicting the benefit of radiation therapy for individual cancer patients or for radiosensitization of cancer cells. Thus, an improved understanding of the mechanisms that promote cancer cell survival after radiation could allow pharmacological strategies to be developed to improve the efficacy of radiation therapy.

Radiation exposure induces numerous cellular signaling pathways, which can lead to cellular responses including apoptosis, cellular senescence and cell cycle checkpoint activation/DNA repair. Among the radiation-induced pro-survival signaling pathways, some are involved in inducing cell cycle arrest and promoting DNA repair, while others are engaged in suppressing apoptosis induction. These pathways act synergistically to protect cancer cells from the cytotoxic effects of radiation, ultimately leading to the development of radioresistance. This review summarizes the signaling pathways that positively contribute to cancer cell survival in response to ionizing radiation.

2. HER (also called ERBB or EGFR) signaling

The HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) consists of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4, which localize on the cell membrane. HER RTKs share a similar protein structure that contains an extracellular region (ligand binding and dimerization domains), a transmembrane region and an intracellular region (protein tyrosine kinase domain and phosphorylation regulatory tail). Among HER receptors, HER2 has no known ligand and HER3 possesses very low kinase activity. Binding of ligands to the ligand binding domain of HER1, HER3 and HER4 results in homo- or hetero-dimerization of the receptors followed by trans-phosphorylation of several tyrosines in the c-terminal regulatory tail of the receptor. The phosphorylated tyrosines form docking sites for downstream adaptors and signal transducers, activating downstream signaling pathways including PI3K/AKT, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, phospholipase C-γ/protein kinase C and JAK/STAT pathways. Among those pathways, PI3K/AKT and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK cascades have been shown to play important roles in cell survival after radiation (Fig. 1).

An increase in HER1 phosphorylation, indicative of HER activation, following ionizing radiation has been reported previously. Our most recent study in human breast cancer cells demonstrates that ionizing radiation results in an increase in phosphorylation of not only HER1, but also HER2, HER3 and HER4. Although the mechanisms responsible for this phosphorylation of HER receptors has not yet been determined, previous studies have shown that receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), which suppress HER RTK phosphorylation, can effectively be inhibited by reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) through oxidation. Previous studies have also demonstrated that radiation induces ROS/RNS production via a mitochondria-dependent mechanism. Thus, the ROS/RNS production in response to radiation could lead to the inhibition of PTPs, resulting in the activation of HER RTKs. Future studies will be needed to examine this possibility for the activation of HER RTKs following radiation.

Inhibition of HER RTKs has been shown to increase the radiosensitivity of cancer cells. Inhibition of HER RTKs by HER pan-inhibitor CI-1033 notably enhances the radiosensitivity of human colon carcinoma cells both in vitro and in vivo, while HER1 inhibition by gefitinib and HER2 inhibition by herceptin, respectively, radiosensitizes EGFR amplified glioma cells and breast cancer cells. Generally, the pro-survival function of HER receptors involves at least two possible mechanisms. The first mechanism is based on the capability of HER receptors to activate AKT and ERK1/2 signaling, which play critical roles in suppressing apoptosis. Another possible mechanism for the pro-survival function of HER receptors is through their regulation of the cell cycle checkpoint response and DNA repair. In our recent study, we found that HER2 activation following radiation is necessary for the activation of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint response. In addition, HER1 has been reported to promote the activation of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which plays an essential role in the NHEJ-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).

3. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) pathway

In a wide variety of cell types, ionizing radiation induces rapid activation of MAPK family members, including ERK1/2, JNK and p38. Among those, radiation-induced ERK1/2 signaling activation has been shown to play an important role in promoting cell survival in response to radiation.

Following radiation, ERK1/2 is activated through dual tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation by MEK1/2 and the activation, in turn, leads to the phosphorylation/activation of over 160 substrates. Some of these substrates are transcription factors that regulate the expression of genes encoding for anti-apoptotic proteins. The best characterized antiapoptotic transcription factors targeted by ERK1/2 signaling are the cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) and CAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBP-β). In response to radiation, ERK1/2 phosphorylates/activates p90rsk kinase, which in turn activates CREB and C/EBP-β, thereby inducing the expression of a number of anti-apoptotic proteins including Bcl-xL, Mcl-1 and c-FLIPs. In addition, ERK1/2 can directly phosphorylate and inhibit a number of pro-apoptotic proteins, including Bad, Bim and caspase 9. Thus, by increasing the expression/activity of anti-apoptotic proteins and inhibiting the activity of pro-apoptotic proteins, the net effect of the radiation-induced ERK1/2 signaling activation is the suppression of apoptosis in irradiated cells.

Studies from our group and others have demonstrated that ERK1/2 signaling activation after radiation is essential for activation of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint in response to radiation. Radiation-induced ERK1/2 signaling is required for the activation of key regulators of the G2 checkpoint, most notably ATR and BRCA1. ERK1/2 signaling also plays an important role in promoting DNA repair. Radiation-induced ERK1/2 signaling has been associated with the transcriptional upregulation of genes involved in DNA repair, such as ERCC1, XRCC1 and XPC. Furthermore, ERK1/2 signaling can activate DNA-PK, which plays a critical role in NHEJ-mediated DSB repair, and PARP-1, which recognizes single-stranded DNA breaks (SSBs) on the damaged DNA. Also, ERK1/2 signaling functions as a positive regulator of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent homologous recombination (HR) DSB repair. Thus, by promoting G2/M cell cycle checkpoint activation and increasing DNA repair, ERK1/2 signaling positively regulates cancer cell survival following radiation. Consistent with these observations, an increasing number of studies demonstrate that constitutive activation of Ras results in an increase in the radioresistance of cancer cells, whereas inhibition of MEK or ERK leads to the radiosensitization of cancer cells.

While the exact mechanisms responsible for the activation of ERK1/2 signaling by radiation has not yet been clearly elucidated, several signaling mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in this activation. As demonstrated by us and others, the rapid activation of HER family receptors following ionizing radiation contributes to ERK1/2 signaling activation in cancer cells of the breast and lung. Furthermore, this role of HER receptors involves Ras GTPase. An activation of Ras in response to HER receptor activation (mainly HER1 and HER2) has been demonstrated and ectopic expression of Ras-N17 dominant negative mutant abolishes the ERK1/2 activation by radiation. Via recruitment of Grb-2 to the activated HER receptors, Grb-2 becomes activated and forms a complex with SOS protein, which triggers the activation of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the activated Ras can induce HER1-ligand production, which, through an autocrine feedback loop, further activates HER1 and then Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Another mechanism implicated in radiation-induced ERK1/2 activation involves the tumor suppressor BRCA1. Studies from our laboratory show that decreasing BRCA1 expression in breast cancer cells using shRNA markedly diminishes the activation of ERK1/2 signaling after radiation. Conversely, inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling using pharmacological inhibitors or siRNA also results in the destabilization of BRCA1 protein in irradiated breast cancer cells. These results suggest a positive feedback loop involving ERK1/2 and BRCA1 in response to ionizing radiation. Lastly, the DNA damage sensor ATM has also been implicated in radiation-induced ERK1/2 activation. ERK1/2 activation following radiation has been shown to require ATM, as ATM inhibition partially blocks the radiation-induced ERK1/2 activation. Conversely, inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling can also attenuate radiation-induced ATM phosphorylation, as well as the recruitment of ATM to DNA damage foci. These studies suggest another positive feedback loop in the radiation response, this time involving ATM and ERK1/2. Collectively, these studies indicate that the activation of ERK1/2 signaling in response to radiation is regulated by multiple inter-regulated signaling pathways.

4. AKT signaling pathway

The AKT signaling pathway plays a vital role in cell survival. Aberrant activation of this signaling cascade has been detected in various types of malignancies and is associated with tumorigenesis. AKT functions as a pro-survival factor by inhibiting apoptotic signal cascades and activating pro-survival signaling pathways (Fig. 2). Upon activation, AKT phosphorylates and inhibits a number of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, including Bad, Bax and Bim. Furthermore, through direct inhibition and exclusion of proapoptotic transcription factor FOXO3a (Forkhead box O3), AKT also suppresses the expressions of the pro-apoptotic factors Bim and Noxa.

AKT also positively regulates anti-apoptotic pathways (Fig. 2). AKT induces activation of NF-κB transcription factor, which promotes the transcription of a wide range of anti-apoptotic genes, in particular BCL-2 and BCL-XL. Furthermore, AKT phosphorylates/activates pro-survival protein XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein), resulting in an increase of binding of XIAP to caspases 3, 7 and 9 and inhibition of these caspases, the activities of which are essential for apoptosis induction. Another key pro-survival pathway targeted by AKT is the mTOR signaling pathway. AKT phosphorylates and activates mTOR kinase, leading to the phosphorylation/activation of anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1. Furthermore, AKT negatively regulates hypoxia-induced apoptosis. Following radiation therapy, hypoxia is often induced in tissues by radiation and can lead to apoptosis in the injured tissue. The hypoxia-induced apoptosis requires glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) to activate the mitochondria-dependent death signaling pathway. However, AKT activation following radiation can inhibits the activity of GSK through phosphorylation, resulting in an activation of glycolysis and glucose transport that suppresses apoptosis induction. Lastly, AKT is directly involved in the activation of the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK after radiation, promoting NHEJ-mediated DSB repair that increases cell survival. These studies establish a pro-survival role for AKT mediated signaling pathways in the response of cancer cells to radiation.

Activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in response to ionizing radiation has been widely observed. A likely mechanism for this activation involves HER RTKs. Upon activation of HER RTKs, the phosphorylated tyrosines in the carboxyl-terminal regulatory tail of HER3 can form six docking sites for recruitment of the p85 adaptor subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). Subsequently, the p110 catalytic subunit of PI3K phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate (PIP2) to generate phosphatidylinositol-triphosphate (PIP3), which then leads to the membrane recruitment and activation of proteins that contain a phospholipid-binding (PH) domain, such as phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (PDK) 1. The activated PDK1 phosphorylates AKT-Thr308 and leads to the initial AKT activation. The full-activation of AKT requires further phosphorylation of its Ser473 by PDK2. Furthermore, mutant K-Ras also positively contributes to the activation of PI3K-AKT signaling in response to radiation, which is through its activation of autocrine production of EGFR ligands.

The pro-survival function of PI3K/AKT signaling is expected to positively contribute to the radioresistance of tumor cells. Indeed, an increasing number of studies indicate that inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling by either pharmacological inhibitors or genetic approaches leads to an enhancement of radiosensitivity of cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the increase in radiosensitivity by PI3K/AKT inhibition involves both the diminution of DNA repair and an enhancement of apoptosis induction. On the other hand, in some cell-based models, inhibition of PI3K/AKT has been shown to have little effect on radiosensitivity, suggesting an involvement of PI3K/AKT-independent mechanisms in the regulation of radiosensitivity.

5. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling

In response to DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoints often become activated to block cell cycle progression, allowing time for cells to repair the damage. Depending on the phase of the cell cycle at which the damage is sensed, the cells can be blocked at the G1/S or G2/M border of the cell cycle (Fig. 3). If the damage is irreversible or the cell cycle checkpoint is dysfunctional, apoptosis may be triggered to eliminate the injured cells. Thus, properly functioning cell cycle checkpoints promote cell survival by counteracting the cytotoxicity of DNA damage.

The G1/S transition is controlled by the activity of Cdk4/6 kinases coupled with Cyclin D, the activities of which are predominantly regulated by the p53/p21 pathway. The G2/M border is tightly controlled by the Cdc2/Cyclin B complex, whose activity is required for the G2/M transition of the cell cycle. The G1 checkpoint is defective in most cancer cells, commonly due to mutations/alterations of key regulators of the G1 checkpoint (p53, Cyclin D, etc.), whereas activation of the G2 checkpoint is rarely impaired in cancer cells, as this checkpoint operates primarily via a p53-independent mechanism (Fig. 3). In fact, in cancer cells lacking a functional G1 checkpoint, abrogation of the G2 checkpoint often sensitizes the cells to radiation.

Previous studies identified Cdc2-Y15 as a vital site involved in G2 checkpoint control in response to radiation. Cdc2-Y15 is phosphorylated in response to radiation exposure and this phosphorylation is maintained during radiation-induced G2/M arrest. Cdc2-Y15 is phosphorylated by the Wee1 and Myt1 kinases and dephosphorylated by the Cdc25 dual-specificity phosphatases.

ATM- and ATR-mediated signaling pathways play essential roles in the radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoint responses. In response to radiation-induced DNA-damage, ATM and ATR kinases are rapidly activated, which, in turn, activate their respective downstream targets, including p53 as well as the Chk1 and Chk2 kinases (Fig. 3). Activation of Chk1 and Chk2 results in phosphorylation of Cdc25, leading to the subcellular sequestration, degradation and/or inhibition of the Cdc25 that normally activates Cdc2/Cyclin B at the G2/M boundary. Chk2 can also phosphorylate p53-Ser20 to induce stabilization of the p53 protein following radiation. Activation of p53 by ATM, ATR and Chk2 kinases leads to the induction of p21 protein, which can directly inhibit the activity of the Cdc2/Cyclin B complex.

In summary, radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways promote cell cycle arrest, which, in turn, contributes positively to cell survival in response to radiation.

6. DNA repair pathways

The cytotoxicity caused by ionizing radiation is mainly the result of DNA damage. Radiation induces several forms of DNA damage, which include SSBs, DSBs, sugar and base modifications and DNA-protein crosslinks. Among these, DSBs are not only a dominant form of damage caused by ionizing radiation, but also is the most deadly form of DNA damage, as unrepaired DSBs can lead to lethality of cells.

In response to ionizing radiation, the activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs), including ATM, ATR and DNA-PK, transduces and amplifies the DNA-damage signal, triggering the assembly of DNA repair apparatuses at the damaged sites and initiating DNA repair. A DSB is repaired by one of two competing mechanisms: non-homologous end joining repair (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR), with both mechanisms regulated by PIKKs. With no sequence homology required, NHEJ rejoins the free ends in a process that commonly produces errors at the point of junction. Each of the two ends is recognized by the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer, which then recruits DNA-PK. Once formed, these complexes bring the ends together for further processing and ligation by DNA ligase IV. In contrast to NHEJ, HR repairs DSBs accurately and with very high fidelity. This process operates during the S and G2 phases and repairs DSBs taking advantage of sequence information present in the intact sister chromatid. Radiation also creates SSBs, mainly through base oxidation driven by ROS/RNS. The repair of this type of damage uses base excision repair, which removes the damaged base using a DNA glycosylase and AP endonuclease and then fills up the nick through the actions of DNA polymerases and DNA ligase. Consequently, successful DNA repairs promote cell survival in response to radiation, whereas a failure to repair the DNA damage enhances the cytotoxic effect of radiation, leading to lethality of the cells.

7. Conclusion

As a standard of care, radiation therapy plays an important role in cancer therapy. However, radiation resistance remains a major obstacle that limits the efficacy of radiation therapy for cancer treatment. In order to improve the efficacy of radiation therapy, it is necessary that we fully understand the signaling network that drives cancer cells to overcome radiation-induced cytotoxicity, leading to survival. As discussed above, the lethal cytotoxicity caused by ionizing radiation is mainly the result of DSBs. However, radiation also simultaneously induces multiple signaling pathways that can protect cells from the cytotoxic effect of radiation. Among these, signalings mediated by HER receptors, ERK1/2 and AKT prevent the irradiated cells from undergoing apoptosis induction, while signalings mediated by ATM, ATR and DNA-PK drive cells into cycle arrest and initiate DNA repair. In addition, HER ERK1/2 and AKT signaling also positively regulate the cell cycle checkpoint response and DNA repair machinery. Consequently, these signaling pathways act conjointly to rescue the cells from radiation-induced injury and promote survival (Fig. 4). To overcome radiation therapy resistance, future research should focus on the development of pharmacological approaches to block the activation of these pro-survival signaling pathways in irradiated cells.

References 101

  1. 1.

    Pignon JP, le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:4-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.014

  2. 2.

    Ramnath N, Dilling TJ, Harris LJ, et al. Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:eS314-eS340.

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.12-2360

  3. 3.

    Wilkinson-Ryan I, Binder PS, Pourabolghasem S, et al. Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation for the treatment of advanced-stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:24-28.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.05.002

  4. 4.

    Johnstone RW, Ruefli AA, Lowe SW. Apoptosis: a link between cancer genetics and chemotherapy. Cell. 2002;108:153-164.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00625-6

  5. 5.

    Milas L, Raju U, Liao Z, Ajani J. Targeting molecular determinants of tumor chemo-radioresistance. Semin Oncol. 2005;32:S78-S81.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.04.028

  6. 6.

    Bernier J. Current state-of-the-art for concurrent chemoradiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2009;19:3-10.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.09.002

  7. 7.

    Ghiam AF, Spayne J, Lee J. Current challenges and future perspectives of radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014;8:46-52.

    Not in our library10.1097/spc.0000000000000032

  8. 8.

    Gewirtz DA. Growth arrest and cell death in the breast tumor cell in response to ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents which induce DNA damage. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62:223-235.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1006414422919

  9. 9.

    Hawkins AJ, Golding SE, Khalil A, Valerie K. DNA double-strand break-induced pro-survival signaling. Radiother Oncol. 2011;101:13-17.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.074

  10. 10.

    Raleigh DR, Haas-Kogan DA. Molecular targets and mechanisms of radiosensitization using DNA damage response pathways. Future Oncol. 2013;9:219-233.

    Not in our library10.2217/fon.12.185

  11. 11.

    Navolanic PM, Steelman LS, McCubrey JA. EGFR family signaling and its association with breast cancer development and resistance to chemotherapy (Review). Int J Oncol. 2003;22:237-252.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Linggi B, Carpenter G. ErbB receptors: new insights on mechanisms and biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:649-656.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2006.10.008

  13. 13.

    Arteaga Carlos L, Engelman Jeffrey A. ERBB receptors: from oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:282-303.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.025

  14. 14.

    Rexer BN, Arteaga CL. Intrinsic and acquired resistance to HER2-targeted therapies in HER2 gene-amplified breast cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Crit Rev Oncog. 2012;17:1-16.

    Not in our library10.1615/critrevoncog.v17.i1.20

  15. 15.

    Valerie K, Yacoub A, Hagan MP, et al. Radiation-induced cell signaling: inside-out and outside-in. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:789-801.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-06-0596

  16. 16.

    Goldkorn T, Balaban N, Shannon M, Matsukuma K. EGF receptor phosphorylation is affected by ionizing radiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1358:289-299.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0167-4889(97)00063-3

  17. 17.

    Lee H-C, An S, Lee H, et al. Activation of epidermal growth factor receptor and its downstream signaling pathway by nitric oxide in response to ionizing radiation. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:996-1002.

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-08-0113

  18. 18.

    Kiyozuka M, Akimoto T, Fukutome M, Motegi A, Mitsuhashi N. Radiation-induced dimer formation of EGFR: implications for the radiosensitizing effect of cetuximab. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:4337-4346.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Yan Y, Hein AL, Greer PM, et al. A novel function of HER2/Neu in the activation of G2/M checkpoint in response to [gamma]-irradiation. Oncogene. 2014.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2014.67

  20. 20.

    Meng TC, Fukada T, Tonks NK. Reversible oxidation and inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases in vivo. Mol Cell. 2002;9:387-399.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00445-8

  21. 21.

    Leach JK, Van Tuyle G, Lin PS, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Mikkelsen RB. Ionizing radiation-induced, mitochondria-dependent generation of reactive oxygen/nitrogen. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3894-3901.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Nyati MK, Maheshwari D, Hanasoge S, et al. Radiosensitization by Pan ErbB Inhibitor CI-1033 in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:691-700.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1041-03

  23. 23.

    Liang K, Lu Y, Jin W, Ang KK, Milas L, Fan Z. Sensitization of breast cancer cells to radiation by trastuzumab. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:1113-1120.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Geoerger B, Gaspar N, Opolon P, et al. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition radiosensitizes and induces apoptosis in malignant glioma and childhood ependymoma xenografts. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:209-216.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.23488

  25. 25.

    Dittmann K, Mayer C, Fehrenbacher B, et al. Radiation-induced epidermal growth factor receptor nuclear import is linked to activation of DNA-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:31182-31189.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m506591200

  26. 26.

    Dittmann K, Mayer C, Rodemann HP. Inhibition of radiation-induced EGFR nuclear import by C225 (Cetuximab) suppresses DNA-PK activity. Radiother Oncol. 2005;76:157-161.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.022

  27. 27.

    Dent P, Yacoub A, Fisher PB, Hagan MP, Grant S. MAPK pathways in radiation responses. Oncogene. 2003;22:5885-5896.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1206701

  28. 28.

    Cui W, Yazlovitskaya EM, Mayo MS, Pelling JC, Persons DL. Cisplatin-induced response of c-jun N-terminal kinase 1 and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 in a series of cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Mol Carcinog. 2000;29:219-228.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Abbott DW, Holt JT. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 2 activation is essential for progression through the G2/M checkpoint arrest in cells exposed to ionizing radiation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2732-2742.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.274.5.2732

  30. 30.

    Tang D, Wu D, Hirao A, et al. ERK activation mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis after DNA damage independently of p53. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:12710-12717.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111598200

  31. 31.

    Yan Y, Black CP, Cowan KH. Irradiation-induced G2/M checkpoint response requires ERK1/2 activation. Oncogene. 2007;26:4689-4698.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1210268

  32. 32.

    Munshi A, Ramesh R. Mitogen-activated protein kinases and their role in radiation response. Genes Cancer. 2013;4:401-408.

    Not in our library10.1177/1947601913485414

  33. 33.

    Boucher MJ, Morisset J, Vachon PH, Reed JC, Laine J, Rivard N. MEK/ERK signaling pathway regulates the expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-X(L), and Mcl-1 and promotes survival of human pancreatic cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2000;79:355-369.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Aoudjit F, Vuori K. Matrix attachment regulates Fas-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells: a role for c-flip and implications for anoikis. J Cell Biol. 2001;152:633-643.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.152.3.633

  35. 35.

    Jost M, Huggett TM, Kari C, Boise LH, Rodeck U. Epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent control of keratinocyte survival and Bcl-xL expression through a MEK-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:6320-6326.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m008210200

  36. 36.

    Bonni A, Brunet A, West AE, Datta SR, Takasu MA, Greenberg ME. Cell survival promoted by the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway by transcription-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Science. 1999;286:1358-1362.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.286.5443.1358

  37. 37.

    Clark CJ, McDade DM, O’Shaughnessy CT, Morris BJ. Contrasting roles of neuronal Msk1 and Rsk2 in Bad phosphorylation and feedback regulation of Erk signalling. J Neurochem. 2007;102:1024-1034.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04601.x

  38. 38.

    Ewings KE, Hadfield-Moorhouse K, Wiggins CM, et al. ERK1/2-dependent phosphorylation of BimEL promotes its rapid dissociation from Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL. EMBO J. 2007;26:2856-2867.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7601723

  39. 39.

    Allan LA, Morrice N, Brady S, Magee G, Pathak S, Clarke PR. Inhibition of caspase-9 through phosphorylation at Thr 125 by ERK MAPK. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:647-654.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1005

  40. 40.

    Tamamoto T, Ohnishi K, Takahashi A, et al. Correlation between gamma-ray-induced G2 arrest and radioresistance in two human cancer cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:905-909.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00072-3

  41. 41.

    Fritz G, Brachetti C, Kaina B. Lovastatin causes sensitization of HeLa cells to ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis by the abrogation of G2 blockage. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003;79:601-610.

    Not in our library10.1080/09553000310001609233

  42. 42.

    Yan Y, Black CP, Cao PT, et al. Gamma-irradiation-induced DNA damage checkpoint activation involves feedback regulation between extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and BRCA1. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5113-5121.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5818

  43. 43.

    Yacoub A, McKinstry R, Hinman D, Chung T, Dent P, Hagan MP. Epidermal growth factor and ionizing radiation up-regulate the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC1 in DU145 and LNCaP prostate carcinoma through MAPK signaling. Radiat Res. 2003;159:439-452.

    Not in our library10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0439:egfair]2.0.co;2

  44. 44.

    Golding SE, Morgan RN, Adams BR, Hawkins AJ, Povirk LF, Valerie K. Pro-survival AKT and ERK signaling from EGFR and mutant EGFRvIII enhances DNA double-strand break repair in human glioma cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8:730-738.

    Not in our library10.4161/cbt.8.8.7927

  45. 45.

    Wei F, Yan J, Tang D, et al. Inhibition of ERK activation enhances the repair of double-stranded breaks via non-homologous end joining by increasing DNA-PKcs activation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1833;90-100.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.016

  46. 46.

    Cohen-Armon M. PARP-1 activation in the ERK signaling pathway. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007;28:556-560.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tips.2007.08.005

  47. 47.

    Cohen-Armon M, Visochek L, Rozensal D, et al. DNA-independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2 increases Elk1 activity: a link to histone acetylation. Mol Cell. 2007;25:297-308.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.012

  48. 48.

    Golding SE, Rosenberg E, Neill S, Dent P, Povirk LF, Valerie K. Extracellular signal-related kinase positively regulates ataxia telangiectasia mutated, homologous recombination repair, and the DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1046-1053.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2371

  49. 49.

    Yan Y, Greer PM, Cao PT, Kolb RH, Cowan KH. RAC1 GTPase plays an important role in gamma-irradiation induced G2/M checkpoint activation. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R60.

    Not in our library10.1186/bcr3164

  50. 50.

    Sasaoka T, Langlois WJ, Leitner JW, Draznin B, Olefsky JM. The signaling pathway coupling epidermal growth factor receptors to activation of p21ras. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:32621-32625.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    Janes PW, Daly RJ, deFazio A, Sutherland RL. Activation of the Ras signalling pathway in human breast cancer cells overexpressing erbB-2. Oncogene. 1994;9:3601-3608.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    Dent P, Reardon DB, Park JS, et al. Radiation-induced release of transforming growth factor alpha activates the epidermal growth factor receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in carcinoma cells, leading to increased proliferation and protection from radiation-induced cell death. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:2493-2506.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.10.8.2493

  53. 53.

    Hagan M, Wang L, Hanley JR, Park JS, Dent P. Ionizing radiation-induced mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation in DU145 prostate carcinoma cells: MAP kinase inhibition enhances radiation-induced cell killing and G2/M-phase arrest. Radiat Res. 2000;153:371-383.

    Not in our library10.1667/0033-7587(2000)153[0371:irimap]2.0.co;2

  54. 54.

    Polivka J, Janku F. Molecular targets for cancer therapy in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;142:164-175.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.12.004

  55. 55.

    Yamaguchi H, Wang HG. The protein kinase PKB/Akt regulates cell survival and apoptosis by inhibiting Bax conformational change. Oncogene. 2001;20:7779-7786.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1204984

  56. 56.

    Gardai SJ, Hildeman DA, Frankel SK, et al. Phosphorylation of Bax Ser184 by Akt regulates its activity and apoptosis in neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:21085-21095.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m400063200

  57. 57.

    Qi XJ, Wildey GM, Howe PH. Evidence that Ser87 of BimEL is phosphorylated by Akt and regulates BimEL apoptotic function. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:813-823.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m505546200

  58. 58.

    Engström M, Karlsson R, Jönsson J-I. Inactivation of the forkhead transcription factor FoxO3 is essential for PKB-mediated survival of hematopoietic progenitor cells by kit ligand. Exp Hematol. 2003;31:316-323.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0301-472x(03)00002-x

  59. 59.

    Yang JY, Xia W, Hu MC. Ionizing radiation activates expression of FOXO3a, Fas ligand, and Bim, and induces cell apoptosis. Int J Oncol. 2006;29:643-648.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Obexer P, Geiger K, Ambros PF, Meister B, Ausserlechner MJ. FKHRL1-mediated expression of Noxa and Bim induces apoptosis via the mitochondria in neuroblastoma cells. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:534-547.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.cdd.4402017

  61. 61.

    Jang S-W, Yang S-J, Srinivasan S, Ye K. Akt phosphorylates MstI and prevents its proteolytic activation, blocking FOXO3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:30836-30844.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m704542200

  62. 62.

    Ozes ON, Mayo LD, Gustin JA, Pfeffer SR, Pfeffer LM, Donner DB. NF-kappaB activation by tumour necrosis factor requires the Akt serine-threonine kinase. Nature. 1999;401:82-85.

    Not in our library10.1038/43466

  63. 63.

    Dan HC, Sun M, Kaneko S, et al. Akt phosphorylation and stabilization of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP). J Biol Chem. 2004;279:5405-5412.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m312044200

  64. 64.

    Shaw RJ, Cantley LC. Ras, PI(3)K and mTOR signalling controls tumour cell growth. Nature. 2006;441:424-430.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04869

  65. 65.

    Fumarola C, Bonelli MA, Petronini PG, Alfieri RR. Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in non small cell lung cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;90:197-207.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2014.05.011

  66. 66.

    Fleckenstein K, Zgonjanin L, Chen L, et al. Temporal onset of hypoxia and oxidative stress after pulmonary irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:196-204.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.056

  67. 67.

    Sendoel A, Hengartner MO. Apoptotic cell death under hypoxia. Physiology. 2014;29:168-176.

    Not in our library10.1152/physiol.00016.2013

  68. 68.

    King TD, Bijur GN, Jope RS. Caspase-3 activation induced by inhibition of mitochondrial complex I is facilitated by glycogen synthase kinase-3β and attenuated by lithium. Brain Res. 2001;919:106-114.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03005-0

  69. 69.

    Loberg RD, Vesely E, Brosius FC. Enhanced glycogen synthase kinase-3β activity mediates hypoxia-induced apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells and is prevented by glucose transport and metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:41667-41673.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m206405200

  70. 70.

    Toulany M, Kehlbach R, Florczak U, et al. Targeting of AKT1 enhances radiation toxicity of human tumor cells by inhibiting DNA-PKcs-dependent DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:1772-1781.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-07-2200

  71. 71.

    Soltoff SP, Carraway KL, Prigent SA, Gullick WG, Cantley LC. ErbB3 is involved in activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by epidermal growth factor. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994;14:3550-3558.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.14.6.3550-3558.1994

  72. 72.

    Marone R, Cmiljanovic V, Giese B, Wymann MP. Targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinase - moving towards therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1784:159-185.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.10.003

  73. 73.

    Toulany M, Baumann M, Rodemann HP. Stimulated PI3K-AKT signaling mediated through ligand or radiation-induced EGFR depends indirectly, but not directly, on constitutive K-Ras activity. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:863-872.

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-06-0297

  74. 74.

    Minjgee M, Toulany M, Kehlbach R, Giehl K, Rodemann HP. K-RAS(V12) induces autocrine production of EGFR ligands and mediates radioresistance through EGFR-dependent Akt signaling and activation of DNA-PKcs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:1506-1514.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.057

  75. 75.

    Toulany M, Lee K-J, Fattah KR, et al. Akt promotes post-irradiation survival of human tumor cells through initiation, progression, and termination of DNA-PKcs-dependent DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10:945-957.

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-11-0592

  76. 76.

    Sahlberg SH, Gustafsson AS, Pendekanti PN, Glimelius B, Stenerlow B. The influence of AKT isoforms on radiation sensitivity and DNA repair in colon cancer cell lines. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:3525-3534.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13277-013-1465-9

  77. 77.

    Shimura T, Kakuda S, Ochiai Y, Kuwahara Y, Takai Y, Fukumoto M. Targeting the AKT/GSK3β/cyclin D1/Cdk4 survival signaling pathway for eradication of tumor radioresistance acquired by fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:540-548.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.065

  78. 78.

    Kim IA, Bae SS, Fernandes A, et al. Selective inhibition of Ras, phosphoinositide 3 kinase, and Akt isoforms increases the radiosensitivity of human carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7902-7910.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0513

  79. 79.

    Contessa JN, Hampton J, Lammering G, et al. Ionizing radiation activates Erb-B receptor dependent Akt and p70 S6 kinase signaling in carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:4032-4041.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1205500

  80. 80.

    Kastan MB, Onyekwere O, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Craig RW. Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res. 1991;51:6304-6311.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    Shonai T, Adachi M, Sakata K, et al. MEK/ERK pathway protects ionizing radiation-induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and cell death in lymphocytic leukemia cells. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:963-971.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.cdd.4401050

  82. 82.

    Lee YJ, Soh JW, Jeoung DI, et al. PKC epsilon-mediated ERK1/2 activation involved in radiation-induced cell death in NIH3T3 cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1593:219-229.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0167-4889(02)00392-0

  83. 83.

    Dai X-F, Ding J, Zhang R-G, Ren J-H, Ma C-MC, Wu G. Radiosensitivity enhancement of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line SMMC-7721 by sorafenib through the MEK/ERK signal pathway. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013;89:1.

    Not in our library10.3109/09553002.2013.791405

  84. 84.

    Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Linn S. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:39-85.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723

  85. 85.

    Smits VA, Medema RH. Checking out the G(2)/M transition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1519:1-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0167-4781(01)00204-4

  86. 86.

    O’Connell MJ, Cimprich KA. G2 damage checkpoints: what is the turn-on? J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1-6.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.01626

  87. 87.

    Chen T, Stephens PA, Middleton FK, Curtin NJ. Targeting the S and G2 checkpoint to treat cancer. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:194-202.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.drudis.2011.12.009

  88. 88.

    Kharbanda S, Saleem A, Datta R, Yuan ZM, Weichselbaum R, Kufe D. Ionizing radiation induces rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of p34cdc2. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1412-1414.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Rhind N, Furnari B, Russell P. Cdc2 tyrosine phosphorylation is required for the DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 1997;11:504-511.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.11.4.504

  90. 90.

    O’Connell MJ, Raleigh JM, Verkade HM, Nurse P. Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation. EMBO J. 1997;16:545-554.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/16.3.545

  91. 91.

    Lundgren K, Walworth N, Booher R, Dembski M, Kirschner M, Beach D. mik1 and wee1 cooperate in the inhibitory tyrosine phosphorylation of cdc2. Cell. 1991;64:1111-1122.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(91)90266-2

  92. 92.

    Parker LL, Atherton-Fessler S, Piwnica-Worms H. p107wee1 is a dual-specificity kinase that phosphorylates p34cdc2 on tyrosine 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:2917-2921.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.89.7.2917

  93. 93.

    Bulavin DV, Higashimoto Y, Demidenko ZN, et al. Dual phosphorylation controls Cdc25 phosphatases and mitotic entry. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:545-551.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb994

  94. 94.

    Kastan MB, Bartek J. Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature. 2004;432:316-323.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03097

  95. 95.

    Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Wilson WE, Goodhead DT. Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 2001;156:577-583.

    Not in our library10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0577:cafdts]2.0.co;2

  96. 96.

    Yu H. Typical cell signaling response to ionizing radiation: DNA damage and extranuclear damage. Chin J Cancer Res. 2012;24:83-89.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11670-012-0083-1

  97. 97.

    Ward JF. DNA damage as the cause of ionizing radiation-induced gene activation. Radiat Res. 1994;138:S85-S88.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    Haddy N, Tartier L, Koscielny S, et al. Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage and risk of second cancer in childhood cancer survivors. Carcinogenesis. 2014.

    Not in our library10.1093/carcin/bgu077

  99. 99.

    Huhn D, Bolck HA, Sartori AA. Targeting DNA double-strand break signalling and repair: recent advances in cancer therapy. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13837.

    Not in our library10.4414/smw.2013.13837

  100. 100.

    Hosoya N, Miyagawa K. Targeting DNA damage response in cancer therapy. Cancer Sci. 2014;105:370-388.

    Not in our library10.1111/cas.12366

  101. 101.

    Iyama T, Wilson DM. DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. DNA Repair. 2013;12:620-636.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.015

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.