COMPARISON OF SELF-EVALUATED AND STUDENTS-REPORTED TEACHER’S EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDICAL TEACHERS: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
Gul Shaikh, Seema Gul, Manya Tahir
Journal of University Medical & Dental College · 2020
doi:10.37723/jumdc.v11i3.409 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Opinions regarding student’s evaluation of faculty performance and use of formal feedback from students and/or lack of self-evaluation to improve their performance ranges widely. Keeping this under consideration, the present study was conducted to compare self-evaluated and students-reported teaching effectiveness of medical teachers. METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional study was conducted in Islamic international Medical college Rawalpindi, of three months duration (10th September to 10th December, 2018), on a sample of one hundred medical students and twenty medical teachers. Teaching effectiveness was assessed using “Self-assessment Instrument for Teacher Evaluation (SITE)” and students rated “Evaluation of teaching performance (CEID)” questionnaires. RESULTS: Teachers rated their teaching more effective with a mean score (M=111) than students (M= 109). The result was significant statistically. CONCLUSION: Self-evaluated teaching effectiveness was rated higher than students reported teaching effectiveness.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.